Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)
This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquaculture research 2017-06, Vol.48 (6), p.3041-3051 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3051 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 3041 |
container_title | Aquaculture research |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Mazandarani, Mohammad Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza |
description | This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cineole: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 ppm. Induction time and recovery time were recorded. Results showed that menthol and 1,8‐cineole anesthetized the fish at higher concentrations compared to eugenol. The fish exposed to menthol showed common fish behavioural responses to anaesthesia, similar to eugenol. But, 1,8‐cineole‐exposed fish showed tail‐up swimming, which was not observed before. Also, 1,8‐cineole failed to completely cease muscle tone. Exposure to 200 ppm eugenol and 600 ppm menthol resulted in 40% and 20% mortality, respectively. Induction time was exponentially dependent on anesthetic concentrations. Recovery time was linearly correlated to eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole concentrations. Recovery time was exponentially dependent on induction time in the fish anesthetized with eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole. Menthol and 1,8‐cineole are recommended for carp anaesthesia. Menthol is capable to anesthetize common carp within 1–3 min at 118–512 ppm. Common carp anesthetized with 108–133 ppm menthol recovers within 5 min. 1,8‐cineole failed to anesthetize common carp within less than 150 s at 300–800 ppm concentrations. However, it anesthetizes carp within 3 min at 595 ppm concentration. Also, 1,8‐cineole is not recommended for fish surgery. Both menthol and 1,8‐cineole were less efficacious than eugenol. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/are.13136 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1895817597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1895817597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-31b49b4e3547476758144c2d2b41da6b5ecc274ad53447b3a37f3e4ef022d3363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgxkKnzXXSWZZSL1ARRMGVIZPJ0JRpUpMOpTsfwWf0SUw7bj2Lc-F858IPwDVGI5xsrIIZYYppfgJ6yfOMYFScHnLOM87F-zm4iHGFEGaI4h74eDJuu_QNVK6CeDj5-frW1hnfGKgidGaXGsrE7dJsrY7QOqj9eu1TUGEzhLP9JljXxmNpPbxdWJf4Ng4hFnwyuARntWqiufqLffB2N3-dPWSL5_vH2XSRaUpJnlFcsqJkhnImmMjTJGZMk4qUDFcqL7nRmgimKk4ZEyVVVNTUMFMjQipKc9oHN93eTfCfbfpXrnwbXDop8aRI6wQvRKIGHaWDjzGYWqbv1yrsJUbyIJ9M8smjfIkdd-zONmb_PyinL_Nu4heuyG9m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1895817597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Mazandarani, Mohammad ; Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazandarani, Mohammad ; Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creatorcontrib><description>This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cineole: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 ppm. Induction time and recovery time were recorded. Results showed that menthol and 1,8‐cineole anesthetized the fish at higher concentrations compared to eugenol. The fish exposed to menthol showed common fish behavioural responses to anaesthesia, similar to eugenol. But, 1,8‐cineole‐exposed fish showed tail‐up swimming, which was not observed before. Also, 1,8‐cineole failed to completely cease muscle tone. Exposure to 200 ppm eugenol and 600 ppm menthol resulted in 40% and 20% mortality, respectively. Induction time was exponentially dependent on anesthetic concentrations. Recovery time was linearly correlated to eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole concentrations. Recovery time was exponentially dependent on induction time in the fish anesthetized with eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole. Menthol and 1,8‐cineole are recommended for carp anaesthesia. Menthol is capable to anesthetize common carp within 1–3 min at 118–512 ppm. Common carp anesthetized with 108–133 ppm menthol recovers within 5 min. 1,8‐cineole failed to anesthetize common carp within less than 150 s at 300–800 ppm concentrations. However, it anesthetizes carp within 3 min at 595 ppm concentration. Also, 1,8‐cineole is not recommended for fish surgery. Both menthol and 1,8‐cineole were less efficacious than eugenol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-557X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/are.13136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>1,8‐cineole ; Anaesthesia ; Anaesthetics ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics ; Behavioural responses ; Carp ; Cineole ; Cyprinus carpio ; Eugenol ; Exposure ; Fingerlings ; Fish ; Fish behavior ; Freshwater fishes ; Menthol ; Recovery ; Recovery time ; Surgery ; Swimming</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture research, 2017-06, Vol.48 (6), p.3041-3051</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-31b49b4e3547476758144c2d2b41da6b5ecc274ad53447b3a37f3e4ef022d3363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-31b49b4e3547476758144c2d2b41da6b5ecc274ad53447b3a37f3e4ef022d3363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fare.13136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fare.13136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazandarani, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creatorcontrib><title>Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)</title><title>Aquaculture research</title><description>This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cineole: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 ppm. Induction time and recovery time were recorded. Results showed that menthol and 1,8‐cineole anesthetized the fish at higher concentrations compared to eugenol. The fish exposed to menthol showed common fish behavioural responses to anaesthesia, similar to eugenol. But, 1,8‐cineole‐exposed fish showed tail‐up swimming, which was not observed before. Also, 1,8‐cineole failed to completely cease muscle tone. Exposure to 200 ppm eugenol and 600 ppm menthol resulted in 40% and 20% mortality, respectively. Induction time was exponentially dependent on anesthetic concentrations. Recovery time was linearly correlated to eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole concentrations. Recovery time was exponentially dependent on induction time in the fish anesthetized with eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole. Menthol and 1,8‐cineole are recommended for carp anaesthesia. Menthol is capable to anesthetize common carp within 1–3 min at 118–512 ppm. Common carp anesthetized with 108–133 ppm menthol recovers within 5 min. 1,8‐cineole failed to anesthetize common carp within less than 150 s at 300–800 ppm concentrations. However, it anesthetizes carp within 3 min at 595 ppm concentration. Also, 1,8‐cineole is not recommended for fish surgery. Both menthol and 1,8‐cineole were less efficacious than eugenol.</description><subject>1,8‐cineole</subject><subject>Anaesthesia</subject><subject>Anaesthetics</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics</subject><subject>Behavioural responses</subject><subject>Carp</subject><subject>Cineole</subject><subject>Cyprinus carpio</subject><subject>Eugenol</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Fingerlings</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish behavior</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Menthol</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery time</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Swimming</subject><issn>1355-557X</issn><issn>1365-2109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgxkKnzXXSWZZSL1ARRMGVIZPJ0JRpUpMOpTsfwWf0SUw7bj2Lc-F858IPwDVGI5xsrIIZYYppfgJ6yfOMYFScHnLOM87F-zm4iHGFEGaI4h74eDJuu_QNVK6CeDj5-frW1hnfGKgidGaXGsrE7dJsrY7QOqj9eu1TUGEzhLP9JljXxmNpPbxdWJf4Ng4hFnwyuARntWqiufqLffB2N3-dPWSL5_vH2XSRaUpJnlFcsqJkhnImmMjTJGZMk4qUDFcqL7nRmgimKk4ZEyVVVNTUMFMjQipKc9oHN93eTfCfbfpXrnwbXDop8aRI6wQvRKIGHaWDjzGYWqbv1yrsJUbyIJ9M8smjfIkdd-zONmb_PyinL_Nu4heuyG9m</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Mazandarani, Mohammad</creator><creator>Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)</title><author>Mazandarani, Mohammad ; Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-31b49b4e3547476758144c2d2b41da6b5ecc274ad53447b3a37f3e4ef022d3363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>1,8‐cineole</topic><topic>Anaesthesia</topic><topic>Anaesthetics</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics</topic><topic>Behavioural responses</topic><topic>Carp</topic><topic>Cineole</topic><topic>Cyprinus carpio</topic><topic>Eugenol</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Fingerlings</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish behavior</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Menthol</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery time</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Swimming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazandarani, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazandarani, Mohammad</au><au>Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3041</spage><epage>3051</epage><pages>3041-3051</pages><issn>1355-557X</issn><eissn>1365-2109</eissn><abstract>This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cineole: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 ppm. Induction time and recovery time were recorded. Results showed that menthol and 1,8‐cineole anesthetized the fish at higher concentrations compared to eugenol. The fish exposed to menthol showed common fish behavioural responses to anaesthesia, similar to eugenol. But, 1,8‐cineole‐exposed fish showed tail‐up swimming, which was not observed before. Also, 1,8‐cineole failed to completely cease muscle tone. Exposure to 200 ppm eugenol and 600 ppm menthol resulted in 40% and 20% mortality, respectively. Induction time was exponentially dependent on anesthetic concentrations. Recovery time was linearly correlated to eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole concentrations. Recovery time was exponentially dependent on induction time in the fish anesthetized with eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole. Menthol and 1,8‐cineole are recommended for carp anaesthesia. Menthol is capable to anesthetize common carp within 1–3 min at 118–512 ppm. Common carp anesthetized with 108–133 ppm menthol recovers within 5 min. 1,8‐cineole failed to anesthetize common carp within less than 150 s at 300–800 ppm concentrations. However, it anesthetizes carp within 3 min at 595 ppm concentration. Also, 1,8‐cineole is not recommended for fish surgery. Both menthol and 1,8‐cineole were less efficacious than eugenol.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/are.13136</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-557X |
ispartof | Aquaculture research, 2017-06, Vol.48 (6), p.3041-3051 |
issn | 1355-557X 1365-2109 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1895817597 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | 1,8‐cineole Anaesthesia Anaesthetics Anesthesia Anesthetics Behavioural responses Carp Cineole Cyprinus carpio Eugenol Exposure Fingerlings Fish Fish behavior Freshwater fishes Menthol Recovery Recovery time Surgery Swimming |
title | Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A58%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Menthol%20and%201,8%E2%80%90cineole%20as%20new%20anaesthetics%20in%20common%20carp,%20Cyprinus%20carpio%20(Linnaeus,%201758)&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20research&rft.au=Mazandarani,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3041&rft.epage=3051&rft.pages=3041-3051&rft.issn=1355-557X&rft.eissn=1365-2109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/are.13136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1895817597%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1895817597&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |