On optimal group claims at voting in a stochastic environment
There is a paradox in the model of social dynamics determined by voting in a stochastic environment (the ViSE model) called “pit of losses.” It consists in the fact that a series of democratic decisions may systematically lead the society to the states unacceptable for all the voters. The paper exam...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Automation and remote control 2017-06, Vol.78 (6), p.1087-1100 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1100 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1087 |
| container_title | Automation and remote control |
| container_volume | 78 |
| creator | Malyshev, V. A. Chebotarev, P. Yu |
| description | There is a paradox in the model of social dynamics determined by voting in a stochastic environment (the ViSE model) called “pit of losses.” It consists in the fact that a series of democratic decisions may systematically lead the society to the states unacceptable for all the voters. The paper examines how this paradox can be neutralized by the presence in society of a group that votes for its benefit and can regulate the threshold of its claims. We obtain and analyze analytical results characterizing the welfare of the whole society, the group, and the other participants as functions of the said claims threshold. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1134/S0005117917060091 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1907343625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1907343625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-eb6e207adcca2e58539363b5415531f9c0279c459970441b40b6edd4cf0d3cab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_wF3A9ei9uclMs3AhxRcUulDXQyaTqVPaZEzSgv_eKXUhiKu7OOc7h3sYu0K4QSR5-woACrHSWEEJoPGITbCEaUFA4phN9nKx10_ZWUorAEQQNGF3C8_DkPuNWfNlDNuB27XpN4mbzHch937Je88NTznYD5Nyb7nzuz4Gv3E-X7CTzqyTu_y55-z98eFt9lzMF08vs_t5YQnLXLimdAIq01prhFNTRZpKapREpQg7bUFU2kqldQVSYiNhBNpW2g5asqahc3Z9yB1i-Ny6lOtV2EY_VtaooSJJpVCjCw8uG0NK0XX1EMfH4leNUO9Xqv-sNDLiwKTR65cu_kr-F_oGrytnug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1907343625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On optimal group claims at voting in a stochastic environment</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Malyshev, V. A. ; Chebotarev, P. Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Malyshev, V. A. ; Chebotarev, P. Yu</creatorcontrib><description>There is a paradox in the model of social dynamics determined by voting in a stochastic environment (the ViSE model) called “pit of losses.” It consists in the fact that a series of democratic decisions may systematically lead the society to the states unacceptable for all the voters. The paper examines how this paradox can be neutralized by the presence in society of a group that votes for its benefit and can regulate the threshold of its claims. We obtain and analyze analytical results characterizing the welfare of the whole society, the group, and the other participants as functions of the said claims threshold.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-1179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1608-3032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0005117917060091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>CAE) and Design ; Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Control ; Data Analysis ; Decisions ; Dynamics ; Intellectual Control Systems ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Mathematics ; Mathematics and Statistics ; Mechanical Engineering ; Mechatronics ; Optimization ; Probability theory ; Robotics ; Series (mathematics) ; Society ; Systems Theory ; Voters ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Automation and remote control, 2017-06, Vol.78 (6), p.1087-1100</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-eb6e207adcca2e58539363b5415531f9c0279c459970441b40b6edd4cf0d3cab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-eb6e207adcca2e58539363b5415531f9c0279c459970441b40b6edd4cf0d3cab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S0005117917060091$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1134/S0005117917060091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malyshev, V. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chebotarev, P. Yu</creatorcontrib><title>On optimal group claims at voting in a stochastic environment</title><title>Automation and remote control</title><addtitle>Autom Remote Control</addtitle><description>There is a paradox in the model of social dynamics determined by voting in a stochastic environment (the ViSE model) called “pit of losses.” It consists in the fact that a series of democratic decisions may systematically lead the society to the states unacceptable for all the voters. The paper examines how this paradox can be neutralized by the presence in society of a group that votes for its benefit and can regulate the threshold of its claims. We obtain and analyze analytical results characterizing the welfare of the whole society, the group, and the other participants as functions of the said claims threshold.</description><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Intellectual Control Systems</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics and Statistics</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Series (mathematics)</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Systems Theory</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0005-1179</issn><issn>1608-3032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_wF3A9ei9uclMs3AhxRcUulDXQyaTqVPaZEzSgv_eKXUhiKu7OOc7h3sYu0K4QSR5-woACrHSWEEJoPGITbCEaUFA4phN9nKx10_ZWUorAEQQNGF3C8_DkPuNWfNlDNuB27XpN4mbzHch937Je88NTznYD5Nyb7nzuz4Gv3E-X7CTzqyTu_y55-z98eFt9lzMF08vs_t5YQnLXLimdAIq01prhFNTRZpKapREpQg7bUFU2kqldQVSYiNhBNpW2g5asqahc3Z9yB1i-Ny6lOtV2EY_VtaooSJJpVCjCw8uG0NK0XX1EMfH4leNUO9Xqv-sNDLiwKTR65cu_kr-F_oGrytnug</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Malyshev, V. A.</creator><creator>Chebotarev, P. Yu</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>On optimal group claims at voting in a stochastic environment</title><author>Malyshev, V. A. ; Chebotarev, P. Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-eb6e207adcca2e58539363b5415531f9c0279c459970441b40b6edd4cf0d3cab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Intellectual Control Systems</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics and Statistics</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Series (mathematics)</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Systems Theory</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malyshev, V. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chebotarev, P. Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Automation and remote control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malyshev, V. A.</au><au>Chebotarev, P. Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On optimal group claims at voting in a stochastic environment</atitle><jtitle>Automation and remote control</jtitle><stitle>Autom Remote Control</stitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1100</epage><pages>1087-1100</pages><issn>0005-1179</issn><eissn>1608-3032</eissn><abstract>There is a paradox in the model of social dynamics determined by voting in a stochastic environment (the ViSE model) called “pit of losses.” It consists in the fact that a series of democratic decisions may systematically lead the society to the states unacceptable for all the voters. The paper examines how this paradox can be neutralized by the presence in society of a group that votes for its benefit and can regulate the threshold of its claims. We obtain and analyze analytical results characterizing the welfare of the whole society, the group, and the other participants as functions of the said claims threshold.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0005117917060091</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0005-1179 |
| ispartof | Automation and remote control, 2017-06, Vol.78 (6), p.1087-1100 |
| issn | 0005-1179 1608-3032 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1907343625 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | CAE) and Design Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Optimization Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD Control Data Analysis Decisions Dynamics Intellectual Control Systems Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Mathematics Mathematics and Statistics Mechanical Engineering Mechatronics Optimization Probability theory Robotics Series (mathematics) Society Systems Theory Voters Voting |
| title | On optimal group claims at voting in a stochastic environment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A53%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20optimal%20group%20claims%20at%20voting%20in%20a%20stochastic%20environment&rft.jtitle=Automation%20and%20remote%20control&rft.au=Malyshev,%20V.%20A.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1100&rft.pages=1087-1100&rft.issn=0005-1179&rft.eissn=1608-3032&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0005117917060091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1907343625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1907343625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |