Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions of the Indicators for Sustainable Development
Nine different indices for measuring sustainable development, comprising Change in Wealth Index (CWI), Ecological Footprint (EF), Environmental Performance Index (EPI), Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), Genuine Savings Index (GSI), Global Well‐Being Index (GWI), Happy Planet Index (HPI), Hum...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) West Yorkshire, England), 2017-05, Vol.25 (3), p.242-253 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 253 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 242 |
| container_title | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Strezov, Vladimir Evans, Annette Evans, Tim J. |
| description | Nine different indices for measuring sustainable development, comprising Change in Wealth Index (CWI), Ecological Footprint (EF), Environmental Performance Index (EPI), Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), Genuine Savings Index (GSI), Global Well‐Being Index (GWI), Happy Planet Index (HPI), Human Development Index (HDI) and Sustainable Society Index (SSI) were selected in this study. The indices were analysed for their ability to measure the economic, environmental and social dimensions of sustainable development. Only two indices (SSI and GSI) considered all three dimensions of sustainable development, while the remaining measured either the socio‐economic, socio‐environmental or just economic and environmental dimensions. A normalized average sustainability index (NASI) was proposed in this study, calculated as an average index of all nine. Switzerland, Norway and Sweden were the countries with the highest, while Burundi, Sierra Leone and Niger were the countries with the lowest NASI scores. The deviation of each index compared with NASI was determined, resulting in GWI followed by HDI having the lowest deviation from the average rankings. The publication contribution of the scientific literature towards the three dimensions of sustainable development for each individual index was further analysed and discussed, identifying public health as one of the potential overarching indicators for sustainable development. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sd.1649 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1909069009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1909069009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-4a69c17b824647e96dcfd0d1c20a6e2308c911e2c92ffe9bf20f5232995eb1ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oWABw-6dZL96M6x2KqFgofqOWSzCabsJjXZVvrv3bV69DTD8MwMvIRcM5gwAP4Q6wkrMjwhIwaICZsyPCUjwKJMoAR-Ti5i3ABAyVk2Iu0sRh1jq11HvaHdh6YL5Z1vrbqna6-sbKh0NV24vQ3eDa6fzG3fROtd_Ftautoq2fkQqfGBrnexk9bJqtF0rve68dth9ZKcGdlEffVbx-T9afH2-JKsXp-Xj7NVotI8xySTBSo2rUqeFdlUY1ErU0PNFAdZaJ5CqZAxzRVyYzRWhoPJecoRc10xqdIxuTne3Qb_udOxExu_C65_KRgCQoEA2Kvbo1LBxxi0EdtgWxkOgoEYshSxFkOWvbw7yi_b6MN_TKznP_obxah1DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1909069009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions of the Indicators for Sustainable Development</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Strezov, Vladimir ; Evans, Annette ; Evans, Tim J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Strezov, Vladimir ; Evans, Annette ; Evans, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><description>Nine different indices for measuring sustainable development, comprising Change in Wealth Index (CWI), Ecological Footprint (EF), Environmental Performance Index (EPI), Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), Genuine Savings Index (GSI), Global Well‐Being Index (GWI), Happy Planet Index (HPI), Human Development Index (HDI) and Sustainable Society Index (SSI) were selected in this study. The indices were analysed for their ability to measure the economic, environmental and social dimensions of sustainable development. Only two indices (SSI and GSI) considered all three dimensions of sustainable development, while the remaining measured either the socio‐economic, socio‐environmental or just economic and environmental dimensions. A normalized average sustainability index (NASI) was proposed in this study, calculated as an average index of all nine. Switzerland, Norway and Sweden were the countries with the highest, while Burundi, Sierra Leone and Niger were the countries with the lowest NASI scores. The deviation of each index compared with NASI was determined, resulting in GWI followed by HDI having the lowest deviation from the average rankings. The publication contribution of the scientific literature towards the three dimensions of sustainable development for each individual index was further analysed and discussed, identifying public health as one of the potential overarching indicators for sustainable development. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0802</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sd.1649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Averages ; Comparative studies ; Deviation ; Ecological Footprint ; Ecological monitoring ; Economic analysis ; Economic development ; Economics ; Environmental performance ; Environmental Performance Index ; Global Well‐Being Index ; Human development ; Human Development Index ; Indexes ; Indicators ; Mathematical analysis ; normalized average sustainability index ; Performance indices ; Public health ; Savings ; Social behavior ; Social development ; Social factors ; Socioeconomic factors ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable Society Index ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2017-05, Vol.25 (3), p.242-253</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-4a69c17b824647e96dcfd0d1c20a6e2308c911e2c92ffe9bf20f5232995eb1ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-4a69c17b824647e96dcfd0d1c20a6e2308c911e2c92ffe9bf20f5232995eb1ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsd.1649$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsd.1649$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strezov, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions of the Indicators for Sustainable Development</title><title>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</title><description>Nine different indices for measuring sustainable development, comprising Change in Wealth Index (CWI), Ecological Footprint (EF), Environmental Performance Index (EPI), Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), Genuine Savings Index (GSI), Global Well‐Being Index (GWI), Happy Planet Index (HPI), Human Development Index (HDI) and Sustainable Society Index (SSI) were selected in this study. The indices were analysed for their ability to measure the economic, environmental and social dimensions of sustainable development. Only two indices (SSI and GSI) considered all three dimensions of sustainable development, while the remaining measured either the socio‐economic, socio‐environmental or just economic and environmental dimensions. A normalized average sustainability index (NASI) was proposed in this study, calculated as an average index of all nine. Switzerland, Norway and Sweden were the countries with the highest, while Burundi, Sierra Leone and Niger were the countries with the lowest NASI scores. The deviation of each index compared with NASI was determined, resulting in GWI followed by HDI having the lowest deviation from the average rankings. The publication contribution of the scientific literature towards the three dimensions of sustainable development for each individual index was further analysed and discussed, identifying public health as one of the potential overarching indicators for sustainable development. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</description><subject>Averages</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Ecological Footprint</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental performance</subject><subject>Environmental Performance Index</subject><subject>Global Well‐Being Index</subject><subject>Human development</subject><subject>Human Development Index</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>normalized average sustainability index</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Savings</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable Society Index</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0968-0802</issn><issn>1099-1719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oWABw-6dZL96M6x2KqFgofqOWSzCabsJjXZVvrv3bV69DTD8MwMvIRcM5gwAP4Q6wkrMjwhIwaICZsyPCUjwKJMoAR-Ti5i3ABAyVk2Iu0sRh1jq11HvaHdh6YL5Z1vrbqna6-sbKh0NV24vQ3eDa6fzG3fROtd_Ftautoq2fkQqfGBrnexk9bJqtF0rve68dth9ZKcGdlEffVbx-T9afH2-JKsXp-Xj7NVotI8xySTBSo2rUqeFdlUY1ErU0PNFAdZaJ5CqZAxzRVyYzRWhoPJecoRc10xqdIxuTne3Qb_udOxExu_C65_KRgCQoEA2Kvbo1LBxxi0EdtgWxkOgoEYshSxFkOWvbw7yi_b6MN_TKznP_obxah1DA</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Strezov, Vladimir</creator><creator>Evans, Annette</creator><creator>Evans, Tim J.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions of the Indicators for Sustainable Development</title><author>Strezov, Vladimir ; Evans, Annette ; Evans, Tim J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-4a69c17b824647e96dcfd0d1c20a6e2308c911e2c92ffe9bf20f5232995eb1ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Averages</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Ecological Footprint</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental performance</topic><topic>Environmental Performance Index</topic><topic>Global Well‐Being Index</topic><topic>Human development</topic><topic>Human Development Index</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>normalized average sustainability index</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Savings</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable Society Index</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strezov, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strezov, Vladimir</au><au>Evans, Annette</au><au>Evans, Tim J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions of the Indicators for Sustainable Development</atitle><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>242-253</pages><issn>0968-0802</issn><eissn>1099-1719</eissn><abstract>Nine different indices for measuring sustainable development, comprising Change in Wealth Index (CWI), Ecological Footprint (EF), Environmental Performance Index (EPI), Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI), Genuine Savings Index (GSI), Global Well‐Being Index (GWI), Happy Planet Index (HPI), Human Development Index (HDI) and Sustainable Society Index (SSI) were selected in this study. The indices were analysed for their ability to measure the economic, environmental and social dimensions of sustainable development. Only two indices (SSI and GSI) considered all three dimensions of sustainable development, while the remaining measured either the socio‐economic, socio‐environmental or just economic and environmental dimensions. A normalized average sustainability index (NASI) was proposed in this study, calculated as an average index of all nine. Switzerland, Norway and Sweden were the countries with the highest, while Burundi, Sierra Leone and Niger were the countries with the lowest NASI scores. The deviation of each index compared with NASI was determined, resulting in GWI followed by HDI having the lowest deviation from the average rankings. The publication contribution of the scientific literature towards the three dimensions of sustainable development for each individual index was further analysed and discussed, identifying public health as one of the potential overarching indicators for sustainable development. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sd.1649</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0968-0802 |
| ispartof | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2017-05, Vol.25 (3), p.242-253 |
| issn | 0968-0802 1099-1719 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1909069009 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Averages Comparative studies Deviation Ecological Footprint Ecological monitoring Economic analysis Economic development Economics Environmental performance Environmental Performance Index Global Well‐Being Index Human development Human Development Index Indexes Indicators Mathematical analysis normalized average sustainability index Performance indices Public health Savings Social behavior Social development Social factors Socioeconomic factors Sustainability Sustainable development Sustainable Society Index Wealth |
| title | Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions of the Indicators for Sustainable Development |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A37%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20Economic,%20Social%20and%20Environmental%20Dimensions%20of%20the%20Indicators%20for%20Sustainable%20Development&rft.jtitle=Sustainable%20development%20(Bradford,%20West%20Yorkshire,%20England)&rft.au=Strezov,%20Vladimir&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=242-253&rft.issn=0968-0802&rft.eissn=1099-1719&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sd.1649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1909069009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1909069009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |