Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations
Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of behavioral development 2017-07, Vol.41 (4), p.514-522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 514 |
container_title | International journal of behavioral development |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Perrin, Robin Miller-Perrin, Cindy Song, Jeongbin |
description | Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in changing pro-spanking attitudes. However, given the strong connection between conservative Christian religious orientation and pro-spanking attitudes and behaviors, many conservative Christians may not be compelled by the empirical research. The current study examined the effectiveness of two interventions: an empirical research intervention that focused on the empirical evidence of the ineffectiveness and potential harm of spanking, and a religion intervention that provided a progressive interpretation of biblical passages that are sometimes used by Christians to justify spanking. A sample of 121 college students (87% female; 34% male; Mage = 20) attending a private, Christian, liberal arts university were randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: 1) Research Only, 2) Research and Religion, and 3) Control. Four weeks prior to the intervention sessions, students completed a demographic form and the Attitudes Toward Spanking (ATS) scale. Following the intervention, students completed the ATS scale a second time. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant Time × Condition interaction for ATS scores, indicating that ATS scores decreased in both the Research Only condition (Mpre = 40.56, Mpost = 37.03) and the Research and Religion condition (Mpre = 41.23; Mpost = 33.29) but not the Control condition (Mpre = 40.17; Mpost = 40.78), F(2, 78) = 10.03, p = .001. Subsequent analyses indicated that ATS scores in both intervention conditions decreased compared to the control condition and that a greater decrease in favorable attitudes toward spanking was observed for the Research and Religion condition compared to the Research Only condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0165025416673295 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1912836151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1145998</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0165025416673295</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1912836151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d1c1b5a628f98ce804ffd41898e5019afd732fba98616e303ac83d7c9fd41f893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7evQgFz9VM06TJUcr6RcGLnkuaJmvW2tYkFfz3plZEBOcyMM87Xy9Cp4AvAIriEgOjOKM5MFaQTNA9tIKc5SlmFPbRasbpzA_Rkfc7HIMUeIWq8ln2W9tvExmCDVOrfSKbYQqJH2X_MoPJf-EuaNfLYN910tims0p2ie1jcXQ6xPrQ-2N0YGTn9cl3XqOn681jeZtWDzd35VWVKkIgpC0oaKhkGTeCK81xbkybAxdcUwxCmjZ-YBopOAOmCSZScdIWSswqwwVZo_Nl7uiGt0n7UO-GKR7X-RoEZJwwoBBVeFEpN3jvtKlHZ1-l-6gB17Nn9V_PYsvZ0qKdVT_yzT1AToXgkacL93Krfy39b94nDIl1ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912836151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Journals【Remote access NOT available】</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Perrin, Robin ; Miller-Perrin, Cindy ; Song, Jeongbin</creator><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Robin ; Miller-Perrin, Cindy ; Song, Jeongbin</creatorcontrib><description>Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in changing pro-spanking attitudes. However, given the strong connection between conservative Christian religious orientation and pro-spanking attitudes and behaviors, many conservative Christians may not be compelled by the empirical research. The current study examined the effectiveness of two interventions: an empirical research intervention that focused on the empirical evidence of the ineffectiveness and potential harm of spanking, and a religion intervention that provided a progressive interpretation of biblical passages that are sometimes used by Christians to justify spanking. A sample of 121 college students (87% female; 34% male; Mage = 20) attending a private, Christian, liberal arts university were randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: 1) Research Only, 2) Research and Religion, and 3) Control. Four weeks prior to the intervention sessions, students completed a demographic form and the Attitudes Toward Spanking (ATS) scale. Following the intervention, students completed the ATS scale a second time. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant Time × Condition interaction for ATS scores, indicating that ATS scores decreased in both the Research Only condition (Mpre = 40.56, Mpost = 37.03) and the Research and Religion condition (Mpre = 41.23; Mpost = 33.29) but not the Control condition (Mpre = 40.17; Mpost = 40.78), F(2, 78) = 10.03, p = .001. Subsequent analyses indicated that ATS scores in both intervention conditions decreased compared to the control condition and that a greater decrease in favorable attitudes toward spanking was observed for the Research and Religion condition compared to the Research Only condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0165025416673295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attitude Change ; Attitudes ; Beliefs ; Best Practices ; Biblical Literature ; Child Rearing ; Christianity ; Christians ; College students ; Control Groups ; Discipline ; Discipline Policy ; Experimental Groups ; Functional Behavioral Assessment ; Health behavior ; Health problems ; Intervention ; Measures ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Mental health services ; Parenting Styles ; Positive Behavior Supports ; Pretests Posttests ; Punishment ; Religion ; Religious attitudes ; Religious Factors ; Religious orientation ; Student attitudes ; Undergraduate Students ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>International journal of behavioral development, 2017-07, Vol.41 (4), p.514-522</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d1c1b5a628f98ce804ffd41898e5019afd732fba98616e303ac83d7c9fd41f893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d1c1b5a628f98ce804ffd41898e5019afd732fba98616e303ac83d7c9fd41f893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0165025416673295$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0165025416673295$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1145998$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Perrin, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Jeongbin</creatorcontrib><title>Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations</title><title>International journal of behavioral development</title><description>Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in changing pro-spanking attitudes. However, given the strong connection between conservative Christian religious orientation and pro-spanking attitudes and behaviors, many conservative Christians may not be compelled by the empirical research. The current study examined the effectiveness of two interventions: an empirical research intervention that focused on the empirical evidence of the ineffectiveness and potential harm of spanking, and a religion intervention that provided a progressive interpretation of biblical passages that are sometimes used by Christians to justify spanking. A sample of 121 college students (87% female; 34% male; Mage = 20) attending a private, Christian, liberal arts university were randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: 1) Research Only, 2) Research and Religion, and 3) Control. Four weeks prior to the intervention sessions, students completed a demographic form and the Attitudes Toward Spanking (ATS) scale. Following the intervention, students completed the ATS scale a second time. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant Time × Condition interaction for ATS scores, indicating that ATS scores decreased in both the Research Only condition (Mpre = 40.56, Mpost = 37.03) and the Research and Religion condition (Mpre = 41.23; Mpost = 33.29) but not the Control condition (Mpre = 40.17; Mpost = 40.78), F(2, 78) = 10.03, p = .001. Subsequent analyses indicated that ATS scores in both intervention conditions decreased compared to the control condition and that a greater decrease in favorable attitudes toward spanking was observed for the Research and Religion condition compared to the Research Only condition.</description><subject>Attitude Change</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Biblical Literature</subject><subject>Child Rearing</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Christians</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Discipline Policy</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Functional Behavioral Assessment</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Parenting Styles</subject><subject>Positive Behavior Supports</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious attitudes</subject><subject>Religious Factors</subject><subject>Religious orientation</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0165-0254</issn><issn>1464-0651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7evQgFz9VM06TJUcr6RcGLnkuaJmvW2tYkFfz3plZEBOcyMM87Xy9Cp4AvAIriEgOjOKM5MFaQTNA9tIKc5SlmFPbRasbpzA_Rkfc7HIMUeIWq8ln2W9tvExmCDVOrfSKbYQqJH2X_MoPJf-EuaNfLYN910tims0p2ie1jcXQ6xPrQ-2N0YGTn9cl3XqOn681jeZtWDzd35VWVKkIgpC0oaKhkGTeCK81xbkybAxdcUwxCmjZ-YBopOAOmCSZScdIWSswqwwVZo_Nl7uiGt0n7UO-GKR7X-RoEZJwwoBBVeFEpN3jvtKlHZ1-l-6gB17Nn9V_PYsvZ0qKdVT_yzT1AToXgkacL93Krfy39b94nDIl1ng</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Perrin, Robin</creator><creator>Miller-Perrin, Cindy</creator><creator>Song, Jeongbin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations</title><author>Perrin, Robin ; Miller-Perrin, Cindy ; Song, Jeongbin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d1c1b5a628f98ce804ffd41898e5019afd732fba98616e303ac83d7c9fd41f893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attitude Change</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Biblical Literature</topic><topic>Child Rearing</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Christians</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Discipline Policy</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Functional Behavioral Assessment</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Parenting Styles</topic><topic>Positive Behavior Supports</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious attitudes</topic><topic>Religious Factors</topic><topic>Religious orientation</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller-Perrin, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Jeongbin</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perrin, Robin</au><au>Miller-Perrin, Cindy</au><au>Song, Jeongbin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1145998</ericid><atitle>Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations</atitle><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>514</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>514-522</pages><issn>0165-0254</issn><eissn>1464-0651</eissn><abstract>Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in changing pro-spanking attitudes. However, given the strong connection between conservative Christian religious orientation and pro-spanking attitudes and behaviors, many conservative Christians may not be compelled by the empirical research. The current study examined the effectiveness of two interventions: an empirical research intervention that focused on the empirical evidence of the ineffectiveness and potential harm of spanking, and a religion intervention that provided a progressive interpretation of biblical passages that are sometimes used by Christians to justify spanking. A sample of 121 college students (87% female; 34% male; Mage = 20) attending a private, Christian, liberal arts university were randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: 1) Research Only, 2) Research and Religion, and 3) Control. Four weeks prior to the intervention sessions, students completed a demographic form and the Attitudes Toward Spanking (ATS) scale. Following the intervention, students completed the ATS scale a second time. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant Time × Condition interaction for ATS scores, indicating that ATS scores decreased in both the Research Only condition (Mpre = 40.56, Mpost = 37.03) and the Research and Religion condition (Mpre = 41.23; Mpost = 33.29) but not the Control condition (Mpre = 40.17; Mpost = 40.78), F(2, 78) = 10.03, p = .001. Subsequent analyses indicated that ATS scores in both intervention conditions decreased compared to the control condition and that a greater decrease in favorable attitudes toward spanking was observed for the Research and Religion condition compared to the Research Only condition.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0165025416673295</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0254 |
ispartof | International journal of behavioral development, 2017-07, Vol.41 (4), p.514-522 |
issn | 0165-0254 1464-0651 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1912836151 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Journals【Remote access NOT available】; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Attitude Change Attitudes Beliefs Best Practices Biblical Literature Child Rearing Christianity Christians College students Control Groups Discipline Discipline Policy Experimental Groups Functional Behavioral Assessment Health behavior Health problems Intervention Measures Mental disorders Mental health Mental health services Parenting Styles Positive Behavior Supports Pretests Posttests Punishment Religion Religious attitudes Religious Factors Religious orientation Student attitudes Undergraduate Students Variance analysis |
title | Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A18%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20attitudes%20about%20spanking%20using%20alternative%20biblical%20interpretations&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20behavioral%20development&rft.au=Perrin,%20Robin&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=514&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=514-522&rft.issn=0165-0254&rft.eissn=1464-0651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0165025416673295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912836151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912836151&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1145998&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0165025416673295&rfr_iscdi=true |