Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations

Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of behavioral development 2017-07, Vol.41 (4), p.514-522
Hauptverfasser: Perrin, Robin, Miller-Perrin, Cindy, Song, Jeongbin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 522
container_issue 4
container_start_page 514
container_title International journal of behavioral development
container_volume 41
creator Perrin, Robin
Miller-Perrin, Cindy
Song, Jeongbin
description Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in changing pro-spanking attitudes. However, given the strong connection between conservative Christian religious orientation and pro-spanking attitudes and behaviors, many conservative Christians may not be compelled by the empirical research. The current study examined the effectiveness of two interventions: an empirical research intervention that focused on the empirical evidence of the ineffectiveness and potential harm of spanking, and a religion intervention that provided a progressive interpretation of biblical passages that are sometimes used by Christians to justify spanking. A sample of 121 college students (87% female; 34% male; Mage = 20) attending a private, Christian, liberal arts university were randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: 1) Research Only, 2) Research and Religion, and 3) Control. Four weeks prior to the intervention sessions, students completed a demographic form and the Attitudes Toward Spanking (ATS) scale. Following the intervention, students completed the ATS scale a second time. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant Time × Condition interaction for ATS scores, indicating that ATS scores decreased in both the Research Only condition (Mpre = 40.56, Mpost = 37.03) and the Research and Religion condition (Mpre = 41.23; Mpost = 33.29) but not the Control condition (Mpre = 40.17; Mpost = 40.78), F(2, 78) = 10.03, p = .001. Subsequent analyses indicated that ATS scores in both intervention conditions decreased compared to the control condition and that a greater decrease in favorable attitudes toward spanking was observed for the Research and Religion condition compared to the Research Only condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0165025416673295
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1912836151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1145998</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0165025416673295</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1912836151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d1c1b5a628f98ce804ffd41898e5019afd732fba98616e303ac83d7c9fd41f893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7evQgFz9VM06TJUcr6RcGLnkuaJmvW2tYkFfz3plZEBOcyMM87Xy9Cp4AvAIriEgOjOKM5MFaQTNA9tIKc5SlmFPbRasbpzA_Rkfc7HIMUeIWq8ln2W9tvExmCDVOrfSKbYQqJH2X_MoPJf-EuaNfLYN910tims0p2ie1jcXQ6xPrQ-2N0YGTn9cl3XqOn681jeZtWDzd35VWVKkIgpC0oaKhkGTeCK81xbkybAxdcUwxCmjZ-YBopOAOmCSZScdIWSswqwwVZo_Nl7uiGt0n7UO-GKR7X-RoEZJwwoBBVeFEpN3jvtKlHZ1-l-6gB17Nn9V_PYsvZ0qKdVT_yzT1AToXgkacL93Krfy39b94nDIl1ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912836151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Journals【Remote access NOT available】</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Perrin, Robin ; Miller-Perrin, Cindy ; Song, Jeongbin</creator><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Robin ; Miller-Perrin, Cindy ; Song, Jeongbin</creatorcontrib><description>Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in changing pro-spanking attitudes. However, given the strong connection between conservative Christian religious orientation and pro-spanking attitudes and behaviors, many conservative Christians may not be compelled by the empirical research. The current study examined the effectiveness of two interventions: an empirical research intervention that focused on the empirical evidence of the ineffectiveness and potential harm of spanking, and a religion intervention that provided a progressive interpretation of biblical passages that are sometimes used by Christians to justify spanking. A sample of 121 college students (87% female; 34% male; Mage = 20) attending a private, Christian, liberal arts university were randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: 1) Research Only, 2) Research and Religion, and 3) Control. Four weeks prior to the intervention sessions, students completed a demographic form and the Attitudes Toward Spanking (ATS) scale. Following the intervention, students completed the ATS scale a second time. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant Time × Condition interaction for ATS scores, indicating that ATS scores decreased in both the Research Only condition (Mpre = 40.56, Mpost = 37.03) and the Research and Religion condition (Mpre = 41.23; Mpost = 33.29) but not the Control condition (Mpre = 40.17; Mpost = 40.78), F(2, 78) = 10.03, p = .001. Subsequent analyses indicated that ATS scores in both intervention conditions decreased compared to the control condition and that a greater decrease in favorable attitudes toward spanking was observed for the Research and Religion condition compared to the Research Only condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0165025416673295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attitude Change ; Attitudes ; Beliefs ; Best Practices ; Biblical Literature ; Child Rearing ; Christianity ; Christians ; College students ; Control Groups ; Discipline ; Discipline Policy ; Experimental Groups ; Functional Behavioral Assessment ; Health behavior ; Health problems ; Intervention ; Measures ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental health services ; Parenting Styles ; Positive Behavior Supports ; Pretests Posttests ; Punishment ; Religion ; Religious attitudes ; Religious Factors ; Religious orientation ; Student attitudes ; Undergraduate Students ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>International journal of behavioral development, 2017-07, Vol.41 (4), p.514-522</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d1c1b5a628f98ce804ffd41898e5019afd732fba98616e303ac83d7c9fd41f893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d1c1b5a628f98ce804ffd41898e5019afd732fba98616e303ac83d7c9fd41f893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0165025416673295$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0165025416673295$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1145998$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Perrin, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Jeongbin</creatorcontrib><title>Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations</title><title>International journal of behavioral development</title><description>Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in changing pro-spanking attitudes. However, given the strong connection between conservative Christian religious orientation and pro-spanking attitudes and behaviors, many conservative Christians may not be compelled by the empirical research. The current study examined the effectiveness of two interventions: an empirical research intervention that focused on the empirical evidence of the ineffectiveness and potential harm of spanking, and a religion intervention that provided a progressive interpretation of biblical passages that are sometimes used by Christians to justify spanking. A sample of 121 college students (87% female; 34% male; Mage = 20) attending a private, Christian, liberal arts university were randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: 1) Research Only, 2) Research and Religion, and 3) Control. Four weeks prior to the intervention sessions, students completed a demographic form and the Attitudes Toward Spanking (ATS) scale. Following the intervention, students completed the ATS scale a second time. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant Time × Condition interaction for ATS scores, indicating that ATS scores decreased in both the Research Only condition (Mpre = 40.56, Mpost = 37.03) and the Research and Religion condition (Mpre = 41.23; Mpost = 33.29) but not the Control condition (Mpre = 40.17; Mpost = 40.78), F(2, 78) = 10.03, p = .001. Subsequent analyses indicated that ATS scores in both intervention conditions decreased compared to the control condition and that a greater decrease in favorable attitudes toward spanking was observed for the Research and Religion condition compared to the Research Only condition.</description><subject>Attitude Change</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Biblical Literature</subject><subject>Child Rearing</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Christians</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Discipline Policy</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Functional Behavioral Assessment</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Parenting Styles</subject><subject>Positive Behavior Supports</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious attitudes</subject><subject>Religious Factors</subject><subject>Religious orientation</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0165-0254</issn><issn>1464-0651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7evQgFz9VM06TJUcr6RcGLnkuaJmvW2tYkFfz3plZEBOcyMM87Xy9Cp4AvAIriEgOjOKM5MFaQTNA9tIKc5SlmFPbRasbpzA_Rkfc7HIMUeIWq8ln2W9tvExmCDVOrfSKbYQqJH2X_MoPJf-EuaNfLYN910tims0p2ie1jcXQ6xPrQ-2N0YGTn9cl3XqOn681jeZtWDzd35VWVKkIgpC0oaKhkGTeCK81xbkybAxdcUwxCmjZ-YBopOAOmCSZScdIWSswqwwVZo_Nl7uiGt0n7UO-GKR7X-RoEZJwwoBBVeFEpN3jvtKlHZ1-l-6gB17Nn9V_PYsvZ0qKdVT_yzT1AToXgkacL93Krfy39b94nDIl1ng</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Perrin, Robin</creator><creator>Miller-Perrin, Cindy</creator><creator>Song, Jeongbin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations</title><author>Perrin, Robin ; Miller-Perrin, Cindy ; Song, Jeongbin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d1c1b5a628f98ce804ffd41898e5019afd732fba98616e303ac83d7c9fd41f893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attitude Change</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Biblical Literature</topic><topic>Child Rearing</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Christians</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Discipline Policy</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Functional Behavioral Assessment</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Parenting Styles</topic><topic>Positive Behavior Supports</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious attitudes</topic><topic>Religious Factors</topic><topic>Religious orientation</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Perrin, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Jeongbin</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perrin, Robin</au><au>Miller-Perrin, Cindy</au><au>Song, Jeongbin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1145998</ericid><atitle>Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations</atitle><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>514</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>514-522</pages><issn>0165-0254</issn><eissn>1464-0651</eissn><abstract>Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in changing pro-spanking attitudes. However, given the strong connection between conservative Christian religious orientation and pro-spanking attitudes and behaviors, many conservative Christians may not be compelled by the empirical research. The current study examined the effectiveness of two interventions: an empirical research intervention that focused on the empirical evidence of the ineffectiveness and potential harm of spanking, and a religion intervention that provided a progressive interpretation of biblical passages that are sometimes used by Christians to justify spanking. A sample of 121 college students (87% female; 34% male; Mage = 20) attending a private, Christian, liberal arts university were randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: 1) Research Only, 2) Research and Religion, and 3) Control. Four weeks prior to the intervention sessions, students completed a demographic form and the Attitudes Toward Spanking (ATS) scale. Following the intervention, students completed the ATS scale a second time. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant Time × Condition interaction for ATS scores, indicating that ATS scores decreased in both the Research Only condition (Mpre = 40.56, Mpost = 37.03) and the Research and Religion condition (Mpre = 41.23; Mpost = 33.29) but not the Control condition (Mpre = 40.17; Mpost = 40.78), F(2, 78) = 10.03, p = .001. Subsequent analyses indicated that ATS scores in both intervention conditions decreased compared to the control condition and that a greater decrease in favorable attitudes toward spanking was observed for the Research and Religion condition compared to the Research Only condition.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0165025416673295</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0254
ispartof International journal of behavioral development, 2017-07, Vol.41 (4), p.514-522
issn 0165-0254
1464-0651
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1912836151
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Journals【Remote access NOT available】; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Attitude Change
Attitudes
Beliefs
Best Practices
Biblical Literature
Child Rearing
Christianity
Christians
College students
Control Groups
Discipline
Discipline Policy
Experimental Groups
Functional Behavioral Assessment
Health behavior
Health problems
Intervention
Measures
Mental disorders
Mental health
Mental health services
Parenting Styles
Positive Behavior Supports
Pretests Posttests
Punishment
Religion
Religious attitudes
Religious Factors
Religious orientation
Student attitudes
Undergraduate Students
Variance analysis
title Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A18%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20attitudes%20about%20spanking%20using%20alternative%20biblical%20interpretations&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20behavioral%20development&rft.au=Perrin,%20Robin&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=514&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=514-522&rft.issn=0165-0254&rft.eissn=1464-0651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0165025416673295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912836151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912836151&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1145998&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0165025416673295&rfr_iscdi=true