UNILATERAL NON-COLONIAL SECESSION AND INTERNAL SELF-DETERMINATION: A RIGHT OF NEWLY SECECED PEOPLES TO DEMOCRACY?
Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arizona journal of international and comparative law 2017-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Since the political unit known as the state first arose in Westphalian Europe, the world's geopolitical map has undergone a process of steady evolution. Indicative of this fact is that in the 20th and early 21st centuries, various states have been directly and indirectly created by unilateral non-colonial (UNC) secession, such as Bangladesh (Pakistan), Eritrea (Ethiopia), BosniaHerzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo (Yugoslavia), and South Sudan (Sudan). The present article chiefly devotes itself to the under-examined question of whether democracy is an integral aspect of UNC secessionist self-determination, such that any UNC secessionist entity created with a political system contrary to this requirement will be devoid of statehood. In essence, the article considers what, if any, ongoing governance requirements might be imposed by the law of self-determination upon states created by UNC secession. The article concludes that, de lege lata, there is no obligation for a state created by UNC secession to implement Western electoral democracy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0743-6963 |