Leadership Process Models: A Review and Synthesis

In organizational research, studying “processes” is important for uncovering and understanding the underlying causal mechanisms in a predictor-mediator-outcome logic. Processes answer “how” and “why” questions and provide more complete explanations about phenomena. Our focus in this review is on stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of management 2017-07, Vol.43 (6), p.1726-1753
Hauptverfasser: Fischer, Thomas, Dietz, Joerg, Antonakis, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1753
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1726
container_title Journal of management
container_volume 43
creator Fischer, Thomas
Dietz, Joerg
Antonakis, John
description In organizational research, studying “processes” is important for uncovering and understanding the underlying causal mechanisms in a predictor-mediator-outcome logic. Processes answer “how” and “why” questions and provide more complete explanations about phenomena. Our focus in this review is on studies of leadership processes, which we systematically analyze to report on the state of the science. In doing so, we present a two-dimensional target-centric taxonomy to integrate previous research: The taxonomy distinguishes the target’s level (i.e., individual follower, team, organizational, and extraorganizational) as well as the type of leadership processes that affect either the target’s development or leverage of resources. Our review indicates that the predominantly studied leadership “meta” process model looks at the effect of leader traits or behaviors on performance-related outcomes through cognitive, affective, or behavioral leveraging factors. This “meta” model points to several important and understudied processes, including a leader’s influence on the target’s development or work context. We also identify two largely overlooked yet critical issues for leadership process research: modeling the role of time and that of multiple processes through which leadership effects manifest themselves in organizations. Using our taxonomy, we provide several reflection points that can guide the development of genuine and thoughtful leadership process theories. We conclude by urging future leadership process research to embrace multiprocess, multilevel, and time-sensitive models.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0149206316682830
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1907485135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0149206316682830</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1907485135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3bf37e66cfdf09abe0a28a7812b0cefc66e79bde9203122363cb07e5e631dabe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Pg0AQxTdGE7F690jiGZ3ZhV3w1jR-JRiNH2eyLIOlqYA7VNP_Xho8GBNPc3i_92bmCXGKcI5ozAVgnEnQCrVOZapgTwSYJCZCibgvgp0c7fRDccS8AgBMIQ4E5mQr8rxs-vDRd46Yw_uuojVfhvPwiT4b-gptW4XP23ZYEjd8LA5qu2Y6-Zkz8Xp99bK4jfKHm7vFPI9cDMkQqbJWhrR2dVVDZksCK1NrUpQlOKqd1mSysqLxaIVSKq1cCYYSGl-oRlzNxNmU2_vuY0M8FKtu49txZYEZmDhNUCUjBRPlfMfsqS5637xbvy0Qil0xxd9iRks0Wdi-0a_Q__hvI5lg_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1907485135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leadership Process Models: A Review and Synthesis</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Fischer, Thomas ; Dietz, Joerg ; Antonakis, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Thomas ; Dietz, Joerg ; Antonakis, John</creatorcontrib><description>In organizational research, studying “processes” is important for uncovering and understanding the underlying causal mechanisms in a predictor-mediator-outcome logic. Processes answer “how” and “why” questions and provide more complete explanations about phenomena. Our focus in this review is on studies of leadership processes, which we systematically analyze to report on the state of the science. In doing so, we present a two-dimensional target-centric taxonomy to integrate previous research: The taxonomy distinguishes the target’s level (i.e., individual follower, team, organizational, and extraorganizational) as well as the type of leadership processes that affect either the target’s development or leverage of resources. Our review indicates that the predominantly studied leadership “meta” process model looks at the effect of leader traits or behaviors on performance-related outcomes through cognitive, affective, or behavioral leveraging factors. This “meta” model points to several important and understudied processes, including a leader’s influence on the target’s development or work context. We also identify two largely overlooked yet critical issues for leadership process research: modeling the role of time and that of multiple processes through which leadership effects manifest themselves in organizations. Using our taxonomy, we provide several reflection points that can guide the development of genuine and thoughtful leadership process theories. We conclude by urging future leadership process research to embrace multiprocess, multilevel, and time-sensitive models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-1211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0149206316682830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Causality ; Classification ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Leadership ; Leverage ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational research ; Taxonomy ; Teams</subject><ispartof>Journal of management, 2017-07, Vol.43 (6), p.1726-1753</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3bf37e66cfdf09abe0a28a7812b0cefc66e79bde9203122363cb07e5e631dabe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3bf37e66cfdf09abe0a28a7812b0cefc66e79bde9203122363cb07e5e631dabe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0149206316682830$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206316682830$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonakis, John</creatorcontrib><title>Leadership Process Models: A Review and Synthesis</title><title>Journal of management</title><description>In organizational research, studying “processes” is important for uncovering and understanding the underlying causal mechanisms in a predictor-mediator-outcome logic. Processes answer “how” and “why” questions and provide more complete explanations about phenomena. Our focus in this review is on studies of leadership processes, which we systematically analyze to report on the state of the science. In doing so, we present a two-dimensional target-centric taxonomy to integrate previous research: The taxonomy distinguishes the target’s level (i.e., individual follower, team, organizational, and extraorganizational) as well as the type of leadership processes that affect either the target’s development or leverage of resources. Our review indicates that the predominantly studied leadership “meta” process model looks at the effect of leader traits or behaviors on performance-related outcomes through cognitive, affective, or behavioral leveraging factors. This “meta” model points to several important and understudied processes, including a leader’s influence on the target’s development or work context. We also identify two largely overlooked yet critical issues for leadership process research: modeling the role of time and that of multiple processes through which leadership effects manifest themselves in organizations. Using our taxonomy, we provide several reflection points that can guide the development of genuine and thoughtful leadership process theories. We conclude by urging future leadership process research to embrace multiprocess, multilevel, and time-sensitive models.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Leverage</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational research</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>0149-2063</issn><issn>1557-1211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1Pg0AQxTdGE7F690jiGZ3ZhV3w1jR-JRiNH2eyLIOlqYA7VNP_Xho8GBNPc3i_92bmCXGKcI5ozAVgnEnQCrVOZapgTwSYJCZCibgvgp0c7fRDccS8AgBMIQ4E5mQr8rxs-vDRd46Yw_uuojVfhvPwiT4b-gptW4XP23ZYEjd8LA5qu2Y6-Zkz8Xp99bK4jfKHm7vFPI9cDMkQqbJWhrR2dVVDZksCK1NrUpQlOKqd1mSysqLxaIVSKq1cCYYSGl-oRlzNxNmU2_vuY0M8FKtu49txZYEZmDhNUCUjBRPlfMfsqS5637xbvy0Qil0xxd9iRks0Wdi-0a_Q__hvI5lg_A</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Fischer, Thomas</creator><creator>Dietz, Joerg</creator><creator>Antonakis, John</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Leadership Process Models: A Review and Synthesis</title><author>Fischer, Thomas ; Dietz, Joerg ; Antonakis, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3bf37e66cfdf09abe0a28a7812b0cefc66e79bde9203122363cb07e5e631dabe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Leverage</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational research</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonakis, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer, Thomas</au><au>Dietz, Joerg</au><au>Antonakis, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leadership Process Models: A Review and Synthesis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management</jtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1726</spage><epage>1753</epage><pages>1726-1753</pages><issn>0149-2063</issn><eissn>1557-1211</eissn><abstract>In organizational research, studying “processes” is important for uncovering and understanding the underlying causal mechanisms in a predictor-mediator-outcome logic. Processes answer “how” and “why” questions and provide more complete explanations about phenomena. Our focus in this review is on studies of leadership processes, which we systematically analyze to report on the state of the science. In doing so, we present a two-dimensional target-centric taxonomy to integrate previous research: The taxonomy distinguishes the target’s level (i.e., individual follower, team, organizational, and extraorganizational) as well as the type of leadership processes that affect either the target’s development or leverage of resources. Our review indicates that the predominantly studied leadership “meta” process model looks at the effect of leader traits or behaviors on performance-related outcomes through cognitive, affective, or behavioral leveraging factors. This “meta” model points to several important and understudied processes, including a leader’s influence on the target’s development or work context. We also identify two largely overlooked yet critical issues for leadership process research: modeling the role of time and that of multiple processes through which leadership effects manifest themselves in organizations. Using our taxonomy, we provide several reflection points that can guide the development of genuine and thoughtful leadership process theories. We conclude by urging future leadership process research to embrace multiprocess, multilevel, and time-sensitive models.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0149206316682830</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2063
ispartof Journal of management, 2017-07, Vol.43 (6), p.1726-1753
issn 0149-2063
1557-1211
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1907485135
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Causality
Classification
Cognitive-behavioral factors
Leadership
Leverage
Organizational behavior
Organizational research
Taxonomy
Teams
title Leadership Process Models: A Review and Synthesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T17%3A43%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leadership%20Process%20Models:%20A%20Review%20and%20Synthesis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Fischer,%20Thomas&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1726&rft.epage=1753&rft.pages=1726-1753&rft.issn=0149-2063&rft.eissn=1557-1211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0149206316682830&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1907485135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1907485135&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0149206316682830&rfr_iscdi=true