On the relationship between the number of a broker’s real estate listings and transaction outcomes

This paper documents that sellers who employ brokerage offices that list a large number of properties (“active brokerages”) obtain higher selling prices, smaller negotiated discounts from the corresponding list prices, and shorter times on the market for their listed properties. Sellers who employ a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of quantitative finance and accounting 2017-07, Vol.49 (1), p.65-89
Hauptverfasser: Palmon, Oded, Sopranzetti, Ben J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 89
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Review of quantitative finance and accounting
container_volume 49
creator Palmon, Oded
Sopranzetti, Ben J.
description This paper documents that sellers who employ brokerage offices that list a large number of properties (“active brokerages”) obtain higher selling prices, smaller negotiated discounts from the corresponding list prices, and shorter times on the market for their listed properties. Sellers who employ active brokerages list their properties at prices that are closer to our hedonic model’s predicted prices. Interestingly, properties that are listed at discounts relative to their predicted prices are snapped up more quickly only if they are associated with brokerages that list a relatively small number of properties. In addition, properties listed by active brokerages are less likely to be listed “as is” and are more likely to have their defects repaired prior to being listed. Moreover, because the efficacy of brokerage services varies across brokerage offices, the results also suggest that the use of an indicator variable for the use of brokerage services is not sufficient to capture the complete impact of the use of a real estate broker on transaction outcomes. In addition, the Appendix discusses the concern for potential endogeneities between the number of brokerage listings and transaction outcomes. It documents that the Durban–Wu–Hausman test indicates that exogeneity cannot be rejected.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11156-016-0583-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1904732949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1904732949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-5c222f29a1cb537c35ff1761fab6f5e1f7f4faa1a9169e7e432e4b8ed75d37423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EEqXwAGyWmAO-dhzHI6r4kyp1AYnNcpLrNqVNiu0IwcRr8Ho8Ca7CwMJg3cHnfPfqI-Qc2CUwpq4CAMgiY5CeLEX2cUAmIJXIFCh9SCZM8zwrC_l8TE5CWDOWLCknpFl0NK6QetzY2PZdWLU7WmF8Qxw_umFboae9o5ZWvn9B__35FRJvNxRDtBHppg2x7ZaB2q6h0dsu2HqfRfsh1v0Wwyk5cnYT8Ox3TsnT7c3j7D6bL-4eZtfzrBYlxEzWnHPHtYW6kkLVQjoHqgBnq8JJBKdc7qwFq6HQqDAXHPOqxEbJRqiciym5GHN3vn8d0nVm3Q--SysNaJYrwXWuEwUjVfs-BI_O7Hy7tf7dADP7Ms1Ypkllmn2Z5iM5fHRCYrsl-j_J_0o_8jR6WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1904732949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the relationship between the number of a broker’s real estate listings and transaction outcomes</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Palmon, Oded ; Sopranzetti, Ben J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palmon, Oded ; Sopranzetti, Ben J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper documents that sellers who employ brokerage offices that list a large number of properties (“active brokerages”) obtain higher selling prices, smaller negotiated discounts from the corresponding list prices, and shorter times on the market for their listed properties. Sellers who employ active brokerages list their properties at prices that are closer to our hedonic model’s predicted prices. Interestingly, properties that are listed at discounts relative to their predicted prices are snapped up more quickly only if they are associated with brokerages that list a relatively small number of properties. In addition, properties listed by active brokerages are less likely to be listed “as is” and are more likely to have their defects repaired prior to being listed. Moreover, because the efficacy of brokerage services varies across brokerage offices, the results also suggest that the use of an indicator variable for the use of brokerage services is not sufficient to capture the complete impact of the use of a real estate broker on transaction outcomes. In addition, the Appendix discusses the concern for potential endogeneities between the number of brokerage listings and transaction outcomes. It documents that the Durban–Wu–Hausman test indicates that exogeneity cannot be rejected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-865X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7179</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11156-016-0583-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accounting/Auditing ; Brokerage ; Corporate Finance ; Discounts ; Econometrics ; Economics and Finance ; Efficacy ; Finance ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Original Research ; Prices ; Real estate ; Real estate agents &amp; brokers ; Real estate sales ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Review of quantitative finance and accounting, 2017-07, Vol.49 (1), p.65-89</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-5c222f29a1cb537c35ff1761fab6f5e1f7f4faa1a9169e7e432e4b8ed75d37423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-5c222f29a1cb537c35ff1761fab6f5e1f7f4faa1a9169e7e432e4b8ed75d37423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11156-016-0583-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11156-016-0583-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palmon, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopranzetti, Ben J.</creatorcontrib><title>On the relationship between the number of a broker’s real estate listings and transaction outcomes</title><title>Review of quantitative finance and accounting</title><addtitle>Rev Quant Finan Acc</addtitle><description>This paper documents that sellers who employ brokerage offices that list a large number of properties (“active brokerages”) obtain higher selling prices, smaller negotiated discounts from the corresponding list prices, and shorter times on the market for their listed properties. Sellers who employ active brokerages list their properties at prices that are closer to our hedonic model’s predicted prices. Interestingly, properties that are listed at discounts relative to their predicted prices are snapped up more quickly only if they are associated with brokerages that list a relatively small number of properties. In addition, properties listed by active brokerages are less likely to be listed “as is” and are more likely to have their defects repaired prior to being listed. Moreover, because the efficacy of brokerage services varies across brokerage offices, the results also suggest that the use of an indicator variable for the use of brokerage services is not sufficient to capture the complete impact of the use of a real estate broker on transaction outcomes. In addition, the Appendix discusses the concern for potential endogeneities between the number of brokerage listings and transaction outcomes. It documents that the Durban–Wu–Hausman test indicates that exogeneity cannot be rejected.</description><subject>Accounting/Auditing</subject><subject>Brokerage</subject><subject>Corporate Finance</subject><subject>Discounts</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Real estate agents &amp; brokers</subject><subject>Real estate sales</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0924-865X</issn><issn>1573-7179</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EEqXwAGyWmAO-dhzHI6r4kyp1AYnNcpLrNqVNiu0IwcRr8Ho8Ca7CwMJg3cHnfPfqI-Qc2CUwpq4CAMgiY5CeLEX2cUAmIJXIFCh9SCZM8zwrC_l8TE5CWDOWLCknpFl0NK6QetzY2PZdWLU7WmF8Qxw_umFboae9o5ZWvn9B__35FRJvNxRDtBHppg2x7ZaB2q6h0dsu2HqfRfsh1v0Wwyk5cnYT8Ox3TsnT7c3j7D6bL-4eZtfzrBYlxEzWnHPHtYW6kkLVQjoHqgBnq8JJBKdc7qwFq6HQqDAXHPOqxEbJRqiciym5GHN3vn8d0nVm3Q--SysNaJYrwXWuEwUjVfs-BI_O7Hy7tf7dADP7Ms1Ypkllmn2Z5iM5fHRCYrsl-j_J_0o_8jR6WA</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Palmon, Oded</creator><creator>Sopranzetti, Ben J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>On the relationship between the number of a broker’s real estate listings and transaction outcomes</title><author>Palmon, Oded ; Sopranzetti, Ben J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-5c222f29a1cb537c35ff1761fab6f5e1f7f4faa1a9169e7e432e4b8ed75d37423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accounting/Auditing</topic><topic>Brokerage</topic><topic>Corporate Finance</topic><topic>Discounts</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Real estate agents &amp; brokers</topic><topic>Real estate sales</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palmon, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopranzetti, Ben J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Review of quantitative finance and accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palmon, Oded</au><au>Sopranzetti, Ben J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the relationship between the number of a broker’s real estate listings and transaction outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Review of quantitative finance and accounting</jtitle><stitle>Rev Quant Finan Acc</stitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>65-89</pages><issn>0924-865X</issn><eissn>1573-7179</eissn><abstract>This paper documents that sellers who employ brokerage offices that list a large number of properties (“active brokerages”) obtain higher selling prices, smaller negotiated discounts from the corresponding list prices, and shorter times on the market for their listed properties. Sellers who employ active brokerages list their properties at prices that are closer to our hedonic model’s predicted prices. Interestingly, properties that are listed at discounts relative to their predicted prices are snapped up more quickly only if they are associated with brokerages that list a relatively small number of properties. In addition, properties listed by active brokerages are less likely to be listed “as is” and are more likely to have their defects repaired prior to being listed. Moreover, because the efficacy of brokerage services varies across brokerage offices, the results also suggest that the use of an indicator variable for the use of brokerage services is not sufficient to capture the complete impact of the use of a real estate broker on transaction outcomes. In addition, the Appendix discusses the concern for potential endogeneities between the number of brokerage listings and transaction outcomes. It documents that the Durban–Wu–Hausman test indicates that exogeneity cannot be rejected.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11156-016-0583-z</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-865X
ispartof Review of quantitative finance and accounting, 2017-07, Vol.49 (1), p.65-89
issn 0924-865X
1573-7179
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1904732949
source SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Accounting/Auditing
Brokerage
Corporate Finance
Discounts
Econometrics
Economics and Finance
Efficacy
Finance
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Original Research
Prices
Real estate
Real estate agents & brokers
Real estate sales
Studies
title On the relationship between the number of a broker’s real estate listings and transaction outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A36%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20relationship%20between%20the%20number%20of%20a%20broker%E2%80%99s%20real%20estate%20listings%20and%20transaction%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20quantitative%20finance%20and%20accounting&rft.au=Palmon,%20Oded&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=65-89&rft.issn=0924-865X&rft.eissn=1573-7179&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11156-016-0583-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1904732949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1904732949&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true