A black and white issue? Learning to see the intersectional and racialized dimensions of gynecological pain

Population-based data suggest that African-American and Latina women in the United States are equally or more likely to complain of vulvar pain than are their White counterparts, yet these two groups of women remain largely missing from published clinical studies. This essay describes a set of inter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social theory & health 2017-05, Vol.15 (2), p.160-181
1. Verfasser: Labuski, Christine M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 181
container_issue 2
container_start_page 160
container_title Social theory & health
container_volume 15
creator Labuski, Christine M.
description Population-based data suggest that African-American and Latina women in the United States are equally or more likely to complain of vulvar pain than are their White counterparts, yet these two groups of women remain largely missing from published clinical studies. This essay describes a set of interrelated variables that contribute to this discrepancy: (1) clinicians’ racialized perceptions of genital-sexual pain, and the diagnostic trajectories that map on to these perceptions; (2) discriminatory health-care practices that undertreat the pain of racial minorities; and (3) the stigmatized and “unmentionable” nature of genital pain, a condition for which up to half of symptomatic women do not seek treatment. I use the feminist theoretical concept of intersectionality to argue that racializing framing mechanisms intersect with well-documented discriminatory clinical practices and a gendered embarrassment unique to female genitalia, making it exceedingly difficult for Black and Latina women to report their vulvar pain to primarily White providers. I conclude by offering strategies by which all clinicians can better identify and treat the gynecological pain conditions of their Black and Latina patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/s41285-017-0027-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1904627562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4322645609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-bee5da2a06348ce490841a968f7fd405d545ecf3b1cb299aefdd6d3633c5169c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhhdRsFZ_gLeA59Ukm2R3T1KKX1DwouAtZJPZbdptUpMtUn-9qSvixdMMzPO-DE-WXRJ8TTAvbyIjtOI5JmWOMS1zdpRNCCvLvKL07fh3J-Q0O4txlRhWFWSSrWeo6ZVeI-UM-ljaAZCNcQe3aAEqOOs6NHgUAdCwTCc3QIigB-ud6r8zQWmrevsJBhm7ARfTKSLfom7vQPved1YndKusO89OWtVHuPiZ0-z1_u5l_pgvnh-e5rNFrgsihrwB4EZRhUXBKg2sxhUjqhZVW7aGYW4446DboiG6oXWtoDVGmEIUheZE1LqYZldj7zb49x3EQa78LqSHoyQ1ZoKWXNBEkZHSwccYoJXbYDcq7CXB8uBUjk5lcioPTiVLGTpmYmJdB-FP87-hL8a4euc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1904627562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A black and white issue? Learning to see the intersectional and racialized dimensions of gynecological pain</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Labuski, Christine M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Labuski, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><description>Population-based data suggest that African-American and Latina women in the United States are equally or more likely to complain of vulvar pain than are their White counterparts, yet these two groups of women remain largely missing from published clinical studies. This essay describes a set of interrelated variables that contribute to this discrepancy: (1) clinicians’ racialized perceptions of genital-sexual pain, and the diagnostic trajectories that map on to these perceptions; (2) discriminatory health-care practices that undertreat the pain of racial minorities; and (3) the stigmatized and “unmentionable” nature of genital pain, a condition for which up to half of symptomatic women do not seek treatment. I use the feminist theoretical concept of intersectionality to argue that racializing framing mechanisms intersect with well-documented discriminatory clinical practices and a gendered embarrassment unique to female genitalia, making it exceedingly difficult for Black and Latina women to report their vulvar pain to primarily White providers. I conclude by offering strategies by which all clinicians can better identify and treat the gynecological pain conditions of their Black and Latina patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-8211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-822X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41285-017-0027-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Embarrassment ; Females ; Feminism ; Feminist theory ; Frame analysis ; Genitalia ; Genitals ; Gynecology ; Health care ; Health services ; Help seeking behavior ; Hispanic Americans ; Intersectionality ; Latin American cultural groups ; Learning ; Medical Sociology ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Minority groups ; Original Article ; Pain ; Patients ; Perceptions ; Racialization ; Social Sciences ; Social Theory ; Sociology ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Social theory &amp; health, 2017-05, Vol.15 (2), p.160-181</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Palgrave Macmillan May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-bee5da2a06348ce490841a968f7fd405d545ecf3b1cb299aefdd6d3633c5169c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-bee5da2a06348ce490841a968f7fd405d545ecf3b1cb299aefdd6d3633c5169c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41285-017-0027-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41285-017-0027-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Labuski, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><title>A black and white issue? Learning to see the intersectional and racialized dimensions of gynecological pain</title><title>Social theory &amp; health</title><addtitle>Soc Theory Health</addtitle><description>Population-based data suggest that African-American and Latina women in the United States are equally or more likely to complain of vulvar pain than are their White counterparts, yet these two groups of women remain largely missing from published clinical studies. This essay describes a set of interrelated variables that contribute to this discrepancy: (1) clinicians’ racialized perceptions of genital-sexual pain, and the diagnostic trajectories that map on to these perceptions; (2) discriminatory health-care practices that undertreat the pain of racial minorities; and (3) the stigmatized and “unmentionable” nature of genital pain, a condition for which up to half of symptomatic women do not seek treatment. I use the feminist theoretical concept of intersectionality to argue that racializing framing mechanisms intersect with well-documented discriminatory clinical practices and a gendered embarrassment unique to female genitalia, making it exceedingly difficult for Black and Latina women to report their vulvar pain to primarily White providers. I conclude by offering strategies by which all clinicians can better identify and treat the gynecological pain conditions of their Black and Latina patients.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Embarrassment</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Feminist theory</subject><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Genitalia</subject><subject>Genitals</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Help seeking behavior</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans</subject><subject>Intersectionality</subject><subject>Latin American cultural groups</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical Sociology</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Racialization</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Theory</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1477-8211</issn><issn>1477-822X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhhdRsFZ_gLeA59Ukm2R3T1KKX1DwouAtZJPZbdptUpMtUn-9qSvixdMMzPO-DE-WXRJ8TTAvbyIjtOI5JmWOMS1zdpRNCCvLvKL07fh3J-Q0O4txlRhWFWSSrWeo6ZVeI-UM-ljaAZCNcQe3aAEqOOs6NHgUAdCwTCc3QIigB-ud6r8zQWmrevsJBhm7ARfTKSLfom7vQPved1YndKusO89OWtVHuPiZ0-z1_u5l_pgvnh-e5rNFrgsihrwB4EZRhUXBKg2sxhUjqhZVW7aGYW4446DboiG6oXWtoDVGmEIUheZE1LqYZldj7zb49x3EQa78LqSHoyQ1ZoKWXNBEkZHSwccYoJXbYDcq7CXB8uBUjk5lcioPTiVLGTpmYmJdB-FP87-hL8a4euc</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Labuski, Christine M.</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>A black and white issue? Learning to see the intersectional and racialized dimensions of gynecological pain</title><author>Labuski, Christine M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-bee5da2a06348ce490841a968f7fd405d545ecf3b1cb299aefdd6d3633c5169c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Embarrassment</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Feminist theory</topic><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Genitalia</topic><topic>Genitals</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Help seeking behavior</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans</topic><topic>Intersectionality</topic><topic>Latin American cultural groups</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical Sociology</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Racialization</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Theory</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Labuski, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social theory &amp; health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Labuski, Christine M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A black and white issue? Learning to see the intersectional and racialized dimensions of gynecological pain</atitle><jtitle>Social theory &amp; health</jtitle><stitle>Soc Theory Health</stitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>160-181</pages><issn>1477-8211</issn><eissn>1477-822X</eissn><abstract>Population-based data suggest that African-American and Latina women in the United States are equally or more likely to complain of vulvar pain than are their White counterparts, yet these two groups of women remain largely missing from published clinical studies. This essay describes a set of interrelated variables that contribute to this discrepancy: (1) clinicians’ racialized perceptions of genital-sexual pain, and the diagnostic trajectories that map on to these perceptions; (2) discriminatory health-care practices that undertreat the pain of racial minorities; and (3) the stigmatized and “unmentionable” nature of genital pain, a condition for which up to half of symptomatic women do not seek treatment. I use the feminist theoretical concept of intersectionality to argue that racializing framing mechanisms intersect with well-documented discriminatory clinical practices and a gendered embarrassment unique to female genitalia, making it exceedingly difficult for Black and Latina women to report their vulvar pain to primarily White providers. I conclude by offering strategies by which all clinicians can better identify and treat the gynecological pain conditions of their Black and Latina patients.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41285-017-0027-4</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-8211
ispartof Social theory & health, 2017-05, Vol.15 (2), p.160-181
issn 1477-8211
1477-822X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1904627562
source Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects African Americans
Embarrassment
Females
Feminism
Feminist theory
Frame analysis
Genitalia
Genitals
Gynecology
Health care
Health services
Help seeking behavior
Hispanic Americans
Intersectionality
Latin American cultural groups
Learning
Medical Sociology
Minority & ethnic groups
Minority groups
Original Article
Pain
Patients
Perceptions
Racialization
Social Sciences
Social Theory
Sociology
Women
Womens health
title A black and white issue? Learning to see the intersectional and racialized dimensions of gynecological pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T16%3A15%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20black%20and%20white%20issue?%20Learning%20to%20see%20the%20intersectional%20and%20racialized%20dimensions%20of%20gynecological%20pain&rft.jtitle=Social%20theory%20&%20health&rft.au=Labuski,%20Christine%20M.&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=160-181&rft.issn=1477-8211&rft.eissn=1477-822X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41285-017-0027-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4322645609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1904627562&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true