Spatial and Temporal Distinction of Microelemental Signatures of Missouri River Tributaries

The microchemical composition of a fish's calcified structure, such as an otolith, fin ray, or scale, is a ‘biological tag’ that reflects the use of different habitats throughout its life history. Hard‐part microchemistry has the potential to address many fish conservation, management, and beha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:River research and applications 2017-05, Vol.33 (4), p.632-638
Hauptverfasser: Wuellner, M. R., Grote, J. D., Fincel, M. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 638
container_issue 4
container_start_page 632
container_title River research and applications
container_volume 33
creator Wuellner, M. R.
Grote, J. D.
Fincel, M. J.
description The microchemical composition of a fish's calcified structure, such as an otolith, fin ray, or scale, is a ‘biological tag’ that reflects the use of different habitats throughout its life history. Hard‐part microchemistry has the potential to address many fish conservation, management, and behavior questions. In order to use hard‐part microchemistry to address fisheries research questions, elemental signatures of water must be distinct at the spatial scale of interest and ideally temporally stable. The goal of this study was to assess whether spatial differences existed in the concentrations of five elements [barium (137Ba), magnesium (24Mg), manganese (55Mn), sodium (23Na), and strontium (88Sr)] between and within eight Missouri River tributaries and whether those signatures were temporally stable. All elemental concentrations were converted to molar ratios (mmol mol−1) using calcium (43Ca) concentrations as the base. Canonical correspondence analysis showed distinct differences in Mg:Ca, Na:Ca, and Sr:Ca concentrations between the eight tributaries. Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests showed that sites within a tributary were distinguished using Mg:Ca and Na:Ca concentrations. However, only Mg:Ca concentrations were temporally stable. Results from this study demonstrate the potential for using hard‐part microchemistry to address various questions at multiple spatial scales in the Missouri River riverscape but also highlight the importance of evaluating water microelemental signatures prior or simultaneous to any hard‐part microchemistry study. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rra.3115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1895053593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1895053593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-c24fb03828422f227fa4ddcc7dac456d148090865b24e6c16e81d61d6109733f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgT1jw4mVrPneTY6mfUBG29eQhpNlEUra7a5JV-u9NXfEmDMwM8zAz7wvAJYIzBCG-8V7NCELsCEwQIyxHtCiP_2omTsFZCFsIUckFn4C3Va-iU02m2jpbm13f-dTcuhBdq6Pr2qyz2bPTvjON2Zk2punKvbcqDt6EcRhCN3iXVe7T-Gzt3WaIyjsTzsGJVU0wF795Cl7v79aLx3z58vC0mC9zjUX6SmNqN5BwzCnGFuPSKlrXWpe10pQVNaIcCsgLtsHUFBoVhqO6OAQUJSGWTMHVuLf33cdgQpTb9FCbTkrEBYNJuiCJuh6ppCUEb6zsvdspv5cIyoN1MlknD9YlNB_RL9eY_b-crKr5D_8NfNtvjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1895053593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial and Temporal Distinction of Microelemental Signatures of Missouri River Tributaries</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Wuellner, M. R. ; Grote, J. D. ; Fincel, M. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wuellner, M. R. ; Grote, J. D. ; Fincel, M. J.</creatorcontrib><description>The microchemical composition of a fish's calcified structure, such as an otolith, fin ray, or scale, is a ‘biological tag’ that reflects the use of different habitats throughout its life history. Hard‐part microchemistry has the potential to address many fish conservation, management, and behavior questions. In order to use hard‐part microchemistry to address fisheries research questions, elemental signatures of water must be distinct at the spatial scale of interest and ideally temporally stable. The goal of this study was to assess whether spatial differences existed in the concentrations of five elements [barium (137Ba), magnesium (24Mg), manganese (55Mn), sodium (23Na), and strontium (88Sr)] between and within eight Missouri River tributaries and whether those signatures were temporally stable. All elemental concentrations were converted to molar ratios (mmol mol−1) using calcium (43Ca) concentrations as the base. Canonical correspondence analysis showed distinct differences in Mg:Ca, Na:Ca, and Sr:Ca concentrations between the eight tributaries. Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests showed that sites within a tributary were distinguished using Mg:Ca and Na:Ca concentrations. However, only Mg:Ca concentrations were temporally stable. Results from this study demonstrate the potential for using hard‐part microchemistry to address various questions at multiple spatial scales in the Missouri River riverscape but also highlight the importance of evaluating water microelemental signatures prior or simultaneous to any hard‐part microchemistry study. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.3115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Barium ; Calcification ; Calcium ; Chemical composition ; Fins ; Fish ; Fish conservation ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fisheries research ; Habitats ; History ; Life history ; Magnesium ; Manganese ; Microchemistry ; otolith microchemistry ; Ratios ; Rivers ; riverscapes ; Scales ; Signatures ; Sodium ; spatial variation ; Spatial variations ; Strontium ; Strontium isotopes ; temporal variation ; Tributaries ; water microchemistry</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2017-05, Vol.33 (4), p.632-638</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-c24fb03828422f227fa4ddcc7dac456d148090865b24e6c16e81d61d6109733f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-c24fb03828422f227fa4ddcc7dac456d148090865b24e6c16e81d61d6109733f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frra.3115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frra.3115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wuellner, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grote, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fincel, M. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial and Temporal Distinction of Microelemental Signatures of Missouri River Tributaries</title><title>River research and applications</title><description>The microchemical composition of a fish's calcified structure, such as an otolith, fin ray, or scale, is a ‘biological tag’ that reflects the use of different habitats throughout its life history. Hard‐part microchemistry has the potential to address many fish conservation, management, and behavior questions. In order to use hard‐part microchemistry to address fisheries research questions, elemental signatures of water must be distinct at the spatial scale of interest and ideally temporally stable. The goal of this study was to assess whether spatial differences existed in the concentrations of five elements [barium (137Ba), magnesium (24Mg), manganese (55Mn), sodium (23Na), and strontium (88Sr)] between and within eight Missouri River tributaries and whether those signatures were temporally stable. All elemental concentrations were converted to molar ratios (mmol mol−1) using calcium (43Ca) concentrations as the base. Canonical correspondence analysis showed distinct differences in Mg:Ca, Na:Ca, and Sr:Ca concentrations between the eight tributaries. Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests showed that sites within a tributary were distinguished using Mg:Ca and Na:Ca concentrations. However, only Mg:Ca concentrations were temporally stable. Results from this study demonstrate the potential for using hard‐part microchemistry to address various questions at multiple spatial scales in the Missouri River riverscape but also highlight the importance of evaluating water microelemental signatures prior or simultaneous to any hard‐part microchemistry study. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Barium</subject><subject>Calcification</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Fins</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish conservation</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fisheries research</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Microchemistry</subject><subject>otolith microchemistry</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>riverscapes</subject><subject>Scales</subject><subject>Signatures</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Strontium</subject><subject>Strontium isotopes</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>water microchemistry</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgT1jw4mVrPneTY6mfUBG29eQhpNlEUra7a5JV-u9NXfEmDMwM8zAz7wvAJYIzBCG-8V7NCELsCEwQIyxHtCiP_2omTsFZCFsIUckFn4C3Va-iU02m2jpbm13f-dTcuhBdq6Pr2qyz2bPTvjON2Zk2punKvbcqDt6EcRhCN3iXVe7T-Gzt3WaIyjsTzsGJVU0wF795Cl7v79aLx3z58vC0mC9zjUX6SmNqN5BwzCnGFuPSKlrXWpe10pQVNaIcCsgLtsHUFBoVhqO6OAQUJSGWTMHVuLf33cdgQpTb9FCbTkrEBYNJuiCJuh6ppCUEb6zsvdspv5cIyoN1MlknD9YlNB_RL9eY_b-crKr5D_8NfNtvjg</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Wuellner, M. R.</creator><creator>Grote, J. D.</creator><creator>Fincel, M. J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Spatial and Temporal Distinction of Microelemental Signatures of Missouri River Tributaries</title><author>Wuellner, M. R. ; Grote, J. D. ; Fincel, M. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-c24fb03828422f227fa4ddcc7dac456d148090865b24e6c16e81d61d6109733f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Barium</topic><topic>Calcification</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Fins</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish conservation</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fisheries research</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Microchemistry</topic><topic>otolith microchemistry</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>riverscapes</topic><topic>Scales</topic><topic>Signatures</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Strontium</topic><topic>Strontium isotopes</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>water microchemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wuellner, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grote, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fincel, M. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wuellner, M. R.</au><au>Grote, J. D.</au><au>Fincel, M. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial and Temporal Distinction of Microelemental Signatures of Missouri River Tributaries</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>638</epage><pages>632-638</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>The microchemical composition of a fish's calcified structure, such as an otolith, fin ray, or scale, is a ‘biological tag’ that reflects the use of different habitats throughout its life history. Hard‐part microchemistry has the potential to address many fish conservation, management, and behavior questions. In order to use hard‐part microchemistry to address fisheries research questions, elemental signatures of water must be distinct at the spatial scale of interest and ideally temporally stable. The goal of this study was to assess whether spatial differences existed in the concentrations of five elements [barium (137Ba), magnesium (24Mg), manganese (55Mn), sodium (23Na), and strontium (88Sr)] between and within eight Missouri River tributaries and whether those signatures were temporally stable. All elemental concentrations were converted to molar ratios (mmol mol−1) using calcium (43Ca) concentrations as the base. Canonical correspondence analysis showed distinct differences in Mg:Ca, Na:Ca, and Sr:Ca concentrations between the eight tributaries. Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests showed that sites within a tributary were distinguished using Mg:Ca and Na:Ca concentrations. However, only Mg:Ca concentrations were temporally stable. Results from this study demonstrate the potential for using hard‐part microchemistry to address various questions at multiple spatial scales in the Missouri River riverscape but also highlight the importance of evaluating water microelemental signatures prior or simultaneous to any hard‐part microchemistry study. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.3115</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-1459
ispartof River research and applications, 2017-05, Vol.33 (4), p.632-638
issn 1535-1459
1535-1467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1895053593
source Wiley Journals
subjects Barium
Calcification
Calcium
Chemical composition
Fins
Fish
Fish conservation
Fisheries
Fisheries management
Fisheries research
Habitats
History
Life history
Magnesium
Manganese
Microchemistry
otolith microchemistry
Ratios
Rivers
riverscapes
Scales
Signatures
Sodium
spatial variation
Spatial variations
Strontium
Strontium isotopes
temporal variation
Tributaries
water microchemistry
title Spatial and Temporal Distinction of Microelemental Signatures of Missouri River Tributaries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A06%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20and%20Temporal%20Distinction%20of%20Microelemental%20Signatures%20of%20Missouri%20River%20Tributaries&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Wuellner,%20M.%20R.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=638&rft.pages=632-638&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.3115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1895053593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1895053593&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true