Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)

This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture research 2017-06, Vol.48 (6), p.3041-3051
Hauptverfasser: Mazandarani, Mohammad, Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3051
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3041
container_title Aquaculture research
container_volume 48
creator Mazandarani, Mohammad
Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza
description This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cineole: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 ppm. Induction time and recovery time were recorded. Results showed that menthol and 1,8‐cineole anesthetized the fish at higher concentrations compared to eugenol. The fish exposed to menthol showed common fish behavioural responses to anaesthesia, similar to eugenol. But, 1,8‐cineole‐exposed fish showed tail‐up swimming, which was not observed before. Also, 1,8‐cineole failed to completely cease muscle tone. Exposure to 200 ppm eugenol and 600 ppm menthol resulted in 40% and 20% mortality, respectively. Induction time was exponentially dependent on anesthetic concentrations. Recovery time was linearly correlated to eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole concentrations. Recovery time was exponentially dependent on induction time in the fish anesthetized with eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole. Menthol and 1,8‐cineole are recommended for carp anaesthesia. Menthol is capable to anesthetize common carp within 1–3 min at 118–512 ppm. Common carp anesthetized with 108–133 ppm menthol recovers within 5 min. 1,8‐cineole failed to anesthetize common carp within less than 150 s at 300–800 ppm concentrations. However, it anesthetizes carp within 3 min at 595 ppm concentration. Also, 1,8‐cineole is not recommended for fish surgery. Both menthol and 1,8‐cineole were less efficacious than eugenol.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/are.13136
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1895817597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1895817597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-31b49b4e3547476758144c2d2b41da6b5ecc274ad53447b3a37f3e4ef022d3363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgxkKnzXXSWZZSL1ARRMGVIZPJ0JRpUpMOpTsfwWf0SUw7bj2Lc-F858IPwDVGI5xsrIIZYYppfgJ6yfOMYFScHnLOM87F-zm4iHGFEGaI4h74eDJuu_QNVK6CeDj5-frW1hnfGKgidGaXGsrE7dJsrY7QOqj9eu1TUGEzhLP9JljXxmNpPbxdWJf4Ng4hFnwyuARntWqiufqLffB2N3-dPWSL5_vH2XSRaUpJnlFcsqJkhnImmMjTJGZMk4qUDFcqL7nRmgimKk4ZEyVVVNTUMFMjQipKc9oHN93eTfCfbfpXrnwbXDop8aRI6wQvRKIGHaWDjzGYWqbv1yrsJUbyIJ9M8smjfIkdd-zONmb_PyinL_Nu4heuyG9m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1895817597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Mazandarani, Mohammad ; Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazandarani, Mohammad ; Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creatorcontrib><description>This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cineole: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 ppm. Induction time and recovery time were recorded. Results showed that menthol and 1,8‐cineole anesthetized the fish at higher concentrations compared to eugenol. The fish exposed to menthol showed common fish behavioural responses to anaesthesia, similar to eugenol. But, 1,8‐cineole‐exposed fish showed tail‐up swimming, which was not observed before. Also, 1,8‐cineole failed to completely cease muscle tone. Exposure to 200 ppm eugenol and 600 ppm menthol resulted in 40% and 20% mortality, respectively. Induction time was exponentially dependent on anesthetic concentrations. Recovery time was linearly correlated to eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole concentrations. Recovery time was exponentially dependent on induction time in the fish anesthetized with eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole. Menthol and 1,8‐cineole are recommended for carp anaesthesia. Menthol is capable to anesthetize common carp within 1–3 min at 118–512 ppm. Common carp anesthetized with 108–133 ppm menthol recovers within 5 min. 1,8‐cineole failed to anesthetize common carp within less than 150 s at 300–800 ppm concentrations. However, it anesthetizes carp within 3 min at 595 ppm concentration. Also, 1,8‐cineole is not recommended for fish surgery. Both menthol and 1,8‐cineole were less efficacious than eugenol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-557X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/are.13136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>1,8‐cineole ; Anaesthesia ; Anaesthetics ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics ; Behavioural responses ; Carp ; Cineole ; Cyprinus carpio ; Eugenol ; Exposure ; Fingerlings ; Fish ; Fish behavior ; Freshwater fishes ; Menthol ; Recovery ; Recovery time ; Surgery ; Swimming</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture research, 2017-06, Vol.48 (6), p.3041-3051</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-31b49b4e3547476758144c2d2b41da6b5ecc274ad53447b3a37f3e4ef022d3363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-31b49b4e3547476758144c2d2b41da6b5ecc274ad53447b3a37f3e4ef022d3363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fare.13136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fare.13136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazandarani, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creatorcontrib><title>Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)</title><title>Aquaculture research</title><description>This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cineole: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 ppm. Induction time and recovery time were recorded. Results showed that menthol and 1,8‐cineole anesthetized the fish at higher concentrations compared to eugenol. The fish exposed to menthol showed common fish behavioural responses to anaesthesia, similar to eugenol. But, 1,8‐cineole‐exposed fish showed tail‐up swimming, which was not observed before. Also, 1,8‐cineole failed to completely cease muscle tone. Exposure to 200 ppm eugenol and 600 ppm menthol resulted in 40% and 20% mortality, respectively. Induction time was exponentially dependent on anesthetic concentrations. Recovery time was linearly correlated to eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole concentrations. Recovery time was exponentially dependent on induction time in the fish anesthetized with eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole. Menthol and 1,8‐cineole are recommended for carp anaesthesia. Menthol is capable to anesthetize common carp within 1–3 min at 118–512 ppm. Common carp anesthetized with 108–133 ppm menthol recovers within 5 min. 1,8‐cineole failed to anesthetize common carp within less than 150 s at 300–800 ppm concentrations. However, it anesthetizes carp within 3 min at 595 ppm concentration. Also, 1,8‐cineole is not recommended for fish surgery. Both menthol and 1,8‐cineole were less efficacious than eugenol.</description><subject>1,8‐cineole</subject><subject>Anaesthesia</subject><subject>Anaesthetics</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics</subject><subject>Behavioural responses</subject><subject>Carp</subject><subject>Cineole</subject><subject>Cyprinus carpio</subject><subject>Eugenol</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Fingerlings</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish behavior</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Menthol</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery time</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Swimming</subject><issn>1355-557X</issn><issn>1365-2109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgxkKnzXXSWZZSL1ARRMGVIZPJ0JRpUpMOpTsfwWf0SUw7bj2Lc-F858IPwDVGI5xsrIIZYYppfgJ6yfOMYFScHnLOM87F-zm4iHGFEGaI4h74eDJuu_QNVK6CeDj5-frW1hnfGKgidGaXGsrE7dJsrY7QOqj9eu1TUGEzhLP9JljXxmNpPbxdWJf4Ng4hFnwyuARntWqiufqLffB2N3-dPWSL5_vH2XSRaUpJnlFcsqJkhnImmMjTJGZMk4qUDFcqL7nRmgimKk4ZEyVVVNTUMFMjQipKc9oHN93eTfCfbfpXrnwbXDop8aRI6wQvRKIGHaWDjzGYWqbv1yrsJUbyIJ9M8smjfIkdd-zONmb_PyinL_Nu4heuyG9m</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Mazandarani, Mohammad</creator><creator>Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)</title><author>Mazandarani, Mohammad ; Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-31b49b4e3547476758144c2d2b41da6b5ecc274ad53447b3a37f3e4ef022d3363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>1,8‐cineole</topic><topic>Anaesthesia</topic><topic>Anaesthetics</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics</topic><topic>Behavioural responses</topic><topic>Carp</topic><topic>Cineole</topic><topic>Cyprinus carpio</topic><topic>Eugenol</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Fingerlings</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish behavior</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Menthol</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery time</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Swimming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazandarani, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazandarani, Mohammad</au><au>Hoseini, Seyyed Morteza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3041</spage><epage>3051</epage><pages>3041-3051</pages><issn>1355-557X</issn><eissn>1365-2109</eissn><abstract>This study describes anaesthetic efficacy of menthol and 1,8‐cineole in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in comparison with eugenol. Common carp fingerlings were exposed to eugenol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 200 ppm; menthol: 5, 10, 15, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 ppm; 1,8‐cineole: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 ppm. Induction time and recovery time were recorded. Results showed that menthol and 1,8‐cineole anesthetized the fish at higher concentrations compared to eugenol. The fish exposed to menthol showed common fish behavioural responses to anaesthesia, similar to eugenol. But, 1,8‐cineole‐exposed fish showed tail‐up swimming, which was not observed before. Also, 1,8‐cineole failed to completely cease muscle tone. Exposure to 200 ppm eugenol and 600 ppm menthol resulted in 40% and 20% mortality, respectively. Induction time was exponentially dependent on anesthetic concentrations. Recovery time was linearly correlated to eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole concentrations. Recovery time was exponentially dependent on induction time in the fish anesthetized with eugenol and menthol, but not 1,8‐cineole. Menthol and 1,8‐cineole are recommended for carp anaesthesia. Menthol is capable to anesthetize common carp within 1–3 min at 118–512 ppm. Common carp anesthetized with 108–133 ppm menthol recovers within 5 min. 1,8‐cineole failed to anesthetize common carp within less than 150 s at 300–800 ppm concentrations. However, it anesthetizes carp within 3 min at 595 ppm concentration. Also, 1,8‐cineole is not recommended for fish surgery. Both menthol and 1,8‐cineole were less efficacious than eugenol.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/are.13136</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-557X
ispartof Aquaculture research, 2017-06, Vol.48 (6), p.3041-3051
issn 1355-557X
1365-2109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1895817597
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects 1,8‐cineole
Anaesthesia
Anaesthetics
Anesthesia
Anesthetics
Behavioural responses
Carp
Cineole
Cyprinus carpio
Eugenol
Exposure
Fingerlings
Fish
Fish behavior
Freshwater fishes
Menthol
Recovery
Recovery time
Surgery
Swimming
title Menthol and 1,8‐cineole as new anaesthetics in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A58%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Menthol%20and%201,8%E2%80%90cineole%20as%20new%20anaesthetics%20in%20common%20carp,%20Cyprinus%20carpio%20(Linnaeus,%201758)&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20research&rft.au=Mazandarani,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3041&rft.epage=3051&rft.pages=3041-3051&rft.issn=1355-557X&rft.eissn=1365-2109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/are.13136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1895817597%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1895817597&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true