Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work
Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Work, employment and society employment and society, 2017-06, Vol.31 (3), p.447-464 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 464 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 447 |
container_title | Work, employment and society |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Randle, Keith Hardy, Kate |
description | Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability. It argues that workers with impairments are ‘doubly disabled’ – in both the labour markets and labour processes of UKF&TV. It concludes that disability cannot simply be incorporated in an additive way in order to understand the exclusion of these workers, but that they face qualitatively different sources of disadvantage compared with other minorities in UKF&TV workplaces. This has negative implications for workers with impairments in other labour markets, as project and network-based freelance work, a contributor to disadvantage, is seen as both increasingly normative and paradigmatic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0950017016643482 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1910837727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26941752</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0950017016643482</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26941752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2419921e94c022771a64859210cae1cfb81bc4bfe74230381a083384dd982a5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQRoMouK7evQgBr1aTNG2Sk8iirrDiRc8lTadu1rZZk65l_71ZKyKCp4H53rwZBqFTSi4pFeKKqIwQKgjNc55yyfbQhPJcJVIwto8muzjZ5YfoKIQVIYQRkU3Q8KjN0l3g1pW2Aay7CnsItrHQ9dd47gY8OP8GPuDB9kts27W2vo1hwNoDrtymbLa4skGXDVTYdnjt3QpMn5Q6xEZtm_bL2kMDHzZY130Zj9FBrZsAJ991il7ubp9n82TxdP8wu1kkhhPeJ4xTpRgFxQ1hTAiqcy6z2CFGAzV1KWlpeFmD4CwlqaSayDSVvKqUZDoz6RSdj9541vsGQl-s3MZ3cWVBFY2wEExEioyU8S4ED3Wx9rbVfltQUuzeW_x9bxxJxpGgX-GX9H_-bORXoXf-x89yxanIWPoJiuWDSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910837727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Randle, Keith ; Hardy, Kate</creator><creatorcontrib>Randle, Keith ; Hardy, Kate</creatorcontrib><description>Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability. It argues that workers with impairments are ‘doubly disabled’ – in both the labour markets and labour processes of UKF&TV. It concludes that disability cannot simply be incorporated in an additive way in order to understand the exclusion of these workers, but that they face qualitatively different sources of disadvantage compared with other minorities in UKF&TV workplaces. This has negative implications for workers with impairments in other labour markets, as project and network-based freelance work, a contributor to disadvantage, is seen as both increasingly normative and paradigmatic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0950017016643482</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications, Ltd</publisher><subject>Articles: Discrimination at work ; Creative industries ; Disability ; Employment discrimination ; Freelance work ; Inequality ; Labor market ; Minority groups ; Motion picture industry ; People with disabilities ; Race ; Television ; Workers with disabilities ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Work, employment and society, 2017-06, Vol.31 (3), p.447-464</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2419921e94c022771a64859210cae1cfb81bc4bfe74230381a083384dd982a5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2419921e94c022771a64859210cae1cfb81bc4bfe74230381a083384dd982a5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26941752$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26941752$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Randle, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Kate</creatorcontrib><title>Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work</title><title>Work, employment and society</title><description>Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability. It argues that workers with impairments are ‘doubly disabled’ – in both the labour markets and labour processes of UKF&TV. It concludes that disability cannot simply be incorporated in an additive way in order to understand the exclusion of these workers, but that they face qualitatively different sources of disadvantage compared with other minorities in UKF&TV workplaces. This has negative implications for workers with impairments in other labour markets, as project and network-based freelance work, a contributor to disadvantage, is seen as both increasingly normative and paradigmatic.</description><subject>Articles: Discrimination at work</subject><subject>Creative industries</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>Freelance work</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Motion picture industry</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>Workers with disabilities</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0950-0170</issn><issn>1469-8722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQRoMouK7evQgBr1aTNG2Sk8iirrDiRc8lTadu1rZZk65l_71ZKyKCp4H53rwZBqFTSi4pFeKKqIwQKgjNc55yyfbQhPJcJVIwto8muzjZ5YfoKIQVIYQRkU3Q8KjN0l3g1pW2Aay7CnsItrHQ9dd47gY8OP8GPuDB9kts27W2vo1hwNoDrtymbLa4skGXDVTYdnjt3QpMn5Q6xEZtm_bL2kMDHzZY130Zj9FBrZsAJ991il7ubp9n82TxdP8wu1kkhhPeJ4xTpRgFxQ1hTAiqcy6z2CFGAzV1KWlpeFmD4CwlqaSayDSVvKqUZDoz6RSdj9541vsGQl-s3MZ3cWVBFY2wEExEioyU8S4ED3Wx9rbVfltQUuzeW_x9bxxJxpGgX-GX9H_-bORXoXf-x89yxanIWPoJiuWDSg</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Randle, Keith</creator><creator>Hardy, Kate</creator><general>Sage Publications, Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work</title><author>Randle, Keith ; Hardy, Kate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2419921e94c022771a64859210cae1cfb81bc4bfe74230381a083384dd982a5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Articles: Discrimination at work</topic><topic>Creative industries</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>Freelance work</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Motion picture industry</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>Workers with disabilities</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Randle, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Kate</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Work, employment and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Randle, Keith</au><au>Hardy, Kate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work</atitle><jtitle>Work, employment and society</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>447-464</pages><issn>0950-0170</issn><eissn>1469-8722</eissn><abstract>Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability. It argues that workers with impairments are ‘doubly disabled’ – in both the labour markets and labour processes of UKF&TV. It concludes that disability cannot simply be incorporated in an additive way in order to understand the exclusion of these workers, but that they face qualitatively different sources of disadvantage compared with other minorities in UKF&TV workplaces. This has negative implications for workers with impairments in other labour markets, as project and network-based freelance work, a contributor to disadvantage, is seen as both increasingly normative and paradigmatic.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0950017016643482</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-0170 |
ispartof | Work, employment and society, 2017-06, Vol.31 (3), p.447-464 |
issn | 0950-0170 1469-8722 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1910837727 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Articles: Discrimination at work Creative industries Disability Employment discrimination Freelance work Inequality Labor market Minority groups Motion picture industry People with disabilities Race Television Workers with disabilities Workplaces |
title | Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A34%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Macho,%20mobile%20and%20resilient?%20How%20workers%20with%20impairments%20are%20doubly%20disabled%20in%20project-based%20film%20and%20television%20work&rft.jtitle=Work,%20employment%20and%20society&rft.au=Randle,%20Keith&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=447-464&rft.issn=0950-0170&rft.eissn=1469-8722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0950017016643482&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26941752%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910837727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26941752&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0950017016643482&rfr_iscdi=true |