AB0625 The Clinical Significance of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundThe association between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and systemic sclerosis (SSc) and its clinical manifestations is controversial, but owing to some shared pathogenetic pathways one expects that SSc patients with aPL will have more severe vascular manifestations that SSc without aPL....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.1118-1118
Hauptverfasser: Merashli, M., Ames, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundThe association between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and systemic sclerosis (SSc) and its clinical manifestations is controversial, but owing to some shared pathogenetic pathways one expects that SSc patients with aPL will have more severe vascular manifestations that SSc without aPL.ObjectivesTo evaluate whether different aPL are associated with SSc and some of its clinical manifestations and if so, whether aPL titre impact on the severity of those clinical manifestations.MethodsSystematic review of EMBASE and PubMed databases from inception to October 2015 followed by meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines.ResultsThe relationship between between aCL (anticardiolipin) of IgG/IgM isotype and SSc was addressed in 8 studies yielding 725 controls and 484 SSc participants. The pooled prevalence of IgG aCL was 1.6% in controls and 15.4% in SSc patients with an odds ratio (OR) of 10.895 (95% CI 5.853, 20.282, I2 =19.5%, p=0.003) and that of IgM was 0.6% and 5.1% respectively with an OR of 7.843 (95% CI 2.981, 20.633, I2 =21.5%, p=0.002). The relationship between between IgG aβ2GPI of IgG/IgM isotype and SSc was addressed in 8 studies yielding 725 controls and 484 SSc participants. The pooled prevalence of IgG aβ2GPI was 1.6% in controls and 15.4% in SSc patients (OR 11.121, 95% CI 2.587, 47.812, I2 =35.6%, p=0.0003) while that of IgM was 0.6% and 5.1% respectively (OR 12.185, 95% CI 1.563, 94.948; I2 =67.5%, p=0.02). The relationship between aPL and thrombosis was addressed in 6 studies yielding 428 aCL negative and 88 aCL positive SSc: the pooled prevalence of thrombosis was 3.7% in the aCL negative group and 25% in the aCL positive group with a relative risk (RR) of 7.344 (95% CI: 4.089–13.191; I2 =29.5%, p =0.0001). The relationship between aPL and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was addressed in 7 studies yielding 1171 aCL negative SSc patients and 166 aCL positive SSc: the pooled prevalence of PAH in aCL negative patients was 11% and in aCL positive patients was 24.6% for a RR of 6.8 (95% CI: 3.110–12.280; I2 =4.18; p =0.0001). The relationship between aPL and renal involvement was investigated in 5 studies yielding 264 aCL negative and 83 aCL positive SSc patients: the pooled prevalence of renal involvement in aCL negative patients was 17% and in aCL positive patients was 40% for a RR of 1.993 (95% CI: 1.359–2.923; I2 =0%, p =0.0001).ConclusionsThere is a strong association between aPL and SSc; within SSc per se, aPL, with va
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.4564