RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTRY AND COMPARATIVE EVALUATION BETWEEN THE OLD AND CURRENT FEDERAL FOREST CODE IN A PROPERTY

This study aimed to carry out the rural environmental registration and benchmarking between Law N o . 4771 of October 15, 1965 (old Forest Code) and Law N o . 12651 of May 25, 2012 (current Forest Code). The study area constitutes a property, located in the north of the Rio Grande do Sul state, ith...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ciência e natura 2017-05, Vol.39 (2), p.259
Hauptverfasser: Vanzetto, Guilherme Victor, Franciele Rosset de Quadros, Rovani, Ivan Luís, Vanderlei Secreti Decian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 259
container_title Ciência e natura
container_volume 39
creator Vanzetto, Guilherme Victor
Franciele Rosset de Quadros
Rovani, Ivan Luís
Vanderlei Secreti Decian
description This study aimed to carry out the rural environmental registration and benchmarking between Law N o . 4771 of October 15, 1965 (old Forest Code) and Law N o . 12651 of May 25, 2012 (current Forest Code). The study area constitutes a property, located in the north of the Rio Grande do Sul state, ith an area of 49.77 hectares, representing 2.48 tax modules. Identified were 14 classes of use and land cover, which were divided into two classes, the anthropic use and natural use. Use areas were found restricted in springs, river banks and plated for the two laws. Areas edge plated found to the old forestry code and areas of restricted use for the current forest code. The use of data crossing and land cover and PPAs showed some flexibility in relation to the current forest code which extinguishes 7.11 hectares in PPAs, 14.22% of the total area. In the property 3.91 hectares belonged to areas of anthropic use and 3.17 hectares of natural areas use. The application of the transitional rules and new concepts covered by Law N o . 12,651/12 may contribute to this effect.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1903495744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1903495744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19034957443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjE8LgkAUxJcoSKrv8KCzsKZpHrd8pqC78lqtTtHBDhL90fz-bdQHaC4zwwy_AbMWThDans8PQ2Zxh3N75fJgzGZd13Ajf-EHjmuxnkoSGaCsUlIyR6lNI9ymO01HEDKCjcoLQUKnFQJWIitNVBLWqPeIEnSCoLLoey2JDAFijPBDjRXhThtChJBKEFCQKpD0ccpGl_O1q2c_n7B5jHqT2I_2_uzr7nVq7n17M9PJCbnrhcvA89z_Xm-q8EMv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1903495744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTRY AND COMPARATIVE EVALUATION BETWEEN THE OLD AND CURRENT FEDERAL FOREST CODE IN A PROPERTY</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vanzetto, Guilherme Victor ; Franciele Rosset de Quadros ; Rovani, Ivan Luís ; Vanderlei Secreti Decian</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanzetto, Guilherme Victor ; Franciele Rosset de Quadros ; Rovani, Ivan Luís ; Vanderlei Secreti Decian</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to carry out the rural environmental registration and benchmarking between Law N o . 4771 of October 15, 1965 (old Forest Code) and Law N o . 12651 of May 25, 2012 (current Forest Code). The study area constitutes a property, located in the north of the Rio Grande do Sul state, ith an area of 49.77 hectares, representing 2.48 tax modules. Identified were 14 classes of use and land cover, which were divided into two classes, the anthropic use and natural use. Use areas were found restricted in springs, river banks and plated for the two laws. Areas edge plated found to the old forestry code and areas of restricted use for the current forest code. The use of data crossing and land cover and PPAs showed some flexibility in relation to the current forest code which extinguishes 7.11 hectares in PPAs, 14.22% of the total area. In the property 3.91 hectares belonged to areas of anthropic use and 3.17 hectares of natural areas use. The application of the transitional rules and new concepts covered by Law N o . 12,651/12 may contribute to this effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0100-8307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2179-460X</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas</publisher><subject>Data processing ; Environmental law ; Forestry ; Forests ; Land cover ; Modules ; River banks ; Rivers ; Rural areas ; Rural environments</subject><ispartof>Ciência e natura, 2017-05, Vol.39 (2), p.259</ispartof><rights>Copyright Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanzetto, Guilherme Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franciele Rosset de Quadros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovani, Ivan Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderlei Secreti Decian</creatorcontrib><title>RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTRY AND COMPARATIVE EVALUATION BETWEEN THE OLD AND CURRENT FEDERAL FOREST CODE IN A PROPERTY</title><title>Ciência e natura</title><description>This study aimed to carry out the rural environmental registration and benchmarking between Law N o . 4771 of October 15, 1965 (old Forest Code) and Law N o . 12651 of May 25, 2012 (current Forest Code). The study area constitutes a property, located in the north of the Rio Grande do Sul state, ith an area of 49.77 hectares, representing 2.48 tax modules. Identified were 14 classes of use and land cover, which were divided into two classes, the anthropic use and natural use. Use areas were found restricted in springs, river banks and plated for the two laws. Areas edge plated found to the old forestry code and areas of restricted use for the current forest code. The use of data crossing and land cover and PPAs showed some flexibility in relation to the current forest code which extinguishes 7.11 hectares in PPAs, 14.22% of the total area. In the property 3.91 hectares belonged to areas of anthropic use and 3.17 hectares of natural areas use. The application of the transitional rules and new concepts covered by Law N o . 12,651/12 may contribute to this effect.</description><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>River banks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural environments</subject><issn>0100-8307</issn><issn>2179-460X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjE8LgkAUxJcoSKrv8KCzsKZpHrd8pqC78lqtTtHBDhL90fz-bdQHaC4zwwy_AbMWThDans8PQ2Zxh3N75fJgzGZd13Ajf-EHjmuxnkoSGaCsUlIyR6lNI9ymO01HEDKCjcoLQUKnFQJWIitNVBLWqPeIEnSCoLLoey2JDAFijPBDjRXhThtChJBKEFCQKpD0ccpGl_O1q2c_n7B5jHqT2I_2_uzr7nVq7n17M9PJCbnrhcvA89z_Xm-q8EMv</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Vanzetto, Guilherme Victor</creator><creator>Franciele Rosset de Quadros</creator><creator>Rovani, Ivan Luís</creator><creator>Vanderlei Secreti Decian</creator><general>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTRY AND COMPARATIVE EVALUATION BETWEEN THE OLD AND CURRENT FEDERAL FOREST CODE IN A PROPERTY</title><author>Vanzetto, Guilherme Victor ; Franciele Rosset de Quadros ; Rovani, Ivan Luís ; Vanderlei Secreti Decian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19034957443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>River banks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural environments</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanzetto, Guilherme Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franciele Rosset de Quadros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovani, Ivan Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderlei Secreti Decian</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Ciência e natura</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanzetto, Guilherme Victor</au><au>Franciele Rosset de Quadros</au><au>Rovani, Ivan Luís</au><au>Vanderlei Secreti Decian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTRY AND COMPARATIVE EVALUATION BETWEEN THE OLD AND CURRENT FEDERAL FOREST CODE IN A PROPERTY</atitle><jtitle>Ciência e natura</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>259</spage><pages>259-</pages><issn>0100-8307</issn><eissn>2179-460X</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to carry out the rural environmental registration and benchmarking between Law N o . 4771 of October 15, 1965 (old Forest Code) and Law N o . 12651 of May 25, 2012 (current Forest Code). The study area constitutes a property, located in the north of the Rio Grande do Sul state, ith an area of 49.77 hectares, representing 2.48 tax modules. Identified were 14 classes of use and land cover, which were divided into two classes, the anthropic use and natural use. Use areas were found restricted in springs, river banks and plated for the two laws. Areas edge plated found to the old forestry code and areas of restricted use for the current forest code. The use of data crossing and land cover and PPAs showed some flexibility in relation to the current forest code which extinguishes 7.11 hectares in PPAs, 14.22% of the total area. In the property 3.91 hectares belonged to areas of anthropic use and 3.17 hectares of natural areas use. The application of the transitional rules and new concepts covered by Law N o . 12,651/12 may contribute to this effect.</abstract><cop>Santa Maria</cop><pub>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0100-8307
ispartof Ciência e natura, 2017-05, Vol.39 (2), p.259
issn 0100-8307
2179-460X
language por
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1903495744
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Data processing
Environmental law
Forestry
Forests
Land cover
Modules
River banks
Rivers
Rural areas
Rural environments
title RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTRY AND COMPARATIVE EVALUATION BETWEEN THE OLD AND CURRENT FEDERAL FOREST CODE IN A PROPERTY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RURAL%20ENVIRONMENTAL%20REGISTRY%20AND%20COMPARATIVE%20EVALUATION%20BETWEEN%20THE%20OLD%20AND%20CURRENT%20FEDERAL%20FOREST%20CODE%20IN%20A%20PROPERTY&rft.jtitle=Ci%C3%AAncia%20e%20natura&rft.au=Vanzetto,%20Guilherme%20Victor&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.pages=259-&rft.issn=0100-8307&rft.eissn=2179-460X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1903495744%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1903495744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true