OP0196-HPR Dose Reduction of Biologic Drugs in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Clinical Practice
BackgroundThe practice of reducing the dose of anti-TNF agents during the treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is often applied in clinical practice; it is not unusual for patients with axSpA to reduce the dose of anti-TNF agents despite the lack of supporting evidence from cli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.130-131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 131 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | 130 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Van Rossen, L. Harris, C. Withrington, R. Keat, A. |
description | BackgroundThe practice of reducing the dose of anti-TNF agents during the treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is often applied in clinical practice; it is not unusual for patients with axSpA to reduce the dose of anti-TNF agents despite the lack of supporting evidence from clinical trials or real-world investigations. Reasons for dose reduction include patient preference (fewer injections or infusions when the patient feels well) and cost reduction. The 2010 update of the ASAS recommendations for the use of anti-TNF agents in patients with axSpA does not consider dose reduction, nor do the 2015 draft BSR guidelines on the topic of biologics in axSpA. However, limited studies have indicated positive results.1–3 Real-life data regarding dose reduction are therefore valuable and may inform further studies, potentially enabling a rational approach to dosing in clinical practice to be adopted in the future.ObjectivesTo report the results of anti-TNF dose reduction in axSpA patients attending rheumatology practices in the UK.MethodsIn this retrospective study in SpA clinics at two UK hospitals, patients with axSpA who met NICE response criteria after 12 weeks of anti-TNF treatment,4 and remained stable for at least 6 months, were considered for dose reduction. Dose reduction could have been suggested by either patient or practitioner. Dose reduction decisions were made on an individual basis and implemented by extending the interval between anti-TNF administration, reducing the dose of each administration, or both. Dose reduction was calculated as a percentage of the standard recommended dose. Outcomes reported include BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI. Observed case data are reported.Results47 patients had their dose reduced between June 2005 and December 2015 (25 adalimumab, 14 etanercept, 7 infliximab and 1 golimumab). Most patients (79%) were male and the mean age was 50.2 years (SD±10.5). At the time of anti-TNF initiation, mean BASDAI was 6.4 (SD±1.7), which improved to a mean of 1.8 (SD±1.4) at the time of dose reduction. BASFI and BASMI scores also improved from anti-TNF initiation to time of dose reduction (Table). The mean time interval between initiation of anti-TNF therapy and dose reduction was 3.8 years (SD±2.8).At the time of analysis 39/47 (83%) remained on a reduced dose and were stable, with maintained efficacy up to 24 months post dose-reduction (Table). In these patients, the mean dose reduction was 36% (SD±16). 8 patients (17%) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3730 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901811358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4322509089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1278-f3f1df5d716c6527880afaeb2a60e631dcd3a4e9860da34855a5a8c1006f8d553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOAjEUhhujiYi-wySsB0_pTKcTV4gXTEggqEvTlF6gZJhiO5PIzo0v6pNYwIVbVyfn_JeTfAj1MPQxJvRa1LVf6XajbEgHgGmq20r4PikInKAOziiLZwqnqAMAJM1KWpyjixDWcQWGWQe9TWeAS5qOZ_Pvz687F3Qy16qVjXV14kxya13lllYmd75dhsTWyfDDiip53rpa7SonfLPytrEHaVTZ2sqozryIDVJfojMjqqCvfmcXvT7cv4zG6WT6-DQaTtIFHhQsNcRgZXJVYCppHi8MhBF6MRAUNCVYSUVEpktGQQmSsTwXuWASA1DDVJ6TLuode7fevbc6NHztWl_HlxyXgFmElbPoujm6pHcheG341tuN8DuOge958j88-Z4nP_Dke54xTY_pxWb9r-APmnmBhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901811358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OP0196-HPR Dose Reduction of Biologic Drugs in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Clinical Practice</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Van Rossen, L. ; Harris, C. ; Withrington, R. ; Keat, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Rossen, L. ; Harris, C. ; Withrington, R. ; Keat, A.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundThe practice of reducing the dose of anti-TNF agents during the treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is often applied in clinical practice; it is not unusual for patients with axSpA to reduce the dose of anti-TNF agents despite the lack of supporting evidence from clinical trials or real-world investigations. Reasons for dose reduction include patient preference (fewer injections or infusions when the patient feels well) and cost reduction. The 2010 update of the ASAS recommendations for the use of anti-TNF agents in patients with axSpA does not consider dose reduction, nor do the 2015 draft BSR guidelines on the topic of biologics in axSpA. However, limited studies have indicated positive results.1–3 Real-life data regarding dose reduction are therefore valuable and may inform further studies, potentially enabling a rational approach to dosing in clinical practice to be adopted in the future.ObjectivesTo report the results of anti-TNF dose reduction in axSpA patients attending rheumatology practices in the UK.MethodsIn this retrospective study in SpA clinics at two UK hospitals, patients with axSpA who met NICE response criteria after 12 weeks of anti-TNF treatment,4 and remained stable for at least 6 months, were considered for dose reduction. Dose reduction could have been suggested by either patient or practitioner. Dose reduction decisions were made on an individual basis and implemented by extending the interval between anti-TNF administration, reducing the dose of each administration, or both. Dose reduction was calculated as a percentage of the standard recommended dose. Outcomes reported include BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI. Observed case data are reported.Results47 patients had their dose reduced between June 2005 and December 2015 (25 adalimumab, 14 etanercept, 7 infliximab and 1 golimumab). Most patients (79%) were male and the mean age was 50.2 years (SD±10.5). At the time of anti-TNF initiation, mean BASDAI was 6.4 (SD±1.7), which improved to a mean of 1.8 (SD±1.4) at the time of dose reduction. BASFI and BASMI scores also improved from anti-TNF initiation to time of dose reduction (Table). The mean time interval between initiation of anti-TNF therapy and dose reduction was 3.8 years (SD±2.8).At the time of analysis 39/47 (83%) remained on a reduced dose and were stable, with maintained efficacy up to 24 months post dose-reduction (Table). In these patients, the mean dose reduction was 36% (SD±16). 8 patients (17%) reverted to their original dose after a mean of 20.2 months (SD±18.7) of treatment with a mean dose reduction of 38% (SD±16).ConclusionsIn this study, patients responding well to anti-TNF therapy successfully had their dose reduced while maintaining treatment response in real-life clinical practice in the UK. This approach to treatment may lead to cost savings in the care of these patients.ReferencesPlasencia C. J Rheumatol 2015;42(0):1638–46;Almirall M. Rheumatol Int 2015;35(9):1565–8;Závada J. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:96–102;NICE. Final appraisal determination: GID-TAG355. 2015AcknowledgementThis publication was supported by UCB Pharma through an educational grant. UCB Pharma had no editorial control on the content. The authors acknowledge Sana Eljamel, Costello Medical Consulting, for statistical analysis and editorial assistance, and Farhan Bari for his support of this research.Disclosure of InterestL. Van Rossen Grant/research support from: Pfizer, AbbVie, and UCB Pharma, Consultant for: Pfizer, AbbVie, and UCB Pharma, C. Harris: None declared, R. Withrington: None declared, A. Keat Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer and MSD, Consultant for: AbbVie, Biogen, MSD, Napp, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3730</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.130-131</ispartof><rights>2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 (c) 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/75/Suppl_2/130.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/75/Suppl_2/130.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Rossen, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Withrington, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keat, A.</creatorcontrib><title>OP0196-HPR Dose Reduction of Biologic Drugs in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Clinical Practice</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>BackgroundThe practice of reducing the dose of anti-TNF agents during the treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is often applied in clinical practice; it is not unusual for patients with axSpA to reduce the dose of anti-TNF agents despite the lack of supporting evidence from clinical trials or real-world investigations. Reasons for dose reduction include patient preference (fewer injections or infusions when the patient feels well) and cost reduction. The 2010 update of the ASAS recommendations for the use of anti-TNF agents in patients with axSpA does not consider dose reduction, nor do the 2015 draft BSR guidelines on the topic of biologics in axSpA. However, limited studies have indicated positive results.1–3 Real-life data regarding dose reduction are therefore valuable and may inform further studies, potentially enabling a rational approach to dosing in clinical practice to be adopted in the future.ObjectivesTo report the results of anti-TNF dose reduction in axSpA patients attending rheumatology practices in the UK.MethodsIn this retrospective study in SpA clinics at two UK hospitals, patients with axSpA who met NICE response criteria after 12 weeks of anti-TNF treatment,4 and remained stable for at least 6 months, were considered for dose reduction. Dose reduction could have been suggested by either patient or practitioner. Dose reduction decisions were made on an individual basis and implemented by extending the interval between anti-TNF administration, reducing the dose of each administration, or both. Dose reduction was calculated as a percentage of the standard recommended dose. Outcomes reported include BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI. Observed case data are reported.Results47 patients had their dose reduced between June 2005 and December 2015 (25 adalimumab, 14 etanercept, 7 infliximab and 1 golimumab). Most patients (79%) were male and the mean age was 50.2 years (SD±10.5). At the time of anti-TNF initiation, mean BASDAI was 6.4 (SD±1.7), which improved to a mean of 1.8 (SD±1.4) at the time of dose reduction. BASFI and BASMI scores also improved from anti-TNF initiation to time of dose reduction (Table). The mean time interval between initiation of anti-TNF therapy and dose reduction was 3.8 years (SD±2.8).At the time of analysis 39/47 (83%) remained on a reduced dose and were stable, with maintained efficacy up to 24 months post dose-reduction (Table). In these patients, the mean dose reduction was 36% (SD±16). 8 patients (17%) reverted to their original dose after a mean of 20.2 months (SD±18.7) of treatment with a mean dose reduction of 38% (SD±16).ConclusionsIn this study, patients responding well to anti-TNF therapy successfully had their dose reduced while maintaining treatment response in real-life clinical practice in the UK. This approach to treatment may lead to cost savings in the care of these patients.ReferencesPlasencia C. J Rheumatol 2015;42(0):1638–46;Almirall M. Rheumatol Int 2015;35(9):1565–8;Závada J. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:96–102;NICE. Final appraisal determination: GID-TAG355. 2015AcknowledgementThis publication was supported by UCB Pharma through an educational grant. UCB Pharma had no editorial control on the content. The authors acknowledge Sana Eljamel, Costello Medical Consulting, for statistical analysis and editorial assistance, and Farhan Bari for his support of this research.Disclosure of InterestL. Van Rossen Grant/research support from: Pfizer, AbbVie, and UCB Pharma, Consultant for: Pfizer, AbbVie, and UCB Pharma, C. Harris: None declared, R. Withrington: None declared, A. Keat Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer and MSD, Consultant for: AbbVie, Biogen, MSD, Napp, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOAjEUhhujiYi-wySsB0_pTKcTV4gXTEggqEvTlF6gZJhiO5PIzo0v6pNYwIVbVyfn_JeTfAj1MPQxJvRa1LVf6XajbEgHgGmq20r4PikInKAOziiLZwqnqAMAJM1KWpyjixDWcQWGWQe9TWeAS5qOZ_Pvz687F3Qy16qVjXV14kxya13lllYmd75dhsTWyfDDiip53rpa7SonfLPytrEHaVTZ2sqozryIDVJfojMjqqCvfmcXvT7cv4zG6WT6-DQaTtIFHhQsNcRgZXJVYCppHi8MhBF6MRAUNCVYSUVEpktGQQmSsTwXuWASA1DDVJ6TLuode7fevbc6NHztWl_HlxyXgFmElbPoujm6pHcheG341tuN8DuOge958j88-Z4nP_Dke54xTY_pxWb9r-APmnmBhQ</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Van Rossen, L.</creator><creator>Harris, C.</creator><creator>Withrington, R.</creator><creator>Keat, A.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>OP0196-HPR Dose Reduction of Biologic Drugs in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Clinical Practice</title><author>Van Rossen, L. ; Harris, C. ; Withrington, R. ; Keat, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1278-f3f1df5d716c6527880afaeb2a60e631dcd3a4e9860da34855a5a8c1006f8d553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Rossen, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Withrington, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keat, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Rossen, L.</au><au>Harris, C.</au><au>Withrington, R.</au><au>Keat, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OP0196-HPR Dose Reduction of Biologic Drugs in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Clinical Practice</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>130-131</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>BackgroundThe practice of reducing the dose of anti-TNF agents during the treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is often applied in clinical practice; it is not unusual for patients with axSpA to reduce the dose of anti-TNF agents despite the lack of supporting evidence from clinical trials or real-world investigations. Reasons for dose reduction include patient preference (fewer injections or infusions when the patient feels well) and cost reduction. The 2010 update of the ASAS recommendations for the use of anti-TNF agents in patients with axSpA does not consider dose reduction, nor do the 2015 draft BSR guidelines on the topic of biologics in axSpA. However, limited studies have indicated positive results.1–3 Real-life data regarding dose reduction are therefore valuable and may inform further studies, potentially enabling a rational approach to dosing in clinical practice to be adopted in the future.ObjectivesTo report the results of anti-TNF dose reduction in axSpA patients attending rheumatology practices in the UK.MethodsIn this retrospective study in SpA clinics at two UK hospitals, patients with axSpA who met NICE response criteria after 12 weeks of anti-TNF treatment,4 and remained stable for at least 6 months, were considered for dose reduction. Dose reduction could have been suggested by either patient or practitioner. Dose reduction decisions were made on an individual basis and implemented by extending the interval between anti-TNF administration, reducing the dose of each administration, or both. Dose reduction was calculated as a percentage of the standard recommended dose. Outcomes reported include BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI. Observed case data are reported.Results47 patients had their dose reduced between June 2005 and December 2015 (25 adalimumab, 14 etanercept, 7 infliximab and 1 golimumab). Most patients (79%) were male and the mean age was 50.2 years (SD±10.5). At the time of anti-TNF initiation, mean BASDAI was 6.4 (SD±1.7), which improved to a mean of 1.8 (SD±1.4) at the time of dose reduction. BASFI and BASMI scores also improved from anti-TNF initiation to time of dose reduction (Table). The mean time interval between initiation of anti-TNF therapy and dose reduction was 3.8 years (SD±2.8).At the time of analysis 39/47 (83%) remained on a reduced dose and were stable, with maintained efficacy up to 24 months post dose-reduction (Table). In these patients, the mean dose reduction was 36% (SD±16). 8 patients (17%) reverted to their original dose after a mean of 20.2 months (SD±18.7) of treatment with a mean dose reduction of 38% (SD±16).ConclusionsIn this study, patients responding well to anti-TNF therapy successfully had their dose reduced while maintaining treatment response in real-life clinical practice in the UK. This approach to treatment may lead to cost savings in the care of these patients.ReferencesPlasencia C. J Rheumatol 2015;42(0):1638–46;Almirall M. Rheumatol Int 2015;35(9):1565–8;Závada J. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:96–102;NICE. Final appraisal determination: GID-TAG355. 2015AcknowledgementThis publication was supported by UCB Pharma through an educational grant. UCB Pharma had no editorial control on the content. The authors acknowledge Sana Eljamel, Costello Medical Consulting, for statistical analysis and editorial assistance, and Farhan Bari for his support of this research.Disclosure of InterestL. Van Rossen Grant/research support from: Pfizer, AbbVie, and UCB Pharma, Consultant for: Pfizer, AbbVie, and UCB Pharma, C. Harris: None declared, R. Withrington: None declared, A. Keat Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer and MSD, Consultant for: AbbVie, Biogen, MSD, Napp, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3730</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016-06, Vol.75 (Suppl 2), p.130-131 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1901811358 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | OP0196-HPR Dose Reduction of Biologic Drugs in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Clinical Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OP0196-HPR%E2%80%85Dose%20Reduction%20of%20Biologic%20Drugs%20in%20Axial%20Spondyloarthritis%20in%20Clinical%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Van%20Rossen,%20L.&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=130-131&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3730&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4322509089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901811358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |