SAT0412 Biological Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA): Differences between Switchers and Non-Switchers

BackgroundSwitching biological therapies is becoming increasingly common in routine management of PsA patients. However, evidence in this topic is still scarce. Predictive markers for an optimal approach to the sequential prescription of biologics are lacking.ObjectivesIn a population of PsA patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.819-819
Hauptverfasser: Ramos Pinheiro, R., Brasileiro, A., Brito, A., Barreto, P., Pinheiro, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 819
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page 819
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 75
creator Ramos Pinheiro, R.
Brasileiro, A.
Brito, A.
Barreto, P.
Pinheiro, S.
description BackgroundSwitching biological therapies is becoming increasingly common in routine management of PsA patients. However, evidence in this topic is still scarce. Predictive markers for an optimal approach to the sequential prescription of biologics are lacking.ObjectivesIn a population of PsA patients, we aimed to determine differences in baseline clinical and laboratory features between switchers and non-switchers.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the PsA patients followed at our outpatient clinic in the last 24 months. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Severity of skin manifestations and peripheral arthritis at PsA onset were recorded using PASI and DAS28 score. Patients who changed biological therapies due to therapeutic failure (primary or secondary) or toxicity were defined as switchers.For comparison of clinical and laboratory features we used chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney or T-Student test for continuous variables.Results58 PsA patients were included, 60.3% were women; the mean age at PsA and psoriasis (PsO) onset was 46.4 (±15) and 34.8 (±15) years, respectively. At PsA onset, 24.1% of patients had a PASI score>10 and a mean DAS of 3.76 (±1.0). Laboratory features, arthritis and extra-articular manifestations were assessed (Image). 94.8% of patients were prescribed with non-biologic DMARD therapy and 55.2% with biological therapy, after failing to respond to a classic DMARD treatment alone. Median time from diagnosis until biological therapy prescription was 25.9 (±56,5) months.Out of 32 patients prescribed with biologics, 15 (46.9%) switched to another biologic agent, mainly due to secondary failure (63.6%), primary failure (18.2%) and adverse events (13.6%). 15.65% and 3.1% of patients required 2 or 3 switches. Etarnacept was the first line agent prescribed in the majority (78.8%) of patients. Adalimumab (73.3%) and ustekinumab (50.0%) were the most used agents as second and third line biological therapies, respectively.Switchers were significantly younger at psoriasis onset (25.6 (±13.8) vs 37.4 (±13.3) years, p=0.020) and also at PsA onset (33.3 (±9.6) vs 50.0 (±13.1) years, p
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901859652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4322515091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1852-c44aa789df16347ab4bcac264925d7aaf253e1800a74771f8efdbf5558436e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE9LwzAYh4MoOKffIbCLHjqTNk1TPdX5F4YOuntI08SldOlMWsZuXvyifhJbJ-LV08v74_e8LzwATDCaYhzRS2GtW6luXRofhAjTQHW1cNMI4fQAjDChrI8pOgQjhFAUkJQmx-DE-6pfEcNsBKo8WyKCw8_3jxvT1M2rkaKGy5VyYrODxsKFb5wRrZEwc-3KmdZ4eL7Is4sreGu0Vk5ZqTwsVLtVysJ8a1rZ0x4KW8Lnxga_ySk40qL26uxnjkF-f7ecPQbzl4enWTYPCsziMJCECJGwtNSYRiQRBSmkkCElaRiXiRA6jCOFGUIiIUmCNVO6LHQcx4xEVEVjMNlf3bjmrVO-5VXTOds_5DhF_YeUxmHfut63pGu8d0rzjTNr4XYcIz6o5X_U8kEt_1bLB7U9Tfd0sa7-BX4BLJyFqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901859652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SAT0412 Biological Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA): Differences between Switchers and Non-Switchers</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Ramos Pinheiro, R. ; Brasileiro, A. ; Brito, A. ; Barreto, P. ; Pinheiro, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramos Pinheiro, R. ; Brasileiro, A. ; Brito, A. ; Barreto, P. ; Pinheiro, S.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundSwitching biological therapies is becoming increasingly common in routine management of PsA patients. However, evidence in this topic is still scarce. Predictive markers for an optimal approach to the sequential prescription of biologics are lacking.ObjectivesIn a population of PsA patients, we aimed to determine differences in baseline clinical and laboratory features between switchers and non-switchers.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the PsA patients followed at our outpatient clinic in the last 24 months. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Severity of skin manifestations and peripheral arthritis at PsA onset were recorded using PASI and DAS28 score. Patients who changed biological therapies due to therapeutic failure (primary or secondary) or toxicity were defined as switchers.For comparison of clinical and laboratory features we used chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney or T-Student test for continuous variables.Results58 PsA patients were included, 60.3% were women; the mean age at PsA and psoriasis (PsO) onset was 46.4 (±15) and 34.8 (±15) years, respectively. At PsA onset, 24.1% of patients had a PASI score&gt;10 and a mean DAS of 3.76 (±1.0). Laboratory features, arthritis and extra-articular manifestations were assessed (Image). 