Groupy versus Non-Groupy Social Preferences: Personality, Region, and Political Party
This paper replicates results that some people, when allocating income, are “groupy” and discriminate between in and out groups, but many show no such bias. The paper explores psychometric, demographic, and political correlates. In an M-Turk experiment, no “Big Five” personality trait relates to thi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American economic review 2017-05, Vol.107 (5), p.65-69 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 69 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 65 |
| container_title | The American economic review |
| container_volume | 107 |
| creator | Kranton, Rachel E. Sanders, Seth G. |
| description | This paper replicates results that some people, when allocating income, are “groupy” and discriminate between in and out groups, but many show no such bias. The paper explores psychometric, demographic, and political correlates. In an M-Turk experiment, no “Big Five” personality trait relates to this individual difference. Gender, education, and political party are not predictive. Political independents, however, are more likely to be non-groupy, and participants in deindustrialized counties or Deep South Republicans are more likely to be groupy. The results indicate (i) psychological notions of personality do not capture this heterogeneity and (ii) groupiness might relate to political and social contestation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1257/aer.p20171096 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1898638700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44250362</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44250362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a34d3dca0295ad56f97cbbad83573711734c813ff0a95700bbb5fde71d04b3503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtHj8KC16bmc5N4k6JVKFrUnkM2ycqWulmTXWH_e1NaPA3z-M3MmwfANUZzTLi4Mz7OO4KwwEiVJ2CCFWNQKIlPwQQhRKAkkpyDi5S2aN9jMQGbZQxDNxa_PqYhFa-hhUflI9jG7Ip19LWPvrU-3RfrTIXW7Jp-nBXv_qsJ7awwrSvWIWuN3fMm9uMlOKvNLvmrY52CzdPj5-IZrt6WL4uHFbSUkx4ayhx11iCiuHG8rJWwVWWcpFxQgbGgzEpM6xoZxQVCVVXx2nmBHWIV5YhOwe1hbxfDz-BTr7dhiNlg0lgqWVKZpzIFD5SNIaX8j-5i823iqDHS--R0Tk7_J5f5mwO_TX2I_zBjJJ8sCf0DOAJrCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1898638700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Groupy versus Non-Groupy Social Preferences: Personality, Region, and Political Party</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Kranton, Rachel E. ; Sanders, Seth G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kranton, Rachel E. ; Sanders, Seth G.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper replicates results that some people, when allocating income, are “groupy” and discriminate between in and out groups, but many show no such bias. The paper explores psychometric, demographic, and political correlates. In an M-Turk experiment, no “Big Five” personality trait relates to this individual difference. Gender, education, and political party are not predictive. Political independents, however, are more likely to be non-groupy, and participants in deindustrialized counties or Deep South Republicans are more likely to be groupy. The results indicate (i) psychological notions of personality do not capture this heterogeneity and (ii) groupiness might relate to political and social contestation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20171096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Allocations ; Bias ; Cultural geography ; Demography ; Employment ; Five factor model ; Individual differences ; INSTITUTIONS, MORALS, AND MARKETS ; Personality ; Personality traits ; Political identity ; Political parties ; Psychological aspects ; Social biases ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 2017-05, Vol.107 (5), p.65-69</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2017 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a34d3dca0295ad56f97cbbad83573711734c813ff0a95700bbb5fde71d04b3503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a34d3dca0295ad56f97cbbad83573711734c813ff0a95700bbb5fde71d04b3503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44250362$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44250362$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3746,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kranton, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Seth G.</creatorcontrib><title>Groupy versus Non-Groupy Social Preferences: Personality, Region, and Political Party</title><title>The American economic review</title><description>This paper replicates results that some people, when allocating income, are “groupy” and discriminate between in and out groups, but many show no such bias. The paper explores psychometric, demographic, and political correlates. In an M-Turk experiment, no “Big Five” personality trait relates to this individual difference. Gender, education, and political party are not predictive. Political independents, however, are more likely to be non-groupy, and participants in deindustrialized counties or Deep South Republicans are more likely to be groupy. The results indicate (i) psychological notions of personality do not capture this heterogeneity and (ii) groupiness might relate to political and social contestation.</description><subject>Allocations</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cultural geography</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Five factor model</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>INSTITUTIONS, MORALS, AND MARKETS</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Political identity</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Social biases</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtHj8KC16bmc5N4k6JVKFrUnkM2ycqWulmTXWH_e1NaPA3z-M3MmwfANUZzTLi4Mz7OO4KwwEiVJ2CCFWNQKIlPwQQhRKAkkpyDi5S2aN9jMQGbZQxDNxa_PqYhFa-hhUflI9jG7Ip19LWPvrU-3RfrTIXW7Jp-nBXv_qsJ7awwrSvWIWuN3fMm9uMlOKvNLvmrY52CzdPj5-IZrt6WL4uHFbSUkx4ayhx11iCiuHG8rJWwVWWcpFxQgbGgzEpM6xoZxQVCVVXx2nmBHWIV5YhOwe1hbxfDz-BTr7dhiNlg0lgqWVKZpzIFD5SNIaX8j-5i823iqDHS--R0Tk7_J5f5mwO_TX2I_zBjJJ8sCf0DOAJrCA</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Kranton, Rachel E.</creator><creator>Sanders, Seth G.</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Groupy versus Non-Groupy Social Preferences: Personality, Region, and Political Party</title><author>Kranton, Rachel E. ; Sanders, Seth G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a34d3dca0295ad56f97cbbad83573711734c813ff0a95700bbb5fde71d04b3503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Allocations</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cultural geography</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Five factor model</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>INSTITUTIONS, MORALS, AND MARKETS</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Political identity</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Social biases</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kranton, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Seth G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kranton, Rachel E.</au><au>Sanders, Seth G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Groupy versus Non-Groupy Social Preferences: Personality, Region, and Political Party</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>65-69</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><abstract>This paper replicates results that some people, when allocating income, are “groupy” and discriminate between in and out groups, but many show no such bias. The paper explores psychometric, demographic, and political correlates. In an M-Turk experiment, no “Big Five” personality trait relates to this individual difference. Gender, education, and political party are not predictive. Political independents, however, are more likely to be non-groupy, and participants in deindustrialized counties or Deep South Republicans are more likely to be groupy. The results indicate (i) psychological notions of personality do not capture this heterogeneity and (ii) groupiness might relate to political and social contestation.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/aer.p20171096</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-8282 |
| ispartof | The American economic review, 2017-05, Vol.107 (5), p.65-69 |
| issn | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1898638700 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; American Economic Association Web |
| subjects | Allocations Bias Cultural geography Demography Employment Five factor model Individual differences INSTITUTIONS, MORALS, AND MARKETS Personality Personality traits Political identity Political parties Psychological aspects Social biases Social psychology |
| title | Groupy versus Non-Groupy Social Preferences: Personality, Region, and Political Party |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T00%3A26%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Groupy%20versus%20Non-Groupy%20Social%20Preferences:%20Personality,%20Region,%20and%20Political%20Party&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Kranton,%20Rachel%20E.&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=65-69&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/aer.p20171096&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44250362%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1898638700&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44250362&rfr_iscdi=true |