Does timeliness of financial information matter in the governmental sector?
The purpose of our study is to investigate whether the timeliness of annual financial statements included in an official registration statement impacts the initial yield and the initial rating of general obligation municipal bonds. Using hand-collected data from 1058 official registration statements...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of accounting and public policy 2017-03, Vol.36 (2), p.163-176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | Journal of accounting and public policy |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Edmonds, Christopher T. Edmonds, Jennifer E. Vermeer, Beth Y. Vermeer, Thomas E. |
description | The purpose of our study is to investigate whether the timeliness of annual financial statements included in an official registration statement impacts the initial yield and the initial rating of general obligation municipal bonds. Using hand-collected data from 1058 official registration statements, we find that total information delay, comprised of two component time periods (i.e., audit delay and post audit delay), is significantly associated with higher municipal debt costs and lower bond ratings. Our findings also support the prediction that municipal investors charge a larger risk premium for untimely information when default risk is high. Overall, our results suggest that future municipal bond studies should consider total information delay, rather than solely audit delay, when examining/controlling for the timeliness of governmental financial statements. Our findings also provide important empirical evidence supporting recent SEC and GASB initiatives to improve municipal reporting and disclosure, especially the need to develop interim financial reporting standards. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.02.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1903492220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278425417300157</els_id><sourcerecordid>1903492220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-e1665b763c9b4658d086db3e97eee8b87ce4bcd75ed3cb29aba18f1bf1c89a9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-h4Lr1pv0kXQlOj5xwI2uQ5Leaso0qUlnwH9vhhFcujpwOedczkdIRqGgQJuroRiUMdNWT35TMKC8AFYAsCOyoIKXOQMOx2QBjIu8YnV1Ss5iHACAs6pekJc7jzGb7Ygb6zDGzPdZb51yxqpNZl3vw6hm612WZMaQTtn8idmH32FwI7o52SKa2Yfrc3LSq03Ei19dkveH-7fVU75-fXxe3axzU3I-50ibpta8KU2rq6YWHYim0yW2HBGFFtxgpU3Ha-xKo1mrtKKip7qnRrSqVeWSXB56p-C_thhnOfhtcOmlpC2UVcsYg-QSB5cJPsaAvZyCHVX4lhTkHp0c5B86uUcngcmELkVvD1FMK3YWg4zGojPY2ZCmys7b_0t-AEOFfko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1903492220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does timeliness of financial information matter in the governmental sector?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Edmonds, Christopher T. ; Edmonds, Jennifer E. ; Vermeer, Beth Y. ; Vermeer, Thomas E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, Christopher T. ; Edmonds, Jennifer E. ; Vermeer, Beth Y. ; Vermeer, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of our study is to investigate whether the timeliness of annual financial statements included in an official registration statement impacts the initial yield and the initial rating of general obligation municipal bonds. Using hand-collected data from 1058 official registration statements, we find that total information delay, comprised of two component time periods (i.e., audit delay and post audit delay), is significantly associated with higher municipal debt costs and lower bond ratings. Our findings also support the prediction that municipal investors charge a larger risk premium for untimely information when default risk is high. Overall, our results suggest that future municipal bond studies should consider total information delay, rather than solely audit delay, when examining/controlling for the timeliness of governmental financial statements. Our findings also provide important empirical evidence supporting recent SEC and GASB initiatives to improve municipal reporting and disclosure, especially the need to develop interim financial reporting standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.02.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Audits ; Bond ratings ; Debt ; Disclosure ; Financial information ; Financial reporting ; Financial statements ; Governmental accounting ; Investors ; Municipal bonds ; Obligations ; Predictions ; Public finance ; Ratings & rankings ; Registration ; Risk ; Time periods ; Timeliness</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting and public policy, 2017-03, Vol.36 (2), p.163-176</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Mar/Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-e1665b763c9b4658d086db3e97eee8b87ce4bcd75ed3cb29aba18f1bf1c89a9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-e1665b763c9b4658d086db3e97eee8b87ce4bcd75ed3cb29aba18f1bf1c89a9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.02.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeer, Beth Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeer, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><title>Does timeliness of financial information matter in the governmental sector?</title><title>Journal of accounting and public policy</title><description>The purpose of our study is to investigate whether the timeliness of annual financial statements included in an official registration statement impacts the initial yield and the initial rating of general obligation municipal bonds. Using hand-collected data from 1058 official registration statements, we find that total information delay, comprised of two component time periods (i.e., audit delay and post audit delay), is significantly associated with higher municipal debt costs and lower bond ratings. Our findings also support the prediction that municipal investors charge a larger risk premium for untimely information when default risk is high. Overall, our results suggest that future municipal bond studies should consider total information delay, rather than solely audit delay, when examining/controlling for the timeliness of governmental financial statements. Our findings also provide important empirical evidence supporting recent SEC and GASB initiatives to improve municipal reporting and disclosure, especially the need to develop interim financial reporting standards.</description><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Bond ratings</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Financial information</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Financial statements</subject><subject>Governmental accounting</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Municipal bonds</subject><subject>Obligations</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Time periods</subject><subject>Timeliness</subject><issn>0278-4254</issn><issn>1873-2070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-h4Lr1pv0kXQlOj5xwI2uQ5Leaso0qUlnwH9vhhFcujpwOedczkdIRqGgQJuroRiUMdNWT35TMKC8AFYAsCOyoIKXOQMOx2QBjIu8YnV1Ss5iHACAs6pekJc7jzGb7Ygb6zDGzPdZb51yxqpNZl3vw6hm612WZMaQTtn8idmH32FwI7o52SKa2Yfrc3LSq03Ei19dkveH-7fVU75-fXxe3axzU3I-50ibpta8KU2rq6YWHYim0yW2HBGFFtxgpU3Ha-xKo1mrtKKip7qnRrSqVeWSXB56p-C_thhnOfhtcOmlpC2UVcsYg-QSB5cJPsaAvZyCHVX4lhTkHp0c5B86uUcngcmELkVvD1FMK3YWg4zGojPY2ZCmys7b_0t-AEOFfko</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Edmonds, Christopher T.</creator><creator>Edmonds, Jennifer E.</creator><creator>Vermeer, Beth Y.</creator><creator>Vermeer, Thomas E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Does timeliness of financial information matter in the governmental sector?</title><author>Edmonds, Christopher T. ; Edmonds, Jennifer E. ; Vermeer, Beth Y. ; Vermeer, Thomas E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-e1665b763c9b4658d086db3e97eee8b87ce4bcd75ed3cb29aba18f1bf1c89a9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Bond ratings</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Financial information</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Financial statements</topic><topic>Governmental accounting</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Municipal bonds</topic><topic>Obligations</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Time periods</topic><topic>Timeliness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edmonds, Jennifer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeer, Beth Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeer, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting and public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edmonds, Christopher T.</au><au>Edmonds, Jennifer E.</au><au>Vermeer, Beth Y.</au><au>Vermeer, Thomas E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does timeliness of financial information matter in the governmental sector?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting and public policy</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>163-176</pages><issn>0278-4254</issn><eissn>1873-2070</eissn><abstract>The purpose of our study is to investigate whether the timeliness of annual financial statements included in an official registration statement impacts the initial yield and the initial rating of general obligation municipal bonds. Using hand-collected data from 1058 official registration statements, we find that total information delay, comprised of two component time periods (i.e., audit delay and post audit delay), is significantly associated with higher municipal debt costs and lower bond ratings. Our findings also support the prediction that municipal investors charge a larger risk premium for untimely information when default risk is high. Overall, our results suggest that future municipal bond studies should consider total information delay, rather than solely audit delay, when examining/controlling for the timeliness of governmental financial statements. Our findings also provide important empirical evidence supporting recent SEC and GASB initiatives to improve municipal reporting and disclosure, especially the need to develop interim financial reporting standards.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.02.002</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-4254 |
ispartof | Journal of accounting and public policy, 2017-03, Vol.36 (2), p.163-176 |
issn | 0278-4254 1873-2070 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1903492220 |
source | PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Audits Bond ratings Debt Disclosure Financial information Financial reporting Financial statements Governmental accounting Investors Municipal bonds Obligations Predictions Public finance Ratings & rankings Registration Risk Time periods Timeliness |
title | Does timeliness of financial information matter in the governmental sector? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A57%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20timeliness%20of%20financial%20information%20matter%20in%20the%20governmental%20sector?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20and%20public%20policy&rft.au=Edmonds,%20Christopher%20T.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=163-176&rft.issn=0278-4254&rft.eissn=1873-2070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.02.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1903492220%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1903492220&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0278425417300157&rfr_iscdi=true |