Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work

Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Work, employment and society employment and society, 2017-06, Vol.31 (3), p.447-464
Hauptverfasser: Randle, Keith, Hardy, Kate
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 464
container_issue 3
container_start_page 447
container_title Work, employment and society
container_volume 31
creator Randle, Keith
Hardy, Kate
description Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability. It argues that workers with impairments are ‘doubly disabled’ – in both the labour markets and labour processes of UKF&TV. It concludes that disability cannot simply be incorporated in an additive way in order to understand the exclusion of these workers, but that they face qualitatively different sources of disadvantage compared with other minorities in UKF&TV workplaces. This has negative implications for workers with impairments in other labour markets, as project and network-based freelance work, a contributor to disadvantage, is seen as both increasingly normative and paradigmatic.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0950017016643482
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1910837727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26941752</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0950017016643482</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26941752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2419921e94c022771a64859210cae1cfb81bc4bfe74230381a083384dd982a5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQRoMouK7evQgBr1aTNG2Sk8iirrDiRc8lTadu1rZZk65l_71ZKyKCp4H53rwZBqFTSi4pFeKKqIwQKgjNc55yyfbQhPJcJVIwto8muzjZ5YfoKIQVIYQRkU3Q8KjN0l3g1pW2Aay7CnsItrHQ9dd47gY8OP8GPuDB9kts27W2vo1hwNoDrtymbLa4skGXDVTYdnjt3QpMn5Q6xEZtm_bL2kMDHzZY130Zj9FBrZsAJ991il7ubp9n82TxdP8wu1kkhhPeJ4xTpRgFxQ1hTAiqcy6z2CFGAzV1KWlpeFmD4CwlqaSayDSVvKqUZDoz6RSdj9541vsGQl-s3MZ3cWVBFY2wEExEioyU8S4ED3Wx9rbVfltQUuzeW_x9bxxJxpGgX-GX9H_-bORXoXf-x89yxanIWPoJiuWDSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910837727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Randle, Keith ; Hardy, Kate</creator><creatorcontrib>Randle, Keith ; Hardy, Kate</creatorcontrib><description>Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&amp;TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability. It argues that workers with impairments are ‘doubly disabled’ – in both the labour markets and labour processes of UKF&amp;TV. It concludes that disability cannot simply be incorporated in an additive way in order to understand the exclusion of these workers, but that they face qualitatively different sources of disadvantage compared with other minorities in UKF&amp;TV workplaces. This has negative implications for workers with impairments in other labour markets, as project and network-based freelance work, a contributor to disadvantage, is seen as both increasingly normative and paradigmatic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0950017016643482</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications, Ltd</publisher><subject>Articles: Discrimination at work ; Creative industries ; Disability ; Employment discrimination ; Freelance work ; Inequality ; Labor market ; Minority groups ; Motion picture industry ; People with disabilities ; Race ; Television ; Workers with disabilities ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Work, employment and society, 2017-06, Vol.31 (3), p.447-464</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2419921e94c022771a64859210cae1cfb81bc4bfe74230381a083384dd982a5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2419921e94c022771a64859210cae1cfb81bc4bfe74230381a083384dd982a5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26941752$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26941752$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Randle, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Kate</creatorcontrib><title>Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work</title><title>Work, employment and society</title><description>Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&amp;TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability. It argues that workers with impairments are ‘doubly disabled’ – in both the labour markets and labour processes of UKF&amp;TV. It concludes that disability cannot simply be incorporated in an additive way in order to understand the exclusion of these workers, but that they face qualitatively different sources of disadvantage compared with other minorities in UKF&amp;TV workplaces. This has negative implications for workers with impairments in other labour markets, as project and network-based freelance work, a contributor to disadvantage, is seen as both increasingly normative and paradigmatic.</description><subject>Articles: Discrimination at work</subject><subject>Creative industries</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Employment discrimination</subject><subject>Freelance work</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Motion picture industry</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>Workers with disabilities</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0950-0170</issn><issn>1469-8722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQRoMouK7evQgBr1aTNG2Sk8iirrDiRc8lTadu1rZZk65l_71ZKyKCp4H53rwZBqFTSi4pFeKKqIwQKgjNc55yyfbQhPJcJVIwto8muzjZ5YfoKIQVIYQRkU3Q8KjN0l3g1pW2Aay7CnsItrHQ9dd47gY8OP8GPuDB9kts27W2vo1hwNoDrtymbLa4skGXDVTYdnjt3QpMn5Q6xEZtm_bL2kMDHzZY130Zj9FBrZsAJ991il7ubp9n82TxdP8wu1kkhhPeJ4xTpRgFxQ1hTAiqcy6z2CFGAzV1KWlpeFmD4CwlqaSayDSVvKqUZDoz6RSdj9541vsGQl-s3MZ3cWVBFY2wEExEioyU8S4ED3Wx9rbVfltQUuzeW_x9bxxJxpGgX-GX9H_-bORXoXf-x89yxanIWPoJiuWDSg</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Randle, Keith</creator><creator>Hardy, Kate</creator><general>Sage Publications, Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work</title><author>Randle, Keith ; Hardy, Kate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-2419921e94c022771a64859210cae1cfb81bc4bfe74230381a083384dd982a5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Articles: Discrimination at work</topic><topic>Creative industries</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Employment discrimination</topic><topic>Freelance work</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Motion picture industry</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>Workers with disabilities</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Randle, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Kate</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Work, employment and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Randle, Keith</au><au>Hardy, Kate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work</atitle><jtitle>Work, employment and society</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>447-464</pages><issn>0950-0170</issn><eissn>1469-8722</eissn><abstract>Inequalities in the creative industries are known to be persistent and systemic. The model of production in UK film and television (UKF&amp;TV) is argued to exclude on the basis of gender, race and class. This article considers a social category that has been overlooked in these debates: disability. It argues that workers with impairments are ‘doubly disabled’ – in both the labour markets and labour processes of UKF&amp;TV. It concludes that disability cannot simply be incorporated in an additive way in order to understand the exclusion of these workers, but that they face qualitatively different sources of disadvantage compared with other minorities in UKF&amp;TV workplaces. This has negative implications for workers with impairments in other labour markets, as project and network-based freelance work, a contributor to disadvantage, is seen as both increasingly normative and paradigmatic.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0950017016643482</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-0170
ispartof Work, employment and society, 2017-06, Vol.31 (3), p.447-464
issn 0950-0170
1469-8722
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1910837727
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Articles: Discrimination at work
Creative industries
Disability
Employment discrimination
Freelance work
Inequality
Labor market
Minority groups
Motion picture industry
People with disabilities
Race
Television
Workers with disabilities
Workplaces
title Macho, mobile and resilient? How workers with impairments are doubly disabled in project-based film and television work
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A34%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Macho,%20mobile%20and%20resilient?%20How%20workers%20with%20impairments%20are%20doubly%20disabled%20in%20project-based%20film%20and%20television%20work&rft.jtitle=Work,%20employment%20and%20society&rft.au=Randle,%20Keith&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=447-464&rft.issn=0950-0170&rft.eissn=1469-8722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0950017016643482&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26941752%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910837727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26941752&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0950017016643482&rfr_iscdi=true