94.8% of patients were prescribed with non-biologic DMARD therapy and 55.2% with biological therapy, after failing to respond to a classic DMARD treatment alone. Median time from diagnosis until biological therapy prescription was 25.9 (±56,5) months.Out of 32 patients prescribed with biologics, 15 (46.9%) switched to another biologic agent, mainly due to secondary failure (63.6%), primary failure (18.2%) and adverse events (13.6%). 15.65% and 3.1% of patients required 2 or 3 switches. Etarnacept was the first line agent prescribed in the majority (78.8%) of patients. Adalimumab (73.3%) and ustekinumab (50.0%) were the most used agents as second and third line biological therapies, respectively.Switchers were significantly younger at psoriasis onset (25.6 (±13.8) vs 37.4 (±13.3) years, p=0.020) and also at PsA onset (33.3 (±9.6) vs 50.0 (±13.1) years, p&lt;0.0001). They had higher PASI (p=0.011) levels comparing to non-switchers. Uveitis and axial involvement were significantly more common in switchers (p=0.047 and p=0.034, respectively). All patients starting biological therapy on the first 12 months after disease onset switched to another biological agent.ConclusionsAge at PsO and PsA onset is a well-established clinical factor with significant impact in disease severity and in skin and arthritis manifestations. Our work suggests that it might also play a role in first biological treatment failure determining a need to switch. Higher PASI score at PsA onset, axial involvement and uveitis also seem to be associated with more likelihood of switching.Our results should be considered exploratory. Larger studies are required to determine the role of these clinical features in predicting biological treatment switching.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.819-819</ispartof><rights>2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 (c) 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1852-c44aa789df16347ab4bcac264925d7aaf253e1800a74771f8efdbf5558436e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/75/Suppl_2/819.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/75/Suppl_2/819.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramos Pinheiro, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasileiro, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, S.</creatorcontrib><title>SAT0412 Biological Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA): Differences between Switchers and Non-Switchers</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>BackgroundSwitching biological therapies is becoming increasingly common in routine management of PsA patients. However, evidence in this topic is still scarce. Predictive markers for an optimal approach to the sequential prescription of biologics are lacking.ObjectivesIn a population of PsA patients, we aimed to determine differences in baseline clinical and laboratory features between switchers and non-switchers.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the PsA patients followed at our outpatient clinic in the last 24 months. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Severity of skin manifestations and peripheral arthritis at PsA onset were recorded using PASI and DAS28 score. Patients who changed biological therapies due to therapeutic failure (primary or secondary) or toxicity were defined as switchers.For comparison of clinical and laboratory features we used chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney or T-Student test for continuous variables.Results58 PsA patients were included, 60.3% were women; the mean age at PsA and psoriasis (PsO) onset was 46.4 (±15) and 34.8 (±15) years, respectively. At PsA onset, 24.1% of patients had a PASI score&gt;10 and a mean DAS of 3.76 (±1.0). Laboratory features, arthritis and extra-articular manifestations were assessed (Image). 94.8% of patients were prescribed with non-biologic DMARD therapy and 55.2% with biological therapy, after failing to respond to a classic DMARD treatment alone. Median time from diagnosis until biological therapy prescription was 25.9 (±56,5) months.Out of 32 patients prescribed with biologics, 15 (46.9%) switched to another biologic agent, mainly due to secondary failure (63.6%), primary failure (18.2%) and adverse events (13.6%). 15.65% and 3.1% of patients required 2 or 3 switches. Etarnacept was the first line agent prescribed in the majority (78.8%) of patients. Adalimumab (73.3%) and ustekinumab (50.0%) were the most used agents as second and third line biological therapies, respectively.Switchers were significantly younger at psoriasis onset (25.6 (±13.8) vs 37.4 (±13.3) years, p=0.020) and also at PsA onset (33.3 (±9.6) vs 50.0 (±13.1) years, p&lt;0.0001). They had higher PASI (p=0.011) levels comparing to non-switchers. Uveitis and axial involvement were significantly more common in switchers (p=0.047 and p=0.034, respectively). All patients starting biological therapy on the first 12 months after disease onset switched to another biological agent.ConclusionsAge at PsO and PsA onset is a well-established clinical factor with significant impact in disease severity and in skin and arthritis manifestations. Our work suggests that it might also play a role in first biological treatment failure determining a need to switch. Higher PASI score at PsA onset, axial involvement and uveitis also seem to be associated with more likelihood of switching.Our results should be considered exploratory. Larger studies are required to determine the role of these clinical features in predicting biological treatment switching.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE9LwzAYh4MoOKffIbCLHjqTNk1TPdX5F4YOuntI08SldOlMWsZuXvyifhJbJ-LV08v74_e8LzwATDCaYhzRS2GtW6luXRofhAjTQHW1cNMI4fQAjDChrI8pOgQjhFAUkJQmx-DE-6pfEcNsBKo8WyKCw8_3jxvT1M2rkaKGy5VyYrODxsKFb5wRrZEwc-3KmdZ4eL7Is4sreGu0Vk5ZqTwsVLtVysJ8a1rZ0x4KW8Lnxga_ySk40qL26uxnjkF-f7ecPQbzl4enWTYPCsziMJCECJGwtNSYRiQRBSmkkCElaRiXiRA6jCOFGUIiIUmCNVO6LHQcx4xEVEVjMNlf3bjmrVO-5VXTOds_5DhF_YeUxmHfut63pGu8d0rzjTNr4XYcIz6o5X_U8kEt_1bLB7U9Tfd0sa7-BX4BLJyFqw</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Ramos Pinheiro, R.</creator><creator>Brasileiro, A.</creator><creator>Brito, A.</creator><creator>Barreto, P.</creator><creator>Pinheiro, S.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>SAT0412 Biological Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA): Differences between Switchers and Non-Switchers</title><author>Ramos Pinheiro, R. ; Brasileiro, A. ; Brito, A. ; Barreto, P. ; Pinheiro, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1852-c44aa789df16347ab4bcac264925d7aaf253e1800a74771f8efdbf5558436e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramos Pinheiro, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasileiro, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramos Pinheiro, R.</au><au>Brasileiro, A.</au><au>Brito, A.</au><au>Barreto, P.</au><au>Pinheiro, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SAT0412 Biological Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA): Differences between Switchers and Non-Switchers</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>819</spage><epage>819</epage><pages>819-819</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>BackgroundSwitching biological therapies is becoming increasingly common in routine management of PsA patients. However, evidence in this topic is still scarce. Predictive markers for an optimal approach to the sequential prescription of biologics are lacking.ObjectivesIn a population of PsA patients, we aimed to determine differences in baseline clinical and laboratory features between switchers and non-switchers.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the PsA patients followed at our outpatient clinic in the last 24 months. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Severity of skin manifestations and peripheral arthritis at PsA onset were recorded using PASI and DAS28 score. Patients who changed biological therapies due to therapeutic failure (primary or secondary) or toxicity were defined as switchers.For comparison of clinical and laboratory features we used chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney or T-Student test for continuous variables.Results58 PsA patients were included, 60.3% were women; the mean age at PsA and psoriasis (PsO) onset was 46.4 (±15) and 34.8 (±15) years, respectively. At PsA onset, 24.1% of patients had a PASI score&gt;10 and a mean DAS of 3.76 (±1.0). Laboratory features, arthritis and extra-articular manifestations were assessed (Image). 94.8% of patients were prescribed with non-biologic DMARD therapy and 55.2% with biological therapy, after failing to respond to a classic DMARD treatment alone. Median time from diagnosis until biological therapy prescription was 25.9 (±56,5) months.Out of 32 patients prescribed with biologics, 15 (46.9%) switched to another biologic agent, mainly due to secondary failure (63.6%), primary failure (18.2%) and adverse events (13.6%). 15.65% and 3.1% of patients required 2 or 3 switches. Etarnacept was the first line agent prescribed in the majority (78.8%) of patients. Adalimumab (73.3%) and ustekinumab (50.0%) were the most used agents as second and third line biological therapies, respectively.Switchers were significantly younger at psoriasis onset (25.6 (±13.8) vs 37.4 (±13.3) years, p=0.020) and also at PsA onset (33.3 (±9.6) vs 50.0 (±13.1) years, p&lt;0.0001). They had higher PASI (p=0.011) levels comparing to non-switchers. Uveitis and axial involvement were significantly more common in switchers (p=0.047 and p=0.034, respectively). All patients starting biological therapy on the first 12 months after disease onset switched to another biological agent.ConclusionsAge at PsO and PsA onset is a well-established clinical factor with significant impact in disease severity and in skin and arthritis manifestations. Our work suggests that it might also play a role in first biological treatment failure determining a need to switch. Higher PASI score at PsA onset, axial involvement and uveitis also seem to be associated with more likelihood of switching.Our results should be considered exploratory. Larger studies are required to determine the role of these clinical features in predicting biological treatment switching.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3019</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.819-819
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1901859652
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title SAT0412 Biological Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA): Differences between Switchers and Non-Switchers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A13%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAT0412%E2%80%85Biological%20Therapy%20in%20Psoriatic%20Arthritis%20(PSA):%20Differences%20between%20Switchers%20and%20Non-Switchers&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Ramos%20Pinheiro,%20R.&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=819&rft.epage=819&rft.pages=819-819&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4322515091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901859652&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true