A6.05 Optimisation of the THP-1 cell model system for interrogation of differential macrophage polarisation in human disease
Background and objectivesMacrophages are a heterogeneous population of cells that play a central role in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. In tissues, macrophages are activated by a diverse array of signals, adopt distinct phenotypes and undertake a wide range of ef...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2016-02, Vol.75 (Suppl 1), p.A49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A49 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Graham, AE Re, NA Baxter, E Carr, I Robinson, JR Aslam, A Antanaviciute, A Mackie, SL Morgan, AW |
description | Background and objectivesMacrophages are a heterogeneous population of cells that play a central role in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. In tissues, macrophages are activated by a diverse array of signals, adopt distinct phenotypes and undertake a wide range of effector functions. Mimicking the Th cell nomenclature, a M1/M2 model of macrophage polarisation was initially proposed in murine models and has been increasingly applied to human disease. THP-1 cells are commonly used in disease model systems, however, differentiation protocols vary widely e.g. concentration and exposure times of priming agent (PMA) and polarising cytokines, necessitating the need for standardisation. M1 protocols have dominated previous literature; possibly due to the absence of clear markers and subset definition for the anti-inflammatory, M2 subtype. Our aim is to identify novel transcriptional signatures that can be used for the interrogation of human disease and ultimately the development of disease-specific in vitro models.Materials and methodsReported M1- and M2-specific macrophage markers were initially used as outcome measures of THP-1 polarisation experiments investigating transcriptional alterations in response to PMA concentration, rest period, cytokine stimulation times and concentrations. Publicly available RNA-seq datasets derived from human primary macrophage subtypes were used to identify additional markers. NOS and arginase production were measured to functionally confirm polarisation towards an M1 or M2 phenotype.ResultsOptimal conditions were selected based on the upregulation of M1 (CXCL10, IL-6 and INHBA) or M2 (CD206, CCL17 and TGM2) transcripts. A low level of PMA (5 ng/ml) and an extended rest period (72 h) were found to be sufficient to induce macrophage maturation, whilst preventing M1 polarisation bias, prior to cytokine stimulation. Characterisation of novel markers identified through analysis of public RNA-seq data is underway, along with generation of RNA-seq data from our optimised conditions.ConclusionsWe are developing a THP-1 cell model for generating pro- and anti-inflammatory macrophages that resemble populations found in disease states. Marker panels and transcriptional signatures will ultimately be applied to the investigation of macrophage phenotypes found in vivo. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209124.117 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901698799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4322497117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1859-5a82901410320dd480c043f878b367690094ac319a95ac84cfaca2db21d467fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUL1OwzAQthBIlMI7WOqcYieOY4upqoAiVSpDmS0nsRtXiR3sZOiCWHhRngRXBcTKcqe77-dOHwAzjOYYZ_RWWusbNXa1CUmKMI2F45REsDgDE0woixuKzsEEIZQlhNPiElyFsI8jYphNwNuCzlH--f6x6QfTmSAH4yx0Gg6NgtvVc4JhpdoWdq5WLQyHMKgOauehsYPy3u1-BbXRWnllByMjXVbe9Y3cKdi7VvofY2NhM3bSRnZQMqhrcKFlG9TNd5-Cl4f77XKVrDePT8vFOikxy3mSS5ZyhAlGWYrqmjBUIZJpVrAyowXlCHEiqwxzyXNZMVJpWcm0LlNcE1roMpuC2cm39-51VGEQezd6G08KHI0pZwXnkXV3YsXnQ_BKi96bTvqDwEgcAxd_AhfHwMUp8AgWUU1P6rLb_0v4BdF4irE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901698799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A6.05 Optimisation of the THP-1 cell model system for interrogation of differential macrophage polarisation in human disease</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Graham, AE ; Re, NA ; Baxter, E ; Carr, I ; Robinson, JR ; Aslam, A ; Antanaviciute, A ; Mackie, SL ; Morgan, AW</creator><creatorcontrib>Graham, AE ; Re, NA ; Baxter, E ; Carr, I ; Robinson, JR ; Aslam, A ; Antanaviciute, A ; Mackie, SL ; Morgan, AW</creatorcontrib><description>Background and objectivesMacrophages are a heterogeneous population of cells that play a central role in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. In tissues, macrophages are activated by a diverse array of signals, adopt distinct phenotypes and undertake a wide range of effector functions. Mimicking the Th cell nomenclature, a M1/M2 model of macrophage polarisation was initially proposed in murine models and has been increasingly applied to human disease. THP-1 cells are commonly used in disease model systems, however, differentiation protocols vary widely e.g. concentration and exposure times of priming agent (PMA) and polarising cytokines, necessitating the need for standardisation. M1 protocols have dominated previous literature; possibly due to the absence of clear markers and subset definition for the anti-inflammatory, M2 subtype. Our aim is to identify novel transcriptional signatures that can be used for the interrogation of human disease and ultimately the development of disease-specific in vitro models.Materials and methodsReported M1- and M2-specific macrophage markers were initially used as outcome measures of THP-1 polarisation experiments investigating transcriptional alterations in response to PMA concentration, rest period, cytokine stimulation times and concentrations. Publicly available RNA-seq datasets derived from human primary macrophage subtypes were used to identify additional markers. NOS and arginase production were measured to functionally confirm polarisation towards an M1 or M2 phenotype.ResultsOptimal conditions were selected based on the upregulation of M1 (CXCL10, IL-6 and INHBA) or M2 (CD206, CCL17 and TGM2) transcripts. A low level of PMA (5 ng/ml) and an extended rest period (72 h) were found to be sufficient to induce macrophage maturation, whilst preventing M1 polarisation bias, prior to cytokine stimulation. Characterisation of novel markers identified through analysis of public RNA-seq data is underway, along with generation of RNA-seq data from our optimised conditions.ConclusionsWe are developing a THP-1 cell model for generating pro- and anti-inflammatory macrophages that resemble populations found in disease states. Marker panels and transcriptional signatures will ultimately be applied to the investigation of macrophage phenotypes found in vivo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209124.117</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Limited</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016-02, Vol.75 (Suppl 1), p.A49</ispartof><rights>2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 (c) 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1859-5a82901410320dd480c043f878b367690094ac319a95ac84cfaca2db21d467fb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/75/Suppl_1/A49.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/75/Suppl_1/A49.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3182,23551,27903,27904,77346,77377</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graham, AE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Re, NA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antanaviciute, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackie, SL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, AW</creatorcontrib><title>A6.05 Optimisation of the THP-1 cell model system for interrogation of differential macrophage polarisation in human disease</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>Background and objectivesMacrophages are a heterogeneous population of cells that play a central role in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. In tissues, macrophages are activated by a diverse array of signals, adopt distinct phenotypes and undertake a wide range of effector functions. Mimicking the Th cell nomenclature, a M1/M2 model of macrophage polarisation was initially proposed in murine models and has been increasingly applied to human disease. THP-1 cells are commonly used in disease model systems, however, differentiation protocols vary widely e.g. concentration and exposure times of priming agent (PMA) and polarising cytokines, necessitating the need for standardisation. M1 protocols have dominated previous literature; possibly due to the absence of clear markers and subset definition for the anti-inflammatory, M2 subtype. Our aim is to identify novel transcriptional signatures that can be used for the interrogation of human disease and ultimately the development of disease-specific in vitro models.Materials and methodsReported M1- and M2-specific macrophage markers were initially used as outcome measures of THP-1 polarisation experiments investigating transcriptional alterations in response to PMA concentration, rest period, cytokine stimulation times and concentrations. Publicly available RNA-seq datasets derived from human primary macrophage subtypes were used to identify additional markers. NOS and arginase production were measured to functionally confirm polarisation towards an M1 or M2 phenotype.ResultsOptimal conditions were selected based on the upregulation of M1 (CXCL10, IL-6 and INHBA) or M2 (CD206, CCL17 and TGM2) transcripts. A low level of PMA (5 ng/ml) and an extended rest period (72 h) were found to be sufficient to induce macrophage maturation, whilst preventing M1 polarisation bias, prior to cytokine stimulation. Characterisation of novel markers identified through analysis of public RNA-seq data is underway, along with generation of RNA-seq data from our optimised conditions.ConclusionsWe are developing a THP-1 cell model for generating pro- and anti-inflammatory macrophages that resemble populations found in disease states. Marker panels and transcriptional signatures will ultimately be applied to the investigation of macrophage phenotypes found in vivo.</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVUL1OwzAQthBIlMI7WOqcYieOY4upqoAiVSpDmS0nsRtXiR3sZOiCWHhRngRXBcTKcqe77-dOHwAzjOYYZ_RWWusbNXa1CUmKMI2F45REsDgDE0woixuKzsEEIZQlhNPiElyFsI8jYphNwNuCzlH--f6x6QfTmSAH4yx0Gg6NgtvVc4JhpdoWdq5WLQyHMKgOauehsYPy3u1-BbXRWnllByMjXVbe9Y3cKdi7VvofY2NhM3bSRnZQMqhrcKFlG9TNd5-Cl4f77XKVrDePT8vFOikxy3mSS5ZyhAlGWYrqmjBUIZJpVrAyowXlCHEiqwxzyXNZMVJpWcm0LlNcE1roMpuC2cm39-51VGEQezd6G08KHI0pZwXnkXV3YsXnQ_BKi96bTvqDwEgcAxd_AhfHwMUp8AgWUU1P6rLb_0v4BdF4irE</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Graham, AE</creator><creator>Re, NA</creator><creator>Baxter, E</creator><creator>Carr, I</creator><creator>Robinson, JR</creator><creator>Aslam, A</creator><creator>Antanaviciute, A</creator><creator>Mackie, SL</creator><creator>Morgan, AW</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>A6.05 Optimisation of the THP-1 cell model system for interrogation of differential macrophage polarisation in human disease</title><author>Graham, AE ; Re, NA ; Baxter, E ; Carr, I ; Robinson, JR ; Aslam, A ; Antanaviciute, A ; Mackie, SL ; Morgan, AW</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1859-5a82901410320dd480c043f878b367690094ac319a95ac84cfaca2db21d467fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, AE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Re, NA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antanaviciute, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackie, SL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, AW</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, AE</au><au>Re, NA</au><au>Baxter, E</au><au>Carr, I</au><au>Robinson, JR</au><au>Aslam, A</au><au>Antanaviciute, A</au><au>Mackie, SL</au><au>Morgan, AW</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A6.05 Optimisation of the THP-1 cell model system for interrogation of differential macrophage polarisation in human disease</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A49</spage><pages>A49-</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background and objectivesMacrophages are a heterogeneous population of cells that play a central role in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. In tissues, macrophages are activated by a diverse array of signals, adopt distinct phenotypes and undertake a wide range of effector functions. Mimicking the Th cell nomenclature, a M1/M2 model of macrophage polarisation was initially proposed in murine models and has been increasingly applied to human disease. THP-1 cells are commonly used in disease model systems, however, differentiation protocols vary widely e.g. concentration and exposure times of priming agent (PMA) and polarising cytokines, necessitating the need for standardisation. M1 protocols have dominated previous literature; possibly due to the absence of clear markers and subset definition for the anti-inflammatory, M2 subtype. Our aim is to identify novel transcriptional signatures that can be used for the interrogation of human disease and ultimately the development of disease-specific in vitro models.Materials and methodsReported M1- and M2-specific macrophage markers were initially used as outcome measures of THP-1 polarisation experiments investigating transcriptional alterations in response to PMA concentration, rest period, cytokine stimulation times and concentrations. Publicly available RNA-seq datasets derived from human primary macrophage subtypes were used to identify additional markers. NOS and arginase production were measured to functionally confirm polarisation towards an M1 or M2 phenotype.ResultsOptimal conditions were selected based on the upregulation of M1 (CXCL10, IL-6 and INHBA) or M2 (CD206, CCL17 and TGM2) transcripts. A low level of PMA (5 ng/ml) and an extended rest period (72 h) were found to be sufficient to induce macrophage maturation, whilst preventing M1 polarisation bias, prior to cytokine stimulation. Characterisation of novel markers identified through analysis of public RNA-seq data is underway, along with generation of RNA-seq data from our optimised conditions.ConclusionsWe are developing a THP-1 cell model for generating pro- and anti-inflammatory macrophages that resemble populations found in disease states. Marker panels and transcriptional signatures will ultimately be applied to the investigation of macrophage phenotypes found in vivo.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209124.117</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016-02, Vol.75 (Suppl 1), p.A49 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1901698799 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | A6.05 Optimisation of the THP-1 cell model system for interrogation of differential macrophage polarisation in human disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A07%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A6.05%E2%80%85Optimisation%20of%20the%20THP-1%20cell%20model%20system%20for%20interrogation%20of%20differential%20macrophage%20polarisation%20in%20human%20disease&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Graham,%20AE&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A49&rft.pages=A49-&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209124.117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4322497117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901698799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |