Pore Structure Characterization of Shale Using Gas Physisorption: Effect of Chemical Compositions

In this study, the pore structure characteristics of Canadian Horn River basin shales with various chemical compositions were evaluated using gas physisorption analyses. The samples used in this research were obtained from two different regions (shallow and deep regions) of rock cuttings during the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Minerals (Basel) 2017-05, Vol.7 (5), p.66
Hauptverfasser: Han, Yosep, Kwak, Daewoong, Choi, Siyoung, Shin, Changhoon, Lee, Youngsoo, Kim, Hyunjung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 66
container_title Minerals (Basel)
container_volume 7
creator Han, Yosep
Kwak, Daewoong
Choi, Siyoung
Shin, Changhoon
Lee, Youngsoo
Kim, Hyunjung
description In this study, the pore structure characteristics of Canadian Horn River basin shales with various chemical compositions were evaluated using gas physisorption analyses. The samples used in this research were obtained from two different regions (shallow and deep regions) of rock cuttings during the drilling of the shale gas field located in Horn River basin. The pore size, specific surface area, total pore volume, micropore surface area, and micropore volume of the shale samples were measured using both nitrogen and CO2. The results indicated that the pore size was not a function of chemical composition, while distinct trends were observed for other macroscopic and microscopic pore-related properties. In particular, the greatest specific surface area and total pore volume were observed for silica-rich carbonate shales, while clay-rich siliceous shales exhibited the greatest micropore volume and micropore surface area. The trends clearly suggested that macroscopic and microscopic pore-related properties of the Canadian Horn River basin shales were closely related to their chemical composition. Furthermore, a stronger correlation was observed between the quartz content and the micropore-related physical properties of shales (i.e., the micropore surface area and micropore volume) in comparison to other properties.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/min7050066
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1910591961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1910591961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-4b18d7a0f2a9eb367ffa88e8809a6a362eccae17d62d913de73ce6298519400c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF9LwzAUxYMoOOZe_AQB34Rq_qxp45uUOYWBgznwrdylic1Ym5qkD_PTr2WC3pd74P4493AQuqXkgXNJHhvbZiQlRIgLNGEkSxMq-OflP32NZiHsyTCS8jxlEwRr5zXeRN-r2A-qqMGDitrbH4jWtdgZvKnhoPE22PYLLyHgdX0MNjjfjcATXhijVRzBotaNVXDAhWs6F-x4DzfoysAh6NnvnqLty-KjeE1W78u34nmVKCbTmMx3NK8yIIaB1DsuMmMgz3WeEwkCuGBaKdA0qwSrhvCVzrjSgsk8pXJOiOJTdHf27bz77nWI5d71vh1ellRSkkoqBR2o-zOlvAvBa1N23jbgjyUl5dhi-dciPwEvAmWm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910591961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pore Structure Characterization of Shale Using Gas Physisorption: Effect of Chemical Compositions</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Han, Yosep ; Kwak, Daewoong ; Choi, Siyoung ; Shin, Changhoon ; Lee, Youngsoo ; Kim, Hyunjung</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Yosep ; Kwak, Daewoong ; Choi, Siyoung ; Shin, Changhoon ; Lee, Youngsoo ; Kim, Hyunjung</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the pore structure characteristics of Canadian Horn River basin shales with various chemical compositions were evaluated using gas physisorption analyses. The samples used in this research were obtained from two different regions (shallow and deep regions) of rock cuttings during the drilling of the shale gas field located in Horn River basin. The pore size, specific surface area, total pore volume, micropore surface area, and micropore volume of the shale samples were measured using both nitrogen and CO2. The results indicated that the pore size was not a function of chemical composition, while distinct trends were observed for other macroscopic and microscopic pore-related properties. In particular, the greatest specific surface area and total pore volume were observed for silica-rich carbonate shales, while clay-rich siliceous shales exhibited the greatest micropore volume and micropore surface area. The trends clearly suggested that macroscopic and microscopic pore-related properties of the Canadian Horn River basin shales were closely related to their chemical composition. Furthermore, a stronger correlation was observed between the quartz content and the micropore-related physical properties of shales (i.e., the micropore surface area and micropore volume) in comparison to other properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-163X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-163X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/min7050066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbonates ; Chemical composition ; Chemistry ; Chips ; Clay ; Composition effects ; Correlation ; Drilling ; Minerals ; Nitrogen ; Oil and gas fields ; Oil shale ; Physical properties ; Pore size ; Porosity ; Porous materials ; Quartz ; Regions ; River basins ; Rivers ; Rocks ; Sedimentary rocks ; Shale ; Shale gas ; Shales ; Silica ; Silicon dioxide ; Specific surface ; Structural analysis ; Surface area ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Minerals (Basel), 2017-05, Vol.7 (5), p.66</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-4b18d7a0f2a9eb367ffa88e8809a6a362eccae17d62d913de73ce6298519400c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-4b18d7a0f2a9eb367ffa88e8809a6a362eccae17d62d913de73ce6298519400c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4101-069X ; 0000-0003-2115-6891</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Yosep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Daewoong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Siyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Changhoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Youngsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunjung</creatorcontrib><title>Pore Structure Characterization of Shale Using Gas Physisorption: Effect of Chemical Compositions</title><title>Minerals (Basel)</title><description>In this study, the pore structure characteristics of Canadian Horn River basin shales with various chemical compositions were evaluated using gas physisorption analyses. The samples used in this research were obtained from two different regions (shallow and deep regions) of rock cuttings during the drilling of the shale gas field located in Horn River basin. The pore size, specific surface area, total pore volume, micropore surface area, and micropore volume of the shale samples were measured using both nitrogen and CO2. The results indicated that the pore size was not a function of chemical composition, while distinct trends were observed for other macroscopic and microscopic pore-related properties. In particular, the greatest specific surface area and total pore volume were observed for silica-rich carbonate shales, while clay-rich siliceous shales exhibited the greatest micropore volume and micropore surface area. The trends clearly suggested that macroscopic and microscopic pore-related properties of the Canadian Horn River basin shales were closely related to their chemical composition. Furthermore, a stronger correlation was observed between the quartz content and the micropore-related physical properties of shales (i.e., the micropore surface area and micropore volume) in comparison to other properties.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chips</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Oil and gas fields</subject><subject>Oil shale</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Porous materials</subject><subject>Quartz</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><subject>Shales</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Specific surface</subject><subject>Structural analysis</subject><subject>Surface area</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>2075-163X</issn><issn>2075-163X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF9LwzAUxYMoOOZe_AQB34Rq_qxp45uUOYWBgznwrdylic1Ym5qkD_PTr2WC3pd74P4493AQuqXkgXNJHhvbZiQlRIgLNGEkSxMq-OflP32NZiHsyTCS8jxlEwRr5zXeRN-r2A-qqMGDitrbH4jWtdgZvKnhoPE22PYLLyHgdX0MNjjfjcATXhijVRzBotaNVXDAhWs6F-x4DzfoysAh6NnvnqLty-KjeE1W78u34nmVKCbTmMx3NK8yIIaB1DsuMmMgz3WeEwkCuGBaKdA0qwSrhvCVzrjSgsk8pXJOiOJTdHf27bz77nWI5d71vh1ellRSkkoqBR2o-zOlvAvBa1N23jbgjyUl5dhi-dciPwEvAmWm</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Han, Yosep</creator><creator>Kwak, Daewoong</creator><creator>Choi, Siyoung</creator><creator>Shin, Changhoon</creator><creator>Lee, Youngsoo</creator><creator>Kim, Hyunjung</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-069X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-6891</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Pore Structure Characterization of Shale Using Gas Physisorption: Effect of Chemical Compositions</title><author>Han, Yosep ; Kwak, Daewoong ; Choi, Siyoung ; Shin, Changhoon ; Lee, Youngsoo ; Kim, Hyunjung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-4b18d7a0f2a9eb367ffa88e8809a6a362eccae17d62d913de73ce6298519400c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chips</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Oil and gas fields</topic><topic>Oil shale</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Porous materials</topic><topic>Quartz</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><topic>Shales</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Specific surface</topic><topic>Structural analysis</topic><topic>Surface area</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Yosep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Daewoong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Siyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Changhoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Youngsoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunjung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Minerals (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Yosep</au><au>Kwak, Daewoong</au><au>Choi, Siyoung</au><au>Shin, Changhoon</au><au>Lee, Youngsoo</au><au>Kim, Hyunjung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pore Structure Characterization of Shale Using Gas Physisorption: Effect of Chemical Compositions</atitle><jtitle>Minerals (Basel)</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>66</spage><pages>66-</pages><issn>2075-163X</issn><eissn>2075-163X</eissn><abstract>In this study, the pore structure characteristics of Canadian Horn River basin shales with various chemical compositions were evaluated using gas physisorption analyses. The samples used in this research were obtained from two different regions (shallow and deep regions) of rock cuttings during the drilling of the shale gas field located in Horn River basin. The pore size, specific surface area, total pore volume, micropore surface area, and micropore volume of the shale samples were measured using both nitrogen and CO2. The results indicated that the pore size was not a function of chemical composition, while distinct trends were observed for other macroscopic and microscopic pore-related properties. In particular, the greatest specific surface area and total pore volume were observed for silica-rich carbonate shales, while clay-rich siliceous shales exhibited the greatest micropore volume and micropore surface area. The trends clearly suggested that macroscopic and microscopic pore-related properties of the Canadian Horn River basin shales were closely related to their chemical composition. Furthermore, a stronger correlation was observed between the quartz content and the micropore-related physical properties of shales (i.e., the micropore surface area and micropore volume) in comparison to other properties.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/min7050066</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-069X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-6891</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-163X
ispartof Minerals (Basel), 2017-05, Vol.7 (5), p.66
issn 2075-163X
2075-163X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1910591961
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Carbon dioxide
Carbonates
Chemical composition
Chemistry
Chips
Clay
Composition effects
Correlation
Drilling
Minerals
Nitrogen
Oil and gas fields
Oil shale
Physical properties
Pore size
Porosity
Porous materials
Quartz
Regions
River basins
Rivers
Rocks
Sedimentary rocks
Shale
Shale gas
Shales
Silica
Silicon dioxide
Specific surface
Structural analysis
Surface area
Trends
title Pore Structure Characterization of Shale Using Gas Physisorption: Effect of Chemical Compositions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pore%20Structure%20Characterization%20of%20Shale%20Using%20Gas%20Physisorption:%20Effect%20of%20Chemical%20Compositions&rft.jtitle=Minerals%20(Basel)&rft.au=Han,%20Yosep&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=66&rft.pages=66-&rft.issn=2075-163X&rft.eissn=2075-163X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/min7050066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1910591961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910591961&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true