Middle school nutrition knowledge tool development and evaluation in North Carolina

Purpose This study aims to develop and empirically assess an instrument for measuring nutrition knowledge aligned to the North Carolina (NC) Healthful Living Essential Standards for teaching nutrition. The instrument was critically evaluated and used to assess nutrition knowledge in Eastern NC stude...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrition and food science 2017-01, Vol.47 (3), p.332-345
Hauptverfasser: Hodges, Caroline, Roseno, Ashley, Duffrin, Melani W, Stage, Virginia C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 345
container_issue 3
container_start_page 332
container_title Nutrition and food science
container_volume 47
creator Hodges, Caroline
Roseno, Ashley
Duffrin, Melani W
Stage, Virginia C
description Purpose This study aims to develop and empirically assess an instrument for measuring nutrition knowledge aligned to the North Carolina (NC) Healthful Living Essential Standards for teaching nutrition. The instrument was critically evaluated and used to assess nutrition knowledge in Eastern NC students. Design/methodology/approach Researchers evaluated 250 students in 16, eighth-grade classrooms using a 22-question researcher-developed nutrition knowledge questionnaire. Assessment questions were aligned with NC Healthful Living Essential Standards, which suggest students should be able to: apply tools to plan healthy nutrition, create strategies to improve dietary intake, create plans for lifelong health, and evaluate health information and products. Survey reliability and validity (face) were evaluated prior to study implementation. Descriptive statistics for individual items, total and individual standard scores were analyzed. Instrument efficacy was evaluated using item-difficulty and discrimination indexes. Findings The survey displayed appropriate levels of item difficulty with three exceptions: two questions were identified as too difficult, and one as too easy. The majority of items also displayed acceptable (>0.20) or excellent (>0.40) discrimination (17 out of 20). Average total nutrition knowledge score was 11.82-3.26 (53.7 per cent). Within aligned standards, students scored highest in creating plans for lifelong health (79 per cent) and lowest in evaluating health information (37.6 per cent). Originality/value Study findings suggest eighth-grade students may only possess half the nutrition knowledge standards expected in the eighth grade. More instrument development is needed to supply researchers with standard means of assessing nutrition knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/NFS-06-2016-0079
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1907223604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2554350582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e0ef687b4ff6e461662ceeae035c34a13bf53fa709389401386f68fbe7ffc313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1v1DAQxS0EokvhzglF4tJL2nH8lVyQ0IpCpbYc2rvlTcZdF8de7GRR_3u83VK1Fac5zG-e5s0bQj5SOKYU2pPL06saZN0AlTWA6l6RBVWirWVH1WuyAGC8llJ0B-RdzrcAVDCq3pIDxpsOuBALcnXhhsFjlft1jL4K85Tc5GKofoX4x-Nwg9W0awy4RR83I4apMmGocGv8bO5JF6rLmKZ1tTQpehfMe_LGGp_xw0M9JNen366XP-rzn9_Pll_P655TNdUIaGWrVtxaiVxSKZse0SAw0TNuKFtZwaxR0LG240BZKwtvV6is7Rllh-TLXnYzr0Yc-rJaMl5vkhtNutPROP28E9xa38StbptyHiaLwNGDQIq_Z8yTHl3u0XsTMM5ZN0JwJkC0TUE_v0Bv45xCcadpB6ppmAReKNhTfYo5J7SPy1DQu8B0CUyD1LvA9C6wMvLpqYnHgX8JFeBkD-CIxcTwP8lnP8D-AslPoIk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1907223604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Middle school nutrition knowledge tool development and evaluation in North Carolina</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Hodges, Caroline ; Roseno, Ashley ; Duffrin, Melani W ; Stage, Virginia C</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Caroline ; Roseno, Ashley ; Duffrin, Melani W ; Stage, Virginia C</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study aims to develop and empirically assess an instrument for measuring nutrition knowledge aligned to the North Carolina (NC) Healthful Living Essential Standards for teaching nutrition. The instrument was critically evaluated and used to assess nutrition knowledge in Eastern NC students. Design/methodology/approach Researchers evaluated 250 students in 16, eighth-grade classrooms using a 22-question researcher-developed nutrition knowledge questionnaire. Assessment questions were aligned with NC Healthful Living Essential Standards, which suggest students should be able to: apply tools to plan healthy nutrition, create strategies to improve dietary intake, create plans for lifelong health, and evaluate health information and products. Survey reliability and validity (face) were evaluated prior to study implementation. Descriptive statistics for individual items, total and individual standard scores were analyzed. Instrument efficacy was evaluated using item-difficulty and discrimination indexes. Findings The survey displayed appropriate levels of item difficulty with three exceptions: two questions were identified as too difficult, and one as too easy. The majority of items also displayed acceptable (&gt;0.20) or excellent (&gt;0.40) discrimination (17 out of 20). Average total nutrition knowledge score was 11.82-3.26 (53.7 per cent). Within aligned standards, students scored highest in creating plans for lifelong health (79 per cent) and lowest in evaluating health information (37.6 per cent). Originality/value Study findings suggest eighth-grade students may only possess half the nutrition knowledge standards expected in the eighth grade. More instrument development is needed to supply researchers with standard means of assessing nutrition knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/NFS-06-2016-0079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34290455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Alignment ; Chronic illnesses ; Classrooms ; Diet ; Dietary intake ; Dietitians ; Discrimination ; Effectiveness ; Health ; Measuring instruments ; Middle schools ; Nutrition ; Obesity ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Quality ; Reliability analysis ; Statistics ; Students ; Studies ; Teenagers ; Truth in advertising</subject><ispartof>Nutrition and food science, 2017-01, Vol.47 (3), p.332-345</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e0ef687b4ff6e461662ceeae035c34a13bf53fa709389401386f68fbe7ffc313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/NFS-06-2016-0079/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,967,11635,27924,27925,52689</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roseno, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffrin, Melani W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stage, Virginia C</creatorcontrib><title>Middle school nutrition knowledge tool development and evaluation in North Carolina</title><title>Nutrition and food science</title><addtitle>Nutr Food Sci</addtitle><description>Purpose This study aims to develop and empirically assess an instrument for measuring nutrition knowledge aligned to the North Carolina (NC) Healthful Living Essential Standards for teaching nutrition. The instrument was critically evaluated and used to assess nutrition knowledge in Eastern NC students. Design/methodology/approach Researchers evaluated 250 students in 16, eighth-grade classrooms using a 22-question researcher-developed nutrition knowledge questionnaire. Assessment questions were aligned with NC Healthful Living Essential Standards, which suggest students should be able to: apply tools to plan healthy nutrition, create strategies to improve dietary intake, create plans for lifelong health, and evaluate health information and products. Survey reliability and validity (face) were evaluated prior to study implementation. Descriptive statistics for individual items, total and individual standard scores were analyzed. Instrument efficacy was evaluated using item-difficulty and discrimination indexes. Findings The survey displayed appropriate levels of item difficulty with three exceptions: two questions were identified as too difficult, and one as too easy. The majority of items also displayed acceptable (&gt;0.20) or excellent (&gt;0.40) discrimination (17 out of 20). Average total nutrition knowledge score was 11.82-3.26 (53.7 per cent). Within aligned standards, students scored highest in creating plans for lifelong health (79 per cent) and lowest in evaluating health information (37.6 per cent). Originality/value Study findings suggest eighth-grade students may only possess half the nutrition knowledge standards expected in the eighth grade. More instrument development is needed to supply researchers with standard means of assessing nutrition knowledge.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Dietitians</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Middle schools</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Truth in advertising</subject><issn>0034-6659</issn><issn>1758-6917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1v1DAQxS0EokvhzglF4tJL2nH8lVyQ0IpCpbYc2rvlTcZdF8de7GRR_3u83VK1Fac5zG-e5s0bQj5SOKYU2pPL06saZN0AlTWA6l6RBVWirWVH1WuyAGC8llJ0B-RdzrcAVDCq3pIDxpsOuBALcnXhhsFjlft1jL4K85Tc5GKofoX4x-Nwg9W0awy4RR83I4apMmGocGv8bO5JF6rLmKZ1tTQpehfMe_LGGp_xw0M9JNen366XP-rzn9_Pll_P655TNdUIaGWrVtxaiVxSKZse0SAw0TNuKFtZwaxR0LG240BZKwtvV6is7Rllh-TLXnYzr0Yc-rJaMl5vkhtNutPROP28E9xa38StbptyHiaLwNGDQIq_Z8yTHl3u0XsTMM5ZN0JwJkC0TUE_v0Bv45xCcadpB6ppmAReKNhTfYo5J7SPy1DQu8B0CUyD1LvA9C6wMvLpqYnHgX8JFeBkD-CIxcTwP8lnP8D-AslPoIk</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Hodges, Caroline</creator><creator>Roseno, Ashley</creator><creator>Duffrin, Melani