Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands
•Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Solar energy 2017-04, Vol.146, p.389-400 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 400 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 389 |
container_title | Solar energy |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Ritzen, M.J. Vroon, Z.A.E.P. Rovers, R. Geurts, C.P.W. |
description | •Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows higher degree of cell damage after 3year monitoring.
Backside ventilation is one of the most common passive cooling methods of PV modules in the built environment, but might be under constraint when integrating PV in the building envelope. To investigate the short and long term effect of backside ventilation on Building Integrated PV (BIPV) performance and lifespan, a comparative BIPV field test is conducted in a real life lab located in the Netherlands. The field test includes 24 modules in 4 segments with different levels of backside ventilation. PV energy output, module backside temperature, relative humidity in the air gap, and air velocity in the air gap have been monitored for three years in the period January 2013–December 2015. At the end of the monitoring period Electric Luminescence (EL) images were made and Standard Testing Condition (STC) power was determined. The ventilated segments show a similar behaviour (6% difference) in PV energy output, but the non-ventilated segment shows a strong decrease of 86% in output after three years. A maximum temperature of 72°C is reached in the ventilated segments and a maximum temperature of 83°C in the non-ventilated segment. Relative humidity (RH) levels reach a maximum of 100% in all segments. Air velocity in the non-ventilated segment is 13–39% of the air velocity in the ventilated segments. STC power determination and EL imaging show lower peak power and more defects in the non-ventilated modules, and modules placed at vertical higher positions in the non-ventilated segment have a lower power output of 50–60%. The results indicate that, considering the first generation Metal Wrap Through (MWT) modules investigated, the non-ventilated BIPV modules exposed to the highest temperatures show the lowest power output, lowest STC power and show the most damaged cells in the EL imaging. Even though PV module manufacturing shows continuous technological advances, the methodology and results of this work has added value for the prediction of BIPV operating aspects and lifespan when designing and realizing a BIPV installation. Moreover, the BIPV field test presented in this study has been a very illustrative |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.042 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1899018213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038092X17301457</els_id><sourcerecordid>1899018213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-859ca563f7e3a478d8921373cef2d962da70022c3bf2d0d0a2f98b1911c8f0b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFrGzEQhUVpIa6Tn1AQ5LzbkeS1tKeQmKY1mDaHJuQmZO2okVlLG0k29N9Hxjn01ssMD733Bn2EfGHQMmDLr7s2xxEDppYDky3wFhb8A5mxhWQN4538SGYAQjXQ8-cL8jnnHVQjU3JGyiruJ5NM8UekEyYX094Ei9TkjDnvMRQaHTU0xNAcq_KjKThQEwb6j7xbPzzRFKMrcaI2Buf_HE6lMWTqAy0vSH9inWmswXxJPjkzZrx633PyeP_t9-pHs_n1fb263TRWCFka1fXWdEvhJAqzkGpQPWdCCouOD_2SD0YCcG7FtmoYwHDXqy3rGbPKwVaKObk-904pvh4wF72LhxTqSc1U3wNTta-6urPLpphzQqen5Pcm_dUM9Amw3ul3wPoEWAPXFXDN3ZxzWL9w9PU1W4-V3eAT2qKH6P_T8AbRA4kQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899018213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ritzen, M.J. ; Vroon, Z.A.E.P. ; Rovers, R. ; Geurts, C.P.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ritzen, M.J. ; Vroon, Z.A.E.P. ; Rovers, R. ; Geurts, C.P.W.</creatorcontrib><description>•Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows higher degree of cell damage after 3year monitoring.
Backside ventilation is one of the most common passive cooling methods of PV modules in the built environment, but might be under constraint when integrating PV in the building envelope. To investigate the short and long term effect of backside ventilation on Building Integrated PV (BIPV) performance and lifespan, a comparative BIPV field test is conducted in a real life lab located in the Netherlands. The field test includes 24 modules in 4 segments with different levels of backside ventilation. PV energy output, module backside temperature, relative humidity in the air gap, and air velocity in the air gap have been monitored for three years in the period January 2013–December 2015. At the end of the monitoring period Electric Luminescence (EL) images were made and Standard Testing Condition (STC) power was determined. The ventilated segments show a similar behaviour (6% difference) in PV energy output, but the non-ventilated segment shows a strong decrease of 86% in output after three years. A maximum temperature of 72°C is reached in the ventilated segments and a maximum temperature of 83°C in the non-ventilated segment. Relative humidity (RH) levels reach a maximum of 100% in all segments. Air velocity in the non-ventilated segment is 13–39% of the air velocity in the ventilated segments. STC power determination and EL imaging show lower peak power and more defects in the non-ventilated modules, and modules placed at vertical higher positions in the non-ventilated segment have a lower power output of 50–60%. The results indicate that, considering the first generation Metal Wrap Through (MWT) modules investigated, the non-ventilated BIPV modules exposed to the highest temperatures show the lowest power output, lowest STC power and show the most damaged cells in the EL imaging. Even though PV module manufacturing shows continuous technological advances, the methodology and results of this work has added value for the prediction of BIPV operating aspects and lifespan when designing and realizing a BIPV installation. Moreover, the BIPV field test presented in this study has been a very illustrative BIPV demonstration project for manufacturers, installers and designers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-092X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-1257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air monitoring ; Air temperature ; Building envelope ; Building envelopes ; Building Integrated Photovoltaics ; Damage ; Energy ; Energy output ; Environmental monitoring ; Life span ; Modules ; Performance assessment ; Relative humidity ; Segments ; Solar energy ; Studies ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Velocity ; Ventilation ; Vertical orientation ; Zero energy buildings</subject><ispartof>Solar energy, 2017-04, Vol.146, p.389-400</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-859ca563f7e3a478d8921373cef2d962da70022c3bf2d0d0a2f98b1911c8f0b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-859ca563f7e3a478d8921373cef2d962da70022c3bf2d0d0a2f98b1911c8f0b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0913-2769</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X17301457$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ritzen, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vroon, Z.A.E.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovers, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geurts, C.P.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands</title><title>Solar energy</title><description>•Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows higher degree of cell damage after 3year monitoring.
Backside ventilation is one of the most common passive cooling methods of PV modules in the built environment, but might be under constraint when integrating PV in the building envelope. To investigate the short and long term effect of backside ventilation on Building Integrated PV (BIPV) performance and lifespan, a comparative BIPV field test is conducted in a real life lab located in the Netherlands. The field test includes 24 modules in 4 segments with different levels of backside ventilation. PV energy output, module backside temperature, relative humidity in the air gap, and air velocity in the air gap have been monitored for three years in the period January 2013–December 2015. At the end of the monitoring period Electric Luminescence (EL) images were made and Standard Testing Condition (STC) power was determined. The ventilated segments show a similar behaviour (6% difference) in PV energy output, but the non-ventilated segment shows a strong decrease of 86% in output after three years. A maximum temperature of 72°C is reached in the ventilated segments and a maximum temperature of 83°C in the non-ventilated segment. Relative humidity (RH) levels reach a maximum of 100% in all segments. Air velocity in the non-ventilated segment is 13–39% of the air velocity in the ventilated segments. STC power determination and EL imaging show lower peak power and more defects in the non-ventilated modules, and modules placed at vertical higher positions in the non-ventilated segment have a lower power output of 50–60%. The results indicate that, considering the first generation Metal Wrap Through (MWT) modules investigated, the non-ventilated BIPV modules exposed to the highest temperatures show the lowest power output, lowest STC power and show the most damaged cells in the EL imaging. Even though PV module manufacturing shows continuous technological advances, the methodology and results of this work has added value for the prediction of BIPV operating aspects and lifespan when designing and realizing a BIPV installation. Moreover, the BIPV field test presented in this study has been a very illustrative BIPV demonstration project for manufacturers, installers and designers.</description><subject>Air monitoring</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Building envelope</subject><subject>Building envelopes</subject><subject>Building Integrated Photovoltaics</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy output</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Vertical orientation</subject><subject>Zero energy buildings</subject><issn>0038-092X</issn><issn>1471-1257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFrGzEQhUVpIa6Tn1AQ5LzbkeS1tKeQmKY1mDaHJuQmZO2okVlLG0k29N9Hxjn01ssMD733Bn2EfGHQMmDLr7s2xxEDppYDky3wFhb8A5mxhWQN4538SGYAQjXQ8-cL8jnnHVQjU3JGyiruJ5NM8UekEyYX094Ei9TkjDnvMRQaHTU0xNAcq_KjKThQEwb6j7xbPzzRFKMrcaI2Buf_HE6lMWTqAy0vSH9inWmswXxJPjkzZrx633PyeP_t9-pHs_n1fb263TRWCFka1fXWdEvhJAqzkGpQPWdCCouOD_2SD0YCcG7FtmoYwHDXqy3rGbPKwVaKObk-904pvh4wF72LhxTqSc1U3wNTta-6urPLpphzQqen5Pcm_dUM9Amw3ul3wPoEWAPXFXDN3ZxzWL9w9PU1W4-V3eAT2qKH6P_T8AbRA4kQ</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Ritzen, M.J.</creator><creator>Vroon, Z.A.E.P.</creator><creator>Rovers, R.</creator><creator>Geurts, C.P.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0913-2769</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands</title><author>Ritzen, M.J. ; Vroon, Z.A.E.P. ; Rovers, R. ; Geurts, C.P.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-859ca563f7e3a478d8921373cef2d962da70022c3bf2d0d0a2f98b1911c8f0b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Air monitoring</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Building envelope</topic><topic>Building envelopes</topic><topic>Building Integrated Photovoltaics</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy output</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Vertical orientation</topic><topic>Zero energy buildings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ritzen, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vroon, Z.A.E.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovers, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geurts, C.P.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ritzen, M.J.</au><au>Vroon, Z.A.E.P.</au><au>Rovers, R.</au><au>Geurts, C.P.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>146</volume><spage>389</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>389-400</pages><issn>0038-092X</issn><eissn>1471-1257</eissn><abstract>•Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows higher degree of cell damage after 3year monitoring.
Backside ventilation is one of the most common passive cooling methods of PV modules in the built environment, but might be under constraint when integrating PV in the building envelope. To investigate the short and long term effect of backside ventilation on Building Integrated PV (BIPV) performance and lifespan, a comparative BIPV field test is conducted in a real life lab located in the Netherlands. The field test includes 24 modules in 4 segments with different levels of backside ventilation. PV energy output, module backside temperature, relative humidity in the air gap, and air velocity in the air gap have been monitored for three years in the period January 2013–December 2015. At the end of the monitoring period Electric Luminescence (EL) images were made and Standard Testing Condition (STC) power was determined. The ventilated segments show a similar behaviour (6% difference) in PV energy output, but the non-ventilated segment shows a strong decrease of 86% in output after three years. A maximum temperature of 72°C is reached in the ventilated segments and a maximum temperature of 83°C in the non-ventilated segment. Relative humidity (RH) levels reach a maximum of 100% in all segments. Air velocity in the non-ventilated segment is 13–39% of the air velocity in the ventilated segments. STC power determination and EL imaging show lower peak power and more defects in the non-ventilated modules, and modules placed at vertical higher positions in the non-ventilated segment have a lower power output of 50–60%. The results indicate that, considering the first generation Metal Wrap Through (MWT) modules investigated, the non-ventilated BIPV modules exposed to the highest temperatures show the lowest power output, lowest STC power and show the most damaged cells in the EL imaging. Even though PV module manufacturing shows continuous technological advances, the methodology and results of this work has added value for the prediction of BIPV operating aspects and lifespan when designing and realizing a BIPV installation. Moreover, the BIPV field test presented in this study has been a very illustrative BIPV demonstration project for manufacturers, installers and designers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.042</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0913-2769</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-092X |
ispartof | Solar energy, 2017-04, Vol.146, p.389-400 |
issn | 0038-092X 1471-1257 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1899018213 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Air monitoring Air temperature Building envelope Building envelopes Building Integrated Photovoltaics Damage Energy Energy output Environmental monitoring Life span Modules Performance assessment Relative humidity Segments Solar energy Studies Temperature Temperature effects Velocity Ventilation Vertical orientation Zero energy buildings |
title | Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A54%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20performance%20assessment%20of%20a%20non-ventilated%20and%20ventilated%20BIPV%20rooftop%20configurations%20in%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy&rft.au=Ritzen,%20M.J.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=146&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=389-400&rft.issn=0038-092X&rft.eissn=1471-1257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1899018213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899018213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038092X17301457&rfr_iscdi=true |