Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model
The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation and program planning 2017-06, Vol.62, p.9-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Evaluation and program planning |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Umar, Sulaiman Man, Norsida Nawi, Nolila Mohd Latif, Ismail Abd Samah, Bahaman Abu |
description | The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study. A sample of 298 respondents was randomly selected and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Thirty-three core competency items were assessed. Instrument validity and reliability were ensured. The cross-sectional data obtained was analysed using SPSS for descriptive statistics including mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS). Results of the study showed that on a scale of 5, the most important core extension competency items according to respondents’ perception were: “Making good use of information and communication technologies/access and use of web-based resources” (M=4.86, SD=0.23); “Conducting needs assessments” (M=4.84, SD=0.16); “organizing extension campaigns” (M=4.82, SD=0.47) and “Managing groups and teamwork” (M=4.81, SD=0.76). In terms of proficiency, the highest competency identified by the respondents was “Conducting farm and home visits (M=3.62, SD=0.82) followed by ‘conducting meetings effectively’ (M=3.19, SD=0.72); “Conducting focus group discussions” (M=3.16, SD=0.32) and “conducting community forums” (M=3.13, SD=0.64). The discrepancies implying competency deficits were widest in “Acquiring and allocating resources” (MWDS=12.67); use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and web-based resources in agricultural extension (MWDS=12.59); and report writing and sharing the results and impacts (MWDS=11.92). It is recommended that any intervention aimed at developing the capacity of extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia should prioritize these core competency items in accordance with the deficits established in this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901763858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149718916301859</els_id><sourcerecordid>1901763858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a63d4380dcf86cf2f5dc29027952f4add0a31b69a15d177d05fd38346716db773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtuFDEQRS0EIkPgF5AV1t2U3Q-7s0uGV6REbMja8tjVwZNuu2N3B2aX3-D3-JJ4NAGxZFWLOnWv6hBywqBkwNr32xLv9TDFcDMN2pccmCiBlwDsGVkxKapCSAHPyQpY3RWCye6IvEppCwB1J-qX5IhL1nHB5Yos6xCRmjBOOKM3OxrxbnERR_RzonoM_obiz7xKLnj6I8RbjIk6Tyf0zqdl0JFe6UHvktOn9DohDT09D9GZ778ffiXqEW3OSQlT2mfSMVgcXpMXvR4Svnmax-T608dv6y_F5dfPF-uzy8LULcyFbitbVxKs6WVret431vAOuOga3tfaWtAV27SdZo1lQlhoelvJqm4Fa-1GiOqYvDvkZll3C6ZZbcMSfa5UrMva2ko2MlOnB8rEkFLEXk3RjTruFAO1N6626l_jam9cAVfZeD5--1SxbEa0f0__KM7AhwOA-dF7h1El47JqtFmzmZUN7n96HgGrFpw9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901763858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Umar, Sulaiman ; Man, Norsida ; Nawi, Nolila Mohd ; Latif, Ismail Abd ; Samah, Bahaman Abu</creator><creatorcontrib>Umar, Sulaiman ; Man, Norsida ; Nawi, Nolila Mohd ; Latif, Ismail Abd ; Samah, Bahaman Abu</creatorcontrib><description>The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study. A sample of 298 respondents was randomly selected and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Thirty-three core competency items were assessed. Instrument validity and reliability were ensured. The cross-sectional data obtained was analysed using SPSS for descriptive statistics including mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS). Results of the study showed that on a scale of 5, the most important core extension competency items according to respondents’ perception were: “Making good use of information and communication technologies/access and use of web-based resources” (M=4.86, SD=0.23); “Conducting needs assessments” (M=4.84, SD=0.16); “organizing extension campaigns” (M=4.82, SD=0.47) and “Managing groups and teamwork” (M=4.81, SD=0.76). In terms of proficiency, the highest competency identified by the respondents was “Conducting farm and home visits (M=3.62, SD=0.82) followed by ‘conducting meetings effectively’ (M=3.19, SD=0.72); “Conducting focus group discussions” (M=3.16, SD=0.32) and “conducting community forums” (M=3.13, SD=0.64). The discrepancies implying competency deficits were widest in “Acquiring and allocating resources” (MWDS=12.67); use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and web-based resources in agricultural extension (MWDS=12.59); and report writing and sharing the results and impacts (MWDS=11.92). It is recommended that any intervention aimed at developing the capacity of extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia should prioritize these core competency items in accordance with the deficits established in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7870</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28192728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural extension ; Agriculture ; Campaigns ; Capacity development ; Communications technology ; Competence ; Core competency ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Developing Countries ; Discrepancies ; Domiciliary visits ; Farmers ; Focus Groups ; Home Visits ; Humans ; Information technology ; Internet ; Knowledge ; Malaysia ; Needs analysis ; Needs Assessment ; Peninsular Malaysia ; Professional Competence - standards ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Report writing ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rural Extension ; Teamwork ; Technical Writing</subject><ispartof>Evaluation and program planning, 2017-06, Vol.62, p.9-14</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a63d4380dcf86cf2f5dc29027952f4add0a31b69a15d177d05fd38346716db773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a63d4380dcf86cf2f5dc29027952f4add0a31b69a15d177d05fd38346716db773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,30998,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Umar, Sulaiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Man, Norsida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawi, Nolila Mohd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latif, Ismail Abd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samah, Bahaman Abu</creatorcontrib><title>Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model</title><title>Evaluation and program planning</title><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><description>The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study. A sample of 298 respondents was randomly selected and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Thirty-three core competency items were assessed. Instrument validity and reliability were ensured. The cross-sectional data obtained was analysed using SPSS for descriptive statistics including mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS). Results of the study showed that on a scale of 5, the most important core extension competency items according to respondents’ perception were: “Making good use of information and communication technologies/access and use of web-based resources” (M=4.86, SD=0.23); “Conducting needs assessments” (M=4.84, SD=0.16); “organizing extension campaigns” (M=4.82, SD=0.47) and “Managing groups and teamwork” (M=4.81, SD=0.76). In terms of proficiency, the highest competency identified by the respondents was “Conducting farm and home visits (M=3.62, SD=0.82) followed by ‘conducting meetings effectively’ (M=3.19, SD=0.72); “Conducting focus group discussions” (M=3.16, SD=0.32) and “conducting community forums” (M=3.13, SD=0.64). The discrepancies implying competency deficits were widest in “Acquiring and allocating resources” (MWDS=12.67); use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and web-based resources in agricultural extension (MWDS=12.59); and report writing and sharing the results and impacts (MWDS=11.92). It is recommended that any intervention aimed at developing the capacity of extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia should prioritize these core competency items in accordance with the deficits established in this study.</description><subject>Agricultural extension</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Capacity development</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Core competency</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Domiciliary visits</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Home Visits</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Malaysia</subject><subject>Needs analysis</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Peninsular Malaysia</subject><subject>Professional Competence - standards</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Report writing</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rural Extension</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Technical Writing</subject><issn>0149-7189</issn><issn>1873-7870</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtuFDEQRS0EIkPgF5AV1t2U3Q-7s0uGV6REbMja8tjVwZNuu2N3B2aX3-D3-JJ4NAGxZFWLOnWv6hBywqBkwNr32xLv9TDFcDMN2pccmCiBlwDsGVkxKapCSAHPyQpY3RWCye6IvEppCwB1J-qX5IhL1nHB5Yos6xCRmjBOOKM3OxrxbnERR_RzonoM_obiz7xKLnj6I8RbjIk6Tyf0zqdl0JFe6UHvktOn9DohDT09D9GZ778ffiXqEW3OSQlT2mfSMVgcXpMXvR4Svnmax-T608dv6y_F5dfPF-uzy8LULcyFbitbVxKs6WVret431vAOuOga3tfaWtAV27SdZo1lQlhoelvJqm4Fa-1GiOqYvDvkZll3C6ZZbcMSfa5UrMva2ko2MlOnB8rEkFLEXk3RjTruFAO1N6626l_jam9cAVfZeD5--1SxbEa0f0__KM7AhwOA-dF7h1El47JqtFmzmZUN7n96HgGrFpw9</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Umar, Sulaiman</creator><creator>Man, Norsida</creator><creator>Nawi, Nolila Mohd</creator><creator>Latif, Ismail Abd</creator><creator>Samah, Bahaman Abu</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model</title><author>Umar, Sulaiman ; Man, Norsida ; Nawi, Nolila Mohd ; Latif, Ismail Abd ; Samah, Bahaman Abu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a63d4380dcf86cf2f5dc29027952f4add0a31b69a15d177d05fd38346716db773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural extension</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Capacity development</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Core competency</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Domiciliary visits</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Home Visits</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Malaysia</topic><topic>Needs analysis</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Peninsular Malaysia</topic><topic>Professional Competence - standards</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Report writing</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rural Extension</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Technical Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Umar, Sulaiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Man, Norsida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawi, Nolila Mohd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latif, Ismail Abd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samah, Bahaman Abu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Umar, Sulaiman</au><au>Man, Norsida</au><au>Nawi, Nolila Mohd</au><au>Latif, Ismail Abd</au><au>Samah, Bahaman Abu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>62</volume><spage>9</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>9-14</pages><issn>0149-7189</issn><eissn>1873-7870</eissn><abstract>The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study. A sample of 298 respondents was randomly selected and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Thirty-three core competency items were assessed. Instrument validity and reliability were ensured. The cross-sectional data obtained was analysed using SPSS for descriptive statistics including mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS). Results of the study showed that on a scale of 5, the most important core extension competency items according to respondents’ perception were: “Making good use of information and communication technologies/access and use of web-based resources” (M=4.86, SD=0.23); “Conducting needs assessments” (M=4.84, SD=0.16); “organizing extension campaigns” (M=4.82, SD=0.47) and “Managing groups and teamwork” (M=4.81, SD=0.76). In terms of proficiency, the highest competency identified by the respondents was “Conducting farm and home visits (M=3.62, SD=0.82) followed by ‘conducting meetings effectively’ (M=3.19, SD=0.72); “Conducting focus group discussions” (M=3.16, SD=0.32) and “conducting community forums” (M=3.13, SD=0.64). The discrepancies implying competency deficits were widest in “Acquiring and allocating resources” (MWDS=12.67); use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and web-based resources in agricultural extension (MWDS=12.59); and report writing and sharing the results and impacts (MWDS=11.92). It is recommended that any intervention aimed at developing the capacity of extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia should prioritize these core competency items in accordance with the deficits established in this study.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28192728</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-7189 |
ispartof | Evaluation and program planning, 2017-06, Vol.62, p.9-14 |
issn | 0149-7189 1873-7870 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1901763858 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Agricultural extension Agriculture Campaigns Capacity development Communications technology Competence Core competency Cross-Sectional Studies Developing Countries Discrepancies Domiciliary visits Farmers Focus Groups Home Visits Humans Information technology Internet Knowledge Malaysia Needs analysis Needs Assessment Peninsular Malaysia Professional Competence - standards Program Evaluation - methods Questionnaires Reliability Report writing Reproducibility of Results Rural Extension Teamwork Technical Writing |
title | Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A40%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Core%20competency%20requirements%20among%20extension%20workers%20in%20peninsular%20Malaysia:%20Use%20of%20Borich%E2%80%99s%20needs%20assessment%20model&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20and%20program%20planning&rft.au=Umar,%20Sulaiman&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=62&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=9-14&rft.issn=0149-7189&rft.eissn=1873-7870&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1901763858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901763858&rft_id=info:pmid/28192728&rft_els_id=S0149718916301859&rfr_iscdi=true |