SAT0053 The Added Value of Ultrasound to Evaluate Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis
BackgroundVarious definitions of remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) have been proposed. The Disease Activity Index 28 joints (DAS28) is the routinely used score. Newer tools for evaluation of RA activity include the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CD...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.667 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | 667 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Ben Abdelghani, K. Miladi, S. Kassab, S. Chekili, S. Laatar, A. Zakraoui, L. |
description | BackgroundVarious definitions of remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) have been proposed. The Disease Activity Index 28 joints (DAS28) is the routinely used score. Newer tools for evaluation of RA activity include the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) are available and have proved to be more stringent.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of composite scores of remission in RA patients using the absence of inflammatory activity detected by ultrasound (US) as a gold standard.MethodsSixty seven patients followed-up for RA were recruited. B-mode and a Power Doppler (PD) US exam were assessed by a single rheumatologist who was experienced in US and blinded to the clinical and laboratory data. Twenty two joints were scanned (wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP)). SDAI and CDAI were calculated for each patient. Sensitivity, specificity and Positive Predictive value (PPV) for each score was calculated with as reference absence of Doppler signal in US. Then ROC curve were analyzed.ResultsAmong all patients, 30 were in remission according to the DAS28, 19 according to SDAI and 26 according to CDAI. For 19 patients there was no Doppler signal in US. The sensitivity and specificity of different remission scores considering as reference absence of joints with PD signal is showed in table 1.Table 1.Sensitivity, specificity for different remission criteriaDAS28SDAICDAISensitivity81,3%56,3%68,8%Specificity63,1%78,3%67,4% The ROC curves showed that the best threshold of DAS28 was 3.2. It was 6.5 for SDAI and 8 for CDAI.ConclusionsOurs results suggest that when considering remission as an absence of Doppler signal, the DAS28 was the most sensitive and the CDAI was the most specific. The ROC curves showed threshold exceeding definition of remission.ReferencesBalsa A, De Miguel E and col. Superiority of SDAI over DAS-28 in assessing remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients using power Doppler ultrasonography as a gold standard. Rheumatology 2010.Disclosure of InterestNone declared |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.6246 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901780544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4322502681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1274-5dcdd630f86e416e5ea471ff160c206a0563fbc532c07a5250dd89e3d14bb2443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbfYaDr1DuZn6S4CqX-QEGoqdthkpnQKUmmziSCOze-qE9i0rpw6-pyD-fce_gQmhGYE0LFrWpbvzN9o22IYiA8Mn2t_FzETJyhCWEiHWQB52gCADRiC5FcoqsQ9sMKKUknaPuS5QCcfn9-5TuDM62Nxq-q7g12Fd7WnVfB9a3GncOr90FXncEb09gQrGuxbfFmLKA6ZzXOfLfztrPhGl1Uqg7m5ndO0fZ-lS8fo_Xzw9MyW0cFiRMWcV1qLShUqTCMCMONYgmpKiKgHHor4IJWRclpXEKieMxB63RhqCasKGLG6BTNTncP3r31JnRy73rfDi8lWQBJUuBH193JVXoXgjeVPHjbKP8hCciRo_zDUY4c5ZGjHDkOaXFKF83-X8EfCoJ-hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901780544</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SAT0053 The Added Value of Ultrasound to Evaluate Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Ben Abdelghani, K. ; Miladi, S. ; Kassab, S. ; Chekili, S. ; Laatar, A. ; Zakraoui, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ben Abdelghani, K. ; Miladi, S. ; Kassab, S. ; Chekili, S. ; Laatar, A. ; Zakraoui, L.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundVarious definitions of remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) have been proposed. The Disease Activity Index 28 joints (DAS28) is the routinely used score. Newer tools for evaluation of RA activity include the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) are available and have proved to be more stringent.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of composite scores of remission in RA patients using the absence of inflammatory activity detected by ultrasound (US) as a gold standard.MethodsSixty seven patients followed-up for RA were recruited. B-mode and a Power Doppler (PD) US exam were assessed by a single rheumatologist who was experienced in US and blinded to the clinical and laboratory data. Twenty two joints were scanned (wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP)). SDAI and CDAI were calculated for each patient. Sensitivity, specificity and Positive Predictive value (PPV) for each score was calculated with as reference absence of Doppler signal in US. Then ROC curve were analyzed.ResultsAmong all patients, 30 were in remission according to the DAS28, 19 according to SDAI and 26 according to CDAI. For 19 patients there was no Doppler signal in US. The sensitivity and specificity of different remission scores considering as reference absence of joints with PD signal is showed in table 1.Table 1.Sensitivity, specificity for different remission criteriaDAS28SDAICDAISensitivity81,3%56,3%68,8%Specificity63,1%78,3%67,4% The ROC curves showed that the best threshold of DAS28 was 3.2. It was 6.5 for SDAI and 8 for CDAI.ConclusionsOurs results suggest that when considering remission as an absence of Doppler signal, the DAS28 was the most sensitive and the CDAI was the most specific. The ROC curves showed threshold exceeding definition of remission.ReferencesBalsa A, De Miguel E and col. Superiority of SDAI over DAS-28 in assessing remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients using power Doppler ultrasonography as a gold standard. Rheumatology 2010.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.6246</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Limited</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.667</ispartof><rights>2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2015 (c) 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/74/Suppl_2/667.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/74/Suppl_2/667.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23552,27903,27904,77346,77377</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ben Abdelghani, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miladi, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassab, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chekili, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laatar, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakraoui, L.</creatorcontrib><title>SAT0053 The Added Value of Ultrasound to Evaluate Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>BackgroundVarious definitions of remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) have been proposed. The Disease Activity Index 28 joints (DAS28) is the routinely used score. Newer tools for evaluation of RA activity include the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) are available and have proved to be more stringent.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of composite scores of remission in RA patients using the absence of inflammatory activity detected by ultrasound (US) as a gold standard.MethodsSixty seven patients followed-up for RA were recruited. B-mode and a Power Doppler (PD) US exam were assessed by a single rheumatologist who was experienced in US and blinded to the clinical and laboratory data. Twenty two joints were scanned (wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP)). SDAI and CDAI were calculated for each patient. Sensitivity, specificity and Positive Predictive value (PPV) for each score was calculated with as reference absence of Doppler signal in US. Then ROC curve were analyzed.ResultsAmong all patients, 30 were in remission according to the DAS28, 19 according to SDAI and 26 according to CDAI. For 19 patients there was no Doppler signal in US. The sensitivity and specificity of different remission scores considering as reference absence of joints with PD signal is showed in table 1.Table 1.Sensitivity, specificity for different remission criteriaDAS28SDAICDAISensitivity81,3%56,3%68,8%Specificity63,1%78,3%67,4% The ROC curves showed that the best threshold of DAS28 was 3.2. It was 6.5 for SDAI and 8 for CDAI.ConclusionsOurs results suggest that when considering remission as an absence of Doppler signal, the DAS28 was the most sensitive and the CDAI was the most specific. The ROC curves showed threshold exceeding definition of remission.ReferencesBalsa A, De Miguel E and col. Superiority of SDAI over DAS-28 in assessing remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients using power Doppler ultrasonography as a gold standard. Rheumatology 2010.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbfYaDr1DuZn6S4CqX-QEGoqdthkpnQKUmmziSCOze-qE9i0rpw6-pyD-fce_gQmhGYE0LFrWpbvzN9o22IYiA8Mn2t_FzETJyhCWEiHWQB52gCADRiC5FcoqsQ9sMKKUknaPuS5QCcfn9-5TuDM62Nxq-q7g12Fd7WnVfB9a3GncOr90FXncEb09gQrGuxbfFmLKA6ZzXOfLfztrPhGl1Uqg7m5ndO0fZ-lS8fo_Xzw9MyW0cFiRMWcV1qLShUqTCMCMONYgmpKiKgHHor4IJWRclpXEKieMxB63RhqCasKGLG6BTNTncP3r31JnRy73rfDi8lWQBJUuBH193JVXoXgjeVPHjbKP8hCciRo_zDUY4c5ZGjHDkOaXFKF83-X8EfCoJ-hw</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Ben Abdelghani, K.</creator><creator>Miladi, S.</creator><creator>Kassab, S.</creator><creator>Chekili, S.</creator><creator>Laatar, A.</creator><creator>Zakraoui, L.</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>SAT0053 The Added Value of Ultrasound to Evaluate Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis</title><author>Ben Abdelghani, K. ; Miladi, S. ; Kassab, S. ; Chekili, S. ; Laatar, A. ; Zakraoui, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1274-5dcdd630f86e416e5ea471ff160c206a0563fbc532c07a5250dd89e3d14bb2443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ben Abdelghani, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miladi, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassab, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chekili, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laatar, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakraoui, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ben Abdelghani, K.</au><au>Miladi, S.</au><au>Kassab, S.</au><au>Chekili, S.</au><au>Laatar, A.</au><au>Zakraoui, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SAT0053 The Added Value of Ultrasound to Evaluate Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>667</spage><pages>667-</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>BackgroundVarious definitions of remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) have been proposed. The Disease Activity Index 28 joints (DAS28) is the routinely used score. Newer tools for evaluation of RA activity include the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) are available and have proved to be more stringent.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of composite scores of remission in RA patients using the absence of inflammatory activity detected by ultrasound (US) as a gold standard.MethodsSixty seven patients followed-up for RA were recruited. B-mode and a Power Doppler (PD) US exam were assessed by a single rheumatologist who was experienced in US and blinded to the clinical and laboratory data. Twenty two joints were scanned (wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP)). SDAI and CDAI were calculated for each patient. Sensitivity, specificity and Positive Predictive value (PPV) for each score was calculated with as reference absence of Doppler signal in US. Then ROC curve were analyzed.ResultsAmong all patients, 30 were in remission according to the DAS28, 19 according to SDAI and 26 according to CDAI. For 19 patients there was no Doppler signal in US. The sensitivity and specificity of different remission scores considering as reference absence of joints with PD signal is showed in table 1.Table 1.Sensitivity, specificity for different remission criteriaDAS28SDAICDAISensitivity81,3%56,3%68,8%Specificity63,1%78,3%67,4% The ROC curves showed that the best threshold of DAS28 was 3.2. It was 6.5 for SDAI and 8 for CDAI.ConclusionsOurs results suggest that when considering remission as an absence of Doppler signal, the DAS28 was the most sensitive and the CDAI was the most specific. The ROC curves showed threshold exceeding definition of remission.ReferencesBalsa A, De Miguel E and col. Superiority of SDAI over DAS-28 in assessing remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients using power Doppler ultrasonography as a gold standard. Rheumatology 2010.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.6246</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.667 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1901780544 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | SAT0053 The Added Value of Ultrasound to Evaluate Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A35%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAT0053%E2%80%85The%20Added%20Value%20of%20Ultrasound%20to%20Evaluate%20Remission%20in%20Rheumatoid%20Arthritis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Ben%20Abdelghani,%20K.&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=667&rft.pages=667-&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.6246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4322502681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901780544&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |