Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model

The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evaluation and program planning 2017-06, Vol.62, p.9-14
Hauptverfasser: Umar, Sulaiman, Man, Norsida, Nawi, Nolila Mohd, Latif, Ismail Abd, Samah, Bahaman Abu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue
container_start_page 9
container_title Evaluation and program planning
container_volume 62
creator Umar, Sulaiman
Man, Norsida
Nawi, Nolila Mohd
Latif, Ismail Abd
Samah, Bahaman Abu
description The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study. A sample of 298 respondents was randomly selected and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Thirty-three core competency items were assessed. Instrument validity and reliability were ensured. The cross-sectional data obtained was analysed using SPSS for descriptive statistics including mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS). Results of the study showed that on a scale of 5, the most important core extension competency items according to respondents’ perception were: “Making good use of information and communication technologies/access and use of web-based resources” (M=4.86, SD=0.23); “Conducting needs assessments” (M=4.84, SD=0.16); “organizing extension campaigns” (M=4.82, SD=0.47) and “Managing groups and teamwork” (M=4.81, SD=0.76). In terms of proficiency, the highest competency identified by the respondents was “Conducting farm and home visits (M=3.62, SD=0.82) followed by ‘conducting meetings effectively’ (M=3.19, SD=0.72); “Conducting focus group discussions” (M=3.16, SD=0.32) and “conducting community forums” (M=3.13, SD=0.64). The discrepancies implying competency deficits were widest in “Acquiring and allocating resources” (MWDS=12.67); use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and web-based resources in agricultural extension (MWDS=12.59); and report writing and sharing the results and impacts (MWDS=11.92). It is recommended that any intervention aimed at developing the capacity of extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia should prioritize these core competency items in accordance with the deficits established in this study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901763858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149718916301859</els_id><sourcerecordid>1901763858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a63d4380dcf86cf2f5dc29027952f4add0a31b69a15d177d05fd38346716db773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtuFDEQRS0EIkPgF5AV1t2U3Q-7s0uGV6REbMja8tjVwZNuu2N3B2aX3-D3-JJ4NAGxZFWLOnWv6hBywqBkwNr32xLv9TDFcDMN2pccmCiBlwDsGVkxKapCSAHPyQpY3RWCye6IvEppCwB1J-qX5IhL1nHB5Yos6xCRmjBOOKM3OxrxbnERR_RzonoM_obiz7xKLnj6I8RbjIk6Tyf0zqdl0JFe6UHvktOn9DohDT09D9GZ778ffiXqEW3OSQlT2mfSMVgcXpMXvR4Svnmax-T608dv6y_F5dfPF-uzy8LULcyFbitbVxKs6WVret431vAOuOga3tfaWtAV27SdZo1lQlhoelvJqm4Fa-1GiOqYvDvkZll3C6ZZbcMSfa5UrMva2ko2MlOnB8rEkFLEXk3RjTruFAO1N6626l_jam9cAVfZeD5--1SxbEa0f0__KM7AhwOA-dF7h1El47JqtFmzmZUN7n96HgGrFpw9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901763858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Umar, Sulaiman ; Man, Norsida ; Nawi, Nolila Mohd ; Latif, Ismail Abd ; Samah, Bahaman Abu</creator><creatorcontrib>Umar, Sulaiman ; Man, Norsida ; Nawi, Nolila Mohd ; Latif, Ismail Abd ; Samah, Bahaman Abu</creatorcontrib><description>The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study. A sample of 298 respondents was randomly selected and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Thirty-three core competency items were assessed. Instrument validity and reliability were ensured. The cross-sectional data obtained was analysed using SPSS for descriptive statistics including mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS). Results of the study showed that on a scale of 5, the most important core extension competency items according to respondents’ perception were: “Making good use of information and communication technologies/access and use of web-based resources” (M=4.86, SD=0.23); “Conducting needs assessments” (M=4.84, SD=0.16); “organizing extension campaigns” (M=4.82, SD=0.47) and “Managing groups and teamwork” (M=4.81, SD=0.76). In terms of proficiency, the highest competency identified by the respondents was “Conducting farm and home visits (M=3.62, SD=0.82) followed by ‘conducting meetings effectively’ (M=3.19, SD=0.72); “Conducting focus group discussions” (M=3.16, SD=0.32) and “conducting community forums” (M=3.13, SD=0.64). The discrepancies implying competency deficits were widest in “Acquiring and allocating resources” (MWDS=12.67); use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and web-based resources in agricultural extension (MWDS=12.59); and report writing and sharing the results and impacts (MWDS=11.92). It is recommended that any intervention aimed at developing the capacity of extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia should prioritize these core competency items in accordance with the deficits established in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7870</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28192728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural extension ; Agriculture ; Campaigns ; Capacity development ; Communications technology ; Competence ; Core competency ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Developing Countries ; Discrepancies ; Domiciliary visits ; Farmers ; Focus Groups ; Home Visits ; Humans ; Information technology ; Internet ; Knowledge ; Malaysia ; Needs analysis ; Needs Assessment ; Peninsular Malaysia ; Professional Competence - standards ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Report writing ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rural Extension ; Teamwork ; Technical Writing</subject><ispartof>Evaluation and program planning, 2017-06, Vol.62, p.9-14</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a63d4380dcf86cf2f5dc29027952f4add0a31b69a15d177d05fd38346716db773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a63d4380dcf86cf2f5dc29027952f4add0a31b69a15d177d05fd38346716db773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,30998,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Umar, Sulaiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Man, Norsida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawi, Nolila Mohd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latif, Ismail Abd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samah, Bahaman Abu</creatorcontrib><title>Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model</title><title>Evaluation and program planning</title><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><description>The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study. A sample of 298 respondents was randomly selected and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Thirty-three core competency items were assessed. Instrument validity and reliability were ensured. The cross-sectional data obtained was analysed using SPSS for descriptive statistics including mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS). Results of the study showed that on a scale of 5, the most important core extension competency items according to respondents’ perception were: “Making good use of information and communication technologies/access and use of web-based resources” (M=4.86, SD=0.23); “Conducting needs assessments” (M=4.84, SD=0.16); “organizing extension campaigns” (M=4.82, SD=0.47) and “Managing groups and teamwork” (M=4.81, SD=0.76). In terms of proficiency, the highest competency identified by the respondents was “Conducting farm and home visits (M=3.62, SD=0.82) followed by ‘conducting meetings effectively’ (M=3.19, SD=0.72); “Conducting focus group discussions” (M=3.16, SD=0.32) and “conducting community forums” (M=3.13, SD=0.64). The discrepancies implying competency deficits were widest in “Acquiring and allocating resources” (MWDS=12.67); use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and web-based resources in agricultural extension (MWDS=12.59); and report writing and sharing the results and impacts (MWDS=11.92). It is recommended that any intervention aimed at developing the capacity of extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia should prioritize these core competency items in accordance with the deficits established in this study.</description><subject>Agricultural extension</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Capacity development</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Core competency</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Discrepancies</subject><subject>Domiciliary visits</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Home Visits</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Malaysia</subject><subject>Needs analysis</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Peninsular Malaysia</subject><subject>Professional Competence - standards</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Report writing</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rural Extension</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Technical Writing</subject><issn>0149-7189</issn><issn>1873-7870</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtuFDEQRS0EIkPgF5AV1t2U3Q-7s0uGV6REbMja8tjVwZNuu2N3B2aX3-D3-JJ4NAGxZFWLOnWv6hBywqBkwNr32xLv9TDFcDMN2pccmCiBlwDsGVkxKapCSAHPyQpY3RWCye6IvEppCwB1J-qX5IhL1nHB5Yos6xCRmjBOOKM3OxrxbnERR_RzonoM_obiz7xKLnj6I8RbjIk6Tyf0zqdl0JFe6UHvktOn9DohDT09D9GZ778ffiXqEW3OSQlT2mfSMVgcXpMXvR4Svnmax-T608dv6y_F5dfPF-uzy8LULcyFbitbVxKs6WVret431vAOuOga3tfaWtAV27SdZo1lQlhoelvJqm4Fa-1GiOqYvDvkZll3C6ZZbcMSfa5UrMva2ko2MlOnB8rEkFLEXk3RjTruFAO1N6626l_jam9cAVfZeD5--1SxbEa0f0__KM7AhwOA-dF7h1El47JqtFmzmZUN7n96HgGrFpw9</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Umar, Sulaiman</creator><creator>Man, Norsida</creator><creator>Nawi, Nolila Mohd</creator><creator>Latif, Ismail Abd</creator><creator>Samah, Bahaman Abu</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model</title><author>Umar, Sulaiman ; Man, Norsida ; Nawi, Nolila Mohd ; Latif, Ismail Abd ; Samah, Bahaman Abu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a63d4380dcf86cf2f5dc29027952f4add0a31b69a15d177d05fd38346716db773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural extension</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Capacity development</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Core competency</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Discrepancies</topic><topic>Domiciliary visits</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Home Visits</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Malaysia</topic><topic>Needs analysis</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Peninsular Malaysia</topic><topic>Professional Competence - standards</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Report writing</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rural Extension</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Technical Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Umar, Sulaiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Man, Norsida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawi, Nolila Mohd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latif, Ismail Abd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samah, Bahaman Abu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Umar, Sulaiman</au><au>Man, Norsida</au><au>Nawi, Nolila Mohd</au><au>Latif, Ismail Abd</au><au>Samah, Bahaman Abu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>62</volume><spage>9</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>9-14</pages><issn>0149-7189</issn><eissn>1873-7870</eissn><abstract>The study described the perceived importance of, and proficiency in core agricultural extension competencies among extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia; and evaluating the resultant deficits in the competencies. The Borich’s Needs Assessment Model was used to achieve the objectives of the study. A sample of 298 respondents was randomly selected and interviewed using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Thirty-three core competency items were assessed. Instrument validity and reliability were ensured. The cross-sectional data obtained was analysed using SPSS for descriptive statistics including mean weighted discrepancy score (MWDS). Results of the study showed that on a scale of 5, the most important core extension competency items according to respondents’ perception were: “Making good use of information and communication technologies/access and use of web-based resources” (M=4.86, SD=0.23); “Conducting needs assessments” (M=4.84, SD=0.16); “organizing extension campaigns” (M=4.82, SD=0.47) and “Managing groups and teamwork” (M=4.81, SD=0.76). In terms of proficiency, the highest competency identified by the respondents was “Conducting farm and home visits (M=3.62, SD=0.82) followed by ‘conducting meetings effectively’ (M=3.19, SD=0.72); “Conducting focus group discussions” (M=3.16, SD=0.32) and “conducting community forums” (M=3.13, SD=0.64). The discrepancies implying competency deficits were widest in “Acquiring and allocating resources” (MWDS=12.67); use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and web-based resources in agricultural extension (MWDS=12.59); and report writing and sharing the results and impacts (MWDS=11.92). It is recommended that any intervention aimed at developing the capacity of extension workers in Peninsular Malaysia should prioritize these core competency items in accordance with the deficits established in this study.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28192728</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-7189
ispartof Evaluation and program planning, 2017-06, Vol.62, p.9-14
issn 0149-7189
1873-7870
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1901763858
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Agricultural extension
Agriculture
Campaigns
Capacity development
Communications technology
Competence
Core competency
Cross-Sectional Studies
Developing Countries
Discrepancies
Domiciliary visits
Farmers
Focus Groups
Home Visits
Humans
Information technology
Internet
Knowledge
Malaysia
Needs analysis
Needs Assessment
Peninsular Malaysia
Professional Competence - standards
Program Evaluation - methods
Questionnaires
Reliability
Report writing
Reproducibility of Results
Rural Extension
Teamwork
Technical Writing
title Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich’s needs assessment model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A40%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Core%20competency%20requirements%20among%20extension%20workers%20in%20peninsular%20Malaysia:%20Use%20of%20Borich%E2%80%99s%20needs%20assessment%20model&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20and%20program%20planning&rft.au=Umar,%20Sulaiman&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=62&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=9-14&rft.issn=0149-7189&rft.eissn=1873-7870&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1901763858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901763858&rft_id=info:pmid/28192728&rft_els_id=S0149718916301859&rfr_iscdi=true