W</creator><creator>Stage, Virginia C</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Middle school nutrition knowledge tool development and evaluation in North Carolina</title><author>Hodges, Caroline ; Roseno, Ashley ; Duffrin, Melani W ; Stage, Virginia C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-e0ef687b4ff6e461662ceeae035c34a13bf53fa709389401386f68fbe7ffc313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Dietitians</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Middle schools</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Truth in advertising</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roseno, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffrin, Melani W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stage, Virginia C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nutrition and food science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodges, Caroline</au><au>Roseno, Ashley</au><au>Duffrin, Melani W</au><au>Stage, Virginia C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Middle school nutrition knowledge tool development and evaluation in North Carolina</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition and food science</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Food Sci</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>345</epage><pages>332-345</pages><issn>0034-6659</issn><eissn>1758-6917</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study aims to develop and empirically assess an instrument for measuring nutrition knowledge aligned to the North Carolina (NC) Healthful Living Essential Standards for teaching nutrition. The instrument was critically evaluated and used to assess nutrition knowledge in Eastern NC students. Design/methodology/approach Researchers evaluated 250 students in 16, eighth-grade classrooms using a 22-question researcher-developed nutrition knowledge questionnaire. Assessment questions were aligned with NC Healthful Living Essential Standards, which suggest students should be able to: apply tools to plan healthy nutrition, create strategies to improve dietary intake, create plans for lifelong health, and evaluate health information and products. Survey reliability and validity (face) were evaluated prior to study implementation. Descriptive statistics for individual items, total and individual standard scores were analyzed. Instrument efficacy was evaluated using item-difficulty and discrimination indexes. Findings The survey displayed appropriate levels of item difficulty with three exceptions: two questions were identified as too difficult, and one as too easy. The majority of items also displayed acceptable (&gt;0.20) or excellent (&gt;0.40) discrimination (17 out of 20). Average total nutrition knowledge score was 11.82-3.26 (53.7 per cent). Within aligned standards, students scored highest in creating plans for lifelong health (79 per cent) and lowest in evaluating health information (37.6 per cent). Originality/value Study findings suggest eighth-grade students may only possess half the nutrition knowledge standards expected in the eighth grade. More instrument development is needed to supply researchers with standard means of assessing nutrition knowledge.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><pmid>34290455</pmid><doi>10.1108/NFS-06-2016-0079</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6659
ispartof Nutrition and food science, 2017-01, Vol.47 (3), p.332-345
issn 0034-6659
1758-6917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1907223604
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Acceptability
Alignment
Chronic illnesses
Classrooms
Diet
Dietary intake
Dietitians
Discrimination
Effectiveness
Health
Measuring instruments
Middle schools
Nutrition
Obesity
Polls & surveys
Quality
Reliability analysis
Statistics
Students
Studies
Teenagers
Truth in advertising
title Middle school nutrition knowledge tool development and evaluation in North Carolina
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A41%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Middle%20school%20nutrition%20knowledge%20tool%20development%20and%20evaluation%20in%20North%20Carolina&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20and%20food%20science&rft.au=Hodges,%20Caroline&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=345&rft.pages=332-345&rft.issn=0034-6659&rft.eissn=1758-6917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/NFS-06-2016-0079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2554350582%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1907223604&rft_id=info:pmid/34290455&rfr_iscdi=true