Material Offshoring: Alternate Measures
Industry measures of offshoring of material inputs are often generated using the proportionality assumption applied to aggregate import data—that the import share of each commodity used in the production process for a particular industry is similar to the import share of a commodity for the total ec...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Review of income and wealth 2017-06, Vol.63 (2), p.253-268 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 268 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 253 |
| container_title | The Review of income and wealth |
| container_volume | 63 |
| creator | Baldwin, John R. Gu, Wulong Sydor, Aaron Yan, Beiling |
| description | Industry measures of offshoring of material inputs are often generated using the proportionality assumption applied to aggregate import data—that the import share of each commodity used in the production process for a particular industry is similar to the import share of a commodity for the total economy. This note compares estimates of offshoring for the Canadian manufacturing sector derived using this assumption to four alternatives: two measures that use direct measures of firm‐based imports, and two hybrid measures that use both input and import information. These indirect measures are compared to survey estimates that directly assess import intensity in the production process in an effort to evaluate which indirect method yields more reasonable offshoring measures. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/roiw.12195 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1900023378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900023378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-93ea7aef433889a0b34f83284c184ebad0ebec9b14981df8ae651178b2884aff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRMFYv_oKAB0FI3cl-ZNdbKVULLQFRPC6bdFZTYlN3G0r_vVvj2bkMzPvMMDyEXAMdQ6x73zX7MeSgxQlJgBci41rDKUkoZTyTQslzchHCmlKQuWAJuV3aHfrGtmnpXPjsfLP5eEgnbRxuYpIu0YbeY7gkZ862Aa_--oi8Pc5ep8_ZonyaTyeLrGZSikwztIVFxxlTSltaMe4UyxWvQXGs7IpihbWugGsFK6csSgFQqCpXilvn2IjcDHe3vvvuMezMuuvjK20woCmlOWOFitTdQNW-C8GjM1vffFl_MEDNUYQ5ijC_IiIMA7xvWjz8Q5qXcv4-7PwA3OBfSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1900023378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Material Offshoring: Alternate Measures</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Baldwin, John R. ; Gu, Wulong ; Sydor, Aaron ; Yan, Beiling</creator><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, John R. ; Gu, Wulong ; Sydor, Aaron ; Yan, Beiling</creatorcontrib><description>Industry measures of offshoring of material inputs are often generated using the proportionality assumption applied to aggregate import data—that the import share of each commodity used in the production process for a particular industry is similar to the import share of a commodity for the total economy. This note compares estimates of offshoring for the Canadian manufacturing sector derived using this assumption to four alternatives: two measures that use direct measures of firm‐based imports, and two hybrid measures that use both input and import information. These indirect measures are compared to survey estimates that directly assess import intensity in the production process in an effort to evaluate which indirect method yields more reasonable offshoring measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aggregate data ; Commodities ; Economic theory ; Imports ; industry import ratios ; intermediate imports ; Labor process ; Manufacturing ; Offshoring ; Outsourcing ; Production ; proportionality</subject><ispartof>The Review of income and wealth, 2017-06, Vol.63 (2), p.253-268</ispartof><rights>2015 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Review of Income and Wealth © 2015 International Association for Research in Income and Wealth</rights><rights>2017 International Association for Research in Income and Wealth</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-93ea7aef433889a0b34f83284c184ebad0ebec9b14981df8ae651178b2884aff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-93ea7aef433889a0b34f83284c184ebad0ebec9b14981df8ae651178b2884aff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Froiw.12195$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Froiw.12195$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Wulong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydor, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Beiling</creatorcontrib><title>Material Offshoring: Alternate Measures</title><title>The Review of income and wealth</title><description>Industry measures of offshoring of material inputs are often generated using the proportionality assumption applied to aggregate import data—that the import share of each commodity used in the production process for a particular industry is similar to the import share of a commodity for the total economy. This note compares estimates of offshoring for the Canadian manufacturing sector derived using this assumption to four alternatives: two measures that use direct measures of firm‐based imports, and two hybrid measures that use both input and import information. These indirect measures are compared to survey estimates that directly assess import intensity in the production process in an effort to evaluate which indirect method yields more reasonable offshoring measures.</description><subject>Aggregate data</subject><subject>Commodities</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>industry import ratios</subject><subject>intermediate imports</subject><subject>Labor process</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Offshoring</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>proportionality</subject><issn>0034-6586</issn><issn>1475-4991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRMFYv_oKAB0FI3cl-ZNdbKVULLQFRPC6bdFZTYlN3G0r_vVvj2bkMzPvMMDyEXAMdQ6x73zX7MeSgxQlJgBci41rDKUkoZTyTQslzchHCmlKQuWAJuV3aHfrGtmnpXPjsfLP5eEgnbRxuYpIu0YbeY7gkZ862Aa_--oi8Pc5ep8_ZonyaTyeLrGZSikwztIVFxxlTSltaMe4UyxWvQXGs7IpihbWugGsFK6csSgFQqCpXilvn2IjcDHe3vvvuMezMuuvjK20woCmlOWOFitTdQNW-C8GjM1vffFl_MEDNUYQ5ijC_IiIMA7xvWjz8Q5qXcv4-7PwA3OBfSg</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Baldwin, John R.</creator><creator>Gu, Wulong</creator><creator>Sydor, Aaron</creator><creator>Yan, Beiling</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Material Offshoring: Alternate Measures</title><author>Baldwin, John R. ; Gu, Wulong ; Sydor, Aaron ; Yan, Beiling</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-93ea7aef433889a0b34f83284c184ebad0ebec9b14981df8ae651178b2884aff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aggregate data</topic><topic>Commodities</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>industry import ratios</topic><topic>intermediate imports</topic><topic>Labor process</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Offshoring</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>proportionality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Wulong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydor, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Beiling</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of income and wealth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baldwin, John R.</au><au>Gu, Wulong</au><au>Sydor, Aaron</au><au>Yan, Beiling</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Material Offshoring: Alternate Measures</atitle><jtitle>The Review of income and wealth</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>253-268</pages><issn>0034-6586</issn><eissn>1475-4991</eissn><abstract>Industry measures of offshoring of material inputs are often generated using the proportionality assumption applied to aggregate import data—that the import share of each commodity used in the production process for a particular industry is similar to the import share of a commodity for the total economy. This note compares estimates of offshoring for the Canadian manufacturing sector derived using this assumption to four alternatives: two measures that use direct measures of firm‐based imports, and two hybrid measures that use both input and import information. These indirect measures are compared to survey estimates that directly assess import intensity in the production process in an effort to evaluate which indirect method yields more reasonable offshoring measures.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/roiw.12195</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0034-6586 |
| ispartof | The Review of income and wealth, 2017-06, Vol.63 (2), p.253-268 |
| issn | 0034-6586 1475-4991 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1900023378 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Aggregate data Commodities Economic theory Imports industry import ratios intermediate imports Labor process Manufacturing Offshoring Outsourcing Production proportionality |
| title | Material Offshoring: Alternate Measures |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A10%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Material%20Offshoring:%20Alternate%20Measures&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20income%20and%20wealth&rft.au=Baldwin,%20John%20R.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=253-268&rft.issn=0034-6586&rft.eissn=1475-4991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/roiw.12195&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1900023378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1900023378&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |