Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1

Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock graz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2017-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1335
Hauptverfasser: Silva, L G, Benedeti, P D B, Paula, E M, Malekjahani, F, Amaral, P M, Mariz, L D S, Shenkoru, T, Faciola, A P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1335
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 95
creator Silva, L G
Benedeti, P D B
Paula, E M
Malekjahani, F
Amaral, P M
Mariz, L D S
Shenkoru, T
Faciola, A P
description Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock grazing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of urea, molasses, or a combination of urea and molasses supplementation of a CG-based diet on digestibility, microbial fermentation, bacterial protein synthesis, and nutrient flow using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Eight fermenters were used in a replicate 4 x 4 Latin square design with four 10-d experimental periods. Experimental treatments (DM basis) were 1) forage only (CON), 2) CG plus urea alone (URE; 1.36% urea), 3) CG plus molasses alone (MOL; 15.9% molasses), and 4) CG plus urea and molasses combined (URE+MOL; 1.28% urea plus 19.3% molasses). Each fermenter was fed 72 g/d of DM, and data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The true digestibilities of NDF and ADF were not affected by diets (P > 0.05). Molasses-containing diets had greater true digestibility of OM (P = 0.02). However, true digestibility of CP was increased when molasses was fed alone (P < 0.01). Molasses-containing diets had lower pH (P < 0.01) and greater VFA concentrations (P < 0.01) compared to those of the other diets. The URE+MOL diet resulted in a greater VFA concentration (P < 0.01). Propionate concentration increased (P < 0.01), whereas acetate concentration decreased (P < 0.01) when molasses alone or in combination with urea was added to the diets. Supplying molasses alone resulted in greater (P = 0.03) total branched-chain VFA compared to the other diets. The concentration of NH^sub 3^-N and total N flow increased (P < 0.01) in response to urea supplementation and was greater (P < 0.01) when urea alone was supplemented in the diet. On the other hand, molassessupplemented diets yielded more non-ammonia N (P < 0.01) and bacterial N (P = 0.04). Supplementation had no effect (P = 0.83) on bacterial efficiency. Results from this study indicate that the addition of urea and molasses in a CG-based diet could improve nutrient supply to animals, notably VFA supply and microbial N supply; however, in the levels tested in this study, it did not improve CG utilization as assessed by NDF digestion.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas2016.0950
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1899015438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1899015438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18990154383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhC0EEuHnxgOsxAUOaW0Hl-QKKuIBuFdusm4TJd7gXQv1KXhlcuDAEWmk0Wi-GaXujF5ZZ5_Xg2erzWalG6fPVGGcdWVlNtW5KrS2pqxrYy_VFfOgtbGucYX63oaArTBQgNanPR1PXfKC4GMHsZdEB4zAeZ5HnDCKl54iLAqY_uRlfEQvh-SZ4eEl0ZQZZDmmlKdH6CN46LIfyzDSF7QUpY-ZFqbNo-SEwCcWnMDcqIvgR8bbX79W92_bj9f3ck70mZFlN1BOcal2pm4abdxTVVf_o34An5RdMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899015438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Silva, L G ; Benedeti, P D B ; Paula, E M ; Malekjahani, F ; Amaral, P M ; Mariz, L D S ; Shenkoru, T ; Faciola, A P</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, L G ; Benedeti, P D B ; Paula, E M ; Malekjahani, F ; Amaral, P M ; Mariz, L D S ; Shenkoru, T ; Faciola, A P</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock grazing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of urea, molasses, or a combination of urea and molasses supplementation of a CG-based diet on digestibility, microbial fermentation, bacterial protein synthesis, and nutrient flow using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Eight fermenters were used in a replicate 4 x 4 Latin square design with four 10-d experimental periods. Experimental treatments (DM basis) were 1) forage only (CON), 2) CG plus urea alone (URE; 1.36% urea), 3) CG plus molasses alone (MOL; 15.9% molasses), and 4) CG plus urea and molasses combined (URE+MOL; 1.28% urea plus 19.3% molasses). Each fermenter was fed 72 g/d of DM, and data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The true digestibilities of NDF and ADF were not affected by diets (P > 0.05). Molasses-containing diets had greater true digestibility of OM (P = 0.02). However, true digestibility of CP was increased when molasses was fed alone (P < 0.01). Molasses-containing diets had lower pH (P < 0.01) and greater VFA concentrations (P < 0.01) compared to those of the other diets. The URE+MOL diet resulted in a greater VFA concentration (P < 0.01). Propionate concentration increased (P < 0.01), whereas acetate concentration decreased (P < 0.01) when molasses alone or in combination with urea was added to the diets. Supplying molasses alone resulted in greater (P = 0.03) total branched-chain VFA compared to the other diets. The concentration of NH^sub 3^-N and total N flow increased (P < 0.01) in response to urea supplementation and was greater (P < 0.01) when urea alone was supplemented in the diet. On the other hand, molassessupplemented diets yielded more non-ammonia N (P < 0.01) and bacterial N (P = 0.04). Supplementation had no effect (P = 0.83) on bacterial efficiency. Results from this study indicate that the addition of urea and molasses in a CG-based diet could improve nutrient supply to animals, notably VFA supply and microbial N supply; however, in the levels tested in this study, it did not improve CG utilization as assessed by NDF digestion.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas2016.0950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Bacteria ; Carbohydrates ; Chain branching ; Continuous culture ; Data processing ; Diet ; Digestibility ; Digestion ; Feed additives ; Fermentation ; Fermenters ; Fire hazards ; Flammability ; Forage ; Forest &amp; brush fires ; Grasses ; Grazing ; Livestock ; Livestock grazing ; Microorganisms ; Molasses ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient flow ; Nutrients ; Propionic acid ; Protein biosynthesis ; Protein synthesis ; Supplying ; Urea ; Wildfires ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1335</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Mar 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, L G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedeti, P D B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paula, E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malekjahani, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariz, L D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenkoru, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faciola, A P</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description><![CDATA[Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock grazing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of urea, molasses, or a combination of urea and molasses supplementation of a CG-based diet on digestibility, microbial fermentation, bacterial protein synthesis, and nutrient flow using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Eight fermenters were used in a replicate 4 x 4 Latin square design with four 10-d experimental periods. Experimental treatments (DM basis) were 1) forage only (CON), 2) CG plus urea alone (URE; 1.36% urea), 3) CG plus molasses alone (MOL; 15.9% molasses), and 4) CG plus urea and molasses combined (URE+MOL; 1.28% urea plus 19.3% molasses). Each fermenter was fed 72 g/d of DM, and data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The true digestibilities of NDF and ADF were not affected by diets (P > 0.05). Molasses-containing diets had greater true digestibility of OM (P = 0.02). However, true digestibility of CP was increased when molasses was fed alone (P < 0.01). Molasses-containing diets had lower pH (P < 0.01) and greater VFA concentrations (P < 0.01) compared to those of the other diets. The URE+MOL diet resulted in a greater VFA concentration (P < 0.01). Propionate concentration increased (P < 0.01), whereas acetate concentration decreased (P < 0.01) when molasses alone or in combination with urea was added to the diets. Supplying molasses alone resulted in greater (P = 0.03) total branched-chain VFA compared to the other diets. The concentration of NH^sub 3^-N and total N flow increased (P < 0.01) in response to urea supplementation and was greater (P < 0.01) when urea alone was supplemented in the diet. On the other hand, molassessupplemented diets yielded more non-ammonia N (P < 0.01) and bacterial N (P = 0.04). Supplementation had no effect (P = 0.83) on bacterial efficiency. Results from this study indicate that the addition of urea and molasses in a CG-based diet could improve nutrient supply to animals, notably VFA supply and microbial N supply; however, in the levels tested in this study, it did not improve CG utilization as assessed by NDF digestion.]]></description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Chain branching</subject><subject>Continuous culture</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Fermenters</subject><subject>Fire hazards</subject><subject>Flammability</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forest &amp; brush fires</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock grazing</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Molasses</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient flow</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Propionic acid</subject><subject>Protein biosynthesis</subject><subject>Protein synthesis</subject><subject>Supplying</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjM1OwzAQhC0EEuHnxgOsxAUOaW0Hl-QKKuIBuFdusm4TJd7gXQv1KXhlcuDAEWmk0Wi-GaXujF5ZZ5_Xg2erzWalG6fPVGGcdWVlNtW5KrS2pqxrYy_VFfOgtbGucYX63oaArTBQgNanPR1PXfKC4GMHsZdEB4zAeZ5HnDCKl54iLAqY_uRlfEQvh-SZ4eEl0ZQZZDmmlKdH6CN46LIfyzDSF7QUpY-ZFqbNo-SEwCcWnMDcqIvgR8bbX79W92_bj9f3ck70mZFlN1BOcal2pm4abdxTVVf_o34An5RdMA</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Silva, L G</creator><creator>Benedeti, P D B</creator><creator>Paula, E M</creator><creator>Malekjahani, F</creator><creator>Amaral, P M</creator><creator>Mariz, L D S</creator><creator>Shenkoru, T</creator><creator>Faciola, A P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1</title><author>Silva, L G ; Benedeti, P D B ; Paula, E M ; Malekjahani, F ; Amaral, P M ; Mariz, L D S ; Shenkoru, T ; Faciola, A P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18990154383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Chain branching</topic><topic>Continuous culture</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Fermenters</topic><topic>Fire hazards</topic><topic>Flammability</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forest &amp; brush fires</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock grazing</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Molasses</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient flow</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Propionic acid</topic><topic>Protein biosynthesis</topic><topic>Protein synthesis</topic><topic>Supplying</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, L G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedeti, P D B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paula, E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malekjahani, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariz, L D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenkoru, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faciola, A P</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, L G</au><au>Benedeti, P D B</au><au>Paula, E M</au><au>Malekjahani, F</au><au>Amaral, P M</au><au>Mariz, L D S</au><au>Shenkoru, T</au><au>Faciola, A P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1335</spage><pages>1335-</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Cheatgrass (CG; Bromus tectorum), an introduced winter annual grass, is an aggressive invader of the sagebrush community in the Western United States. Because of its greater flammability, mature CG constitutes a fire hazard leading to repeated wildfires. One fuel-reduction strategy is livestock grazing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of urea, molasses, or a combination of urea and molasses supplementation of a CG-based diet on digestibility, microbial fermentation, bacterial protein synthesis, and nutrient flow using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Eight fermenters were used in a replicate 4 x 4 Latin square design with four 10-d experimental periods. Experimental treatments (DM basis) were 1) forage only (CON), 2) CG plus urea alone (URE; 1.36% urea), 3) CG plus molasses alone (MOL; 15.9% molasses), and 4) CG plus urea and molasses combined (URE+MOL; 1.28% urea plus 19.3% molasses). Each fermenter was fed 72 g/d of DM, and data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The true digestibilities of NDF and ADF were not affected by diets (P > 0.05). Molasses-containing diets had greater true digestibility of OM (P = 0.02). However, true digestibility of CP was increased when molasses was fed alone (P < 0.01). Molasses-containing diets had lower pH (P < 0.01) and greater VFA concentrations (P < 0.01) compared to those of the other diets. The URE+MOL diet resulted in a greater VFA concentration (P < 0.01). Propionate concentration increased (P < 0.01), whereas acetate concentration decreased (P < 0.01) when molasses alone or in combination with urea was added to the diets. Supplying molasses alone resulted in greater (P = 0.03) total branched-chain VFA compared to the other diets. The concentration of NH^sub 3^-N and total N flow increased (P < 0.01) in response to urea supplementation and was greater (P < 0.01) when urea alone was supplemented in the diet. On the other hand, molassessupplemented diets yielded more non-ammonia N (P < 0.01) and bacterial N (P = 0.04). Supplementation had no effect (P = 0.83) on bacterial efficiency. Results from this study indicate that the addition of urea and molasses in a CG-based diet could improve nutrient supply to animals, notably VFA supply and microbial N supply; however, in the levels tested in this study, it did not improve CG utilization as assessed by NDF digestion.]]></abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas2016.0950</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2017-03, Vol.95 (3), p.1335
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1899015438
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Ammonia
Bacteria
Carbohydrates
Chain branching
Continuous culture
Data processing
Diet
Digestibility
Digestion
Feed additives
Fermentation
Fermenters
Fire hazards
Flammability
Forage
Forest & brush fires
Grasses
Grazing
Livestock
Livestock grazing
Microorganisms
Molasses
Nitrogen
Nutrient flow
Nutrients
Propionic acid
Protein biosynthesis
Protein synthesis
Supplying
Urea
Wildfires
Winter
title Effects of carbohydrate and nitrogen supplementation on fermentation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) in a dual-flow continuous culture system 1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A15%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20carbohydrate%20and%20nitrogen%20supplementation%20on%20fermentation%20of%20cheatgrass%20(Bromus%20tectorum)%20in%20a%20dual-flow%20continuous%20culture%20system%201&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Silva,%20L%20G&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1335&rft.pages=1335-&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas2016.0950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1899015438%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899015438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true