Bedrock geology controls on catchment storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments

The bedrock controls on catchment mixing, storage, and release have been actively studied in recent years. However, it has been difficult to find neighbouring catchments with sufficiently different and clean expressions of geology to do comparative analysis. Here, we present new data for 16 nested c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological processes 2017-05, Vol.31 (10), p.1828-1845
Hauptverfasser: Pfister, Laurent, Martínez‐Carreras, Núria, Hissler, Christophe, Klaus, Julian, Carrer, Gwenael E., Stewart, Mike K., McDonnell, Jeffrey J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1845
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1828
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 31
creator Pfister, Laurent
Martínez‐Carreras, Núria
Hissler, Christophe
Klaus, Julian
Carrer, Gwenael E.
Stewart, Mike K.
McDonnell, Jeffrey J.
description The bedrock controls on catchment mixing, storage, and release have been actively studied in recent years. However, it has been difficult to find neighbouring catchments with sufficiently different and clean expressions of geology to do comparative analysis. Here, we present new data for 16 nested catchments (0.45 to 410 km2) in the Alzette River basin (Luxembourg) that span a range of clean and mixed expressions of schists, phyllites, sandstones, and quartzites to quantify the relationships between bedrock permeability and metrics of water storage and release. We examined 9 years' worth of precipitation and discharge data, and 6 years of fortnightly stable isotope data in streamflow, to explore how bedrock permeability controls (a) streamflow regime metrics, (b) catchment storage, and (c) isotope response and catchment mean transit time (MTT). We used annual and winter precipitation–run‐off ratios, as well as average summer and winter precipitation–run‐off ratios to characterise the streamflow regime in our 16 study catchments. Catchment storage was then used as a metric for catchment comparison. Water mixing potential of 11 catchments was quantified via the standard deviation in streamflow δD (σδD) and the amplitude ratio (AS/AP) of annual cycles of δ18O in streamflow and precipitation. Catchment MTT values were estimated via both stable isotope signature damping and hydraulic turnover calculations. In our 16 nested catchments, the variance in ratios of summer versus winter average run‐off was best explained by bedrock permeability. Whereas active storage (defined here as a measure of the observed maximum interannual variability in catchment storage) ranged from 107 to 373 mm, total catchment storage (defined as the maximum catchment storage connected to the stream network) extended up to ~1700 mm (±200 mm). Catchment bedrock permeability was strongly correlated with mixing proxies of σδD in streamflow and δ18O AS/AP ratios. Catchment MTT values ranged from 0.5 to 2 years, based on stable isotope signature damping, and from 0.5 to 10 years, based on hydraulic turnover.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.11134
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1895766430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1895766430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-bdf31390cf119df6e658f139db35cc57c01a3717e5cf0192977a37a4859deb0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqUw8A8sMSE17V0TJzFbqYAiVYIBBqbIdew0JYmDnQL59xiCxMR0urvvPT09Qs4Rpggwn237doqIYXRARgicBwgpOyQjSFMWxJAmx-TEuR0ARJDCiNhrlVsjX2mhTGWKnkrTdNZUjpqGStHJba2ajrrOWFGoCa3Lz7IpJlQ0ObWqUsKpK7rwqroVVnTlu_IvUfWu9A6aYkwb5TqV_3m5U3KkReXU2e8ck-fbm6flKlg_3N0vF-tARHOMgk2uQww5SI3Icx2rmKXaH_JNyKRkiQQUYYKJYlID8jlPEr-LKGU8VxvQ4ZhcDL6tNW97nyLbmb314VyGKWdJHEcheOpyoKQ1zlmls9aWtbB9hpB9V5r5SrOfSj07G9iPslL9_2C2enkcFF-623iO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1895766430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bedrock geology controls on catchment storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Pfister, Laurent ; Martínez‐Carreras, Núria ; Hissler, Christophe ; Klaus, Julian ; Carrer, Gwenael E. ; Stewart, Mike K. ; McDonnell, Jeffrey J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfister, Laurent ; Martínez‐Carreras, Núria ; Hissler, Christophe ; Klaus, Julian ; Carrer, Gwenael E. ; Stewart, Mike K. ; McDonnell, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><description>The bedrock controls on catchment mixing, storage, and release have been actively studied in recent years. However, it has been difficult to find neighbouring catchments with sufficiently different and clean expressions of geology to do comparative analysis. Here, we present new data for 16 nested catchments (0.45 to 410 km2) in the Alzette River basin (Luxembourg) that span a range of clean and mixed expressions of schists, phyllites, sandstones, and quartzites to quantify the relationships between bedrock permeability and metrics of water storage and release. We examined 9 years' worth of precipitation and discharge data, and 6 years of fortnightly stable isotope data in streamflow, to explore how bedrock permeability controls (a) streamflow regime metrics, (b) catchment storage, and (c) isotope response and catchment mean transit time (MTT). We used annual and winter precipitation–run‐off ratios, as well as average summer and winter precipitation–run‐off ratios to characterise the streamflow regime in our 16 study catchments. Catchment storage was then used as a metric for catchment comparison. Water mixing potential of 11 catchments was quantified via the standard deviation in streamflow δD (σδD) and the amplitude ratio (AS/AP) of annual cycles of δ18O in streamflow and precipitation. Catchment MTT values were estimated via both stable isotope signature damping and hydraulic turnover calculations. In our 16 nested catchments, the variance in ratios of summer versus winter average run‐off was best explained by bedrock permeability. Whereas active storage (defined here as a measure of the observed maximum interannual variability in catchment storage) ranged from 107 to 373 mm, total catchment storage (defined as the maximum catchment storage connected to the stream network) extended up to ~1700 mm (±200 mm). Catchment bedrock permeability was strongly correlated with mixing proxies of σδD in streamflow and δ18O AS/AP ratios. Catchment MTT values ranged from 0.5 to 2 years, based on stable isotope signature damping, and from 0.5 to 10 years, based on hydraulic turnover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.11134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Annual cycles ; Annual precipitation ; Bedrock ; bedrock permeability ; Catchment area ; catchment storage ; Catchments ; Comparative analysis ; Damping ; Data ; Geology ; Interannual variability ; mean transit time ; mesoscale ; Permeability ; Precipitation ; Quartzite ; Ratios ; River basins ; Rivers ; Sandstone ; Schists ; stable isotope response ; Stable isotopes ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streamflow regime ; Summer ; Transit time ; Variance analysis ; Water mixing ; Water pollution effects ; Water storage ; Winter ; Winter precipitation</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2017-05, Vol.31 (10), p.1828-1845</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. Hydrological Processes Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-bdf31390cf119df6e658f139db35cc57c01a3717e5cf0192977a37a4859deb0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-bdf31390cf119df6e658f139db35cc57c01a3717e5cf0192977a37a4859deb0f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5494-5753</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.11134$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.11134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfister, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Carreras, Núria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hissler, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaus, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrer, Gwenael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Mike K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><title>Bedrock geology controls on catchment storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><description>The bedrock controls on catchment mixing, storage, and release have been actively studied in recent years. However, it has been difficult to find neighbouring catchments with sufficiently different and clean expressions of geology to do comparative analysis. Here, we present new data for 16 nested catchments (0.45 to 410 km2) in the Alzette River basin (Luxembourg) that span a range of clean and mixed expressions of schists, phyllites, sandstones, and quartzites to quantify the relationships between bedrock permeability and metrics of water storage and release. We examined 9 years' worth of precipitation and discharge data, and 6 years of fortnightly stable isotope data in streamflow, to explore how bedrock permeability controls (a) streamflow regime metrics, (b) catchment storage, and (c) isotope response and catchment mean transit time (MTT). We used annual and winter precipitation–run‐off ratios, as well as average summer and winter precipitation–run‐off ratios to characterise the streamflow regime in our 16 study catchments. Catchment storage was then used as a metric for catchment comparison. Water mixing potential of 11 catchments was quantified via the standard deviation in streamflow δD (σδD) and the amplitude ratio (AS/AP) of annual cycles of δ18O in streamflow and precipitation. Catchment MTT values were estimated via both stable isotope signature damping and hydraulic turnover calculations. In our 16 nested catchments, the variance in ratios of summer versus winter average run‐off was best explained by bedrock permeability. Whereas active storage (defined here as a measure of the observed maximum interannual variability in catchment storage) ranged from 107 to 373 mm, total catchment storage (defined as the maximum catchment storage connected to the stream network) extended up to ~1700 mm (±200 mm). Catchment bedrock permeability was strongly correlated with mixing proxies of σδD in streamflow and δ18O AS/AP ratios. Catchment MTT values ranged from 0.5 to 2 years, based on stable isotope signature damping, and from 0.5 to 10 years, based on hydraulic turnover.</description><subject>Annual cycles</subject><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>bedrock permeability</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>catchment storage</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Damping</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Interannual variability</subject><subject>mean transit time</subject><subject>mesoscale</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Quartzite</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Schists</subject><subject>stable isotope response</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streamflow regime</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Transit time</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Water mixing</subject><subject>Water pollution effects</subject><subject>Water storage</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Winter precipitation</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqUw8A8sMSE17V0TJzFbqYAiVYIBBqbIdew0JYmDnQL59xiCxMR0urvvPT09Qs4Rpggwn237doqIYXRARgicBwgpOyQjSFMWxJAmx-TEuR0ARJDCiNhrlVsjX2mhTGWKnkrTdNZUjpqGStHJba2ajrrOWFGoCa3Lz7IpJlQ0ObWqUsKpK7rwqroVVnTlu_IvUfWu9A6aYkwb5TqV_3m5U3KkReXU2e8ck-fbm6flKlg_3N0vF-tARHOMgk2uQww5SI3Icx2rmKXaH_JNyKRkiQQUYYKJYlID8jlPEr-LKGU8VxvQ4ZhcDL6tNW97nyLbmb314VyGKWdJHEcheOpyoKQ1zlmls9aWtbB9hpB9V5r5SrOfSj07G9iPslL9_2C2enkcFF-623iO</recordid><startdate>20170515</startdate><enddate>20170515</enddate><creator>Pfister, Laurent</creator><creator>Martínez‐Carreras, Núria</creator><creator>Hissler, Christophe</creator><creator>Klaus, Julian</creator><creator>Carrer, Gwenael E.</creator><creator>Stewart, Mike K.</creator><creator>McDonnell, Jeffrey J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5494-5753</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170515</creationdate><title>Bedrock geology controls on catchment storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments</title><author>Pfister, Laurent ; Martínez‐Carreras, Núria ; Hissler, Christophe ; Klaus, Julian ; Carrer, Gwenael E. ; Stewart, Mike K. ; McDonnell, Jeffrey J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4214-bdf31390cf119df6e658f139db35cc57c01a3717e5cf0192977a37a4859deb0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Annual cycles</topic><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>bedrock permeability</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>catchment storage</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Damping</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Interannual variability</topic><topic>mean transit time</topic><topic>mesoscale</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Quartzite</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Schists</topic><topic>stable isotope response</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streamflow regime</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Transit time</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Water mixing</topic><topic>Water pollution effects</topic><topic>Water storage</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Winter precipitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfister, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Carreras, Núria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hissler, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaus, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrer, Gwenael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Mike K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfister, Laurent</au><au>Martínez‐Carreras, Núria</au><au>Hissler, Christophe</au><au>Klaus, Julian</au><au>Carrer, Gwenael E.</au><au>Stewart, Mike K.</au><au>McDonnell, Jeffrey J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bedrock geology controls on catchment storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><date>2017-05-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1828</spage><epage>1845</epage><pages>1828-1845</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>The bedrock controls on catchment mixing, storage, and release have been actively studied in recent years. However, it has been difficult to find neighbouring catchments with sufficiently different and clean expressions of geology to do comparative analysis. Here, we present new data for 16 nested catchments (0.45 to 410 km2) in the Alzette River basin (Luxembourg) that span a range of clean and mixed expressions of schists, phyllites, sandstones, and quartzites to quantify the relationships between bedrock permeability and metrics of water storage and release. We examined 9 years' worth of precipitation and discharge data, and 6 years of fortnightly stable isotope data in streamflow, to explore how bedrock permeability controls (a) streamflow regime metrics, (b) catchment storage, and (c) isotope response and catchment mean transit time (MTT). We used annual and winter precipitation–run‐off ratios, as well as average summer and winter precipitation–run‐off ratios to characterise the streamflow regime in our 16 study catchments. Catchment storage was then used as a metric for catchment comparison. Water mixing potential of 11 catchments was quantified via the standard deviation in streamflow δD (σδD) and the amplitude ratio (AS/AP) of annual cycles of δ18O in streamflow and precipitation. Catchment MTT values were estimated via both stable isotope signature damping and hydraulic turnover calculations. In our 16 nested catchments, the variance in ratios of summer versus winter average run‐off was best explained by bedrock permeability. Whereas active storage (defined here as a measure of the observed maximum interannual variability in catchment storage) ranged from 107 to 373 mm, total catchment storage (defined as the maximum catchment storage connected to the stream network) extended up to ~1700 mm (±200 mm). Catchment bedrock permeability was strongly correlated with mixing proxies of σδD in streamflow and δ18O AS/AP ratios. Catchment MTT values ranged from 0.5 to 2 years, based on stable isotope signature damping, and from 0.5 to 10 years, based on hydraulic turnover.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.11134</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5494-5753</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2017-05, Vol.31 (10), p.1828-1845
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1895766430
source Wiley Online Library
subjects Annual cycles
Annual precipitation
Bedrock
bedrock permeability
Catchment area
catchment storage
Catchments
Comparative analysis
Damping
Data
Geology
Interannual variability
mean transit time
mesoscale
Permeability
Precipitation
Quartzite
Ratios
River basins
Rivers
Sandstone
Schists
stable isotope response
Stable isotopes
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Streamflow regime
Summer
Transit time
Variance analysis
Water mixing
Water pollution effects
Water storage
Winter
Winter precipitation
title Bedrock geology controls on catchment storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bedrock%20geology%20controls%20on%20catchment%20storage,%20mixing,%20and%20release:%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%2016%20nested%20catchments&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Pfister,%20Laurent&rft.date=2017-05-15&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1828&rft.epage=1845&rft.pages=1828-1845&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.11134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1895766430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1895766430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true