AB0192 Some of The Painful RA Patients Underrate Global Health VAS at Hospitals
BackgroundEvaluating patient global VAS is one of the most essential process in RA practice. Despite reliability of patient global VAS being highly important in clinical practice, there has been no study comparing global VAS scores obtained at hospitals and those obtained at home where patients answ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.963-963 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 963 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Suppl 2 |
| container_start_page | 963 |
| container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
| container_volume | 75 |
| creator | Kageyama, G. Onishi, A. Ueda, Y. Kamei, Y. Yamada, H. Ichise, Y. Waki, D. Naka, I. Tsuda, K. Okano, T. Takahashi, S. Nishida, M. Akashi, K. Nishimura, K. Sendo, S. Kogata, Y. Saegusa, J. Morinobu, A. |
| description | BackgroundEvaluating patient global VAS is one of the most essential process in RA practice. Despite reliability of patient global VAS being highly important in clinical practice, there has been no study comparing global VAS scores obtained at hospitals and those obtained at home where patients answer anonymously.ObjectivesTo compare the patient global VAS obtained before clinical examination in hospital with those answered anonymously at home.MethodsWe asked RA patients to answer and mail the EQ5D data set anonymously. EQ5D consisted of 5 component questions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and patient assessment global health VAS. EQ5D global VAS is anonymized patient global VAS evaluated at home. We compared the patient global VAS which is routinely surveyed at hospital before clinical examination with those surveyed anonymously at home.ResultsThe anonymized VAS score was higher than those routinely evaluated at hospital (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.1312 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901881831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4322515811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1271-29a572212c4828e1335950ff0230dc4a8b147a3f8762b38a0280a84dac80d1b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD5a6Tpmx83DEKlTQIlXi0Zat5SSOmiqPYjsLdmz4Ub4El7Jgy-rOjO6d0RxCJghTRB5fq64zWz20ZW0DBhgHemiUmSJHdkJGGMbCj2M4JSMA4EGYxsk5ubB251sQKEbkObsFTNnXx-eqbzXtK7reavqk6q4aGvqS-dLVunOWbrpSG6OcpvOmz1VDF1o1bktfsxVVji56u6-dauwlOau86KtfHZPN_d16tgiWj_OHWbYMcmQJBixVUcIYsiIUTGjkPEojqCpgHMoiVCLHMFG8EknMci4UMAFKhKUqBJSYR3xMJse9e9O_Ddo6uesH0_mTElNA4d_j6F03R1dhemuNruTe1K0y7xJBHhjKPwzlgaH8YSgPDH06Pqbzdvev4DeGCnq_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901881831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AB0192 Some of The Painful RA Patients Underrate Global Health VAS at Hospitals</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Kageyama, G. ; Onishi, A. ; Ueda, Y. ; Kamei, Y. ; Yamada, H. ; Ichise, Y. ; Waki, D. ; Naka, I. ; Tsuda, K. ; Okano, T. ; Takahashi, S. ; Nishida, M. ; Akashi, K. ; Nishimura, K. ; Sendo, S. ; Kogata, Y. ; Saegusa, J. ; Morinobu, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kageyama, G. ; Onishi, A. ; Ueda, Y. ; Kamei, Y. ; Yamada, H. ; Ichise, Y. ; Waki, D. ; Naka, I. ; Tsuda, K. ; Okano, T. ; Takahashi, S. ; Nishida, M. ; Akashi, K. ; Nishimura, K. ; Sendo, S. ; Kogata, Y. ; Saegusa, J. ; Morinobu, A.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundEvaluating patient global VAS is one of the most essential process in RA practice. Despite reliability of patient global VAS being highly important in clinical practice, there has been no study comparing global VAS scores obtained at hospitals and those obtained at home where patients answer anonymously.ObjectivesTo compare the patient global VAS obtained before clinical examination in hospital with those answered anonymously at home.MethodsWe asked RA patients to answer and mail the EQ5D data set anonymously. EQ5D consisted of 5 component questions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and patient assessment global health VAS. EQ5D global VAS is anonymized patient global VAS evaluated at home. We compared the patient global VAS which is routinely surveyed at hospital before clinical examination with those surveyed anonymously at home.ResultsThe anonymized VAS score was higher than those routinely evaluated at hospital (p<0.0001). Global VAS scores obtained at hospital poorly correlated with those obtained anonymously at home (r=0.426). We compared patients who had higher patient global VAS at hospital than anonymized VAS at home with patients who had lower patient global VAS at hospital than anonymized VAS at home. Pain VAS scores remained to be risk factor to be higher anonymized VAS at home than those routinely evaluated at hospital after multivariate analysis.ConclusionsDiscrepancy exists between patient global VAS evaluated in the hospital before clinical examination and those evaluated anonymously at home. There is a possibility that patients rating high pain VAS are underrating their global VAS scores at hospital.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.1312</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.963-963</ispartof><rights>2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 (c) 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/75/Suppl_2/963.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/75/Suppl_2/963.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kageyama, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onishi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamei, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichise, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waki, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naka, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuda, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okano, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akashi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sendo, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogata, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saegusa, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morinobu, A.</creatorcontrib><title>AB0192 Some of The Painful RA Patients Underrate Global Health VAS at Hospitals</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>BackgroundEvaluating patient global VAS is one of the most essential process in RA practice. Despite reliability of patient global VAS being highly important in clinical practice, there has been no study comparing global VAS scores obtained at hospitals and those obtained at home where patients answer anonymously.ObjectivesTo compare the patient global VAS obtained before clinical examination in hospital with those answered anonymously at home.MethodsWe asked RA patients to answer and mail the EQ5D data set anonymously. EQ5D consisted of 5 component questions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and patient assessment global health VAS. EQ5D global VAS is anonymized patient global VAS evaluated at home. We compared the patient global VAS which is routinely surveyed at hospital before clinical examination with those surveyed anonymously at home.ResultsThe anonymized VAS score was higher than those routinely evaluated at hospital (p<0.0001). Global VAS scores obtained at hospital poorly correlated with those obtained anonymously at home (r=0.426). We compared patients who had higher patient global VAS at hospital than anonymized VAS at home with patients who had lower patient global VAS at hospital than anonymized VAS at home. Pain VAS scores remained to be risk factor to be higher anonymized VAS at home than those routinely evaluated at hospital after multivariate analysis.ConclusionsDiscrepancy exists between patient global VAS evaluated in the hospital before clinical examination and those evaluated anonymously at home. There is a possibility that patients rating high pain VAS are underrating their global VAS scores at hospital.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD5a6Tpmx83DEKlTQIlXi0Zat5SSOmiqPYjsLdmz4Ub4El7Jgy-rOjO6d0RxCJghTRB5fq64zWz20ZW0DBhgHemiUmSJHdkJGGMbCj2M4JSMA4EGYxsk5ubB251sQKEbkObsFTNnXx-eqbzXtK7reavqk6q4aGvqS-dLVunOWbrpSG6OcpvOmz1VDF1o1bktfsxVVji56u6-dauwlOau86KtfHZPN_d16tgiWj_OHWbYMcmQJBixVUcIYsiIUTGjkPEojqCpgHMoiVCLHMFG8EknMci4UMAFKhKUqBJSYR3xMJse9e9O_Ddo6uesH0_mTElNA4d_j6F03R1dhemuNruTe1K0y7xJBHhjKPwzlgaH8YSgPDH06Pqbzdvev4DeGCnq_</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Kageyama, G.</creator><creator>Onishi, A.</creator><creator>Ueda, Y.</creator><creator>Kamei, Y.</creator><creator>Yamada, H.</creator><creator>Ichise, Y.</creator><creator>Waki, D.</creator><creator>Naka, I.</creator><creator>Tsuda, K.</creator><creator>Okano, T.</creator><creator>Takahashi, S.</creator><creator>Nishida, M.</creator><creator>Akashi, K.</creator><creator>Nishimura, K.</creator><creator>Sendo, S.</creator><creator>Kogata, Y.</creator><creator>Saegusa, J.</creator><creator>Morinobu, A.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>AB0192 Some of The Painful RA Patients Underrate Global Health VAS at Hospitals</title><author>Kageyama, G. ; Onishi, A. ; Ueda, Y. ; Kamei, Y. ; Yamada, H. ; Ichise, Y. ; Waki, D. ; Naka, I. ; Tsuda, K. ; Okano, T. ; Takahashi, S. ; Nishida, M. ; Akashi, K. ; Nishimura, K. ; Sendo, S. ; Kogata, Y. ; Saegusa, J. ; Morinobu, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1271-29a572212c4828e1335950ff0230dc4a8b147a3f8762b38a0280a84dac80d1b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kageyama, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onishi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamei, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichise, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waki, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naka, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuda, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okano, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akashi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sendo, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogata, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saegusa, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morinobu, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kageyama, G.</au><au>Onishi, A.</au><au>Ueda, Y.</au><au>Kamei, Y.</au><au>Yamada, H.</au><au>Ichise, Y.</au><au>Waki, D.</au><au>Naka, I.</au><au>Tsuda, K.</au><au>Okano, T.</au><au>Takahashi, S.</au><au>Nishida, M.</au><au>Akashi, K.</au><au>Nishimura, K.</au><au>Sendo, S.</au><au>Kogata, Y.</au><au>Saegusa, J.</au><au>Morinobu, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AB0192 Some of The Painful RA Patients Underrate Global Health VAS at Hospitals</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>963</epage><pages>963-963</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>BackgroundEvaluating patient global VAS is one of the most essential process in RA practice. Despite reliability of patient global VAS being highly important in clinical practice, there has been no study comparing global VAS scores obtained at hospitals and those obtained at home where patients answer anonymously.ObjectivesTo compare the patient global VAS obtained before clinical examination in hospital with those answered anonymously at home.MethodsWe asked RA patients to answer and mail the EQ5D data set anonymously. EQ5D consisted of 5 component questions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and patient assessment global health VAS. EQ5D global VAS is anonymized patient global VAS evaluated at home. We compared the patient global VAS which is routinely surveyed at hospital before clinical examination with those surveyed anonymously at home.ResultsThe anonymized VAS score was higher than those routinely evaluated at hospital (p<0.0001). Global VAS scores obtained at hospital poorly correlated with those obtained anonymously at home (r=0.426). We compared patients who had higher patient global VAS at hospital than anonymized VAS at home with patients who had lower patient global VAS at hospital than anonymized VAS at home. Pain VAS scores remained to be risk factor to be higher anonymized VAS at home than those routinely evaluated at hospital after multivariate analysis.ConclusionsDiscrepancy exists between patient global VAS evaluated in the hospital before clinical examination and those evaluated anonymously at home. There is a possibility that patients rating high pain VAS are underrating their global VAS scores at hospital.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.1312</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
| ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.963-963 |
| issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1901881831 |
| source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
| title | AB0192 Some of The Painful RA Patients Underrate Global Health VAS at Hospitals |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AB0192%E2%80%85Some%20of%20The%20Painful%20RA%20Patients%20Underrate%20Global%20Health%20VAS%20at%20Hospitals&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Kageyama,%20G.&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=963&rft.pages=963-963&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.1312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4322515811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901881831&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |