assessing students’ reflections on work-placed modules
Students of ‘conventional’ academic disciplines can struggle to determine the extent of their employability. Work-based modules offer a potential solution to this issue. That these type of modules give students the opportunity to apply their knowledge and realise the scope of possible employment opp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European political science 2017-06, Vol.16 (2), p.148-158 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 158 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 148 |
container_title | European political science |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | statham, alison scullion, jane |
description | Students of ‘conventional’ academic disciplines can struggle to determine the extent of their employability. Work-based modules offer a potential solution to this issue. That these type of modules give students the opportunity to apply their knowledge and realise the scope of possible employment opportunities afforded by their degree is commonly accepted, but real issues arise in tackling the assessment of ‘on the job’ experiential learning, particularly in the area of politics. This article outlines an integrated and iterative approach to assessment, starting with the design of the component parts of the module, moving on consider the role played by simple tools such as the framing of key narratives, the development of placement diaries incorporating SWOT analysis and the use of the Politics and International Relations Subject Benchmark Statement. The importance of integrating the module design with the final assessment processes is described, and some examples are offered of how students have described the ways in which the module has enabled them to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and scholarship and employability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/eps.2015.103 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1908575257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4322821839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a16d69c6181c520728e5c2b95cbfb00974d93c149811ce5ef1fb4dfccecaaace3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEiccXFG8dJfEQVf1IlLnC2HGdTpaRx8CZC3HgNXo8nwaUcOHDaGenTzGoYOwexAKGKKxxokQpQ0ckDNoO8TLnQpTz80YJnUspjdkK0EUJKnWczVloiJGr7dULjVGM_0tfHZxKw6dCNre8p8X3y5sMLHzrrsE62vp46pFN21NiO8Oz3ztnz7c3T8p6vHu8eltcr7qSAkVvI61y7HEpwKhVFWqJyaaWVq5pKCF1ktZYOMl0COFTYQFNldeMcOmtjn5yzi33uEPzrhDSajZ9CHysNaFGqQqWqiNTlnnLBE8XvzRDarQ3vBoTZbWPiNma3TXQy4nyPU8T6NYY_of_x308CZ-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1908575257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>assessing students’ reflections on work-placed modules</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>statham, alison ; scullion, jane</creator><creatorcontrib>statham, alison ; scullion, jane</creatorcontrib><description>Students of ‘conventional’ academic disciplines can struggle to determine the extent of their employability. Work-based modules offer a potential solution to this issue. That these type of modules give students the opportunity to apply their knowledge and realise the scope of possible employment opportunities afforded by their degree is commonly accepted, but real issues arise in tackling the assessment of ‘on the job’ experiential learning, particularly in the area of politics. This article outlines an integrated and iterative approach to assessment, starting with the design of the component parts of the module, moving on consider the role played by simple tools such as the framing of key narratives, the development of placement diaries incorporating SWOT analysis and the use of the Politics and International Relations Subject Benchmark Statement. The importance of integrating the module design with the final assessment processes is described, and some examples are offered of how students have described the ways in which the module has enabled them to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and scholarship and employability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1680-4333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1682-0983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/eps.2015.103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Comparative Politics ; Diaries ; Employability ; Employment ; Employment opportunities ; Evaluation ; Experiential learning ; International relations ; Job opportunities ; Narratives ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Political Theory ; Politics ; Scholarship ; Students ; Symposium ; Work</subject><ispartof>European political science, 2017-06, Vol.16 (2), p.148-158</ispartof><rights>European Consortium for Political Research 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Palgrave Macmillan Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a16d69c6181c520728e5c2b95cbfb00974d93c149811ce5ef1fb4dfccecaaace3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a16d69c6181c520728e5c2b95cbfb00974d93c149811ce5ef1fb4dfccecaaace3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/eps.2015.103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/eps.2015.103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,12832,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>statham, alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>scullion, jane</creatorcontrib><title>assessing students’ reflections on work-placed modules</title><title>European political science</title><addtitle>Eur Polit Sci</addtitle><description>Students of ‘conventional’ academic disciplines can struggle to determine the extent of their employability. Work-based modules offer a potential solution to this issue. That these type of modules give students the opportunity to apply their knowledge and realise the scope of possible employment opportunities afforded by their degree is commonly accepted, but real issues arise in tackling the assessment of ‘on the job’ experiential learning, particularly in the area of politics. This article outlines an integrated and iterative approach to assessment, starting with the design of the component parts of the module, moving on consider the role played by simple tools such as the framing of key narratives, the development of placement diaries incorporating SWOT analysis and the use of the Politics and International Relations Subject Benchmark Statement. The importance of integrating the module design with the final assessment processes is described, and some examples are offered of how students have described the ways in which the module has enabled them to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and scholarship and employability.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Comparative Politics</subject><subject>Diaries</subject><subject>Employability</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment opportunities</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiential learning</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Job opportunities</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Symposium</subject><subject>Work</subject><issn>1680-4333</issn><issn>1682-0983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEiccXFG8dJfEQVf1IlLnC2HGdTpaRx8CZC3HgNXo8nwaUcOHDaGenTzGoYOwexAKGKKxxokQpQ0ckDNoO8TLnQpTz80YJnUspjdkK0EUJKnWczVloiJGr7dULjVGM_0tfHZxKw6dCNre8p8X3y5sMLHzrrsE62vp46pFN21NiO8Oz3ztnz7c3T8p6vHu8eltcr7qSAkVvI61y7HEpwKhVFWqJyaaWVq5pKCF1ktZYOMl0COFTYQFNldeMcOmtjn5yzi33uEPzrhDSajZ9CHysNaFGqQqWqiNTlnnLBE8XvzRDarQ3vBoTZbWPiNma3TXQy4nyPU8T6NYY_of_x308CZ-Y</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>statham, alison</creator><creator>scullion, jane</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>assessing students’ reflections on work-placed modules</title><author>statham, alison ; scullion, jane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a16d69c6181c520728e5c2b95cbfb00974d93c149811ce5ef1fb4dfccecaaace3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Comparative Politics</topic><topic>Diaries</topic><topic>Employability</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment opportunities</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiential learning</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Job opportunities</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Symposium</topic><topic>Work</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>statham, alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>scullion, jane</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>statham, alison</au><au>scullion, jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>assessing students’ reflections on work-placed modules</atitle><jtitle>European political science</jtitle><stitle>Eur Polit Sci</stitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>148-158</pages><issn>1680-4333</issn><eissn>1682-0983</eissn><abstract>Students of ‘conventional’ academic disciplines can struggle to determine the extent of their employability. Work-based modules offer a potential solution to this issue. That these type of modules give students the opportunity to apply their knowledge and realise the scope of possible employment opportunities afforded by their degree is commonly accepted, but real issues arise in tackling the assessment of ‘on the job’ experiential learning, particularly in the area of politics. This article outlines an integrated and iterative approach to assessment, starting with the design of the component parts of the module, moving on consider the role played by simple tools such as the framing of key narratives, the development of placement diaries incorporating SWOT analysis and the use of the Politics and International Relations Subject Benchmark Statement. The importance of integrating the module design with the final assessment processes is described, and some examples are offered of how students have described the ways in which the module has enabled them to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and scholarship and employability.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/eps.2015.103</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1680-4333 |
ispartof | European political science, 2017-06, Vol.16 (2), p.148-158 |
issn | 1680-4333 1682-0983 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1908575257 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Academic disciplines Comparative Politics Diaries Employability Employment Employment opportunities Evaluation Experiential learning International relations Job opportunities Narratives Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Political Theory Politics Scholarship Students Symposium Work |
title | assessing students’ reflections on work-placed modules |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=assessing%20students%E2%80%99%20reflections%20on%20work-placed%20modules&rft.jtitle=European%20political%20science&rft.au=statham,%20alison&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=148-158&rft.issn=1680-4333&rft.eissn=1682-0983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/eps.2015.103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4322821839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1908575257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |