Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR): Lessons from Central America
The last decade has seen an increasing advancement and interest in the integration of agroecology and participatory action research (PAR). This article aims to: (1) analyze the key characteristics and principles of two case studies that integrated PAR and agroecology in Central America; and (2) lear...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2017, Vol.9 (5), p.705 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 705 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Méndez, V. Caswell, Martha Gliessman, Stephen Cohen, Roseann |
description | The last decade has seen an increasing advancement and interest in the integration of agroecology and participatory action research (PAR). This article aims to: (1) analyze the key characteristics and principles of two case studies that integrated PAR and agroecology in Central America; and (2) learn from the lessons offered by these case studies, as well as others from the literature, on how to better integrate PAR and agroecology. Key principles identified for effective PAR agroecological processes include a shared interest in research by partners, a belief in collective power/action, a commitment to participation, practicing humility and establishing trust and accountability. Important lessons to consider for future work include: (1) research processes that did not start as PAR, can evolve into it; (2) farmer/stakeholder participation in setting the research agenda, from the outset, results in higher engagement and enhanced outcomes; (3) having the right partners for the desired outcomes is key; (4) intentional and explicit reflection is an essential component of PAR processes; and (5) cross-generational collaborations are crucial to long-term benefits. Key challenges that confront PAR processes include the need for time and resources over longer periods; the complexity of multi-actor process facilitation; and institutional barriers within the academy and development organizations, which prevent shifting investment towards integrated PAR agroecological processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su9050705 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1910595561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1910595561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-544eeb27529dbd81848b31adc388a8bdd6c60015d96285463dc6776aa3929e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAG7sYzWOSSdwNxUehYCndypBJ0nFKm9SbdNF_70hFPJt7Dnzcyz0I3VLywLkmj-moiSAVERdoxEhFCzrEy3_-Gk1S2pJBnFNN5Qh9zEP2HZjchw7XHURv4y52J2yCw0sDubf9weQIJ1zb3MeAVz55A_YT3y_r1fQJL3xKMSS8gbjHMx8ymB2u9x56a27Q1cbskp_8zjFavzyvZ2_F4v11PqsXhWWa5UKUpfctqwTTrnWKqlK1nBpnuVJGtc5JKwmhwmnJlCgld1ZWlTSGa6Y942N0d157gPh19Ck323iEMFxshi-J0EJIOlDTM2UhpgR-0xyg3xs4NZQ0P_01f_3xb6bSYT4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910595561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR): Lessons from Central America</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Méndez, V. ; Caswell, Martha ; Gliessman, Stephen ; Cohen, Roseann</creator><creatorcontrib>Méndez, V. ; Caswell, Martha ; Gliessman, Stephen ; Cohen, Roseann</creatorcontrib><description>The last decade has seen an increasing advancement and interest in the integration of agroecology and participatory action research (PAR). This article aims to: (1) analyze the key characteristics and principles of two case studies that integrated PAR and agroecology in Central America; and (2) learn from the lessons offered by these case studies, as well as others from the literature, on how to better integrate PAR and agroecology. Key principles identified for effective PAR agroecological processes include a shared interest in research by partners, a belief in collective power/action, a commitment to participation, practicing humility and establishing trust and accountability. Important lessons to consider for future work include: (1) research processes that did not start as PAR, can evolve into it; (2) farmer/stakeholder participation in setting the research agenda, from the outset, results in higher engagement and enhanced outcomes; (3) having the right partners for the desired outcomes is key; (4) intentional and explicit reflection is an essential component of PAR processes; and (5) cross-generational collaborations are crucial to long-term benefits. Key challenges that confront PAR processes include the need for time and resources over longer periods; the complexity of multi-actor process facilitation; and institutional barriers within the academy and development organizations, which prevent shifting investment towards integrated PAR agroecological processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su9050705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agroecology ; Barriers ; Case studies ; Integration ; Investment ; Organizations ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2017, Vol.9 (5), p.705</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-544eeb27529dbd81848b31adc388a8bdd6c60015d96285463dc6776aa3929e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-544eeb27529dbd81848b31adc388a8bdd6c60015d96285463dc6776aa3929e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7394-5679</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Méndez, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caswell, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gliessman, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Roseann</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR): Lessons from Central America</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The last decade has seen an increasing advancement and interest in the integration of agroecology and participatory action research (PAR). This article aims to: (1) analyze the key characteristics and principles of two case studies that integrated PAR and agroecology in Central America; and (2) learn from the lessons offered by these case studies, as well as others from the literature, on how to better integrate PAR and agroecology. Key principles identified for effective PAR agroecological processes include a shared interest in research by partners, a belief in collective power/action, a commitment to participation, practicing humility and establishing trust and accountability. Important lessons to consider for future work include: (1) research processes that did not start as PAR, can evolve into it; (2) farmer/stakeholder participation in setting the research agenda, from the outset, results in higher engagement and enhanced outcomes; (3) having the right partners for the desired outcomes is key; (4) intentional and explicit reflection is an essential component of PAR processes; and (5) cross-generational collaborations are crucial to long-term benefits. Key challenges that confront PAR processes include the need for time and resources over longer periods; the complexity of multi-actor process facilitation; and institutional barriers within the academy and development organizations, which prevent shifting investment towards integrated PAR agroecological processes.</description><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGoX_oOAG7sYzWOSSdwNxUehYCndypBJ0nFKm9SbdNF_70hFPJt7Dnzcyz0I3VLywLkmj-moiSAVERdoxEhFCzrEy3_-Gk1S2pJBnFNN5Qh9zEP2HZjchw7XHURv4y52J2yCw0sDubf9weQIJ1zb3MeAVz55A_YT3y_r1fQJL3xKMSS8gbjHMx8ymB2u9x56a27Q1cbskp_8zjFavzyvZ2_F4v11PqsXhWWa5UKUpfctqwTTrnWKqlK1nBpnuVJGtc5JKwmhwmnJlCgld1ZWlTSGa6Y942N0d157gPh19Ck323iEMFxshi-J0EJIOlDTM2UhpgR-0xyg3xs4NZQ0P_01f_3xb6bSYT4</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Méndez, V.</creator><creator>Caswell, Martha</creator><creator>Gliessman, Stephen</creator><creator>Cohen, Roseann</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-5679</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR): Lessons from Central America</title><author>Méndez, V. ; Caswell, Martha ; Gliessman, Stephen ; Cohen, Roseann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-544eeb27529dbd81848b31adc388a8bdd6c60015d96285463dc6776aa3929e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Méndez, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caswell, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gliessman, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Roseann</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Méndez, V.</au><au>Caswell, Martha</au><au>Gliessman, Stephen</au><au>Cohen, Roseann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR): Lessons from Central America</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>705</spage><pages>705-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The last decade has seen an increasing advancement and interest in the integration of agroecology and participatory action research (PAR). This article aims to: (1) analyze the key characteristics and principles of two case studies that integrated PAR and agroecology in Central America; and (2) learn from the lessons offered by these case studies, as well as others from the literature, on how to better integrate PAR and agroecology. Key principles identified for effective PAR agroecological processes include a shared interest in research by partners, a belief in collective power/action, a commitment to participation, practicing humility and establishing trust and accountability. Important lessons to consider for future work include: (1) research processes that did not start as PAR, can evolve into it; (2) farmer/stakeholder participation in setting the research agenda, from the outset, results in higher engagement and enhanced outcomes; (3) having the right partners for the desired outcomes is key; (4) intentional and explicit reflection is an essential component of PAR processes; and (5) cross-generational collaborations are crucial to long-term benefits. Key challenges that confront PAR processes include the need for time and resources over longer periods; the complexity of multi-actor process facilitation; and institutional barriers within the academy and development organizations, which prevent shifting investment towards integrated PAR agroecological processes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su9050705</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-5679</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2017, Vol.9 (5), p.705 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1910595561 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agroecology Barriers Case studies Integration Investment Organizations Sustainability |
title | Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR): Lessons from Central America |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A52%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Agroecology%20and%20Participatory%20Action%20Research%20(PAR):%20Lessons%20from%20Central%20America&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=M%C3%A9ndez,%20V.&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=705&rft.pages=705-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su9050705&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1910595561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910595561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |