Willow Short‐Rotation Production Systems in Canada and Northern United States: A Review

Willow (Salix spp.) short‐rotation coppice (SRC) systems are becoming an attractive practice because they are a sustainable system fulfilling multiple ecological objectives with significant environmental benefits. A sustainable supply of bioenergy feedstock can be produced by willow on marginal land...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2014, Vol.78 (S1), p.S168-S182
Hauptverfasser: Amichev, Beyhan Y., Hangs, Ryan D., Konecsni, Sheala M., Stadnyk, Christine N., Volk, Timothy A., Bélanger, Nicolas, Vujanovic, Vladimir, Schoenau, Jeff J., Moukoumi, Judicaël, Van Rees, Ken C.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S182
container_issue S1
container_start_page S168
container_title Soil Science Society of America journal
container_volume 78
creator Amichev, Beyhan Y.
Hangs, Ryan D.
Konecsni, Sheala M.
Stadnyk, Christine N.
Volk, Timothy A.
Bélanger, Nicolas
Vujanovic, Vladimir
Schoenau, Jeff J.
Moukoumi, Judicaël
Van Rees, Ken C.J.
description Willow (Salix spp.) short‐rotation coppice (SRC) systems are becoming an attractive practice because they are a sustainable system fulfilling multiple ecological objectives with significant environmental benefits. A sustainable supply of bioenergy feedstock can be produced by willow on marginal land using well‐adapted or tolerant cultivars. Across Canada and the northern United States, there are millions of hectares of available degraded land that have the potential for willow SRC biomass production, with a C sequestration potential capable of offsetting appreciable amounts of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. A fundamental question concerning sustainable SRC willow yields was whether long‐term soil productivity is maintained within a multi‐rotation SRC system, given the rapid growth rate and associated nutrient exports offsite when harvesting the willow biomass after repeated short rotations. Based on early results from the first willow SRC rotation, it was found that willow systems have relatively low nutrient demands, with minimal nutrient outputs other than in the harvested biomass. Our overall aim was to summarize the literature and present findings and data from ongoing research trials across Canada and the northern United States examining willow SRC system establishment and viability. The research areas of interest are the crop production of willow SRC systems, above‐ and belowground biomass dynamics and the C budget, comprehensive soil–willow system nutrient budgets, and soil nutrient amendments (via fertilization) in willow SRC systems. Areas of existing research gaps were also identified for the Canadian context.
doi_str_mv 10.2136/sssaj2013.08.0368nafsc
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1903428902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1903428902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400C-58889bbe668f036202cc8b9d5b83d9d84241dccf3373fbeefd6c24f64ddc31f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KAzEQx4MoWKuvIAHPWyfJbky8lcVPSpWuRTyFbD7olrqrydbSm4_gM_okbq307GVmmP_8ZoY_QqcEBpQwfh5j1HMKhA1ADIBxUWsfzR7qkZRlCXBO9lGv65MkkzI7REcxzgFIJgF66OW5WiyaFS5mTWi_P78mTavbqqnxY2js0vyWxTq27jXiqsa5rrXVWNcWjztg5kKNp3XVOouLDnTxEg_xxH1UbnWMDrxeRHfyl_toen31lN8mo4ebu3w4SkwKkCeZEEKWpeNc-O5JCtQYUUqblYJZaUVKU2KN8YxdMF865y03NPU8tdYw4iXro7Pt3rfQvC9dbNW8WYa6O6mIBJZSIYF2U3w7ZUITY3BevYXqVYe1IqA2NqqdjQqE2tnYgaMtuKoWbv1PShXDe1oUm9hJIDbCeHhd5OwHsmOB0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1903428902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Willow Short‐Rotation Production Systems in Canada and Northern United States: A Review</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Amichev, Beyhan Y. ; Hangs, Ryan D. ; Konecsni, Sheala M. ; Stadnyk, Christine N. ; Volk, Timothy A. ; Bélanger, Nicolas ; Vujanovic, Vladimir ; Schoenau, Jeff J. ; Moukoumi, Judicaël ; Van Rees, Ken C.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Amichev, Beyhan Y. ; Hangs, Ryan D. ; Konecsni, Sheala M. ; Stadnyk, Christine N. ; Volk, Timothy A. ; Bélanger, Nicolas ; Vujanovic, Vladimir ; Schoenau, Jeff J. ; Moukoumi, Judicaël ; Van Rees, Ken C.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Willow (Salix spp.) short‐rotation coppice (SRC) systems are becoming an attractive practice because they are a sustainable system fulfilling multiple ecological objectives with significant environmental benefits. A sustainable supply of bioenergy feedstock can be produced by willow on marginal land using well‐adapted or tolerant cultivars. Across Canada and the northern United States, there are millions of hectares of available degraded land that have the potential for willow SRC biomass production, with a C sequestration potential capable of offsetting appreciable amounts of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. A fundamental question concerning sustainable SRC willow yields was whether long‐term soil productivity is maintained within a multi‐rotation SRC system, given the rapid growth rate and associated nutrient exports offsite when harvesting the willow biomass after repeated short rotations. Based on early results from the first willow SRC rotation, it was found that willow systems have relatively low nutrient demands, with minimal nutrient outputs other than in the harvested biomass. Our overall aim was to summarize the literature and present findings and data from ongoing research trials across Canada and the northern United States examining willow SRC system establishment and viability. The research areas of interest are the crop production of willow SRC systems, above‐ and belowground biomass dynamics and the C budget, comprehensive soil–willow system nutrient budgets, and soil nutrient amendments (via fertilization) in willow SRC systems. Areas of existing research gaps were also identified for the Canadian context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2013.08.0368nafsc</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Alternative energy sources ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biomass ; Consortia ; Crop diseases ; Crop production ; Crops ; Cultivars ; Emissions ; Fertilization ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Growth rate ; Harvest ; Harvesting ; Information storage ; Land degradation ; Nutrient dynamics ; Raw materials ; Renewable energy ; Soil dynamics ; Soil nutrients ; Soil sciences ; Soils ; Sustainability ; Viability ; Willow</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2014, Vol.78 (S1), p.S168-S182</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400C-58889bbe668f036202cc8b9d5b83d9d84241dccf3373fbeefd6c24f64ddc31f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400C-58889bbe668f036202cc8b9d5b83d9d84241dccf3373fbeefd6c24f64ddc31f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2136%2Fsssaj2013.08.0368nafsc$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136%2Fsssaj2013.08.0368nafsc$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amichev, Beyhan Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hangs, Ryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konecsni, Sheala M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadnyk, Christine N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bélanger, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vujanovic, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenau, Jeff J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moukoumi, Judicaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Rees, Ken C.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Willow Short‐Rotation Production Systems in Canada and Northern United States: A Review</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Willow (Salix spp.) short‐rotation coppice (SRC) systems are becoming an attractive practice because they are a sustainable system fulfilling multiple ecological objectives with significant environmental benefits. A sustainable supply of bioenergy feedstock can be produced by willow on marginal land using well‐adapted or tolerant cultivars. Across Canada and the northern United States, there are millions of hectares of available degraded land that have the potential for willow SRC biomass production, with a C sequestration potential capable of offsetting appreciable amounts of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. A fundamental question concerning sustainable SRC willow yields was whether long‐term soil productivity is maintained within a multi‐rotation SRC system, given the rapid growth rate and associated nutrient exports offsite when harvesting the willow biomass after repeated short rotations. Based on early results from the first willow SRC rotation, it was found that willow systems have relatively low nutrient demands, with minimal nutrient outputs other than in the harvested biomass. Our overall aim was to summarize the literature and present findings and data from ongoing research trials across Canada and the northern United States examining willow SRC system establishment and viability. The research areas of interest are the crop production of willow SRC systems, above‐ and belowground biomass dynamics and the C budget, comprehensive soil–willow system nutrient budgets, and soil nutrient amendments (via fertilization) in willow SRC systems. Areas of existing research gaps were also identified for the Canadian context.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Crop diseases</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Information storage</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Viability</subject><subject>Willow</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1KAzEQx4MoWKuvIAHPWyfJbky8lcVPSpWuRTyFbD7olrqrydbSm4_gM_okbq307GVmmP_8ZoY_QqcEBpQwfh5j1HMKhA1ADIBxUWsfzR7qkZRlCXBO9lGv65MkkzI7REcxzgFIJgF66OW5WiyaFS5mTWi_P78mTavbqqnxY2js0vyWxTq27jXiqsa5rrXVWNcWjztg5kKNp3XVOouLDnTxEg_xxH1UbnWMDrxeRHfyl_toen31lN8mo4ebu3w4SkwKkCeZEEKWpeNc-O5JCtQYUUqblYJZaUVKU2KN8YxdMF865y03NPU8tdYw4iXro7Pt3rfQvC9dbNW8WYa6O6mIBJZSIYF2U3w7ZUITY3BevYXqVYe1IqA2NqqdjQqE2tnYgaMtuKoWbv1PShXDe1oUm9hJIDbCeHhd5OwHsmOB0A</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Amichev, Beyhan Y.</creator><creator>Hangs, Ryan D.</creator><creator>Konecsni, Sheala M.</creator><creator>Stadnyk, Christine N.</creator><creator>Volk, Timothy A.</creator><creator>Bélanger, Nicolas</creator><creator>Vujanovic, Vladimir</creator><creator>Schoenau, Jeff J.</creator><creator>Moukoumi, Judicaël</creator><creator>Van Rees, Ken C.J.</creator><general>The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Willow Short‐Rotation Production Systems in Canada and Northern United States: A Review</title><author>Amichev, Beyhan Y. ; Hangs, Ryan D. ; Konecsni, Sheala M. ; Stadnyk, Christine N. ; Volk, Timothy A. ; Bélanger, Nicolas ; Vujanovic, Vladimir ; Schoenau, Jeff J. ; Moukoumi, Judicaël ; Van Rees, Ken C.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400C-58889bbe668f036202cc8b9d5b83d9d84241dccf3373fbeefd6c24f64ddc31f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Crop diseases</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Information storage</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Viability</topic><topic>Willow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amichev, Beyhan Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hangs, Ryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konecsni, Sheala M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadnyk, Christine N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bélanger, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vujanovic, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenau, Jeff J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moukoumi, Judicaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Rees, Ken C.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amichev, Beyhan Y.</au><au>Hangs, Ryan D.</au><au>Konecsni, Sheala M.</au><au>Stadnyk, Christine N.</au><au>Volk, Timothy A.</au><au>Bélanger, Nicolas</au><au>Vujanovic, Vladimir</au><au>Schoenau, Jeff J.</au><au>Moukoumi, Judicaël</au><au>Van Rees, Ken C.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Willow Short‐Rotation Production Systems in Canada and Northern United States: A Review</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S168</spage><epage>S182</epage><pages>S168-S182</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><abstract>Willow (Salix spp.) short‐rotation coppice (SRC) systems are becoming an attractive practice because they are a sustainable system fulfilling multiple ecological objectives with significant environmental benefits. A sustainable supply of bioenergy feedstock can be produced by willow on marginal land using well‐adapted or tolerant cultivars. Across Canada and the northern United States, there are millions of hectares of available degraded land that have the potential for willow SRC biomass production, with a C sequestration potential capable of offsetting appreciable amounts of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. A fundamental question concerning sustainable SRC willow yields was whether long‐term soil productivity is maintained within a multi‐rotation SRC system, given the rapid growth rate and associated nutrient exports offsite when harvesting the willow biomass after repeated short rotations. Based on early results from the first willow SRC rotation, it was found that willow systems have relatively low nutrient demands, with minimal nutrient outputs other than in the harvested biomass. Our overall aim was to summarize the literature and present findings and data from ongoing research trials across Canada and the northern United States examining willow SRC system establishment and viability. The research areas of interest are the crop production of willow SRC systems, above‐ and belowground biomass dynamics and the C budget, comprehensive soil–willow system nutrient budgets, and soil nutrient amendments (via fertilization) in willow SRC systems. Areas of existing research gaps were also identified for the Canadian context.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2136/sssaj2013.08.0368nafsc</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-5995
ispartof Soil Science Society of America journal, 2014, Vol.78 (S1), p.S168-S182
issn 0361-5995
1435-0661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1903428902
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Agricultural production
Agriculture
Agroforestry
Alternative energy sources
Anthropogenic factors
Biodiesel fuels
Biomass
Consortia
Crop diseases
Crop production
Crops
Cultivars
Emissions
Fertilization
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gases
Growth rate
Harvest
Harvesting
Information storage
Land degradation
Nutrient dynamics
Raw materials
Renewable energy
Soil dynamics
Soil nutrients
Soil sciences
Soils
Sustainability
Viability
Willow
title Willow Short‐Rotation Production Systems in Canada and Northern United States: A Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A13%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Willow%20Short%E2%80%90Rotation%20Production%20Systems%20in%20Canada%20and%20Northern%20United%20States:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Amichev,%20Beyhan%20Y.&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S168&rft.epage=S182&rft.pages=S168-S182&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136/sssaj2013.08.0368nafsc&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1903428902%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1903428902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true