Review of project planning methods for deconstruction projects of buildings
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature and methods that can be used for deconstruction project planning of buildings. Furthermore, shortcomings of the identified planning methods are presented and research gaps are identified.Design/methodology/approach...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Built Environment Project and Asset Management 2017-05, Vol.7 (2), p.212-226 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 226 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 212 |
container_title | Built Environment Project and Asset Management |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Hübner, Felix Volk, Rebekka Kühlen, Anna Schultmann, Frank |
description | PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature and methods that can be used for deconstruction project planning of buildings. Furthermore, shortcomings of the identified planning methods are presented and research gaps are identified.Design/methodology/approachRequirements to consider for the planning of deconstruction projects are defined, to help in the classification of planning methods. With the help of these requirements, in a detailed literature review strategic and operational planning methods for deconstruction projects are investigated and discussed. Requirements which are not met by any of the identified planning methods can be interpreted as research and/or documentation gaps.FindingsOn the one hand, the literature review shows that recent approaches deal with planning methods for deterministic time and resource scheduling. Furthermore, project costs can be well planned by several methods. On the other hand, the literature review reveals that recent approaches mostly do not consider risks and uncertainties, environmental hazards or specific safety issues. A major shortcoming is that applied planning methods can only calculate up to a specific level of detail, e.g. with a limited number of activities, due to a very high computational effort in solving such project planning problems exactly.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that provides an overview of literature and methods for the deconstruction project planning of buildings and it is also the first study that unveils research gaps for future research. Furthermore, the classified planning methods assist in identifying suitable methods for the planning of future deconstruction projects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/BEPAM-11-2016-0075 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1895059839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1895059839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-aa2b52cd6d01a81ee5c65915f3290f2239237a026f91c7eb608fbdba6ac27a5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEhX0B1hFYh2YsWPHXpaqPEQRCIHEznIcG1K1cbETEH9PQoHV3MW5M6NDyAnCGSLI84vFw-wuR8wpoMgBSr5HJhSKIkfK5f5_Ll4OyTSlFQAgCFkUxYTcPrqPxn1mwWfbGFbOdtl2bdq2aV-zjeveQp0yH2JWOxva1MXedk1o_9g09qq-WdcDn47JgTfr5Ka_84g8Xy6e5tf58v7qZj5b5pYJ7HJjaMWprUUNaCQ6x63gCrlnVIGnlCnKSgNUeIW2dJUA6au6MsJYWhpu2RE53e0dvnjvXer0KvSxHU5qlIoDV5KpgaI7ysaQUnReb2OzMfFLI-jRm_7xNkQ9etOjN_YNW-5hLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1895059839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of project planning methods for deconstruction projects of buildings</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Hübner, Felix ; Volk, Rebekka ; Kühlen, Anna ; Schultmann, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Felix ; Volk, Rebekka ; Kühlen, Anna ; Schultmann, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature and methods that can be used for deconstruction project planning of buildings. Furthermore, shortcomings of the identified planning methods are presented and research gaps are identified.Design/methodology/approachRequirements to consider for the planning of deconstruction projects are defined, to help in the classification of planning methods. With the help of these requirements, in a detailed literature review strategic and operational planning methods for deconstruction projects are investigated and discussed. Requirements which are not met by any of the identified planning methods can be interpreted as research and/or documentation gaps.FindingsOn the one hand, the literature review shows that recent approaches deal with planning methods for deterministic time and resource scheduling. Furthermore, project costs can be well planned by several methods. On the other hand, the literature review reveals that recent approaches mostly do not consider risks and uncertainties, environmental hazards or specific safety issues. A major shortcoming is that applied planning methods can only calculate up to a specific level of detail, e.g. with a limited number of activities, due to a very high computational effort in solving such project planning problems exactly.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that provides an overview of literature and methods for the deconstruction project planning of buildings and it is also the first study that unveils research gaps for future research. Furthermore, the classified planning methods assist in identifying suitable methods for the planning of future deconstruction projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-124X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-1258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/BEPAM-11-2016-0075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Building construction ; Buildings ; Computer applications ; Decision making ; Deconstruction ; Demolition ; Environmental hazards ; Identification methods ; Industrial production ; International conferences ; Literature reviews ; Methods ; Nuclear power plants ; Objectives ; Project management ; Project planning ; Resource scheduling ; Reviews ; Scheduling ; Strategic planning ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2017-05, Vol.7 (2), p.212-226</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-aa2b52cd6d01a81ee5c65915f3290f2239237a026f91c7eb608fbdba6ac27a5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-aa2b52cd6d01a81ee5c65915f3290f2239237a026f91c7eb608fbdba6ac27a5c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4482-5595</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,962,21676,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Rebekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühlen, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultmann, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Review of project planning methods for deconstruction projects of buildings</title><title>Built Environment Project and Asset Management</title><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature and methods that can be used for deconstruction project planning of buildings. Furthermore, shortcomings of the identified planning methods are presented and research gaps are identified.Design/methodology/approachRequirements to consider for the planning of deconstruction projects are defined, to help in the classification of planning methods. With the help of these requirements, in a detailed literature review strategic and operational planning methods for deconstruction projects are investigated and discussed. Requirements which are not met by any of the identified planning methods can be interpreted as research and/or documentation gaps.FindingsOn the one hand, the literature review shows that recent approaches deal with planning methods for deterministic time and resource scheduling. Furthermore, project costs can be well planned by several methods. On the other hand, the literature review reveals that recent approaches mostly do not consider risks and uncertainties, environmental hazards or specific safety issues. A major shortcoming is that applied planning methods can only calculate up to a specific level of detail, e.g. with a limited number of activities, due to a very high computational effort in solving such project planning problems exactly.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that provides an overview of literature and methods for the deconstruction project planning of buildings and it is also the first study that unveils research gaps for future research. Furthermore, the classified planning methods assist in identifying suitable methods for the planning of future deconstruction projects.</description><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deconstruction</subject><subject>Demolition</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Industrial production</subject><subject>International conferences</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Project planning</subject><subject>Resource scheduling</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2044-124X</issn><issn>2044-1258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEhX0B1hFYh2YsWPHXpaqPEQRCIHEznIcG1K1cbETEH9PQoHV3MW5M6NDyAnCGSLI84vFw-wuR8wpoMgBSr5HJhSKIkfK5f5_Ll4OyTSlFQAgCFkUxYTcPrqPxn1mwWfbGFbOdtl2bdq2aV-zjeveQp0yH2JWOxva1MXedk1o_9g09qq-WdcDn47JgTfr5Ka_84g8Xy6e5tf58v7qZj5b5pYJ7HJjaMWprUUNaCQ6x63gCrlnVIGnlCnKSgNUeIW2dJUA6au6MsJYWhpu2RE53e0dvnjvXer0KvSxHU5qlIoDV5KpgaI7ysaQUnReb2OzMfFLI-jRm_7xNkQ9etOjN_YNW-5hLA</recordid><startdate>20170511</startdate><enddate>20170511</enddate><creator>Hübner, Felix</creator><creator>Volk, Rebekka</creator><creator>Kühlen, Anna</creator><creator>Schultmann, Frank</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4482-5595</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170511</creationdate><title>Review of project planning methods for deconstruction projects of buildings</title><author>Hübner, Felix ; Volk, Rebekka ; Kühlen, Anna ; Schultmann, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-aa2b52cd6d01a81ee5c65915f3290f2239237a026f91c7eb608fbdba6ac27a5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deconstruction</topic><topic>Demolition</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Industrial production</topic><topic>International conferences</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Project planning</topic><topic>Resource scheduling</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Rebekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühlen, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultmann, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Built Environment Project and Asset Management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hübner, Felix</au><au>Volk, Rebekka</au><au>Kühlen, Anna</au><au>Schultmann, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of project planning methods for deconstruction projects of buildings</atitle><jtitle>Built Environment Project and Asset Management</jtitle><date>2017-05-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>212-226</pages><issn>2044-124X</issn><eissn>2044-1258</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature and methods that can be used for deconstruction project planning of buildings. Furthermore, shortcomings of the identified planning methods are presented and research gaps are identified.Design/methodology/approachRequirements to consider for the planning of deconstruction projects are defined, to help in the classification of planning methods. With the help of these requirements, in a detailed literature review strategic and operational planning methods for deconstruction projects are investigated and discussed. Requirements which are not met by any of the identified planning methods can be interpreted as research and/or documentation gaps.FindingsOn the one hand, the literature review shows that recent approaches deal with planning methods for deterministic time and resource scheduling. Furthermore, project costs can be well planned by several methods. On the other hand, the literature review reveals that recent approaches mostly do not consider risks and uncertainties, environmental hazards or specific safety issues. A major shortcoming is that applied planning methods can only calculate up to a specific level of detail, e.g. with a limited number of activities, due to a very high computational effort in solving such project planning problems exactly.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that provides an overview of literature and methods for the deconstruction project planning of buildings and it is also the first study that unveils research gaps for future research. Furthermore, the classified planning methods assist in identifying suitable methods for the planning of future deconstruction projects.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/BEPAM-11-2016-0075</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4482-5595</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-124X |
ispartof | Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2017-05, Vol.7 (2), p.212-226 |
issn | 2044-124X 2044-1258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1895059839 |
source | Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Building construction Buildings Computer applications Decision making Deconstruction Demolition Environmental hazards Identification methods Industrial production International conferences Literature reviews Methods Nuclear power plants Objectives Project management Project planning Resource scheduling Reviews Scheduling Strategic planning Studies |
title | Review of project planning methods for deconstruction projects of buildings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A50%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20project%20planning%20methods%20for%20deconstruction%20projects%20of%20buildings&rft.jtitle=Built%20Environment%20Project%20and%20Asset%20Management&rft.au=H%C3%BCbner,%20Felix&rft.date=2017-05-11&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=212-226&rft.issn=2044-124X&rft.eissn=2044-1258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2016-0075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1895059839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1895059839&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |