PL02: Derivation and validation of a feasible emergency department specific frailty index to predict adverse outcomes

Introduction: Frailty is an overarching concept in geriatric medicine. However its utility in the emergency department (ED) was not well understood. Objectives were to derive and validate an ED specific frailty index (FI-ED), using a cumulative deficits model; and to evaluate its ability to predict...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of emergency medicine 2017-05, Vol.19 (S1), p.S26-S26
Hauptverfasser: Brousseau, A., Dent, E., Hubbard, R.E., Melady, D., Émond, M., Mercier, E., Costa, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S26
container_issue S1
container_start_page S26
container_title Canadian journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 19
creator Brousseau, A.
Dent, E.
Hubbard, R.E.
Melady, D.
Émond, M.
Mercier, E.
Costa, A.
description Introduction: Frailty is an overarching concept in geriatric medicine. However its utility in the emergency department (ED) was not well understood. Objectives were to derive and validate an ED specific frailty index (FI-ED), using a cumulative deficits model; and to evaluate its ability to predict adverse outcomes. Methods: This was a large multinational prospective cohort study using data from: The Management of Older Persons in Emergency Departments (MOPED) and the interRAI study. The FI-ED was derived from the Canadian sample and validated in the multinational sample. Inclusion criteria were all patients ≥75 years old presenting to an ED. The FI-ED used 24 variables identified in the interRAI ED-Contact Assessment tool, a brief focussed geriatric assessment. Its ability to predict adverse outcomes were analysed by logistic regression with odds ratio (OR). Results: There were 3903 participants: 2153 in the derivation sample and 1750 in the validation sample. In the derivation sample, increasing FI-ED was significantly associated with admission (OR 1.43 [95% CI 1.34-1.52]), death in hospital (OR 1.55 [1.38-1.73]), prolonged hospital stay (OR 1.37 [1.22-1.54]), needs for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (OR 1.51 [1.41-1.60]) and discharge to long-term care (OR 1.30 [1.16-1.47]). In the validation sample, results were similar except for long-term care disposition (OR 0.84 [0.75 0.85]). Conclusion: The FI-ED conformed to characteristics previously reported in other geriatric populations. It was accurately derived and validated from a brief geriatric assessment feasible in the ED and can be used to predict adverse outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/cem.2017.60
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1898614335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_cem_2017_60</cupid><sourcerecordid>1898614335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1025-c0b0cb267e177e758038bccd8fac67cb55a9c74e26208a160a012c52ed14fb463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsnv0DAo2xNspts6k3qXyjoQc8hm0xKyu5mTdJiv71bKuLB07yBH2_mPYQuKZlRQusbA92MjWImyBGa0ErSQpKqPP7VJT9FZymtCaGMUzlBm7clYbf4HqLf6uxDj3Vv8Va33h7W4LDGDnTyTQsYOogr6M0OWxh0zB30GacBjHfeYBe1b_MO-97CF84BDxGsNxlru4WYAIdNNqGDdI5OnG4TXPzMKfp4fHhfPBfL16eXxd2yMJQwXhjSENMwUQOta6j5-L9sjLHSaSNq03Cu56augAlGpKaC6DGW4QwsrVxTiXKKrg6-QwyfG0hZrcMm9uNJReVcClqVJR-p6wNlYkgpglND9J2OO0WJ2veqxl7VvlclyEgXP7TumujtCv6Y_sN_Aw6tev4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1898614335</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PL02: Derivation and validation of a feasible emergency department specific frailty index to predict adverse outcomes</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Brousseau, A. ; Dent, E. ; Hubbard, R.E. ; Melady, D. ; Émond, M. ; Mercier, E. ; Costa, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brousseau, A. ; Dent, E. ; Hubbard, R.E. ; Melady, D. ; Émond, M. ; Mercier, E. ; Costa, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Frailty is an overarching concept in geriatric medicine. However its utility in the emergency department (ED) was not well understood. Objectives were to derive and validate an ED specific frailty index (FI-ED), using a cumulative deficits model; and to evaluate its ability to predict adverse outcomes. Methods: This was a large multinational prospective cohort study using data from: The Management of Older Persons in Emergency Departments (MOPED) and the interRAI study. The FI-ED was derived from the Canadian sample and validated in the multinational sample. Inclusion criteria were all patients ≥75 years old presenting to an ED. The FI-ED used 24 variables identified in the interRAI ED-Contact Assessment tool, a brief focussed geriatric assessment. Its ability to predict adverse outcomes were analysed by logistic regression with odds ratio (OR). Results: There were 3903 participants: 2153 in the derivation sample and 1750 in the validation sample. In the derivation sample, increasing FI-ED was significantly associated with admission (OR 1.43 [95% CI 1.34-1.52]), death in hospital (OR 1.55 [1.38-1.73]), prolonged hospital stay (OR 1.37 [1.22-1.54]), needs for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (OR 1.51 [1.41-1.60]) and discharge to long-term care (OR 1.30 [1.16-1.47]). In the validation sample, results were similar except for long-term care disposition (OR 0.84 [0.75 0.85]). Conclusion: The FI-ED conformed to characteristics previously reported in other geriatric populations. It was accurately derived and validated from a brief geriatric assessment feasible in the ED and can be used to predict adverse outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-8035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1481-8043</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/cem.2017.60</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Emergency medical care ; Frailty ; Geriatrics ; Health risk assessment ; Long term health care ; Plenary Oral Presentations</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2017-05, Vol.19 (S1), p.S26-S26</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brousseau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melady, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Émond, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, A.</creatorcontrib><title>PL02: Derivation and validation of a feasible emergency department specific frailty index to predict adverse outcomes</title><title>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>CJEM</addtitle><description>Introduction: Frailty is an overarching concept in geriatric medicine. However its utility in the emergency department (ED) was not well understood. Objectives were to derive and validate an ED specific frailty index (FI-ED), using a cumulative deficits model; and to evaluate its ability to predict adverse outcomes. Methods: This was a large multinational prospective cohort study using data from: The Management of Older Persons in Emergency Departments (MOPED) and the interRAI study. The FI-ED was derived from the Canadian sample and validated in the multinational sample. Inclusion criteria were all patients ≥75 years old presenting to an ED. The FI-ED used 24 variables identified in the interRAI ED-Contact Assessment tool, a brief focussed geriatric assessment. Its ability to predict adverse outcomes were analysed by logistic regression with odds ratio (OR). Results: There were 3903 participants: 2153 in the derivation sample and 1750 in the validation sample. In the derivation sample, increasing FI-ED was significantly associated with admission (OR 1.43 [95% CI 1.34-1.52]), death in hospital (OR 1.55 [1.38-1.73]), prolonged hospital stay (OR 1.37 [1.22-1.54]), needs for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (OR 1.51 [1.41-1.60]) and discharge to long-term care (OR 1.30 [1.16-1.47]). In the validation sample, results were similar except for long-term care disposition (OR 0.84 [0.75 0.85]). Conclusion: The FI-ED conformed to characteristics previously reported in other geriatric populations. It was accurately derived and validated from a brief geriatric assessment feasible in the ED and can be used to predict adverse outcomes.</description><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Plenary Oral Presentations</subject><issn>1481-8035</issn><issn>1481-8043</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsnv0DAo2xNspts6k3qXyjoQc8hm0xKyu5mTdJiv71bKuLB07yBH2_mPYQuKZlRQusbA92MjWImyBGa0ErSQpKqPP7VJT9FZymtCaGMUzlBm7clYbf4HqLf6uxDj3Vv8Va33h7W4LDGDnTyTQsYOogr6M0OWxh0zB30GacBjHfeYBe1b_MO-97CF84BDxGsNxlru4WYAIdNNqGDdI5OnG4TXPzMKfp4fHhfPBfL16eXxd2yMJQwXhjSENMwUQOta6j5-L9sjLHSaSNq03Cu56augAlGpKaC6DGW4QwsrVxTiXKKrg6-QwyfG0hZrcMm9uNJReVcClqVJR-p6wNlYkgpglND9J2OO0WJ2veqxl7VvlclyEgXP7TumujtCv6Y_sN_Aw6tev4</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Brousseau, A.</creator><creator>Dent, E.</creator><creator>Hubbard, R.E.</creator><creator>Melady, D.</creator><creator>Émond, M.</creator><creator>Mercier, E.</creator><creator>Costa, A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>PL02: Derivation and validation of a feasible emergency department specific frailty index to predict adverse outcomes</title><author>Brousseau, A. ; Dent, E. ; Hubbard, R.E. ; Melady, D. ; Émond, M. ; Mercier, E. ; Costa, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1025-c0b0cb267e177e758038bccd8fac67cb55a9c74e26208a160a012c52ed14fb463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Plenary Oral Presentations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brousseau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melady, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Émond, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brousseau, A.</au><au>Dent, E.</au><au>Hubbard, R.E.</au><au>Melady, D.</au><au>Émond, M.</au><au>Mercier, E.</au><au>Costa, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PL02: Derivation and validation of a feasible emergency department specific frailty index to predict adverse outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>CJEM</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S26</spage><epage>S26</epage><pages>S26-S26</pages><issn>1481-8035</issn><eissn>1481-8043</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Frailty is an overarching concept in geriatric medicine. However its utility in the emergency department (ED) was not well understood. Objectives were to derive and validate an ED specific frailty index (FI-ED), using a cumulative deficits model; and to evaluate its ability to predict adverse outcomes. Methods: This was a large multinational prospective cohort study using data from: The Management of Older Persons in Emergency Departments (MOPED) and the interRAI study. The FI-ED was derived from the Canadian sample and validated in the multinational sample. Inclusion criteria were all patients ≥75 years old presenting to an ED. The FI-ED used 24 variables identified in the interRAI ED-Contact Assessment tool, a brief focussed geriatric assessment. Its ability to predict adverse outcomes were analysed by logistic regression with odds ratio (OR). Results: There were 3903 participants: 2153 in the derivation sample and 1750 in the validation sample. In the derivation sample, increasing FI-ED was significantly associated with admission (OR 1.43 [95% CI 1.34-1.52]), death in hospital (OR 1.55 [1.38-1.73]), prolonged hospital stay (OR 1.37 [1.22-1.54]), needs for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (OR 1.51 [1.41-1.60]) and discharge to long-term care (OR 1.30 [1.16-1.47]). In the validation sample, results were similar except for long-term care disposition (OR 0.84 [0.75 0.85]). Conclusion: The FI-ED conformed to characteristics previously reported in other geriatric populations. It was accurately derived and validated from a brief geriatric assessment feasible in the ED and can be used to predict adverse outcomes.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/cem.2017.60</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1481-8035
ispartof Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2017-05, Vol.19 (S1), p.S26-S26
issn 1481-8035
1481-8043
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1898614335
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Emergency medical care
Frailty
Geriatrics
Health risk assessment
Long term health care
Plenary Oral Presentations
title PL02: Derivation and validation of a feasible emergency department specific frailty index to predict adverse outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A34%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PL02:%20Derivation%20and%20validation%20of%20a%20feasible%20emergency%20department%20specific%20frailty%20index%20to%20predict%20adverse%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Brousseau,%20A.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S26&rft.epage=S26&rft.pages=S26-S26&rft.issn=1481-8035&rft.eissn=1481-8043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/cem.2017.60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1898614335%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1898614335&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_cem_2017_60&rfr_iscdi=true