The Management of Research and Innovation Systems: Comparative Study of the East and the West Practices
Purpose: This paper reviews and analyses the national innovation systems in selected countries: Israel and Germany (Western practices) and Singapore and Taiwan (Eastern practices) in order to identify the uniqueness, challenges and best practices of each innovation system. Design/methodology/approac...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Global business and management research 2017-01, Vol.9 SI (1), p.289 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 289 |
| container_title | Global business and management research |
| container_volume | 9 SI |
| creator | Lau, Teck-Chai Choe, Kum-Lung Cheng, Ming-Yu |
| description | Purpose: This paper reviews and analyses the national innovation systems in selected countries: Israel and Germany (Western practices) and Singapore and Taiwan (Eastern practices) in order to identify the uniqueness, challenges and best practices of each innovation system. Design/methodology/approach: This is a comparative study looking at the best practices in in the East (Singapore and Taiwan) and the West (Israel and Germany). A review of certain innovative practices in each of the countries is discussed. Findings: The findings provide valuable information for countries, particularly developing countries, to learn and design appropriate innovation ecosystem in respective countries. Originality/value: - The impact of Science and Technology (SandT) development is not equally distributed across countries. Not all countries are able to absorb the benefits or able to take great advantage of SandT advancement, despite the efforts and resources allocated for RandD activities. The study articulates the implication for developing countries such as Malaysia to take some pointers on how certain successful innovative countries managed their SandT. Keywords: National Innovation Ecosystem, Science and Technology, East and West Practices, Comparative Study |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1903447576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A522760255</galeid><sourcerecordid>A522760255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1706-16f2702ef40ca2e2a6dba22e2c4bae6ede4b37bee1677ade5c2281cd54b0ce463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjm9LwzAQxosoOKffIeBbK2mWJs53Y_hnMFHcxJflml6zjDWZTTrYtzdTX1QYB3fPHb_n7k6SQTbmMs2FkKc9fZ5ceL-mVEg6loNEL1dIXsCCxgZtIK4m7-gRWrUiYCsys9btIBhnyWLvAzb-nkxds4U2DndIFqGr9gdXiHsewIcf16H5xNi8taCCUegvk7MaNh6v_uow-Xh8WE6f0_nr02w6mac6k1SkmaiZpAxrThUwZCCqElgUipeAAivk5UiWiJmQEirMFWN3mapyXlKFXIyGyfXv3m3rvrr4QrF2XWvjySIb0xHnMpc9SsMGC2NrF-KjjfGqmOSMSUFZnkcqPUJptNjCxlmsTRz_42-P8DEqbIw6arjpGcrOG4s-Jm_0KngNnfd9_BtKYY7t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1903447576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Management of Research and Innovation Systems: Comparative Study of the East and the West Practices</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lau, Teck-Chai ; Choe, Kum-Lung ; Cheng, Ming-Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Lau, Teck-Chai ; Choe, Kum-Lung ; Cheng, Ming-Yu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This paper reviews and analyses the national innovation systems in selected countries: Israel and Germany (Western practices) and Singapore and Taiwan (Eastern practices) in order to identify the uniqueness, challenges and best practices of each innovation system. Design/methodology/approach: This is a comparative study looking at the best practices in in the East (Singapore and Taiwan) and the West (Israel and Germany). A review of certain innovative practices in each of the countries is discussed. Findings: The findings provide valuable information for countries, particularly developing countries, to learn and design appropriate innovation ecosystem in respective countries. Originality/value: - The impact of Science and Technology (SandT) development is not equally distributed across countries. Not all countries are able to absorb the benefits or able to take great advantage of SandT advancement, despite the efforts and resources allocated for RandD activities. The study articulates the implication for developing countries such as Malaysia to take some pointers on how certain successful innovative countries managed their SandT. Keywords: National Innovation Ecosystem, Science and Technology, East and West Practices, Comparative Study</description><identifier>ISSN: 1947-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1947-5667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boca Raton: Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Cross cultural studies ; Developing countries ; Economic growth ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; High tech industries ; Innovations ; International ; LDCs ; Management science ; R&D ; Research & development ; Science ; Small & medium sized enterprises-SME ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Global business and management research, 2017-01, Vol.9 SI (1), p.289</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal</rights><rights>Copyright Mehran Nejati 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lau, Teck-Chai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Kum-Lung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Ming-Yu</creatorcontrib><title>The Management of Research and Innovation Systems: Comparative Study of the East and the West Practices</title><title>Global business and management research</title><description>Purpose: This paper reviews and analyses the national innovation systems in selected countries: Israel and Germany (Western practices) and Singapore and Taiwan (Eastern practices) in order to identify the uniqueness, challenges and best practices of each innovation system. Design/methodology/approach: This is a comparative study looking at the best practices in in the East (Singapore and Taiwan) and the West (Israel and Germany). A review of certain innovative practices in each of the countries is discussed. Findings: The findings provide valuable information for countries, particularly developing countries, to learn and design appropriate innovation ecosystem in respective countries. Originality/value: - The impact of Science and Technology (SandT) development is not equally distributed across countries. Not all countries are able to absorb the benefits or able to take great advantage of SandT advancement, despite the efforts and resources allocated for RandD activities. The study articulates the implication for developing countries such as Malaysia to take some pointers on how certain successful innovative countries managed their SandT. Keywords: National Innovation Ecosystem, Science and Technology, East and West Practices, Comparative Study</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>High tech industries</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1947-5667</issn><issn>1947-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptjm9LwzAQxosoOKffIeBbK2mWJs53Y_hnMFHcxJflml6zjDWZTTrYtzdTX1QYB3fPHb_n7k6SQTbmMs2FkKc9fZ5ceL-mVEg6loNEL1dIXsCCxgZtIK4m7-gRWrUiYCsys9btIBhnyWLvAzb-nkxds4U2DndIFqGr9gdXiHsewIcf16H5xNi8taCCUegvk7MaNh6v_uow-Xh8WE6f0_nr02w6mac6k1SkmaiZpAxrThUwZCCqElgUipeAAivk5UiWiJmQEirMFWN3mapyXlKFXIyGyfXv3m3rvrr4QrF2XWvjySIb0xHnMpc9SsMGC2NrF-KjjfGqmOSMSUFZnkcqPUJptNjCxlmsTRz_42-P8DEqbIw6arjpGcrOG4s-Jm_0KngNnfd9_BtKYY7t</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Lau, Teck-Chai</creator><creator>Choe, Kum-Lung</creator><creator>Cheng, Ming-Yu</creator><general>Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal</general><general>Mehran Nejati</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>The Management of Research and Innovation Systems: Comparative Study of the East and the West Practices</title><author>Lau, Teck-Chai ; Choe, Kum-Lung ; Cheng, Ming-Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1706-16f2702ef40ca2e2a6dba22e2c4bae6ede4b37bee1677ade5c2281cd54b0ce463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>High tech industries</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lau, Teck-Chai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Kum-Lung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Ming-Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Global business and management research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lau, Teck-Chai</au><au>Choe, Kum-Lung</au><au>Cheng, Ming-Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Management of Research and Innovation Systems: Comparative Study of the East and the West Practices</atitle><jtitle>Global business and management research</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9 SI</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>289</spage><pages>289-</pages><issn>1947-5667</issn><eissn>1947-5667</eissn><abstract>Purpose: This paper reviews and analyses the national innovation systems in selected countries: Israel and Germany (Western practices) and Singapore and Taiwan (Eastern practices) in order to identify the uniqueness, challenges and best practices of each innovation system. Design/methodology/approach: This is a comparative study looking at the best practices in in the East (Singapore and Taiwan) and the West (Israel and Germany). A review of certain innovative practices in each of the countries is discussed. Findings: The findings provide valuable information for countries, particularly developing countries, to learn and design appropriate innovation ecosystem in respective countries. Originality/value: - The impact of Science and Technology (SandT) development is not equally distributed across countries. Not all countries are able to absorb the benefits or able to take great advantage of SandT advancement, despite the efforts and resources allocated for RandD activities. The study articulates the implication for developing countries such as Malaysia to take some pointers on how certain successful innovative countries managed their SandT. Keywords: National Innovation Ecosystem, Science and Technology, East and West Practices, Comparative Study</abstract><cop>Boca Raton</cop><pub>Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1947-5667 |
| ispartof | Global business and management research, 2017-01, Vol.9 SI (1), p.289 |
| issn | 1947-5667 1947-5667 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1903447576 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Best practice Cross cultural studies Developing countries Economic growth GDP Gross Domestic Product High tech industries Innovations International LDCs Management science R&D Research & development Science Small & medium sized enterprises-SME Technology |
| title | The Management of Research and Innovation Systems: Comparative Study of the East and the West Practices |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A57%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Management%20of%20Research%20and%20Innovation%20Systems:%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20the%20East%20and%20the%20West%20Practices&rft.jtitle=Global%20business%20and%20management%20research&rft.au=Lau,%20Teck-Chai&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=9%20SI&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=289&rft.pages=289-&rft.issn=1947-5667&rft.eissn=1947-5667&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA522760255%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1903447576&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A522760255&rfr_iscdi=true |