Control Points in Ecosystems: Moving Beyond the Hot Spot Hot Moment Concept
The phrase “hot spots and hot moments” first entered the lexicon in 2003, following the publication of the paper “Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems” by McClain and others (Ecosystems 6:301–312, 2003). This paper described the potential fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecosystems (New York) 2017-06, Vol.20 (4), p.665-682 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 682 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 665 |
container_title | Ecosystems (New York) |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Bernhardt, Emily S. Blaszczak, Joanna R. Ficken, Cari D. Fork, Megan L. Kaiser, Kendra E. Seybold, Erin C. |
description | The phrase “hot spots and hot moments” first entered the lexicon in 2003, following the publication of the paper “Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems” by McClain and others (Ecosystems 6:301–312, 2003). This paper described the potential for rare places and rare events to exert a disproportionate influence on the movement of elements at the scale of landscapes and ecosystems. Here, we examine how the cleverly named hot spot and hot moment concept (hereafter HSHM) has influenced biogeochemistry and ecosystem science over the last 13 years. We specifically examined the extent to which the HSHM concept has: (1) motivated research aimed at understanding how and why biogeochemical behavior varies across spatiotemporal scales; (2) improved our ability to detect HSHM phenomena; and (3) influenced our approaches to restoration and ecosystem management practices. We found that the HSHM concept has provided a highly fertile framework for a substantial volume of research on the spatial and temporal dynamics of nutrient cycling, and in doing so, has improved our understanding of when and where biogeochemical rates are maximized. Despite the high usage of the term, we found limited examples of rigorous statistical or modeling approaches that would allow ecosystem scientists to not only identify, but scale the aggregate impact of HSHM on ecosystem processes. We propose that the phrase “hot spots and hot moments” includes two implicit assumptions that may actually be limiting progress in applying the concept. First, by differentiating “hot spots” from “hot moments,” the phrase separates the spatial and temporal components of biogeochemical behavior. Instead, we argue that the temporal dynamics of a putative hot spot are a fundamental trait that should be used in their description. Second, the adjective “hot” implicitly suggests that a place or a time must be dichotomously classified as “hot or not.” We suggest instead that each landscape of interest contains a wide range of biogeochemical process rates that respond to critical drivers, and the gradations of this biogeochemical topography are of greater interest than the maximum peaks. For these reasons, we recommend replacing the HSHM terminology with the more nuanced term ecosystem control points. “Ecosystem control” suggests that the rate must be of sufficient magnitude or ubiquity to affect dynamics of the ecosystem, while “points” allows for descriptions tha |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10021-016-0103-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1901640490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713731215</galeid><jstor_id>48719435</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713731215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b8a1b42a7f9c1bce6b0a80a65e4df7e40e0ea61e0039ee50591704b29f2488d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QFAoeN46k2Q3m2MprQoFPfQestvZsqXd1CQ97L83dUU8SUgyhPflTV4Yu0eYIoB6DmnlmAEWaYLI-gs2QinyDAquL79rnulSwjW7CWEHgHkp5Yg9zF0XvdtPPlzbxTBpu8midqEPkQ7hll01dh_o7mcfs_VysZ6_Zqv3l7f5bJXVQqmYVaXFSnKrGl1jVVNRgS3BFjnJTaNIAgHZAglAaKIcco0KZMV1w2VZbsSYPQ3XHr37PFGIZudOvkuOBnV6kQSpIammg2pr92TarnHR2zqNDR3a2nXUtOl8plAogRzzBOAA1N6F4KkxR98erO8NgjmHZobQTLIw59BMnxg-MCFpuy35P638Az0O0C5E539dZKlQpy8QX9Iqdq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901640490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Control Points in Ecosystems: Moving Beyond the Hot Spot Hot Moment Concept</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Bernhardt, Emily S. ; Blaszczak, Joanna R. ; Ficken, Cari D. ; Fork, Megan L. ; Kaiser, Kendra E. ; Seybold, Erin C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Emily S. ; Blaszczak, Joanna R. ; Ficken, Cari D. ; Fork, Megan L. ; Kaiser, Kendra E. ; Seybold, Erin C.</creatorcontrib><description>The phrase “hot spots and hot moments” first entered the lexicon in 2003, following the publication of the paper “Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems” by McClain and others (Ecosystems 6:301–312, 2003). This paper described the potential for rare places and rare events to exert a disproportionate influence on the movement of elements at the scale of landscapes and ecosystems. Here, we examine how the cleverly named hot spot and hot moment concept (hereafter HSHM) has influenced biogeochemistry and ecosystem science over the last 13 years. We specifically examined the extent to which the HSHM concept has: (1) motivated research aimed at understanding how and why biogeochemical behavior varies across spatiotemporal scales; (2) improved our ability to detect HSHM phenomena; and (3) influenced our approaches to restoration and ecosystem management practices. We found that the HSHM concept has provided a highly fertile framework for a substantial volume of research on the spatial and temporal dynamics of nutrient cycling, and in doing so, has improved our understanding of when and where biogeochemical rates are maximized. Despite the high usage of the term, we found limited examples of rigorous statistical or modeling approaches that would allow ecosystem scientists to not only identify, but scale the aggregate impact of HSHM on ecosystem processes. We propose that the phrase “hot spots and hot moments” includes two implicit assumptions that may actually be limiting progress in applying the concept. First, by differentiating “hot spots” from “hot moments,” the phrase separates the spatial and temporal components of biogeochemical behavior. Instead, we argue that the temporal dynamics of a putative hot spot are a fundamental trait that should be used in their description. Second, the adjective “hot” implicitly suggests that a place or a time must be dichotomously classified as “hot or not.” We suggest instead that each landscape of interest contains a wide range of biogeochemical process rates that respond to critical drivers, and the gradations of this biogeochemical topography are of greater interest than the maximum peaks. For these reasons, we recommend replacing the HSHM terminology with the more nuanced term ecosystem control points. “Ecosystem control” suggests that the rate must be of sufficient magnitude or ubiquity to affect dynamics of the ecosystem, while “points” allows for descriptions that simultaneously incorporate both spatial and temporal dynamics. We further suggest that there are at least four distinct types of ecosystem control points whose influence arises through distinct hydrologic and biogeochemical mechanisms. Our goal is to provide the tools with which researchers can develop testable hypotheses regarding the spatiotemporal dynamics of biogeochemistry that will stimulate advances in more accurately identifying, modeling and scaling biogeochemical heterogeneity to better understand ecosystem processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-9840</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10021-016-0103-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>20th Anniversary Paper ; Analysis ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Biogeochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Dynamics ; Ecology ; Ecosystem dynamics ; Ecosystem management ; Environmental Management ; Environmental protection ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Heterogeneity ; Hydrology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Invited 20th Anniversary Papers ; Landscape ; Language ; Life Sciences ; Mathematical models ; Movement ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrient dynamics ; Plant Sciences ; Restoration ; Scaling ; Terminology ; Topography ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Ecosystems (New York), 2017-06, Vol.20 (4), p.665-682</ispartof><rights>2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Ecosystems is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b8a1b42a7f9c1bce6b0a80a65e4df7e40e0ea61e0039ee50591704b29f2488d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b8a1b42a7f9c1bce6b0a80a65e4df7e40e0ea61e0039ee50591704b29f2488d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48719435$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48719435$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaszczak, Joanna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ficken, Cari D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fork, Megan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Kendra E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seybold, Erin C.</creatorcontrib><title>Control Points in Ecosystems: Moving Beyond the Hot Spot Hot Moment Concept</title><title>Ecosystems (New York)</title><addtitle>Ecosystems</addtitle><description>The phrase “hot spots and hot moments” first entered the lexicon in 2003, following the publication of the paper “Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems” by McClain and others (Ecosystems 6:301–312, 2003). This paper described the potential for rare places and rare events to exert a disproportionate influence on the movement of elements at the scale of landscapes and ecosystems. Here, we examine how the cleverly named hot spot and hot moment concept (hereafter HSHM) has influenced biogeochemistry and ecosystem science over the last 13 years. We specifically examined the extent to which the HSHM concept has: (1) motivated research aimed at understanding how and why biogeochemical behavior varies across spatiotemporal scales; (2) improved our ability to detect HSHM phenomena; and (3) influenced our approaches to restoration and ecosystem management practices. We found that the HSHM concept has provided a highly fertile framework for a substantial volume of research on the spatial and temporal dynamics of nutrient cycling, and in doing so, has improved our understanding of when and where biogeochemical rates are maximized. Despite the high usage of the term, we found limited examples of rigorous statistical or modeling approaches that would allow ecosystem scientists to not only identify, but scale the aggregate impact of HSHM on ecosystem processes. We propose that the phrase “hot spots and hot moments” includes two implicit assumptions that may actually be limiting progress in applying the concept. First, by differentiating “hot spots” from “hot moments,” the phrase separates the spatial and temporal components of biogeochemical behavior. Instead, we argue that the temporal dynamics of a putative hot spot are a fundamental trait that should be used in their description. Second, the adjective “hot” implicitly suggests that a place or a time must be dichotomously classified as “hot or not.” We suggest instead that each landscape of interest contains a wide range of biogeochemical process rates that respond to critical drivers, and the gradations of this biogeochemical topography are of greater interest than the maximum peaks. For these reasons, we recommend replacing the HSHM terminology with the more nuanced term ecosystem control points. “Ecosystem control” suggests that the rate must be of sufficient magnitude or ubiquity to affect dynamics of the ecosystem, while “points” allows for descriptions that simultaneously incorporate both spatial and temporal dynamics. We further suggest that there are at least four distinct types of ecosystem control points whose influence arises through distinct hydrologic and biogeochemical mechanisms. Our goal is to provide the tools with which researchers can develop testable hypotheses regarding the spatiotemporal dynamics of biogeochemistry that will stimulate advances in more accurately identifying, modeling and scaling biogeochemical heterogeneity to better understand ecosystem processes.</description><subject>20th Anniversary Paper</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem dynamics</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Invited 20th Anniversary Papers</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1432-9840</issn><issn>1435-0629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QFAoeN46k2Q3m2MprQoFPfQestvZsqXd1CQ97L83dUU8SUgyhPflTV4Yu0eYIoB6DmnlmAEWaYLI-gs2QinyDAquL79rnulSwjW7CWEHgHkp5Yg9zF0XvdtPPlzbxTBpu8midqEPkQ7hll01dh_o7mcfs_VysZ6_Zqv3l7f5bJXVQqmYVaXFSnKrGl1jVVNRgS3BFjnJTaNIAgHZAglAaKIcco0KZMV1w2VZbsSYPQ3XHr37PFGIZudOvkuOBnV6kQSpIammg2pr92TarnHR2zqNDR3a2nXUtOl8plAogRzzBOAA1N6F4KkxR98erO8NgjmHZobQTLIw59BMnxg-MCFpuy35P638Az0O0C5E539dZKlQpy8QX9Iqdq0</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Bernhardt, Emily S.</creator><creator>Blaszczak, Joanna R.</creator><creator>Ficken, Cari D.</creator><creator>Fork, Megan L.</creator><creator>Kaiser, Kendra E.</creator><creator>Seybold, Erin C.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Control Points in Ecosystems</title><author>Bernhardt, Emily S. ; Blaszczak, Joanna R. ; Ficken, Cari D. ; Fork, Megan L. ; Kaiser, Kendra E. ; Seybold, Erin C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b8a1b42a7f9c1bce6b0a80a65e4df7e40e0ea61e0039ee50591704b29f2488d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>20th Anniversary Paper</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem dynamics</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Invited 20th Anniversary Papers</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaszczak, Joanna R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ficken, Cari D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fork, Megan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Kendra E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seybold, Erin C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernhardt, Emily S.</au><au>Blaszczak, Joanna R.</au><au>Ficken, Cari D.</au><au>Fork, Megan L.</au><au>Kaiser, Kendra E.</au><au>Seybold, Erin C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Control Points in Ecosystems: Moving Beyond the Hot Spot Hot Moment Concept</atitle><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Ecosystems</stitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>665</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>665-682</pages><issn>1432-9840</issn><eissn>1435-0629</eissn><abstract>The phrase “hot spots and hot moments” first entered the lexicon in 2003, following the publication of the paper “Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems” by McClain and others (Ecosystems 6:301–312, 2003). This paper described the potential for rare places and rare events to exert a disproportionate influence on the movement of elements at the scale of landscapes and ecosystems. Here, we examine how the cleverly named hot spot and hot moment concept (hereafter HSHM) has influenced biogeochemistry and ecosystem science over the last 13 years. We specifically examined the extent to which the HSHM concept has: (1) motivated research aimed at understanding how and why biogeochemical behavior varies across spatiotemporal scales; (2) improved our ability to detect HSHM phenomena; and (3) influenced our approaches to restoration and ecosystem management practices. We found that the HSHM concept has provided a highly fertile framework for a substantial volume of research on the spatial and temporal dynamics of nutrient cycling, and in doing so, has improved our understanding of when and where biogeochemical rates are maximized. Despite the high usage of the term, we found limited examples of rigorous statistical or modeling approaches that would allow ecosystem scientists to not only identify, but scale the aggregate impact of HSHM on ecosystem processes. We propose that the phrase “hot spots and hot moments” includes two implicit assumptions that may actually be limiting progress in applying the concept. First, by differentiating “hot spots” from “hot moments,” the phrase separates the spatial and temporal components of biogeochemical behavior. Instead, we argue that the temporal dynamics of a putative hot spot are a fundamental trait that should be used in their description. Second, the adjective “hot” implicitly suggests that a place or a time must be dichotomously classified as “hot or not.” We suggest instead that each landscape of interest contains a wide range of biogeochemical process rates that respond to critical drivers, and the gradations of this biogeochemical topography are of greater interest than the maximum peaks. For these reasons, we recommend replacing the HSHM terminology with the more nuanced term ecosystem control points. “Ecosystem control” suggests that the rate must be of sufficient magnitude or ubiquity to affect dynamics of the ecosystem, while “points” allows for descriptions that simultaneously incorporate both spatial and temporal dynamics. We further suggest that there are at least four distinct types of ecosystem control points whose influence arises through distinct hydrologic and biogeochemical mechanisms. Our goal is to provide the tools with which researchers can develop testable hypotheses regarding the spatiotemporal dynamics of biogeochemistry that will stimulate advances in more accurately identifying, modeling and scaling biogeochemical heterogeneity to better understand ecosystem processes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s10021-016-0103-y</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1432-9840 |
ispartof | Ecosystems (New York), 2017-06, Vol.20 (4), p.665-682 |
issn | 1432-9840 1435-0629 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1901640490 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | 20th Anniversary Paper Analysis Aquatic ecosystems Biogeochemistry Biomedical and Life Sciences Dynamics Ecology Ecosystem dynamics Ecosystem management Environmental Management Environmental protection Geoecology/Natural Processes Heterogeneity Hydrology Hydrology/Water Resources Invited 20th Anniversary Papers Landscape Language Life Sciences Mathematical models Movement Nutrient cycles Nutrient dynamics Plant Sciences Restoration Scaling Terminology Topography Zoology |
title | Control Points in Ecosystems: Moving Beyond the Hot Spot Hot Moment Concept |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A02%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Control%20Points%20in%20Ecosystems:%20Moving%20Beyond%20the%20Hot%20Spot%20Hot%20Moment%20Concept&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Bernhardt,%20Emily%20S.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=665&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=665-682&rft.issn=1432-9840&rft.eissn=1435-0629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10021-016-0103-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713731215%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901640490&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713731215&rft_jstor_id=48719435&rfr_iscdi=true |