Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1
Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock graz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2017-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1335 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Silva, L G Benedeti, P D B Paula, E M Malekjahani, F Amaral, P M Mariz, L D S Shenkoru, T Faciola, A P |
description | Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock grazing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of urea, molasses, or a combination of urea and molasses supplementation of a CG-based diet on digestibility, microbial fermentation, bacterial protein synthesis, and nutrient flow using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Eight fermenters were used in a replicate 4 x 4 Latin square design with four 10-d experimental periods. Experimental treatments (DM basis) were 1) forage only (CON), 2) CG plus urea alone (URE; 1.36% urea), 3) CG plus molasses alone (MOL; 15.9% molasses), and 4) CG plus urea and molasses combined (URE+MOL; 1.28% urea plus 19.3% molasses). Each fermenter was fed 72 g/d of DM, and data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The true digestibilities of NDF and ADF were not affected by diets (P > 0.05). Molasses-containing diets had greater true digestibility of OM (P = 0.02). However, true digestibility of CP was increased when molasses was fed alone (P < 0.01). Molasses-containing diets had lower pH (P < 0.01) and greater VFA concentrations (P < 0.01) compared to those of the other diets. The URE+MOL diet resulted in a greater VFA concentration (P < 0.01). Propionate concentration increased (P < 0.01), whereas acetate concentration decreased (P < 0.01) when molasses alone or in combination with urea was added to the diets. Supplying molasses alone resulted in greater (P = 0.03) total branched-chain VFA compared to the other diets. The concentration of NH^sub 3^-N and total N flow increased (P < 0.01) in response to urea supplementation and was greater (P < 0.01) when urea alone was supplemented in the diet. On the other hand, molassessupplemented diets yielded more non-ammonia N (P < 0.01) and bacterial N (P = 0.04). Supplementation had no effect (P = 0.83) on bacterial efficiency. Results from this study indicate that the addition of urea and molasses in a CG-based diet could improve nutrient supply to animals, notably VFA supply and microbial N supply; however, in the levels tested in this study, it did not improve CG utilization as assessed by NDF digestion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas2016.0950 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1899015438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1899015438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18990154383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhC0EEuHnxgOsxAUOaW0Hl-QKKuIBuFdusm4TJd7gXQv1KXhlcuDAEWmk0Wi-GaXujF5ZZ5_Xg2erzWalG6fPVGGcdWVlNtW5KrS2pqxrYy_VFfOgtbGucYX63oaArTBQgNanPR1PXfKC4GMHsZdEB4zAeZ5HnDCKl54iLAqY_uRlfEQvh-SZ4eEl0ZQZZDmmlKdH6CN46LIfyzDSF7QUpY-ZFqbNo-SEwCcWnMDcqIvgR8bbX79W92_bj9f3ck70mZFlN1BOcal2pm4abdxTVVf_o34An5RdMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899015438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Silva, L G ; Benedeti, P D B ; Paula, E M ; Malekjahani, F ; Amaral, P M ; Mariz, L D S ; Shenkoru, T ; Faciola, A P</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, L G ; Benedeti, P D B ; Paula, E M ; Malekjahani, F ; Amaral, P M ; Mariz, L D S ; Shenkoru, T ; Faciola, A P</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock grazing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of urea, molasses, or a combination of urea and molasses supplementation of a CG-based diet on digestibility, microbial fermentation, bacterial protein synthesis, and nutrient flow using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Eight fermenters were used in a replicate 4 x 4 Latin square design with four 10-d experimental periods. Experimental treatments (DM basis) were 1) forage only (CON), 2) CG plus urea alone (URE; 1.36% urea), 3) CG plus molasses alone (MOL; 15.9% molasses), and 4) CG plus urea and molasses combined (URE+MOL; 1.28% urea plus 19.3% molasses). Each fermenter was fed 72 g/d of DM, and data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The true digestibilities of NDF and ADF were not affected by diets (P > 0.05). Molasses-containing diets had greater true digestibility of OM (P = 0.02). However, true digestibility of CP was increased when molasses was fed alone (P < 0.01). Molasses-containing diets had lower pH (P < 0.01) and greater VFA concentrations (P < 0.01) compared to those of the other diets. The URE+MOL diet resulted in a greater VFA concentration (P < 0.01). Propionate concentration increased (P < 0.01), whereas acetate concentration decreased (P < 0.01) when molasses alone or in combination with urea was added to the diets. Supplying molasses alone resulted in greater (P = 0.03) total branched-chain VFA compared to the other diets. The concentration of NH^sub 3^-N and total N flow increased (P < 0.01) in response to urea supplementation and was greater (P < 0.01) when urea alone was supplemented in the diet. On the other hand, molassessupplemented diets yielded more non-ammonia N (P < 0.01) and bacterial N (P = 0.04). Supplementation had no effect (P = 0.83) on bacterial efficiency. Results from this study indicate that the addition of urea and molasses in a CG-based diet could improve nutrient supply to animals, notably VFA supply and microbial N supply; however, in the levels tested in this study, it did not improve CG utilization as assessed by NDF digestion.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas2016.0950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Bacteria ; Carbohydrates ; Chain branching ; Continuous culture ; Data processing ; Diet ; Digestibility ; Digestion ; Feed additives ; Fermentation ; Fermenters ; Fire hazards ; Flammability ; Forage ; Forest & brush fires ; Grasses ; Grazing ; Livestock ; Livestock grazing ; Microorganisms ; Molasses ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient flow ; Nutrients ; Propionic acid ; Protein biosynthesis ; Protein synthesis ; Supplying ; Urea ; Wildfires ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1335</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Mar 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, L G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedeti, P D B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paula, E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malekjahani, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariz, L D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenkoru, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faciola, A P</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description><![CDATA[Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock grazing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of urea, molasses, or a combination of urea and molasses supplementation of a CG-based diet on digestibility, microbial fermentation, bacterial protein synthesis, and nutrient flow using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Eight fermenters were used in a replicate 4 x 4 Latin square design with four 10-d experimental periods. Experimental treatments (DM basis) were 1) forage only (CON), 2) CG plus urea alone (URE; 1.36% urea), 3) CG plus molasses alone (MOL; 15.9% molasses), and 4) CG plus urea and molasses combined (URE+MOL; 1.28% urea plus 19.3% molasses). Each fermenter was fed 72 g/d of DM, and data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The true digestibilities of NDF and ADF were not affected by diets (P > 0.05). Molasses-containing diets had greater true digestibility of OM (P = 0.02). However, true digestibility of CP was increased when molasses was fed alone (P < 0.01). Molasses-containing diets had lower pH (P < 0.01) and greater VFA concentrations (P < 0.01) compared to those of the other diets. The URE+MOL diet resulted in a greater VFA concentration (P < 0.01). Propionate concentration increased (P < 0.01), whereas acetate concentration decreased (P < 0.01) when molasses alone or in combination with urea was added to the diets. Supplying molasses alone resulted in greater (P = 0.03) total branched-chain VFA compared to the other diets. The concentration of NH^sub 3^-N and total N flow increased (P < 0.01) in response to urea supplementation and was greater (P < 0.01) when urea alone was supplemented in the diet. On the other hand, molassessupplemented diets yielded more non-ammonia N (P < 0.01) and bacterial N (P = 0.04). Supplementation had no effect (P = 0.83) on bacterial efficiency. Results from this study indicate that the addition of urea and molasses in a CG-based diet could improve nutrient supply to animals, notably VFA supply and microbial N supply; however, in the levels tested in this study, it did not improve CG utilization as assessed by NDF digestion.]]></description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Chain branching</subject><subject>Continuous culture</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Fermenters</subject><subject>Fire hazards</subject><subject>Flammability</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forest & brush fires</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock grazing</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Molasses</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient flow</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Propionic acid</subject><subject>Protein biosynthesis</subject><subject>Protein synthesis</subject><subject>Supplying</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhC0EEuHnxgOsxAUOaW0Hl-QKKuIBuFdusm4TJd7gXQv1KXhlcuDAEWmk0Wi-GaXujF5ZZ5_Xg2erzWalG6fPVGGcdWVlNtW5KrS2pqxrYy_VFfOgtbGucYX63oaArTBQgNanPR1PXfKC4GMHsZdEB4zAeZ5HnDCKl54iLAqY_uRlfEQvh-SZ4eEl0ZQZZDmmlKdH6CN46LIfyzDSF7QUpY-ZFqbNo-SEwCcWnMDcqIvgR8bbX79W92_bj9f3ck70mZFlN1BOcal2pm4abdxTVVf_o34An5RdMA</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Silva, L G</creator><creator>Benedeti, P D B</creator><creator>Paula, E M</creator><creator>Malekjahani, F</creator><creator>Amaral, P M</creator><creator>Mariz, L D S</creator><creator>Shenkoru, T</creator><creator>Faciola, A P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1</title><author>Silva, L G ; Benedeti, P D B ; Paula, E M ; Malekjahani, F ; Amaral, P M ; Mariz, L D S ; Shenkoru, T ; Faciola, A P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18990154383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Chain branching</topic><topic>Continuous culture</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Fermenters</topic><topic>Fire hazards</topic><topic>Flammability</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forest & brush fires</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock grazing</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Molasses</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient flow</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Propionic acid</topic><topic>Protein biosynthesis</topic><topic>Protein synthesis</topic><topic>Supplying</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, L G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedeti, P D B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paula, E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malekjahani, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariz, L D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenkoru, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faciola, A P</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, L G</au><au>Benedeti, P D B</au><au>Paula, E M</au><au>Malekjahani, F</au><au>Amaral, P M</au><au>Mariz, L D S</au><au>Shenkoru, T</au><au>Faciola, A P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1335</spage><pages>1335-</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock grazing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of urea, molasses, or a combination of urea and molasses supplementation of a CG-based diet on digestibility, microbial fermentation, bacterial protein synthesis, and nutrient flow using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Eight fermenters were used in a replicate 4 x 4 Latin square design with four 10-d experimental periods. Experimental treatments (DM basis) were 1) forage only (CON), 2) CG plus urea alone (URE; 1.36% urea), 3) CG plus molasses alone (MOL; 15.9% molasses), and 4) CG plus urea and molasses combined (URE+MOL; 1.28% urea plus 19.3% molasses). Each fermenter was fed 72 g/d of DM, and data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The true digestibilities of NDF and ADF were not affected by diets (P > 0.05). Molasses-containing diets had greater true digestibility of OM (P = 0.02). However, true digestibility of CP was increased when molasses was fed alone (P < 0.01). Molasses-containing diets had lower pH (P < 0.01) and greater VFA concentrations (P < 0.01) compared to those of the other diets. The URE+MOL diet resulted in a greater VFA concentration (P < 0.01). Propionate concentration increased (P < 0.01), whereas acetate concentration decreased (P < 0.01) when molasses alone or in combination with urea was added to the diets. Supplying molasses alone resulted in greater (P = 0.03) total branched-chain VFA compared to the other diets. The concentration of NH^sub 3^-N and total N flow increased (P < 0.01) in response to urea supplementation and was greater (P < 0.01) when urea alone was supplemented in the diet. On the other hand, molassessupplemented diets yielded more non-ammonia N (P < 0.01) and bacterial N (P = 0.04). Supplementation had no effect (P = 0.83) on bacterial efficiency. Results from this study indicate that the addition of urea and molasses in a CG-based diet could improve nutrient supply to animals, notably VFA supply and microbial N supply; however, in the levels tested in this study, it did not improve CG utilization as assessed by NDF digestion.]]></abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas2016.0950</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2017-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1335 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1899015438 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Ammonia Bacteria Carbohydrates Chain branching Continuous culture Data processing Diet Digestibility Digestion Feed additives Fermentation Fermenters Fire hazards Flammability Forage Forest & brush fires Grasses Grazing Livestock Livestock grazing Microorganisms Molasses Nitrogen Nutrient flow Nutrients Propionic acid Protein biosynthesis Protein synthesis Supplying Urea Wildfires Winter |
title | Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A15%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20carbohydrate%20and%20nitrogen%20supplementation%20on%20fermentation%20of%20cheatgrass%20(Bromus%20tectorum)%20in%20a%20dual-flow%20continuous%20culture%20system%201&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Silva,%20L%20G&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1335&rft.pages=1335-&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas2016.0950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1899015438%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899015438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |