Development and implementation of a site‐specific water quality limit for uranium in a high conservation value ecosystem

ABSTRACT Water quality guideline values (GVs) are a key tool for water quality assessments. Site‐specific GVs, which incorporate data relevant to local conditions and organisms, provide a higher level of confidence that the GV will protect the aquatic ecosystem at a site compared to generic GVs. Sit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Integrated environmental assessment and management 2017-07, Vol.13 (4), p.765-777
Hauptverfasser: van Dam, Rick A, Hogan, Alicia C, Harford, Andrew J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 777
container_issue 4
container_start_page 765
container_title Integrated environmental assessment and management
container_volume 13
creator van Dam, Rick A
Hogan, Alicia C
Harford, Andrew J
description ABSTRACT Water quality guideline values (GVs) are a key tool for water quality assessments. Site‐specific GVs, which incorporate data relevant to local conditions and organisms, provide a higher level of confidence that the GV will protect the aquatic ecosystem at a site compared to generic GVs. Site‐specific GVs are, therefore, considered particularly suitable for sites of high sociopolitical or ecological importance. The present paper provides an example of the refinement of a site‐specific GV for high ecological value aquatic ecosystems in Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia, to improve its site specificity and statistical robustness, thereby increasing confidence in its application. Uranium is a contaminant of concern for Ranger U mine, which releases water into Magela Creek and Gulungul Creek in Kakadu National Park. A site‐specific GV for U has been applied, as a statutory limit, to Magela Creek since 2004 and to Gulungul Creek since 2015. The GV of 6 μg/L U was derived from toxicity data for 5 local species tested under local conditions. The acquisition of additional U data, including new information on the effect of DOC on U toxicity, enabled a revision of the site‐specific U GV to 2.8 μg/L U and an ability to adjust the value on the basis of environmental concentrations of DOC. The revised GV has been adopted as the statutory limit, with the regulatory framework structured so the GV requires adjustment based on DOC concentration only when an exceedance occurs. Monitoring data for Magela Creek (2001–2013) and Gulungul Creek (2003–2013) downstream of the mine show that dissolved U has not exceeded 1 μg/L. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:765–777. © 2016 SETAC Key Points A site‐specific water quality limit for U was revised on the basis of new toxicity data and quantitative data on the influence of DOC. The revised U limit was 2.8 μg/L and can be adjusted on the basis of environmental DOC concentration. The U limit has been implemented in the regulatory framework for the Ranger U mine, surrounded by World Heritage– and Ramsar–listed wetlands, in northern Australia. This case study illustrates how site‐specific water quality limits can be derived and implemented in a rigorous manner.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ieam.1871
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1909118494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1909118494</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3201-c85103037821eb43468913c3c72e1c7c5a0f58f49dc05bcf2eb52bf9c5d58bb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EouWx4AeQJVYs0voR42RZlfKQQGxgHTnuGFwlcWonrcqKT-Ab-RISCt2xmhnp3DPSReiMkhElhI0tqHJEE0n30JAKQSMuU76_26UcoKMQFoTEnHF2iAZMpjEXiRyi92tYQeHqEqoGq2qObVkX0F-qsa7CzmCFg23g6-Mz1KCtsRqvVQMeL1tV2GaDC1vaBhvncetVZdsS26oLvdnXN6xdFcCvtq6VKlrAoF3YhAbKE3RgVBHg9Hceo5eb2fP0Lnp4ur2fTh4izRmhkU4EJZxwmTAKeczjqySlXHMtGVAttVDEiMTE6VwTkWvDIBcsN6kWc5HkXeAYXWy9tXfLFkKTLVzrq-5lRlOSUprEaU9dbintXQgeTFZ7Wyq_ySjJ-pazvuWsb7ljz3-NbV7CfEf-1doB4y2wtgVs_jdl97PJ44_yGw7Nidc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1909118494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and implementation of a site‐specific water quality limit for uranium in a high conservation value ecosystem</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>van Dam, Rick A ; Hogan, Alicia C ; Harford, Andrew J</creator><creatorcontrib>van Dam, Rick A ; Hogan, Alicia C ; Harford, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Water quality guideline values (GVs) are a key tool for water quality assessments. Site‐specific GVs, which incorporate data relevant to local conditions and organisms, provide a higher level of confidence that the GV will protect the aquatic ecosystem at a site compared to generic GVs. Site‐specific GVs are, therefore, considered particularly suitable for sites of high sociopolitical or ecological importance. The present paper provides an example of the refinement of a site‐specific GV for high ecological value aquatic ecosystems in Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia, to improve its site specificity and statistical robustness, thereby increasing confidence in its application. Uranium is a contaminant of concern for Ranger U mine, which releases water into Magela Creek and Gulungul Creek in Kakadu National Park. A site‐specific GV for U has been applied, as a statutory limit, to Magela Creek since 2004 and to Gulungul Creek since 2015. The GV of 6 μg/L U was derived from toxicity data for 5 local species tested under local conditions. The acquisition of additional U data, including new information on the effect of DOC on U toxicity, enabled a revision of the site‐specific U GV to 2.8 μg/L U and an ability to adjust the value on the basis of environmental concentrations of DOC. The revised GV has been adopted as the statutory limit, with the regulatory framework structured so the GV requires adjustment based on DOC concentration only when an exceedance occurs. Monitoring data for Magela Creek (2001–2013) and Gulungul Creek (2003–2013) downstream of the mine show that dissolved U has not exceeded 1 μg/L. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:765–777. © 2016 SETAC Key Points A site‐specific water quality limit for U was revised on the basis of new toxicity data and quantitative data on the influence of DOC. The revised U limit was 2.8 μg/L and can be adjusted on the basis of environmental DOC concentration. The U limit has been implemented in the regulatory framework for the Ranger U mine, surrounded by World Heritage– and Ramsar–listed wetlands, in northern Australia. This case study illustrates how site‐specific water quality limits can be derived and implemented in a rigorous manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-3777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-3793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1871</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27943587</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Assessments ; Case studies ; Coastal inlets ; Confidence intervals ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Contaminants ; Creeks ; Data processing ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Ecological risk ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental quality standards ; Frameworks ; National parks ; Quality assessment ; Radiation Monitoring ; Robustness ; Site‐specific ; Specificity ; Statistics ; Toxicity ; Uranium ; Uranium - analysis ; Water conservation ; Water Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis ; Water quality ; Water Quality - standards ; Water quality assessments ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2017-07, Vol.13 (4), p.765-777</ispartof><rights>2016 SETAC</rights><rights>2016 SETAC.</rights><rights>2017 SETAC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3201-c85103037821eb43468913c3c72e1c7c5a0f58f49dc05bcf2eb52bf9c5d58bb43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3201-c85103037821eb43468913c3c72e1c7c5a0f58f49dc05bcf2eb52bf9c5d58bb43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fieam.1871$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fieam.1871$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27943587$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Dam, Rick A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Alicia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harford, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><title>Development and implementation of a site‐specific water quality limit for uranium in a high conservation value ecosystem</title><title>Integrated environmental assessment and management</title><addtitle>Integr Environ Assess Manag</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Water quality guideline values (GVs) are a key tool for water quality assessments. Site‐specific GVs, which incorporate data relevant to local conditions and organisms, provide a higher level of confidence that the GV will protect the aquatic ecosystem at a site compared to generic GVs. Site‐specific GVs are, therefore, considered particularly suitable for sites of high sociopolitical or ecological importance. The present paper provides an example of the refinement of a site‐specific GV for high ecological value aquatic ecosystems in Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia, to improve its site specificity and statistical robustness, thereby increasing confidence in its application. Uranium is a contaminant of concern for Ranger U mine, which releases water into Magela Creek and Gulungul Creek in Kakadu National Park. A site‐specific GV for U has been applied, as a statutory limit, to Magela Creek since 2004 and to Gulungul Creek since 2015. The GV of 6 μg/L U was derived from toxicity data for 5 local species tested under local conditions. The acquisition of additional U data, including new information on the effect of DOC on U toxicity, enabled a revision of the site‐specific U GV to 2.8 μg/L U and an ability to adjust the value on the basis of environmental concentrations of DOC. The revised GV has been adopted as the statutory limit, with the regulatory framework structured so the GV requires adjustment based on DOC concentration only when an exceedance occurs. Monitoring data for Magela Creek (2001–2013) and Gulungul Creek (2003–2013) downstream of the mine show that dissolved U has not exceeded 1 μg/L. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:765–777. © 2016 SETAC Key Points A site‐specific water quality limit for U was revised on the basis of new toxicity data and quantitative data on the influence of DOC. The revised U limit was 2.8 μg/L and can be adjusted on the basis of environmental DOC concentration. The U limit has been implemented in the regulatory framework for the Ranger U mine, surrounded by World Heritage– and Ramsar–listed wetlands, in northern Australia. This case study illustrates how site‐specific water quality limits can be derived and implemented in a rigorous manner.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Coastal inlets</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Ecological risk</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental quality standards</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Radiation Monitoring</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Site‐specific</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Uranium</subject><subject>Uranium - analysis</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water Quality - standards</subject><subject>Water quality assessments</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1551-3777</issn><issn>1551-3793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EouWx4AeQJVYs0voR42RZlfKQQGxgHTnuGFwlcWonrcqKT-Ab-RISCt2xmhnp3DPSReiMkhElhI0tqHJEE0n30JAKQSMuU76_26UcoKMQFoTEnHF2iAZMpjEXiRyi92tYQeHqEqoGq2qObVkX0F-qsa7CzmCFg23g6-Mz1KCtsRqvVQMeL1tV2GaDC1vaBhvncetVZdsS26oLvdnXN6xdFcCvtq6VKlrAoF3YhAbKE3RgVBHg9Hceo5eb2fP0Lnp4ur2fTh4izRmhkU4EJZxwmTAKeczjqySlXHMtGVAttVDEiMTE6VwTkWvDIBcsN6kWc5HkXeAYXWy9tXfLFkKTLVzrq-5lRlOSUprEaU9dbintXQgeTFZ7Wyq_ySjJ-pazvuWsb7ljz3-NbV7CfEf-1doB4y2wtgVs_jdl97PJ44_yGw7Nidc</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>van Dam, Rick A</creator><creator>Hogan, Alicia C</creator><creator>Harford, Andrew J</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Development and implementation of a site‐specific water quality limit for uranium in a high conservation value ecosystem</title><author>van Dam, Rick A ; Hogan, Alicia C ; Harford, Andrew J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3201-c85103037821eb43468913c3c72e1c7c5a0f58f49dc05bcf2eb52bf9c5d58bb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Coastal inlets</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Ecological risk</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental quality standards</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Radiation Monitoring</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Site‐specific</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Uranium</topic><topic>Uranium - analysis</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water Quality - standards</topic><topic>Water quality assessments</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Dam, Rick A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Alicia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harford, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Integrated environmental assessment and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Dam, Rick A</au><au>Hogan, Alicia C</au><au>Harford, Andrew J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and implementation of a site‐specific water quality limit for uranium in a high conservation value ecosystem</atitle><jtitle>Integrated environmental assessment and management</jtitle><addtitle>Integr Environ Assess Manag</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>765</spage><epage>777</epage><pages>765-777</pages><issn>1551-3777</issn><eissn>1551-3793</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Water quality guideline values (GVs) are a key tool for water quality assessments. Site‐specific GVs, which incorporate data relevant to local conditions and organisms, provide a higher level of confidence that the GV will protect the aquatic ecosystem at a site compared to generic GVs. Site‐specific GVs are, therefore, considered particularly suitable for sites of high sociopolitical or ecological importance. The present paper provides an example of the refinement of a site‐specific GV for high ecological value aquatic ecosystems in Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia, to improve its site specificity and statistical robustness, thereby increasing confidence in its application. Uranium is a contaminant of concern for Ranger U mine, which releases water into Magela Creek and Gulungul Creek in Kakadu National Park. A site‐specific GV for U has been applied, as a statutory limit, to Magela Creek since 2004 and to Gulungul Creek since 2015. The GV of 6 μg/L U was derived from toxicity data for 5 local species tested under local conditions. The acquisition of additional U data, including new information on the effect of DOC on U toxicity, enabled a revision of the site‐specific U GV to 2.8 μg/L U and an ability to adjust the value on the basis of environmental concentrations of DOC. The revised GV has been adopted as the statutory limit, with the regulatory framework structured so the GV requires adjustment based on DOC concentration only when an exceedance occurs. Monitoring data for Magela Creek (2001–2013) and Gulungul Creek (2003–2013) downstream of the mine show that dissolved U has not exceeded 1 μg/L. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:765–777. © 2016 SETAC Key Points A site‐specific water quality limit for U was revised on the basis of new toxicity data and quantitative data on the influence of DOC. The revised U limit was 2.8 μg/L and can be adjusted on the basis of environmental DOC concentration. The U limit has been implemented in the regulatory framework for the Ranger U mine, surrounded by World Heritage– and Ramsar–listed wetlands, in northern Australia. This case study illustrates how site‐specific water quality limits can be derived and implemented in a rigorous manner.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27943587</pmid><doi>10.1002/ieam.1871</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-3777
ispartof Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2017-07, Vol.13 (4), p.765-777
issn 1551-3777
1551-3793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1909118494
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aquatic ecosystems
Assessments
Case studies
Coastal inlets
Confidence intervals
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
Contaminants
Creeks
Data processing
Dissolved organic carbon
Ecological risk
Ecology
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Environmental monitoring
Environmental quality standards
Frameworks
National parks
Quality assessment
Radiation Monitoring
Robustness
Site‐specific
Specificity
Statistics
Toxicity
Uranium
Uranium - analysis
Water conservation
Water Pollutants, Radioactive - analysis
Water quality
Water Quality - standards
Water quality assessments
Wetlands
title Development and implementation of a site‐specific water quality limit for uranium in a high conservation value ecosystem
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A37%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20implementation%20of%20a%20site%E2%80%90specific%20water%20quality%20limit%20for%20uranium%20in%20a%20high%20conservation%20value%20ecosystem&rft.jtitle=Integrated%20environmental%20assessment%20and%20management&rft.au=van%20Dam,%20Rick%20A&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=765&rft.epage=777&rft.pages=765-777&rft.issn=1551-3777&rft.eissn=1551-3793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ieam.1871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1909118494%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1909118494&rft_id=info:pmid/27943587&rfr_iscdi=true