UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?
Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arizona journal of international and comparative law 2017-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Arizona journal of international and comparative law |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Anderson, Glen |
description | Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral non-colonial (UNC) secession, such as Bangladesh (Pakistan), Eritrea (Ethiopia), BosniaHerzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo (Yugoslavia), and South Sudan (Sudan). The present article chiefly devotes itself to the under-examined question of whether democracy is an integral aspect of UNC secessionist self-determination, such that any UNC secessionist entity created with a political system contrary to this requirement will be devoid of statehood. In essence, the article considers what, if any, ongoing governance requirements might be imposed by the law of self-determination upon states created by UNC secession. The article concludes that, de lege lata, there is no obligation for a state created by UNC secession to implement Western electoral democracy. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1896375112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1896375112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18963751123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjssKwjAURLNQsD7-4YLrQmO1VTcS0lsbSG-kjUhXxUVdFPFV_X9D8QNcDTNnBmbAvCBehn60icIRG3ddGwQ84PHKY88jKS0sFkIDGfKl0YaUMyVKLEtlCAQloMhVqI916ifoXK5IWMe3IKBQ-8yCSYHwpKt-KzGBA5qDxhKsgQRzIwshq92UDS_na9fMfjph8xStzPzH6_78NN27bu-f182hmq_d4XjF-SL8r_UFH4Y_Ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1896375112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Anderson, Glen</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Glen</creatorcontrib><description>Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral non-colonial (UNC) secession, such as Bangladesh (Pakistan), Eritrea (Ethiopia), BosniaHerzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo (Yugoslavia), and South Sudan (Sudan). The present article chiefly devotes itself to the under-examined question of whether democracy is an integral aspect of UNC secessionist self-determination, such that any UNC secessionist entity created with a political system contrary to this requirement will be devoid of statehood. In essence, the article considers what, if any, ongoing governance requirements might be imposed by the law of self-determination upon states created by UNC secession. The article concludes that, de lege lata, there is no obligation for a state created by UNC secession to implement Western electoral democracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-6963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tucson: University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Elections ; Geopolitics ; Governance ; Law ; Obligations ; Political systems ; Secession ; Self determination ; Statehood ; Unilateralism</subject><ispartof>Arizona journal of international and comparative law, 2017-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27871</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Glen</creatorcontrib><title>UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?</title><title>Arizona journal of international and comparative law</title><description>Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral non-colonial (UNC) secession, such as Bangladesh (Pakistan), Eritrea (Ethiopia), BosniaHerzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo (Yugoslavia), and South Sudan (Sudan). The present article chiefly devotes itself to the under-examined question of whether democracy is an integral aspect of UNC secessionist self-determination, such that any UNC secessionist entity created with a political system contrary to this requirement will be devoid of statehood. In essence, the article considers what, if any, ongoing governance requirements might be imposed by the law of self-determination upon states created by UNC secession. The article concludes that, de lege lata, there is no obligation for a state created by UNC secession to implement Western electoral democracy.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Obligations</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Secession</subject><subject>Self determination</subject><subject>Statehood</subject><subject>Unilateralism</subject><issn>0743-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjssKwjAURLNQsD7-4YLrQmO1VTcS0lsbSG-kjUhXxUVdFPFV_X9D8QNcDTNnBmbAvCBehn60icIRG3ddGwQ84PHKY88jKS0sFkIDGfKl0YaUMyVKLEtlCAQloMhVqI916ifoXK5IWMe3IKBQ-8yCSYHwpKt-KzGBA5qDxhKsgQRzIwshq92UDS_na9fMfjph8xStzPzH6_78NN27bu-f182hmq_d4XjF-SL8r_UFH4Y_Ug</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Anderson, Glen</creator><general>University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?</title><author>Anderson, Glen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18963751123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Obligations</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Secession</topic><topic>Self determination</topic><topic>Statehood</topic><topic>Unilateralism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Glen</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Arizona journal of international and comparative law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Glen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?</atitle><jtitle>Arizona journal of international and comparative law</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0743-6963</issn><abstract>Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral non-colonial (UNC) secession, such as Bangladesh (Pakistan), Eritrea (Ethiopia), BosniaHerzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo (Yugoslavia), and South Sudan (Sudan). The present article chiefly devotes itself to the under-examined question of whether democracy is an integral aspect of UNC secessionist self-determination, such that any UNC secessionist entity created with a political system contrary to this requirement will be devoid of statehood. In essence, the article considers what, if any, ongoing governance requirements might be imposed by the law of self-determination upon states created by UNC secession. The article concludes that, de lege lata, there is no obligation for a state created by UNC secession to implement Western electoral democracy.</abstract><cop>Tucson</cop><pub>University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0743-6963 |
ispartof | Arizona journal of international and comparative law, 2017-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1 |
issn | 0743-6963 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1896375112 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Democracy Elections Geopolitics Governance Law Obligations Political systems Secession Self determination Statehood Unilateralism |
title | UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T11%3A05%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UNILATERAL%20NON-COLONIAL%20SECESSION%20AND%20INTERNAL%20SELF-DETERMINATION:%20A%20RIGHT%20OF%20NEWLY%20SECECED%20PEOPLES%20TO%20DEMOCRACY?&rft.jtitle=Arizona%20journal%20of%20international%20and%20comparative%20law&rft.au=Anderson,%20Glen&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0743-6963&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1896375112%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1896375112&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |