Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands

•Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy 2017-04, Vol.146, p.389-400
Hauptverfasser: Ritzen, M.J., Vroon, Z.A.E.P., Rovers, R., Geurts, C.P.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue
container_start_page 389
container_title Solar energy
container_volume 146
creator Ritzen, M.J.
Vroon, Z.A.E.P.
Rovers, R.
Geurts, C.P.W.
description •Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows higher degree of cell damage after 3year monitoring. Backside ventilation is one of the most common passive cooling methods of PV modules in the built environment, but might be under constraint when integrating PV in the building envelope. To investigate the short and long term effect of backside ventilation on Building Integrated PV (BIPV) performance and lifespan, a comparative BIPV field test is conducted in a real life lab located in the Netherlands. The field test includes 24 modules in 4 segments with different levels of backside ventilation. PV energy output, module backside temperature, relative humidity in the air gap, and air velocity in the air gap have been monitored for three years in the period January 2013–December 2015. At the end of the monitoring period Electric Luminescence (EL) images were made and Standard Testing Condition (STC) power was determined. The ventilated segments show a similar behaviour (6% difference) in PV energy output, but the non-ventilated segment shows a strong decrease of 86% in output after three years. A maximum temperature of 72°C is reached in the ventilated segments and a maximum temperature of 83°C in the non-ventilated segment. Relative humidity (RH) levels reach a maximum of 100% in all segments. Air velocity in the non-ventilated segment is 13–39% of the air velocity in the ventilated segments. STC power determination and EL imaging show lower peak power and more defects in the non-ventilated modules, and modules placed at vertical higher positions in the non-ventilated segment have a lower power output of 50–60%. The results indicate that, considering the first generation Metal Wrap Through (MWT) modules investigated, the non-ventilated BIPV modules exposed to the highest temperatures show the lowest power output, lowest STC power and show the most damaged cells in the EL imaging. Even though PV module manufacturing shows continuous technological advances, the methodology and results of this work has added value for the prediction of BIPV operating aspects and lifespan when designing and realizing a BIPV installation. Moreover, the BIPV field test presented in this study has been a very illustrative
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1899018213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038092X17301457</els_id><sourcerecordid>1899018213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-859ca563f7e3a478d8921373cef2d962da70022c3bf2d0d0a2f98b1911c8f0b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFrGzEQhUVpIa6Tn1AQ5LzbkeS1tKeQmKY1mDaHJuQmZO2okVlLG0k29N9Hxjn01ssMD733Bn2EfGHQMmDLr7s2xxEDppYDky3wFhb8A5mxhWQN4538SGYAQjXQ8-cL8jnnHVQjU3JGyiruJ5NM8UekEyYX094Ei9TkjDnvMRQaHTU0xNAcq_KjKThQEwb6j7xbPzzRFKMrcaI2Buf_HE6lMWTqAy0vSH9inWmswXxJPjkzZrx633PyeP_t9-pHs_n1fb263TRWCFka1fXWdEvhJAqzkGpQPWdCCouOD_2SD0YCcG7FtmoYwHDXqy3rGbPKwVaKObk-904pvh4wF72LhxTqSc1U3wNTta-6urPLpphzQqen5Pcm_dUM9Amw3ul3wPoEWAPXFXDN3ZxzWL9w9PU1W4-V3eAT2qKH6P_T8AbRA4kQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899018213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ritzen, M.J. ; Vroon, Z.A.E.P. ; Rovers, R. ; Geurts, C.P.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ritzen, M.J. ; Vroon, Z.A.E.P. ; Rovers, R. ; Geurts, C.P.W.</creatorcontrib><description>•Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows higher degree of cell damage after 3year monitoring. Backside ventilation is one of the most common passive cooling methods of PV modules in the built environment, but might be under constraint when integrating PV in the building envelope. To investigate the short and long term effect of backside ventilation on Building Integrated PV (BIPV) performance and lifespan, a comparative BIPV field test is conducted in a real life lab located in the Netherlands. The field test includes 24 modules in 4 segments with different levels of backside ventilation. PV energy output, module backside temperature, relative humidity in the air gap, and air velocity in the air gap have been monitored for three years in the period January 2013–December 2015. At the end of the monitoring period Electric Luminescence (EL) images were made and Standard Testing Condition (STC) power was determined. The ventilated segments show a similar behaviour (6% difference) in PV energy output, but the non-ventilated segment shows a strong decrease of 86% in output after three years. A maximum temperature of 72°C is reached in the ventilated segments and a maximum temperature of 83°C in the non-ventilated segment. Relative humidity (RH) levels reach a maximum of 100% in all segments. Air velocity in the non-ventilated segment is 13–39% of the air velocity in the ventilated segments. STC power determination and EL imaging show lower peak power and more defects in the non-ventilated modules, and modules placed at vertical higher positions in the non-ventilated segment have a lower power output of 50–60%. The results indicate that, considering the first generation Metal Wrap Through (MWT) modules investigated, the non-ventilated BIPV modules exposed to the highest temperatures show the lowest power output, lowest STC power and show the most damaged cells in the EL imaging. Even though PV module manufacturing shows continuous technological advances, the methodology and results of this work has added value for the prediction of BIPV operating aspects and lifespan when designing and realizing a BIPV installation. Moreover, the BIPV field test presented in this study has been a very illustrative BIPV demonstration project for manufacturers, installers and designers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-092X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-1257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air monitoring ; Air temperature ; Building envelope ; Building envelopes ; Building Integrated Photovoltaics ; Damage ; Energy ; Energy output ; Environmental monitoring ; Life span ; Modules ; Performance assessment ; Relative humidity ; Segments ; Solar energy ; Studies ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Velocity ; Ventilation ; Vertical orientation ; Zero energy buildings</subject><ispartof>Solar energy, 2017-04, Vol.146, p.389-400</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-859ca563f7e3a478d8921373cef2d962da70022c3bf2d0d0a2f98b1911c8f0b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-859ca563f7e3a478d8921373cef2d962da70022c3bf2d0d0a2f98b1911c8f0b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0913-2769</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X17301457$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ritzen, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vroon, Z.A.E.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovers, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geurts, C.P.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands</title><title>Solar energy</title><description>•Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows higher degree of cell damage after 3year monitoring. Backside ventilation is one of the most common passive cooling methods of PV modules in the built environment, but might be under constraint when integrating PV in the building envelope. To investigate the short and long term effect of backside ventilation on Building Integrated PV (BIPV) performance and lifespan, a comparative BIPV field test is conducted in a real life lab located in the Netherlands. The field test includes 24 modules in 4 segments with different levels of backside ventilation. PV energy output, module backside temperature, relative humidity in the air gap, and air velocity in the air gap have been monitored for three years in the period January 2013–December 2015. At the end of the monitoring period Electric Luminescence (EL) images were made and Standard Testing Condition (STC) power was determined. The ventilated segments show a similar behaviour (6% difference) in PV energy output, but the non-ventilated segment shows a strong decrease of 86% in output after three years. A maximum temperature of 72°C is reached in the ventilated segments and a maximum temperature of 83°C in the non-ventilated segment. Relative humidity (RH) levels reach a maximum of 100% in all segments. Air velocity in the non-ventilated segment is 13–39% of the air velocity in the ventilated segments. STC power determination and EL imaging show lower peak power and more defects in the non-ventilated modules, and modules placed at vertical higher positions in the non-ventilated segment have a lower power output of 50–60%. The results indicate that, considering the first generation Metal Wrap Through (MWT) modules investigated, the non-ventilated BIPV modules exposed to the highest temperatures show the lowest power output, lowest STC power and show the most damaged cells in the EL imaging. Even though PV module manufacturing shows continuous technological advances, the methodology and results of this work has added value for the prediction of BIPV operating aspects and lifespan when designing and realizing a BIPV installation. Moreover, the BIPV field test presented in this study has been a very illustrative BIPV demonstration project for manufacturers, installers and designers.</description><subject>Air monitoring</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Building envelope</subject><subject>Building envelopes</subject><subject>Building Integrated Photovoltaics</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy output</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Vertical orientation</subject><subject>Zero energy buildings</subject><issn>0038-092X</issn><issn>1471-1257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFrGzEQhUVpIa6Tn1AQ5LzbkeS1tKeQmKY1mDaHJuQmZO2okVlLG0k29N9Hxjn01ssMD733Bn2EfGHQMmDLr7s2xxEDppYDky3wFhb8A5mxhWQN4538SGYAQjXQ8-cL8jnnHVQjU3JGyiruJ5NM8UekEyYX094Ei9TkjDnvMRQaHTU0xNAcq_KjKThQEwb6j7xbPzzRFKMrcaI2Buf_HE6lMWTqAy0vSH9inWmswXxJPjkzZrx633PyeP_t9-pHs_n1fb263TRWCFka1fXWdEvhJAqzkGpQPWdCCouOD_2SD0YCcG7FtmoYwHDXqy3rGbPKwVaKObk-904pvh4wF72LhxTqSc1U3wNTta-6urPLpphzQqen5Pcm_dUM9Amw3ul3wPoEWAPXFXDN3ZxzWL9w9PU1W4-V3eAT2qKH6P_T8AbRA4kQ</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Ritzen, M.J.</creator><creator>Vroon, Z.A.E.P.</creator><creator>Rovers, R.</creator><creator>Geurts, C.P.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0913-2769</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands</title><author>Ritzen, M.J. ; Vroon, Z.A.E.P. ; Rovers, R. ; Geurts, C.P.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-859ca563f7e3a478d8921373cef2d962da70022c3bf2d0d0a2f98b1911c8f0b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Air monitoring</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Building envelope</topic><topic>Building envelopes</topic><topic>Building Integrated Photovoltaics</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy output</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Vertical orientation</topic><topic>Zero energy buildings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ritzen, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vroon, Z.A.E.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovers, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geurts, C.P.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ritzen, M.J.</au><au>Vroon, Z.A.E.P.</au><au>Rovers, R.</au><au>Geurts, C.P.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>146</volume><spage>389</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>389-400</pages><issn>0038-092X</issn><eissn>1471-1257</eissn><abstract>•Realization of a BIPV field test with different ventilation configurations.•3-year monitoring of BIPV performance, temperatures, and relative humidity.•Post measurement EL And STC power determination.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows lower PV performance, higher temperatures, and higher RH.•Non-ventilated BIPV shows higher degree of cell damage after 3year monitoring. Backside ventilation is one of the most common passive cooling methods of PV modules in the built environment, but might be under constraint when integrating PV in the building envelope. To investigate the short and long term effect of backside ventilation on Building Integrated PV (BIPV) performance and lifespan, a comparative BIPV field test is conducted in a real life lab located in the Netherlands. The field test includes 24 modules in 4 segments with different levels of backside ventilation. PV energy output, module backside temperature, relative humidity in the air gap, and air velocity in the air gap have been monitored for three years in the period January 2013–December 2015. At the end of the monitoring period Electric Luminescence (EL) images were made and Standard Testing Condition (STC) power was determined. The ventilated segments show a similar behaviour (6% difference) in PV energy output, but the non-ventilated segment shows a strong decrease of 86% in output after three years. A maximum temperature of 72°C is reached in the ventilated segments and a maximum temperature of 83°C in the non-ventilated segment. Relative humidity (RH) levels reach a maximum of 100% in all segments. Air velocity in the non-ventilated segment is 13–39% of the air velocity in the ventilated segments. STC power determination and EL imaging show lower peak power and more defects in the non-ventilated modules, and modules placed at vertical higher positions in the non-ventilated segment have a lower power output of 50–60%. The results indicate that, considering the first generation Metal Wrap Through (MWT) modules investigated, the non-ventilated BIPV modules exposed to the highest temperatures show the lowest power output, lowest STC power and show the most damaged cells in the EL imaging. Even though PV module manufacturing shows continuous technological advances, the methodology and results of this work has added value for the prediction of BIPV operating aspects and lifespan when designing and realizing a BIPV installation. Moreover, the BIPV field test presented in this study has been a very illustrative BIPV demonstration project for manufacturers, installers and designers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.042</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0913-2769</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-092X
ispartof Solar energy, 2017-04, Vol.146, p.389-400
issn 0038-092X
1471-1257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1899018213
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Air monitoring
Air temperature
Building envelope
Building envelopes
Building Integrated Photovoltaics
Damage
Energy
Energy output
Environmental monitoring
Life span
Modules
Performance assessment
Relative humidity
Segments
Solar energy
Studies
Temperature
Temperature effects
Velocity
Ventilation
Vertical orientation
Zero energy buildings
title Comparative performance assessment of a non-ventilated and ventilated BIPV rooftop configurations in the Netherlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A54%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20performance%20assessment%20of%20a%20non-ventilated%20and%20ventilated%20BIPV%20rooftop%20configurations%20in%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy&rft.au=Ritzen,%20M.J.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=146&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=389-400&rft.issn=0038-092X&rft.eissn=1471-1257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1899018213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899018213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038092X17301457&rfr_iscdi=true