AB1165 Effectiveness of Nursing Consultations in Rheumatology: Results from the Score Study
BackgroundNursing Consultations in Rheumatology (NCR) are organizational care models that provide care centred on the rheumatology patient within the scope of a nurse's abilities.ObjectivesTo analyze the effectiveness and quality of care of NCR.MethodsNational multicenter observational prospect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.1292 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | 1292 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Almodovar, R. Fernandez Nebro, A. Gracia Perez, L.A. Román Ivorra, J.A. Rodríguez Cros, J.R. del Pino Montes, J. Rodríguez-Serrano, A. Muñoz-Fernández, S. |
description | BackgroundNursing Consultations in Rheumatology (NCR) are organizational care models that provide care centred on the rheumatology patient within the scope of a nurse's abilities.ObjectivesTo analyze the effectiveness and quality of care of NCR.MethodsNational multicenter observational prospective cohort study one year follow-up, comparing patients attending rheumatology services with and without NCR. NCR was defined by the presence: 1) Office itself; 2) at least one dedicated nurse, albeit part-time; 3) own agenda citation; and 4) phone.Variables included were (baseline, 6 and 12 months): a) Clinical activity, research and training, infrastructure of unit and resources of NCR); b) Socio-demographics, work productivity (WPAI), assessment of rheumatic disease, use of services and treatments, quality of life, knowledge of the disease and treatment and perceived quality of care. Analysis: Chi square, Fischer's test, t-Student test, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon and McNemar's tests were used.ResultsA total of 393 patients were included: 181NCR and 212 not NCR, corresponding to 39 units, 21 with NCR and 18 without NCR (age 53±11,8 vs 56±13,5 years); females 70% vs 61% and AR 78.5% vs 75,5%. Statistically significant differences were found in patients attended in sites without NCR for the following parameters: higher CRP level (5.9±8.3 vs 4.8±7.8; p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.2605 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901786615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4322503531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1275-61a7c131567371f646f561d68d091a2e25184c1b98ca8f0fc1fc5e9bda852943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwDpY6p_gksePAVCpuUgVS6Yosx7HbVIld7ASpGwsvypOQUAZWlnP_zy99CE2ATAESdimt9RvdNWUVopgAjXRXSz-NGaFHaAQp4_2YkWM0IoQkUZqz7BSdhbDtW8KBj9Dr7AaA0a-Pz1tjtGqrd211CNgZ_NT5UNk1njsburqVbdUXuLJ4OVjK1tVuvb_CSz1sAzbeNbjdaPyinO9j25X7c3RiZB30xW8eo9Xd7Wr-EC2e7x_ns0VUQJzRiIHMFCRAWZZkYFjKDGVQMl6SHGSsYwo8VVDkXEluiFFgFNV5UUpO4zxNxmhyeLvz7q3ToRVb13nbOwrICWScMaD91fXhSnkXgtdG7HzVSL8XQMSAU_zBKQac4genGHD2anZQF832X8Jv10uBnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901786615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AB1165 Effectiveness of Nursing Consultations in Rheumatology: Results from the Score Study</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Almodovar, R. ; Fernandez Nebro, A. ; Gracia Perez, L.A. ; Román Ivorra, J.A. ; Rodríguez Cros, J.R. ; del Pino Montes, J. ; Rodríguez-Serrano, A. ; Muñoz-Fernández, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Almodovar, R. ; Fernandez Nebro, A. ; Gracia Perez, L.A. ; Román Ivorra, J.A. ; Rodríguez Cros, J.R. ; del Pino Montes, J. ; Rodríguez-Serrano, A. ; Muñoz-Fernández, S.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundNursing Consultations in Rheumatology (NCR) are organizational care models that provide care centred on the rheumatology patient within the scope of a nurse's abilities.ObjectivesTo analyze the effectiveness and quality of care of NCR.MethodsNational multicenter observational prospective cohort study one year follow-up, comparing patients attending rheumatology services with and without NCR. NCR was defined by the presence: 1) Office itself; 2) at least one dedicated nurse, albeit part-time; 3) own agenda citation; and 4) phone.Variables included were (baseline, 6 and 12 months): a) Clinical activity, research and training, infrastructure of unit and resources of NCR); b) Socio-demographics, work productivity (WPAI), assessment of rheumatic disease, use of services and treatments, quality of life, knowledge of the disease and treatment and perceived quality of care. Analysis: Chi square, Fischer's test, t-Student test, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon and McNemar's tests were used.ResultsA total of 393 patients were included: 181NCR and 212 not NCR, corresponding to 39 units, 21 with NCR and 18 without NCR (age 53±11,8 vs 56±13,5 years); females 70% vs 61% and AR 78.5% vs 75,5%. Statistically significant differences were found in patients attended in sites without NCR for the following parameters: higher CRP level (5.9±8.3 vs 4.8±7.8; p<0.005), global disease patient VAS (3.6±2.3 vs 3.1±2.4), physician VAS (2.9±2.1 vs 2.3±2.1; p<0.05) and use of primary care consultations (2.7±5.4 vs 1.4±2.3; p<0.001), worse work productivity, knowledge of the disease, treatment adherence and perceived quality. There were no significant differences in the other parameters between the two groups.ConclusionsThe presence of NCR in the Rheumatology unit contributes to a lower frequency of primary care consultations, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with rheumatic diseases, also the knowledge of the disease, leading to an improvement of patient adherence to treatment and perceived quality of care.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.2605</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Limited</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.1292</ispartof><rights>2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2015 (c) 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/74/Suppl_2/1292.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/74/Suppl_2/1292.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3182,23551,27903,27904,77346,77377</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Almodovar, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez Nebro, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gracia Perez, L.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román Ivorra, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Cros, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Pino Montes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Serrano, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Fernández, S.</creatorcontrib><title>AB1165 Effectiveness of Nursing Consultations in Rheumatology: Results from the Score Study</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>BackgroundNursing Consultations in Rheumatology (NCR) are organizational care models that provide care centred on the rheumatology patient within the scope of a nurse's abilities.ObjectivesTo analyze the effectiveness and quality of care of NCR.MethodsNational multicenter observational prospective cohort study one year follow-up, comparing patients attending rheumatology services with and without NCR. NCR was defined by the presence: 1) Office itself; 2) at least one dedicated nurse, albeit part-time; 3) own agenda citation; and 4) phone.Variables included were (baseline, 6 and 12 months): a) Clinical activity, research and training, infrastructure of unit and resources of NCR); b) Socio-demographics, work productivity (WPAI), assessment of rheumatic disease, use of services and treatments, quality of life, knowledge of the disease and treatment and perceived quality of care. Analysis: Chi square, Fischer's test, t-Student test, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon and McNemar's tests were used.ResultsA total of 393 patients were included: 181NCR and 212 not NCR, corresponding to 39 units, 21 with NCR and 18 without NCR (age 53±11,8 vs 56±13,5 years); females 70% vs 61% and AR 78.5% vs 75,5%. Statistically significant differences were found in patients attended in sites without NCR for the following parameters: higher CRP level (5.9±8.3 vs 4.8±7.8; p<0.005), global disease patient VAS (3.6±2.3 vs 3.1±2.4), physician VAS (2.9±2.1 vs 2.3±2.1; p<0.05) and use of primary care consultations (2.7±5.4 vs 1.4±2.3; p<0.001), worse work productivity, knowledge of the disease, treatment adherence and perceived quality. There were no significant differences in the other parameters between the two groups.ConclusionsThe presence of NCR in the Rheumatology unit contributes to a lower frequency of primary care consultations, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with rheumatic diseases, also the knowledge of the disease, leading to an improvement of patient adherence to treatment and perceived quality of care.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwDpY6p_gksePAVCpuUgVS6Yosx7HbVIld7ASpGwsvypOQUAZWlnP_zy99CE2ATAESdimt9RvdNWUVopgAjXRXSz-NGaFHaAQp4_2YkWM0IoQkUZqz7BSdhbDtW8KBj9Dr7AaA0a-Pz1tjtGqrd211CNgZ_NT5UNk1njsburqVbdUXuLJ4OVjK1tVuvb_CSz1sAzbeNbjdaPyinO9j25X7c3RiZB30xW8eo9Xd7Wr-EC2e7x_ns0VUQJzRiIHMFCRAWZZkYFjKDGVQMl6SHGSsYwo8VVDkXEluiFFgFNV5UUpO4zxNxmhyeLvz7q3ToRVb13nbOwrICWScMaD91fXhSnkXgtdG7HzVSL8XQMSAU_zBKQac4genGHD2anZQF832X8Jv10uBnQ</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Almodovar, R.</creator><creator>Fernandez Nebro, A.</creator><creator>Gracia Perez, L.A.</creator><creator>Román Ivorra, J.A.</creator><creator>Rodríguez Cros, J.R.</creator><creator>del Pino Montes, J.</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Serrano, A.</creator><creator>Muñoz-Fernández, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>AB1165 Effectiveness of Nursing Consultations in Rheumatology: Results from the Score Study</title><author>Almodovar, R. ; Fernandez Nebro, A. ; Gracia Perez, L.A. ; Román Ivorra, J.A. ; Rodríguez Cros, J.R. ; del Pino Montes, J. ; Rodríguez-Serrano, A. ; Muñoz-Fernández, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1275-61a7c131567371f646f561d68d091a2e25184c1b98ca8f0fc1fc5e9bda852943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Almodovar, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez Nebro, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gracia Perez, L.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román Ivorra, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Cros, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Pino Montes, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Serrano, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Fernández, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Almodovar, R.</au><au>Fernandez Nebro, A.</au><au>Gracia Perez, L.A.</au><au>Román Ivorra, J.A.</au><au>Rodríguez Cros, J.R.</au><au>del Pino Montes, J.</au><au>Rodríguez-Serrano, A.</au><au>Muñoz-Fernández, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AB1165 Effectiveness of Nursing Consultations in Rheumatology: Results from the Score Study</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>1292</spage><pages>1292-</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>BackgroundNursing Consultations in Rheumatology (NCR) are organizational care models that provide care centred on the rheumatology patient within the scope of a nurse's abilities.ObjectivesTo analyze the effectiveness and quality of care of NCR.MethodsNational multicenter observational prospective cohort study one year follow-up, comparing patients attending rheumatology services with and without NCR. NCR was defined by the presence: 1) Office itself; 2) at least one dedicated nurse, albeit part-time; 3) own agenda citation; and 4) phone.Variables included were (baseline, 6 and 12 months): a) Clinical activity, research and training, infrastructure of unit and resources of NCR); b) Socio-demographics, work productivity (WPAI), assessment of rheumatic disease, use of services and treatments, quality of life, knowledge of the disease and treatment and perceived quality of care. Analysis: Chi square, Fischer's test, t-Student test, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon and McNemar's tests were used.ResultsA total of 393 patients were included: 181NCR and 212 not NCR, corresponding to 39 units, 21 with NCR and 18 without NCR (age 53±11,8 vs 56±13,5 years); females 70% vs 61% and AR 78.5% vs 75,5%. Statistically significant differences were found in patients attended in sites without NCR for the following parameters: higher CRP level (5.9±8.3 vs 4.8±7.8; p<0.005), global disease patient VAS (3.6±2.3 vs 3.1±2.4), physician VAS (2.9±2.1 vs 2.3±2.1; p<0.05) and use of primary care consultations (2.7±5.4 vs 1.4±2.3; p<0.001), worse work productivity, knowledge of the disease, treatment adherence and perceived quality. There were no significant differences in the other parameters between the two groups.ConclusionsThe presence of NCR in the Rheumatology unit contributes to a lower frequency of primary care consultations, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with rheumatic diseases, also the knowledge of the disease, leading to an improvement of patient adherence to treatment and perceived quality of care.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.2605</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.1292 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1901786615 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | AB1165 Effectiveness of Nursing Consultations in Rheumatology: Results from the Score Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A57%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AB1165%E2%80%85Effectiveness%20of%20Nursing%20Consultations%20in%20Rheumatology:%20Results%20from%20the%20Score%20Study&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Almodovar,%20R.&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=1292&rft.pages=1292-&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.2605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4322503531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901786615&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |