UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?

Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arizona journal of international and comparative law 2017-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1
1. Verfasser: Anderson, Glen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Arizona journal of international and comparative law
container_volume 34
creator Anderson, Glen
description Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral non-colonial (UNC) secession, such as Bangladesh (Pakistan), Eritrea (Ethiopia), BosniaHerzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo (Yugoslavia), and South Sudan (Sudan). The present article chiefly devotes itself to the under-examined question of whether democracy is an integral aspect of UNC secessionist self-determination, such that any UNC secessionist entity created with a political system contrary to this requirement will be devoid of statehood. In essence, the article considers what, if any, ongoing governance requirements might be imposed by the law of self-determination upon states created by UNC secession. The article concludes that, de lege lata, there is no obligation for a state created by UNC secession to implement Western electoral democracy.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1896375112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1896375112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18963751123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjssKwjAURLNQsD7-4YLrQmO1VTcS0lsbSG-kjUhXxUVdFPFV_X9D8QNcDTNnBmbAvCBehn60icIRG3ddGwQ84PHKY88jKS0sFkIDGfKl0YaUMyVKLEtlCAQloMhVqI916ifoXK5IWMe3IKBQ-8yCSYHwpKt-KzGBA5qDxhKsgQRzIwshq92UDS_na9fMfjph8xStzPzH6_78NN27bu-f182hmq_d4XjF-SL8r_UFH4Y_Ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1896375112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Anderson, Glen</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Glen</creatorcontrib><description>Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral non-colonial (UNC) secession, such as Bangladesh (Pakistan), Eritrea (Ethiopia), BosniaHerzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo (Yugoslavia), and South Sudan (Sudan). The present article chiefly devotes itself to the under-examined question of whether democracy is an integral aspect of UNC secessionist self-determination, such that any UNC secessionist entity created with a political system contrary to this requirement will be devoid of statehood. In essence, the article considers what, if any, ongoing governance requirements might be imposed by the law of self-determination upon states created by UNC secession. The article concludes that, de lege lata, there is no obligation for a state created by UNC secession to implement Western electoral democracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-6963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tucson: University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Elections ; Geopolitics ; Governance ; Law ; Obligations ; Political systems ; Secession ; Self determination ; Statehood ; Unilateralism</subject><ispartof>Arizona journal of international and comparative law, 2017-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27871</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Glen</creatorcontrib><title>UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?</title><title>Arizona journal of international and comparative law</title><description>Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral non-colonial (UNC) secession, such as Bangladesh (Pakistan), Eritrea (Ethiopia), BosniaHerzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo (Yugoslavia), and South Sudan (Sudan). The present article chiefly devotes itself to the under-examined question of whether democracy is an integral aspect of UNC secessionist self-determination, such that any UNC secessionist entity created with a political system contrary to this requirement will be devoid of statehood. In essence, the article considers what, if any, ongoing governance requirements might be imposed by the law of self-determination upon states created by UNC secession. The article concludes that, de lege lata, there is no obligation for a state created by UNC secession to implement Western electoral democracy.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Obligations</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Secession</subject><subject>Self determination</subject><subject>Statehood</subject><subject>Unilateralism</subject><issn>0743-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjssKwjAURLNQsD7-4YLrQmO1VTcS0lsbSG-kjUhXxUVdFPFV_X9D8QNcDTNnBmbAvCBehn60icIRG3ddGwQ84PHKY88jKS0sFkIDGfKl0YaUMyVKLEtlCAQloMhVqI916ifoXK5IWMe3IKBQ-8yCSYHwpKt-KzGBA5qDxhKsgQRzIwshq92UDS_na9fMfjph8xStzPzH6_78NN27bu-f182hmq_d4XjF-SL8r_UFH4Y_Ug</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Anderson, Glen</creator><general>University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?</title><author>Anderson, Glen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18963751123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Obligations</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Secession</topic><topic>Self determination</topic><topic>Statehood</topic><topic>Unilateralism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Glen</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Arizona journal of international and comparative law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Glen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?</atitle><jtitle>Arizona journal of international and comparative law</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0743-6963</issn><abstract>Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral non-colonial (UNC) secession, such as Bangladesh (Pakistan), Eritrea (Ethiopia), BosniaHerzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo (Yugoslavia), and South Sudan (Sudan). The present article chiefly devotes itself to the under-examined question of whether democracy is an integral aspect of UNC secessionist self-determination, such that any UNC secessionist entity created with a political system contrary to this requirement will be devoid of statehood. In essence, the article considers what, if any, ongoing governance requirements might be imposed by the law of self-determination upon states created by UNC secession. The article concludes that, de lege lata, there is no obligation for a state created by UNC secession to implement Western electoral democracy.</abstract><cop>Tucson</cop><pub>University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0743-6963
ispartof Arizona journal of international and comparative law, 2017-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1
issn 0743-6963
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1896375112
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Democracy
Elections
Geopolitics
Governance
Law
Obligations
Political systems
Secession
Self determination
Statehood
Unilateralism
title UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T11%3A05%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UNILATERAL%20NON-COLONIAL%20SECESSION%20AND%20INTERNAL%20SELF-DETERMINATION:%20A%20RIGHT%20OF%20NEWLY%20SECECED%20PEOPLES%20TO%20DEMOCRACY?&rft.jtitle=Arizona%20journal%20of%20international%20and%20comparative%20law&rft.au=Anderson,%20Glen&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0743-6963&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1896375112%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1896375112&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true