Dynamically modeling fault step overs using various friction laws
It is well known that fault step overs can under some circumstances allow through‐going rupture and under other circumstances cause rupture to terminate. However, the effects of different friction law formulations on jumping rupture have not been extensively explored. In this study we use the 2‐D dy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2014-07, Vol.119 (7), p.5814-5829 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5829 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 5814 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Ryan, Kenny J. Oglesby, David D. |
description | It is well known that fault step overs can under some circumstances allow through‐going rupture and under other circumstances cause rupture to terminate. However, the effects of different friction law formulations on jumping rupture have not been extensively explored. In this study we use the 2‐D dynamic finite element method to investigate how different frictional parameterizations affect the ability of rupture to jump a step over, in both extensional and compressional settings. We compare linear slip‐weakening friction and three forms of rate‐ and state‐dependent friction: the aging law, slip law, and slip law with strong rate weakening. We have found that for friction parameterizations with the same effective slip‐weakening distance, the functional forms of such friction laws can have a significant effect on maximum jump distance. With friction laws scaled to have equivalent fracture energies, we find that the functional forms of such friction laws have a second‐order effect on jumping rupture. Finally, with our specific parameterizations we find that delays in rupture across the step over systems can lead to a previously unseen mode of supershear transition once the rupture renucleates on the secondary fault segment, even if the initial stress field precludes such a transition. Studies using multiple friction laws in complex geometries such as fault step overs can lead to better understanding of the dependence of rupture properties on the type of friction law utilized in models and statistical analysis.
Key Points
Dynamic models of strike‐slip fault step oversModeling earthquake rupture with rate‐state frictionSupershear transition at fault step overs |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2014JB011151 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1912039220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1912039220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4625-4ba0d0c47c9556c426057db4db8d8be71b151223c1b51dada0d309e91bb3db233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEtPYjR9QiSuFOGnS9bgOKEwbXwJxjJI2RR1dO5J2o_-eTEUTp_lgW9Zjv9aL0DngK8CYXBMMwSzGAMDgCA0I8MiPKOPH-x7oKRpZu8Quxm4EwQBNbrpKropUlmXnrepMl0X16eWyLRvPNnrt1RttrNfa3XgjTVG31stNkTZFXXml3NozdJLL0urRXx2i97vbt-m9P39KHqaTuS8DTpgfKIkznAZhGjHG04BwzMJMBZkaZ2OlQ1Dub0JoCopBJjNHUxzpCJSimSKUDtFFf3dt6u9W20Ys69ZUTlJABATTiLh0iOJOlFMImKMueyo1tbVG52JtipU0nQAsdm6K_246nPb4tih1d5AVs-Q1ZjhkOxG_3yqckT_7LWm-BA9pyMTHYyKSxXOM4xcuFvQXIBuC9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642663145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamically modeling fault step overs using various friction laws</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ryan, Kenny J. ; Oglesby, David D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Kenny J. ; Oglesby, David D.</creatorcontrib><description>It is well known that fault step overs can under some circumstances allow through‐going rupture and under other circumstances cause rupture to terminate. However, the effects of different friction law formulations on jumping rupture have not been extensively explored. In this study we use the 2‐D dynamic finite element method to investigate how different frictional parameterizations affect the ability of rupture to jump a step over, in both extensional and compressional settings. We compare linear slip‐weakening friction and three forms of rate‐ and state‐dependent friction: the aging law, slip law, and slip law with strong rate weakening. We have found that for friction parameterizations with the same effective slip‐weakening distance, the functional forms of such friction laws can have a significant effect on maximum jump distance. With friction laws scaled to have equivalent fracture energies, we find that the functional forms of such friction laws have a second‐order effect on jumping rupture. Finally, with our specific parameterizations we find that delays in rupture across the step over systems can lead to a previously unseen mode of supershear transition once the rupture renucleates on the secondary fault segment, even if the initial stress field precludes such a transition. Studies using multiple friction laws in complex geometries such as fault step overs can lead to better understanding of the dependence of rupture properties on the type of friction law utilized in models and statistical analysis.
Key Points
Dynamic models of strike‐slip fault step oversModeling earthquake rupture with rate‐state frictionSupershear transition at fault step overs</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2014JB011151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Distance ; Dynamic models ; Dynamical systems ; Earthquakes ; Fault lines ; Finite element analysis ; Finite element method ; Formulations ; Friction ; Geophysics ; jumping rupture ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Plate tectonics ; rate-state friction ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; Seismic activity ; Seismology ; Slip ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; step over ; Stresses ; supershear</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2014-07, Vol.119 (7), p.5814-5829</ispartof><rights>2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4625-4ba0d0c47c9556c426057db4db8d8be71b151223c1b51dada0d309e91bb3db233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4625-4ba0d0c47c9556c426057db4db8d8be71b151223c1b51dada0d309e91bb3db233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2014JB011151$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2014JB011151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Kenny J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oglesby, David D.</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamically modeling fault step overs using various friction laws</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><description>It is well known that fault step overs can under some circumstances allow through‐going rupture and under other circumstances cause rupture to terminate. However, the effects of different friction law formulations on jumping rupture have not been extensively explored. In this study we use the 2‐D dynamic finite element method to investigate how different frictional parameterizations affect the ability of rupture to jump a step over, in both extensional and compressional settings. We compare linear slip‐weakening friction and three forms of rate‐ and state‐dependent friction: the aging law, slip law, and slip law with strong rate weakening. We have found that for friction parameterizations with the same effective slip‐weakening distance, the functional forms of such friction laws can have a significant effect on maximum jump distance. With friction laws scaled to have equivalent fracture energies, we find that the functional forms of such friction laws have a second‐order effect on jumping rupture. Finally, with our specific parameterizations we find that delays in rupture across the step over systems can lead to a previously unseen mode of supershear transition once the rupture renucleates on the secondary fault segment, even if the initial stress field precludes such a transition. Studies using multiple friction laws in complex geometries such as fault step overs can lead to better understanding of the dependence of rupture properties on the type of friction law utilized in models and statistical analysis.
Key Points
Dynamic models of strike‐slip fault step oversModeling earthquake rupture with rate‐state frictionSupershear transition at fault step overs</description><subject>Distance</subject><subject>Dynamic models</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>jumping rupture</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Plate tectonics</subject><subject>rate-state friction</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>step over</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>supershear</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEtPYjR9QiSuFOGnS9bgOKEwbXwJxjJI2RR1dO5J2o_-eTEUTp_lgW9Zjv9aL0DngK8CYXBMMwSzGAMDgCA0I8MiPKOPH-x7oKRpZu8Quxm4EwQBNbrpKropUlmXnrepMl0X16eWyLRvPNnrt1RttrNfa3XgjTVG31stNkTZFXXml3NozdJLL0urRXx2i97vbt-m9P39KHqaTuS8DTpgfKIkznAZhGjHG04BwzMJMBZkaZ2OlQ1Dub0JoCopBJjNHUxzpCJSimSKUDtFFf3dt6u9W20Ys69ZUTlJABATTiLh0iOJOlFMImKMueyo1tbVG52JtipU0nQAsdm6K_246nPb4tih1d5AVs-Q1ZjhkOxG_3yqckT_7LWm-BA9pyMTHYyKSxXOM4xcuFvQXIBuC9A</recordid><startdate>201407</startdate><enddate>201407</enddate><creator>Ryan, Kenny J.</creator><creator>Oglesby, David D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201407</creationdate><title>Dynamically modeling fault step overs using various friction laws</title><author>Ryan, Kenny J. ; Oglesby, David D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4625-4ba0d0c47c9556c426057db4db8d8be71b151223c1b51dada0d309e91bb3db233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Distance</topic><topic>Dynamic models</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>jumping rupture</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Plate tectonics</topic><topic>rate-state friction</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>step over</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>supershear</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Kenny J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oglesby, David D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryan, Kenny J.</au><au>Oglesby, David D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamically modeling fault step overs using various friction laws</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><date>2014-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>5814</spage><epage>5829</epage><pages>5814-5829</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>It is well known that fault step overs can under some circumstances allow through‐going rupture and under other circumstances cause rupture to terminate. However, the effects of different friction law formulations on jumping rupture have not been extensively explored. In this study we use the 2‐D dynamic finite element method to investigate how different frictional parameterizations affect the ability of rupture to jump a step over, in both extensional and compressional settings. We compare linear slip‐weakening friction and three forms of rate‐ and state‐dependent friction: the aging law, slip law, and slip law with strong rate weakening. We have found that for friction parameterizations with the same effective slip‐weakening distance, the functional forms of such friction laws can have a significant effect on maximum jump distance. With friction laws scaled to have equivalent fracture energies, we find that the functional forms of such friction laws have a second‐order effect on jumping rupture. Finally, with our specific parameterizations we find that delays in rupture across the step over systems can lead to a previously unseen mode of supershear transition once the rupture renucleates on the secondary fault segment, even if the initial stress field precludes such a transition. Studies using multiple friction laws in complex geometries such as fault step overs can lead to better understanding of the dependence of rupture properties on the type of friction law utilized in models and statistical analysis.
Key Points
Dynamic models of strike‐slip fault step oversModeling earthquake rupture with rate‐state frictionSupershear transition at fault step overs</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2014JB011151</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2014-07, Vol.119 (7), p.5814-5829 |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1912039220 |
source | Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Distance Dynamic models Dynamical systems Earthquakes Fault lines Finite element analysis Finite element method Formulations Friction Geophysics jumping rupture Mathematical models Modelling Plate tectonics rate-state friction Rupture Rupturing Seismic activity Seismology Slip Statistical analysis Statistical methods step over Stresses supershear |
title | Dynamically modeling fault step overs using various friction laws |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T15%3A22%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamically%20modeling%20fault%20step%20overs%20using%20various%20friction%20laws&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Ryan,%20Kenny%20J.&rft.date=2014-07&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=5814&rft.epage=5829&rft.pages=5814-5829&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2014JB011151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912039220%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642663145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |