Proximal Tibial Opening Wedge Osteotomy as the Initial Treatment for Chronic Posterolateral Corner Deficiency in the Varus Knee

Background: Nonoperative treatment of posterolateral knee injuries tends to yield poor results. In patients with chronic posterolateral knee injuries, failure to correct genu varus alignment will often result in failure of the posterolateral knee repair or reconstruction. Purpose: To prospectively a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 2007-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1844
Hauptverfasser: Arthur, Andrew, LaPrade, Robert F, Agel, Julie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1844
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 35
creator Arthur, Andrew
LaPrade, Robert F
Agel, Julie
description Background: Nonoperative treatment of posterolateral knee injuries tends to yield poor results. In patients with chronic posterolateral knee injuries, failure to correct genu varus alignment will often result in failure of the posterolateral knee repair or reconstruction. Purpose: To prospectively assess the functional outcomes of patients with combined grade 3 posterolateral instability and genu varus alignment initially treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Twenty-one patients with combined chronic posterolateral corner deficiency and genu varus alignment were initially treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy and observed prospectively. Second-stage ligamentous reconstruction was performed in patients with continued clinical and functional instability after the osteotomies had healed and they had undergone at least 3 months of rehabilitation. Results: At a mean follow-up of 37 months, 8 of 21 patients (38%) had sufficient improvement in knee function that a subsequent posterolateral corner reconstruction was not necessary. There was a significant difference in coronal alignment between the preoperative and postoperative mechanical axis action point. There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative posterior tibial slope. Thirteen patients underwent a second-stage ligament reconstruction at an average of 13.8 months after the initial osteotomy procedure. Final postoperative Cincinnati Knee Rating System scores were significantly lower for those patients who required a subsequent posterolateral corner reconstruction than for those patients who did not have a reconstruction. The P value for the preoperative differences between groups was not significant ( P = .11). Seven of 9 patients with high-velocity knee injuries required a second-stage reconstruction. Ten of 14 patients (71%) with multiligament knee injuries required a posterolateral corner reconstruction. In contrast, 4 of 6 patients (67%) with an isolated posterolateral corner injury did not require a second-stage ligament reconstruction. Conclusion: Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy can be an effective first method of treatment for patients with chronic combined posterolateral knee injuries and genu varus alignment. Patients with low-velocity knee injuries and isolated chronic posterolateral knee injuries may not require a second-stage soft tissue ligament reconstr
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0363546507304717
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1908233584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1908233584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1074-ad21df7a845717a1f9cf602c75bd1edf42523db7f1ec4757e16a690233bcfdad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkL1PwzAQxS0EouVjZ7TEwBSwYztORlS-Kiq1Q4ExcpJz4yq1i50IOvGv41KWe8P73Tu9Q-iKkltKpbwjLGOCZ4JIRrik8giNqRBpwlgmjtF4byd7f4TOQlgTQqjM8lM0irspJ0U2Rj8L777NRnV4aSoTZb4Fa-wKf0CzAjwPPbjebXZYBdy3gKfW9Hts6UH1G7A91s7jSeudNTVeuMh716k4IzRx3oLHD6BNbcDWO2zsX8q78kPArxbgAp1o1QW4_Ndz9Pb0uJy8JLP583RyP0tqSiRPVJPSRkuVcxFrKqqLWmckraWoGgqN5qlIWVNJTaHmUkigmcoKkjJW1bpRDTtH14fcrXefA4S-XLvB23iypAXJIyhyHqmbA9WaVftlPJQhvqbbDhUr1TowUVJa0pxz9gs5w3Fw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1908233584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proximal Tibial Opening Wedge Osteotomy as the Initial Treatment for Chronic Posterolateral Corner Deficiency in the Varus Knee</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Arthur, Andrew ; LaPrade, Robert F ; Agel, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Andrew ; LaPrade, Robert F ; Agel, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Nonoperative treatment of posterolateral knee injuries tends to yield poor results. In patients with chronic posterolateral knee injuries, failure to correct genu varus alignment will often result in failure of the posterolateral knee repair or reconstruction. Purpose: To prospectively assess the functional outcomes of patients with combined grade 3 posterolateral instability and genu varus alignment initially treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Twenty-one patients with combined chronic posterolateral corner deficiency and genu varus alignment were initially treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy and observed prospectively. Second-stage ligamentous reconstruction was performed in patients with continued clinical and functional instability after the osteotomies had healed and they had undergone at least 3 months of rehabilitation. Results: At a mean follow-up of 37 months, 8 of 21 patients (38%) had sufficient improvement in knee function that a subsequent posterolateral corner reconstruction was not necessary. There was a significant difference in coronal alignment between the preoperative and postoperative mechanical axis action point. There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative posterior tibial slope. Thirteen patients underwent a second-stage ligament reconstruction at an average of 13.8 months after the initial osteotomy procedure. Final postoperative Cincinnati Knee Rating System scores were significantly lower for those patients who required a subsequent posterolateral corner reconstruction than for those patients who did not have a reconstruction. The P value for the preoperative differences between groups was not significant ( P = .11). Seven of 9 patients with high-velocity knee injuries required a second-stage reconstruction. Ten of 14 patients (71%) with multiligament knee injuries required a posterolateral corner reconstruction. In contrast, 4 of 6 patients (67%) with an isolated posterolateral corner injury did not require a second-stage ligament reconstruction. Conclusion: Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy can be an effective first method of treatment for patients with chronic combined posterolateral knee injuries and genu varus alignment. Patients with low-velocity knee injuries and isolated chronic posterolateral knee injuries may not require a second-stage soft tissue ligament reconstruction after healing the osteotomy and undergoing a program of rehabilitation. Keywords: posterolateral knee genu varus proximal tibial osteotomy</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0363546507304717</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17724096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</publisher><subject>Knee ; Ligaments ; Orthopedics ; Sports injuries ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 2007-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1844</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Nov 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1074-ad21df7a845717a1f9cf602c75bd1edf42523db7f1ec4757e16a690233bcfdad3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPrade, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agel, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>Proximal Tibial Opening Wedge Osteotomy as the Initial Treatment for Chronic Posterolateral Corner Deficiency in the Varus Knee</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><description>Background: Nonoperative treatment of posterolateral knee injuries tends to yield poor results. In patients with chronic posterolateral knee injuries, failure to correct genu varus alignment will often result in failure of the posterolateral knee repair or reconstruction. Purpose: To prospectively assess the functional outcomes of patients with combined grade 3 posterolateral instability and genu varus alignment initially treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Twenty-one patients with combined chronic posterolateral corner deficiency and genu varus alignment were initially treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy and observed prospectively. Second-stage ligamentous reconstruction was performed in patients with continued clinical and functional instability after the osteotomies had healed and they had undergone at least 3 months of rehabilitation. Results: At a mean follow-up of 37 months, 8 of 21 patients (38%) had sufficient improvement in knee function that a subsequent posterolateral corner reconstruction was not necessary. There was a significant difference in coronal alignment between the preoperative and postoperative mechanical axis action point. There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative posterior tibial slope. Thirteen patients underwent a second-stage ligament reconstruction at an average of 13.8 months after the initial osteotomy procedure. Final postoperative Cincinnati Knee Rating System scores were significantly lower for those patients who required a subsequent posterolateral corner reconstruction than for those patients who did not have a reconstruction. The P value for the preoperative differences between groups was not significant ( P = .11). Seven of 9 patients with high-velocity knee injuries required a second-stage reconstruction. Ten of 14 patients (71%) with multiligament knee injuries required a posterolateral corner reconstruction. In contrast, 4 of 6 patients (67%) with an isolated posterolateral corner injury did not require a second-stage ligament reconstruction. Conclusion: Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy can be an effective first method of treatment for patients with chronic combined posterolateral knee injuries and genu varus alignment. Patients with low-velocity knee injuries and isolated chronic posterolateral knee injuries may not require a second-stage soft tissue ligament reconstruction after healing the osteotomy and undergoing a program of rehabilitation. Keywords: posterolateral knee genu varus proximal tibial osteotomy</description><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Sports injuries</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkL1PwzAQxS0EouVjZ7TEwBSwYztORlS-Kiq1Q4ExcpJz4yq1i50IOvGv41KWe8P73Tu9Q-iKkltKpbwjLGOCZ4JIRrik8giNqRBpwlgmjtF4byd7f4TOQlgTQqjM8lM0irspJ0U2Rj8L777NRnV4aSoTZb4Fa-wKf0CzAjwPPbjebXZYBdy3gKfW9Hts6UH1G7A91s7jSeudNTVeuMh716k4IzRx3oLHD6BNbcDWO2zsX8q78kPArxbgAp1o1QW4_Ndz9Pb0uJy8JLP583RyP0tqSiRPVJPSRkuVcxFrKqqLWmckraWoGgqN5qlIWVNJTaHmUkigmcoKkjJW1bpRDTtH14fcrXefA4S-XLvB23iypAXJIyhyHqmbA9WaVftlPJQhvqbbDhUr1TowUVJa0pxz9gs5w3Fw</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Arthur, Andrew</creator><creator>LaPrade, Robert F</creator><creator>Agel, Julie</creator><general>American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Proximal Tibial Opening Wedge Osteotomy as the Initial Treatment for Chronic Posterolateral Corner Deficiency in the Varus Knee</title><author>Arthur, Andrew ; LaPrade, Robert F ; Agel, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1074-ad21df7a845717a1f9cf602c75bd1edf42523db7f1ec4757e16a690233bcfdad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Sports injuries</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arthur, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPrade, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agel, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arthur, Andrew</au><au>LaPrade, Robert F</au><au>Agel, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proximal Tibial Opening Wedge Osteotomy as the Initial Treatment for Chronic Posterolateral Corner Deficiency in the Varus Knee</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1844</spage><pages>1844-</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>Background: Nonoperative treatment of posterolateral knee injuries tends to yield poor results. In patients with chronic posterolateral knee injuries, failure to correct genu varus alignment will often result in failure of the posterolateral knee repair or reconstruction. Purpose: To prospectively assess the functional outcomes of patients with combined grade 3 posterolateral instability and genu varus alignment initially treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy. Study Design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Twenty-one patients with combined chronic posterolateral corner deficiency and genu varus alignment were initially treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy and observed prospectively. Second-stage ligamentous reconstruction was performed in patients with continued clinical and functional instability after the osteotomies had healed and they had undergone at least 3 months of rehabilitation. Results: At a mean follow-up of 37 months, 8 of 21 patients (38%) had sufficient improvement in knee function that a subsequent posterolateral corner reconstruction was not necessary. There was a significant difference in coronal alignment between the preoperative and postoperative mechanical axis action point. There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative posterior tibial slope. Thirteen patients underwent a second-stage ligament reconstruction at an average of 13.8 months after the initial osteotomy procedure. Final postoperative Cincinnati Knee Rating System scores were significantly lower for those patients who required a subsequent posterolateral corner reconstruction than for those patients who did not have a reconstruction. The P value for the preoperative differences between groups was not significant ( P = .11). Seven of 9 patients with high-velocity knee injuries required a second-stage reconstruction. Ten of 14 patients (71%) with multiligament knee injuries required a posterolateral corner reconstruction. In contrast, 4 of 6 patients (67%) with an isolated posterolateral corner injury did not require a second-stage ligament reconstruction. Conclusion: Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy can be an effective first method of treatment for patients with chronic combined posterolateral knee injuries and genu varus alignment. Patients with low-velocity knee injuries and isolated chronic posterolateral knee injuries may not require a second-stage soft tissue ligament reconstruction after healing the osteotomy and undergoing a program of rehabilitation. Keywords: posterolateral knee genu varus proximal tibial osteotomy</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</pub><pmid>17724096</pmid><doi>10.1177/0363546507304717</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 2007-11, Vol.35 (11), p.1844
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1908233584
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Knee
Ligaments
Orthopedics
Sports injuries
Sports medicine
title Proximal Tibial Opening Wedge Osteotomy as the Initial Treatment for Chronic Posterolateral Corner Deficiency in the Varus Knee
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A01%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proximal%20Tibial%20Opening%20Wedge%20Osteotomy%20as%20the%20Initial%20Treatment%20for%20Chronic%20Posterolateral%20Corner%20Deficiency%20in%20the%20Varus%20Knee&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Arthur,%20Andrew&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1844&rft.pages=1844-&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0363546507304717&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_highw%3E1908233584%3C/proquest_highw%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1908233584&rft_id=info:pmid/17724096&rfr_iscdi=true