OP0180 Remission Induction with Dmard Combinations and Glucocorticoids is not Superior to Remission Induction with MTX Monotherapy and Glucocorticoids: Week 52 Results of the High-Risk Group from the Carera Trial
BackgroundTo date, intensive DMARD combination therapy with glucocorticoids (GCs) is the most effective treatment approach for the management of early Rheumatoid Arthritis (eRA). The ideal content of the combination and the dose of GCs are however not yet known.ObjectivesTo compare different intensi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.139-139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 139 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Verschueren, P. De Cock, D. Corluy, L. Joos, R. Langenaken, C. Taelman, V. Raeman, F. Ravilingien, I. Vandevyvere, K. Lenaerts, J. Geens, E. Geusens, P. Vanhoof, J. Durnez, A. Remans, J. Vander Cruyssen, B. Van Essche, E. Sileghem, A. De Brabanter, G. Joly, J. Van der Elst, K. Meyfroidt, S. Westhovens, R. |
description | BackgroundTo date, intensive DMARD combination therapy with glucocorticoids (GCs) is the most effective treatment approach for the management of early Rheumatoid Arthritis (eRA). The ideal content of the combination and the dose of GCs are however not yet known.ObjectivesTo compare different intensive combination treatment strategies associated with GCs in eRA patients with a poor prognosis at week (W)52 in the CareRA trial.MethodsCareRA is a two year prospective investigator-initiated multicenter RCT rooted in daily practice. DMARD naïve eRA patients were stratified into a high or low-risk group based on classical prognostic markers (presence of erosions, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein and DAS28(CRP). High-risk patients (n=290) were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment strategies.1) Cobra Classic (n=98): Methotrexate (MTX)+Sulphasalazine+60mg prednisone tapered weekly to 7.5mg daily from W72) Cobra Slim (n=98): MTX+30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W63) Cobra Avant-Garde (n=94):MTX+Leflunomide +30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W6From W28, GCs were tapered in all patients and stopped at W34. A predefined treat to target approach was applied. From W40, we aimed for DMARD monotherapy.Efficacy measures were proportions of DAS28(CRP) remission, good EULAR response, clinically meaningful HAQ response, HAQ=0 (ITT analysis). Radiographic progression was measured via the Sharp Van der Heijde score. Adverse events related to therapy (AEs) were registered. Missing data were imputed by last observation carried forward.ResultsRemission rates were 64.3%, 60.2% and 62.8% in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.837). Also no other efficacy outcomes did not differ between groups. 82% of X-ray images were available at baseline. Radiographic progression was minimal. SvH scores were 1.3±2.1, 1.3±2.5 and 1.0±1.4 at baseline and changed over 52 weeks 0.3±0.5, 0.4±1.1 and 0.3±0.6 in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.581). The total numbers of AEs were 182 in 65 Classic patients, 125 in 64 Slim patients and 174 in 72 Avant-Garde patients (p=0.026). Serious AEs were reported in 3 Classic, 2 Slim and 3 Avant-Garde patients.ConclusionsHigh rates of remission were achieved at week 52 with csDMARDs and GCs in all remission induction schemes. Cobra Slim showed comparable efficacy with less adverse events compared to DMARD combinations with moderate or high GC dosages.Disclosure of InterestNone declared |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.4018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901779032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4322502011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1852-dfc3abfdab09d5a16070e8d8d55f8305909e838a9f69da5d24b4672db0c60fb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1u1DAURi0EEkPLO1yp65Tr_DgOrNAA00qtWpVBsLOc2GY8TeJgx0LdddNX5AF4EpwOCxawYGX7-vuOJR9CTiieUlqwV3Ic_U7HQdmQ5UirTMde-tMSKX9CVrRkPI0ZPiUrRCyysmH1c_IihH06Iqd8RX5cXacw_rx_uNGDDcG6Ec5HFbt52X238w7eDdIrWLuhtaNcxgHkqGDTx851zs-2c1YFsAFGN8PHOGlvnYfZwT-Rl9svcOlSfKe9nO7-xnsNn7W-hSpPlBD7OYAzkPJwZr_ushsbbmHjXZzAeDc8XqylTzTYeiv7Y_LMyD7ol7_XI_Lpw_vt-iy7uNqcr99eZC3lVZ4p0xWyNUq22KhKUoY1aq64qirDC6wabDQvuGwMa5SsVF62Jatz1WLH0LS0OCInB-7k3beowyz2LvoxPSlog7SuGyzylHpzSHXeheC1EZO36VfvBEWxiBR_iBSLSPEoUiwiU5sd2u2w_6_iL4ilrsI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901779032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OP0180 Remission Induction with Dmard Combinations and Glucocorticoids is not Superior to Remission Induction with MTX Monotherapy and Glucocorticoids: Week 52 Results of the High-Risk Group from the Carera Trial</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Verschueren, P. ; De Cock, D. ; Corluy, L. ; Joos, R. ; Langenaken, C. ; Taelman, V. ; Raeman, F. ; Ravilingien, I. ; Vandevyvere, K. ; Lenaerts, J. ; Geens, E. ; Geusens, P. ; Vanhoof, J. ; Durnez, A. ; Remans, J. ; Vander Cruyssen, B. ; Van Essche, E. ; Sileghem, A. ; De Brabanter, G. ; Joly, J. ; Van der Elst, K. ; Meyfroidt, S. ; Westhovens, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Verschueren, P. ; De Cock, D. ; Corluy, L. ; Joos, R. ; Langenaken, C. ; Taelman, V. ; Raeman, F. ; Ravilingien, I. ; Vandevyvere, K. ; Lenaerts, J. ; Geens, E. ; Geusens, P. ; Vanhoof, J. ; Durnez, A. ; Remans, J. ; Vander Cruyssen, B. ; Van Essche, E. ; Sileghem, A. ; De Brabanter, G. ; Joly, J. ; Van der Elst, K. ; Meyfroidt, S. ; Westhovens, R.</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundTo date, intensive DMARD combination therapy with glucocorticoids (GCs) is the most effective treatment approach for the management of early Rheumatoid Arthritis (eRA). The ideal content of the combination and the dose of GCs are however not yet known.ObjectivesTo compare different intensive combination treatment strategies associated with GCs in eRA patients with a poor prognosis at week (W)52 in the CareRA trial.MethodsCareRA is a two year prospective investigator-initiated multicenter RCT rooted in daily practice. DMARD naïve eRA patients were stratified into a high or low-risk group based on classical prognostic markers (presence of erosions, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein and DAS28(CRP). High-risk patients (n=290) were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment strategies.1) Cobra Classic (n=98): Methotrexate (MTX)+Sulphasalazine+60mg prednisone tapered weekly to 7.5mg daily from W72) Cobra Slim (n=98): MTX+30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W63) Cobra Avant-Garde (n=94):MTX+Leflunomide +30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W6From W28, GCs were tapered in all patients and stopped at W34. A predefined treat to target approach was applied. From W40, we aimed for DMARD monotherapy.Efficacy measures were proportions of DAS28(CRP) remission, good EULAR response, clinically meaningful HAQ response, HAQ=0 (ITT analysis). Radiographic progression was measured via the Sharp Van der Heijde score. Adverse events related to therapy (AEs) were registered. Missing data were imputed by last observation carried forward.ResultsRemission rates were 64.3%, 60.2% and 62.8% in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.837). Also no other efficacy outcomes did not differ between groups. 82% of X-ray images were available at baseline. Radiographic progression was minimal. SvH scores were 1.3±2.1, 1.3±2.5 and 1.0±1.4 at baseline and changed over 52 weeks 0.3±0.5, 0.4±1.1 and 0.3±0.6 in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.581). The total numbers of AEs were 182 in 65 Classic patients, 125 in 64 Slim patients and 174 in 72 Avant-Garde patients (p=0.026). Serious AEs were reported in 3 Classic, 2 Slim and 3 Avant-Garde patients.ConclusionsHigh rates of remission were achieved at week 52 with csDMARDs and GCs in all remission induction schemes. Cobra Slim showed comparable efficacy with less adverse events compared to DMARD combinations with moderate or high GC dosages.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.4018</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.139-139</ispartof><rights>2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2015 (c) 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1852-dfc3abfdab09d5a16070e8d8d55f8305909e838a9f69da5d24b4672db0c60fb13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/74/Suppl_2/139.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/74/Suppl_2/139.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verschueren, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Cock, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corluy, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenaken, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taelman, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raeman, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravilingien, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandevyvere, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenaerts, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geens, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geusens, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhoof, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durnez, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remans, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vander Cruyssen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Essche, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sileghem, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Brabanter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joly, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Elst, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyfroidt, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westhovens, R.</creatorcontrib><title>OP0180 Remission Induction with Dmard Combinations and Glucocorticoids is not Superior to Remission Induction with MTX Monotherapy and Glucocorticoids: Week 52 Results of the High-Risk Group from the Carera Trial</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>BackgroundTo date, intensive DMARD combination therapy with glucocorticoids (GCs) is the most effective treatment approach for the management of early Rheumatoid Arthritis (eRA). The ideal content of the combination and the dose of GCs are however not yet known.ObjectivesTo compare different intensive combination treatment strategies associated with GCs in eRA patients with a poor prognosis at week (W)52 in the CareRA trial.MethodsCareRA is a two year prospective investigator-initiated multicenter RCT rooted in daily practice. DMARD naïve eRA patients were stratified into a high or low-risk group based on classical prognostic markers (presence of erosions, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein and DAS28(CRP). High-risk patients (n=290) were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment strategies.1) Cobra Classic (n=98): Methotrexate (MTX)+Sulphasalazine+60mg prednisone tapered weekly to 7.5mg daily from W72) Cobra Slim (n=98): MTX+30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W63) Cobra Avant-Garde (n=94):MTX+Leflunomide +30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W6From W28, GCs were tapered in all patients and stopped at W34. A predefined treat to target approach was applied. From W40, we aimed for DMARD monotherapy.Efficacy measures were proportions of DAS28(CRP) remission, good EULAR response, clinically meaningful HAQ response, HAQ=0 (ITT analysis). Radiographic progression was measured via the Sharp Van der Heijde score. Adverse events related to therapy (AEs) were registered. Missing data were imputed by last observation carried forward.ResultsRemission rates were 64.3%, 60.2% and 62.8% in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.837). Also no other efficacy outcomes did not differ between groups. 82% of X-ray images were available at baseline. Radiographic progression was minimal. SvH scores were 1.3±2.1, 1.3±2.5 and 1.0±1.4 at baseline and changed over 52 weeks 0.3±0.5, 0.4±1.1 and 0.3±0.6 in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.581). The total numbers of AEs were 182 in 65 Classic patients, 125 in 64 Slim patients and 174 in 72 Avant-Garde patients (p=0.026). Serious AEs were reported in 3 Classic, 2 Slim and 3 Avant-Garde patients.ConclusionsHigh rates of remission were achieved at week 52 with csDMARDs and GCs in all remission induction schemes. Cobra Slim showed comparable efficacy with less adverse events compared to DMARD combinations with moderate or high GC dosages.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1u1DAURi0EEkPLO1yp65Tr_DgOrNAA00qtWpVBsLOc2GY8TeJgx0LdddNX5AF4EpwOCxawYGX7-vuOJR9CTiieUlqwV3Ic_U7HQdmQ5UirTMde-tMSKX9CVrRkPI0ZPiUrRCyysmH1c_IihH06Iqd8RX5cXacw_rx_uNGDDcG6Ec5HFbt52X238w7eDdIrWLuhtaNcxgHkqGDTx851zs-2c1YFsAFGN8PHOGlvnYfZwT-Rl9svcOlSfKe9nO7-xnsNn7W-hSpPlBD7OYAzkPJwZr_ushsbbmHjXZzAeDc8XqylTzTYeiv7Y_LMyD7ol7_XI_Lpw_vt-iy7uNqcr99eZC3lVZ4p0xWyNUq22KhKUoY1aq64qirDC6wabDQvuGwMa5SsVF62Jatz1WLH0LS0OCInB-7k3beowyz2LvoxPSlog7SuGyzylHpzSHXeheC1EZO36VfvBEWxiBR_iBSLSPEoUiwiU5sd2u2w_6_iL4ilrsI</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Verschueren, P.</creator><creator>De Cock, D.</creator><creator>Corluy, L.</creator><creator>Joos, R.</creator><creator>Langenaken, C.</creator><creator>Taelman, V.</creator><creator>Raeman, F.</creator><creator>Ravilingien, I.</creator><creator>Vandevyvere, K.</creator><creator>Lenaerts, J.</creator><creator>Geens, E.</creator><creator>Geusens, P.</creator><creator>Vanhoof, J.</creator><creator>Durnez, A.</creator><creator>Remans, J.</creator><creator>Vander Cruyssen, B.</creator><creator>Van Essche, E.</creator><creator>Sileghem, A.</creator><creator>De Brabanter, G.</creator><creator>Joly, J.</creator><creator>Van der Elst, K.</creator><creator>Meyfroidt, S.</creator><creator>Westhovens, R.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>OP0180 Remission Induction with Dmard Combinations and Glucocorticoids is not Superior to Remission Induction with MTX Monotherapy and Glucocorticoids: Week 52 Results of the High-Risk Group from the Carera Trial</title><author>Verschueren, P. ; De Cock, D. ; Corluy, L. ; Joos, R. ; Langenaken, C. ; Taelman, V. ; Raeman, F. ; Ravilingien, I. ; Vandevyvere, K. ; Lenaerts, J. ; Geens, E. ; Geusens, P. ; Vanhoof, J. ; Durnez, A. ; Remans, J. ; Vander Cruyssen, B. ; Van Essche, E. ; Sileghem, A. ; De Brabanter, G. ; Joly, J. ; Van der Elst, K. ; Meyfroidt, S. ; Westhovens, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1852-dfc3abfdab09d5a16070e8d8d55f8305909e838a9f69da5d24b4672db0c60fb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verschueren, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Cock, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corluy, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenaken, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taelman, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raeman, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravilingien, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandevyvere, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenaerts, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geens, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geusens, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhoof, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durnez, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remans, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vander Cruyssen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Essche, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sileghem, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Brabanter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joly, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Elst, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyfroidt, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westhovens, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verschueren, P.</au><au>De Cock, D.</au><au>Corluy, L.</au><au>Joos, R.</au><au>Langenaken, C.</au><au>Taelman, V.</au><au>Raeman, F.</au><au>Ravilingien, I.</au><au>Vandevyvere, K.</au><au>Lenaerts, J.</au><au>Geens, E.</au><au>Geusens, P.</au><au>Vanhoof, J.</au><au>Durnez, A.</au><au>Remans, J.</au><au>Vander Cruyssen, B.</au><au>Van Essche, E.</au><au>Sileghem, A.</au><au>De Brabanter, G.</au><au>Joly, J.</au><au>Van der Elst, K.</au><au>Meyfroidt, S.</au><au>Westhovens, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OP0180 Remission Induction with Dmard Combinations and Glucocorticoids is not Superior to Remission Induction with MTX Monotherapy and Glucocorticoids: Week 52 Results of the High-Risk Group from the Carera Trial</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>139-139</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>BackgroundTo date, intensive DMARD combination therapy with glucocorticoids (GCs) is the most effective treatment approach for the management of early Rheumatoid Arthritis (eRA). The ideal content of the combination and the dose of GCs are however not yet known.ObjectivesTo compare different intensive combination treatment strategies associated with GCs in eRA patients with a poor prognosis at week (W)52 in the CareRA trial.MethodsCareRA is a two year prospective investigator-initiated multicenter RCT rooted in daily practice. DMARD naïve eRA patients were stratified into a high or low-risk group based on classical prognostic markers (presence of erosions, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein and DAS28(CRP). High-risk patients (n=290) were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment strategies.1) Cobra Classic (n=98): Methotrexate (MTX)+Sulphasalazine+60mg prednisone tapered weekly to 7.5mg daily from W72) Cobra Slim (n=98): MTX+30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W63) Cobra Avant-Garde (n=94):MTX+Leflunomide +30mg prednisone tapered to 5 mg daily from W6From W28, GCs were tapered in all patients and stopped at W34. A predefined treat to target approach was applied. From W40, we aimed for DMARD monotherapy.Efficacy measures were proportions of DAS28(CRP) remission, good EULAR response, clinically meaningful HAQ response, HAQ=0 (ITT analysis). Radiographic progression was measured via the Sharp Van der Heijde score. Adverse events related to therapy (AEs) were registered. Missing data were imputed by last observation carried forward.ResultsRemission rates were 64.3%, 60.2% and 62.8% in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.837). Also no other efficacy outcomes did not differ between groups. 82% of X-ray images were available at baseline. Radiographic progression was minimal. SvH scores were 1.3±2.1, 1.3±2.5 and 1.0±1.4 at baseline and changed over 52 weeks 0.3±0.5, 0.4±1.1 and 0.3±0.6 in the Classic, Slim and Avant-Garde group respectively (p=0.581). The total numbers of AEs were 182 in 65 Classic patients, 125 in 64 Slim patients and 174 in 72 Avant-Garde patients (p=0.026). Serious AEs were reported in 3 Classic, 2 Slim and 3 Avant-Garde patients.ConclusionsHigh rates of remission were achieved at week 52 with csDMARDs and GCs in all remission induction schemes. Cobra Slim showed comparable efficacy with less adverse events compared to DMARD combinations with moderate or high GC dosages.Disclosure of InterestNone declared</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.4018</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2015-06, Vol.74 (Suppl 2), p.139-139 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1901779032 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | OP0180 Remission Induction with Dmard Combinations and Glucocorticoids is not Superior to Remission Induction with MTX Monotherapy and Glucocorticoids: Week 52 Results of the High-Risk Group from the Carera Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T19%3A15%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OP0180%E2%80%85Remission%20Induction%20with%20Dmard%20Combinations%20and%20Glucocorticoids%20is%20not%20Superior%20to%20Remission%20Induction%20with%20MTX%20Monotherapy%20and%20Glucocorticoids:%20Week%2052%20Results%20of%20the%20High-Risk%20Group%20from%20the%20Carera%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Verschueren,%20P.&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=139-139&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.4018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4322502011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901779032&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |