Design of Concrete Slabs for Punching Shear: Controversial Concepts
The authors have made a comparison between design requirements and recommendations currently provided by ACI for slab-column connections. Specifically, they point out select differences in the recommendations of three ACI guides: ACI 352.1R-11, ACI 421.1R-08, and ACI 421.2R-10. The authors also comp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | ACI structural journal 2017-05, Vol.114 (3), p.787 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 787 |
| container_title | ACI structural journal |
| container_volume | 114 |
| creator | Fick, Damon R Hueste, Mary Beth D Kang, Thomas Kreger, Michael E LaFave, James M French, Catherine Bakir, Burcu Burak |
| description | The authors have made a comparison between design requirements and recommendations currently provided by ACI for slab-column connections. Specifically, they point out select differences in the recommendations of three ACI guides: ACI 352.1R-11, ACI 421.1R-08, and ACI 421.2R-10. The authors also compare these recommendations to ACI 318-14 requirements. In the paper, the authors suggest that overly conservative or erroneous recommendations are made in ACI 352.1R-11. The discussers would like to provide a general response to this paper, as it tends to shed a negative light on a document that was developed and reviewed through the formal consensus-based process required of ACI technical committees. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1896752738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A558712224</galeid><sourcerecordid>A558712224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g678-c4665f4ba355208d265de5b6c4f94d4381db0cac31b6fcafd7d317c9a3351f263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjV1LwzAYhYMoWKf_IeB1pcmbr3o36seEgcJ2X9J8dB01mUnr77c6rw4cnvOcC1SQmrFSgiCXqKiUqkugjFyjm5yPVQUVBVag5snloQ84etzEYJKbHN6NusvYx4Q_5mAOQ-jx7uB0evxFphS_XcqDHv8G7jTlW3Tl9Zjd3X-u0P7led9syu3761uz3pa9kKo0TAjuWaeBc1opSwW3jnfCMF8zy0AR21VGGyCd8EZ7Ky0QaWoNwImnAlbo_qw9pfg1uzy1xzinsDy2RNVCcipBLdTDmer16Noh-DglvWi1dZ-DicH5YenXnCtJKKUMfgBh2Vaf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1896752738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design of Concrete Slabs for Punching Shear: Controversial Concepts</title><source>American Concrete Institute Online Journal Archives</source><creator>Fick, Damon R ; Hueste, Mary Beth D ; Kang, Thomas ; Kreger, Michael E ; LaFave, James M ; French, Catherine ; Bakir, Burcu Burak</creator><creatorcontrib>Fick, Damon R ; Hueste, Mary Beth D ; Kang, Thomas ; Kreger, Michael E ; LaFave, James M ; French, Catherine ; Bakir, Burcu Burak</creatorcontrib><description>The authors have made a comparison between design requirements and recommendations currently provided by ACI for slab-column connections. Specifically, they point out select differences in the recommendations of three ACI guides: ACI 352.1R-11, ACI 421.1R-08, and ACI 421.2R-10. The authors also compare these recommendations to ACI 318-14 requirements. In the paper, the authors suggest that overly conservative or erroneous recommendations are made in ACI 352.1R-11. The discussers would like to provide a general response to this paper, as it tends to shed a negative light on a document that was developed and reviewed through the formal consensus-based process required of ACI technical committees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-3241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute</publisher><subject>College professors ; Colleges & universities ; Concrete ; Punching shear ; Shear strength</subject><ispartof>ACI structural journal, 2017-05, Vol.114 (3), p.787</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 American Concrete Institute</rights><rights>Copyright American Concrete Institute May/Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fick, Damon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hueste, Mary Beth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreger, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFave, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakir, Burcu Burak</creatorcontrib><title>Design of Concrete Slabs for Punching Shear: Controversial Concepts</title><title>ACI structural journal</title><description>The authors have made a comparison between design requirements and recommendations currently provided by ACI for slab-column connections. Specifically, they point out select differences in the recommendations of three ACI guides: ACI 352.1R-11, ACI 421.1R-08, and ACI 421.2R-10. The authors also compare these recommendations to ACI 318-14 requirements. In the paper, the authors suggest that overly conservative or erroneous recommendations are made in ACI 352.1R-11. The discussers would like to provide a general response to this paper, as it tends to shed a negative light on a document that was developed and reviewed through the formal consensus-based process required of ACI technical committees.</description><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Punching shear</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><issn>0889-3241</issn><issn>1944-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjV1LwzAYhYMoWKf_IeB1pcmbr3o36seEgcJ2X9J8dB01mUnr77c6rw4cnvOcC1SQmrFSgiCXqKiUqkugjFyjm5yPVQUVBVag5snloQ84etzEYJKbHN6NusvYx4Q_5mAOQ-jx7uB0evxFphS_XcqDHv8G7jTlW3Tl9Zjd3X-u0P7led9syu3761uz3pa9kKo0TAjuWaeBc1opSwW3jnfCMF8zy0AR21VGGyCd8EZ7Ky0QaWoNwImnAlbo_qw9pfg1uzy1xzinsDy2RNVCcipBLdTDmer16Noh-DglvWi1dZ-DicH5YenXnCtJKKUMfgBh2Vaf</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Fick, Damon R</creator><creator>Hueste, Mary Beth D</creator><creator>Kang, Thomas</creator><creator>Kreger, Michael E</creator><creator>LaFave, James M</creator><creator>French, Catherine</creator><creator>Bakir, Burcu Burak</creator><general>American Concrete Institute</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Design of Concrete Slabs for Punching Shear: Controversial Concepts</title><author>Fick, Damon R ; Hueste, Mary Beth D ; Kang, Thomas ; Kreger, Michael E ; LaFave, James M ; French, Catherine ; Bakir, Burcu Burak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g678-c4665f4ba355208d265de5b6c4f94d4381db0cac31b6fcafd7d317c9a3351f263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Punching shear</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fick, Damon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hueste, Mary Beth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreger, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFave, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakir, Burcu Burak</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>ACI structural journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fick, Damon R</au><au>Hueste, Mary Beth D</au><au>Kang, Thomas</au><au>Kreger, Michael E</au><au>LaFave, James M</au><au>French, Catherine</au><au>Bakir, Burcu Burak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design of Concrete Slabs for Punching Shear: Controversial Concepts</atitle><jtitle>ACI structural journal</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>787</spage><pages>787-</pages><issn>0889-3241</issn><eissn>1944-7361</eissn><abstract>The authors have made a comparison between design requirements and recommendations currently provided by ACI for slab-column connections. Specifically, they point out select differences in the recommendations of three ACI guides: ACI 352.1R-11, ACI 421.1R-08, and ACI 421.2R-10. The authors also compare these recommendations to ACI 318-14 requirements. In the paper, the authors suggest that overly conservative or erroneous recommendations are made in ACI 352.1R-11. The discussers would like to provide a general response to this paper, as it tends to shed a negative light on a document that was developed and reviewed through the formal consensus-based process required of ACI technical committees.</abstract><cop>Farmington Hills</cop><pub>American Concrete Institute</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0889-3241 |
| ispartof | ACI structural journal, 2017-05, Vol.114 (3), p.787 |
| issn | 0889-3241 1944-7361 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1896752738 |
| source | American Concrete Institute Online Journal Archives |
| subjects | College professors Colleges & universities Concrete Punching shear Shear strength |
| title | Design of Concrete Slabs for Punching Shear: Controversial Concepts |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A00%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20of%20Concrete%20Slabs%20for%20Punching%20Shear:%20Controversial%20Concepts&rft.jtitle=ACI%20structural%20journal&rft.au=Fick,%20Damon%20R&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=787&rft.pages=787-&rft.issn=0889-3241&rft.eissn=1944-7361&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA558712224%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1896752738&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A558712224&rfr_iscdi=true |