Rule-Making Feedbacks through Intermediation and Evaluation in Transnational Private Governance
Feedback from rule-making is an important facet of regulatory processes. By examining the operations of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), a transnational private certification program, we explore two types of feedback that operate within and outside R-I-T relationships and potentially influence...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2017-03, Vol.670 (1), p.93-111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 111 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science |
container_volume | 670 |
creator | AULD, GRAEME RENCKENS, STEFAN |
description | Feedback from rule-making is an important facet of regulatory processes. By examining the operations of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), a transnational private certification program, we explore two types of feedback that operate within and outside R-I-T relationships and potentially influence agenda-setting and rule-reformulation. Within R-I-T relationships, intermediation feedback results from the knowledge that intermediaries acquire as they translate rules into practical forms applicable to specific regulatory targets. Intermediaries may communicate this knowledge to the regulator to strategically inform rule-reformulation. But the regulator may also have access to this information if transparency obligations come with the responsibility of performing intermediation functions. Outside R-I-T relationships, evaluation feedback involves external evaluative audiences—actors outside the regulatory process that hold an interest in evaluating and influencing that process. Transparency about R-I-T relationships should strengthen this feedback, though lack of information will not prevent external evaluators from rendering judgments and seeking to influence rule-reformulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0002716217690185 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1891973137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26362036</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0002716217690185</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26362036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-113a2c6d6fb0a20e454c59f32c5163a52700d9105a8e87043f588e243ba6ffe93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvXoQFz9H9yO5mj1LaWqgoUs9hmkzatOmm7iYF_3sbIyKCcxmG93uP4RFyzdkd58bcM8aE4Vpwoy3jiTohA66UiKSM7SkZdHLU6efkIoQN64bbAUlf2wqjJ9iWbkUniPkSsm2gzdrX7WpNZ65Bv8O8hKasHQWX0_EBqrY_S0cXHlxwXydU9MWXB2iQTusDegcuw0tyVkAV8Op7D8nbZLwYPUbz5-ls9DCPMqnjJuJcgsh0roslA8EwVnGmbCFFpriWoIRhLLecKUgwMSyWhUoSFLFcgi4KtHJIbvvcva_fWwxNuqnb4wtVSHliuTWSS3OkWE9lvg7BY5HufbkD_5FylnY1pn9rPFqi3hJghb9C_-dven4Tmtr_5AsttWBSy0_u4HsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1891973137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rule-Making Feedbacks through Intermediation and Evaluation in Transnational Private Governance</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>AULD, GRAEME ; RENCKENS, STEFAN</creator><creatorcontrib>AULD, GRAEME ; RENCKENS, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><description>Feedback from rule-making is an important facet of regulatory processes. By examining the operations of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), a transnational private certification program, we explore two types of feedback that operate within and outside R-I-T relationships and potentially influence agenda-setting and rule-reformulation. Within R-I-T relationships, intermediation feedback results from the knowledge that intermediaries acquire as they translate rules into practical forms applicable to specific regulatory targets. Intermediaries may communicate this knowledge to the regulator to strategically inform rule-reformulation. But the regulator may also have access to this information if transparency obligations come with the responsibility of performing intermediation functions. Outside R-I-T relationships, evaluation feedback involves external evaluative audiences—actors outside the regulatory process that hold an interest in evaluating and influencing that process. Transparency about R-I-T relationships should strengthen this feedback, though lack of information will not prevent external evaluators from rendering judgments and seeking to influence rule-reformulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0002716217690185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publishing</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Certification ; Disclosure ; Feedback ; Fishing ; Governance ; Management ; Obligations ; Transnationalism ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2017-03, Vol.670 (1), p.93-111</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 The American Academy of Political and Social Science</rights><rights>2017 by The American Academy of Political and Social Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-113a2c6d6fb0a20e454c59f32c5163a52700d9105a8e87043f588e243ba6ffe93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-113a2c6d6fb0a20e454c59f32c5163a52700d9105a8e87043f588e243ba6ffe93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002716217690185$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716217690185$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>AULD, GRAEME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RENCKENS, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><title>Rule-Making Feedbacks through Intermediation and Evaluation in Transnational Private Governance</title><title>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</title><description>Feedback from rule-making is an important facet of regulatory processes. By examining the operations of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), a transnational private certification program, we explore two types of feedback that operate within and outside R-I-T relationships and potentially influence agenda-setting and rule-reformulation. Within R-I-T relationships, intermediation feedback results from the knowledge that intermediaries acquire as they translate rules into practical forms applicable to specific regulatory targets. Intermediaries may communicate this knowledge to the regulator to strategically inform rule-reformulation. But the regulator may also have access to this information if transparency obligations come with the responsibility of performing intermediation functions. Outside R-I-T relationships, evaluation feedback involves external evaluative audiences—actors outside the regulatory process that hold an interest in evaluating and influencing that process. Transparency about R-I-T relationships should strengthen this feedback, though lack of information will not prevent external evaluators from rendering judgments and seeking to influence rule-reformulation.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Obligations</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0002-7162</issn><issn>1552-3349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvXoQFz9H9yO5mj1LaWqgoUs9hmkzatOmm7iYF_3sbIyKCcxmG93uP4RFyzdkd58bcM8aE4Vpwoy3jiTohA66UiKSM7SkZdHLU6efkIoQN64bbAUlf2wqjJ9iWbkUniPkSsm2gzdrX7WpNZ65Bv8O8hKasHQWX0_EBqrY_S0cXHlxwXydU9MWXB2iQTusDegcuw0tyVkAV8Op7D8nbZLwYPUbz5-ls9DCPMqnjJuJcgsh0roslA8EwVnGmbCFFpriWoIRhLLecKUgwMSyWhUoSFLFcgi4KtHJIbvvcva_fWwxNuqnb4wtVSHliuTWSS3OkWE9lvg7BY5HufbkD_5FylnY1pn9rPFqi3hJghb9C_-dven4Tmtr_5AsttWBSy0_u4HsQ</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>AULD, GRAEME</creator><creator>RENCKENS, STEFAN</creator><general>SAGE Publishing</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Rule-Making Feedbacks through Intermediation and Evaluation in Transnational Private Governance</title><author>AULD, GRAEME ; RENCKENS, STEFAN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-113a2c6d6fb0a20e454c59f32c5163a52700d9105a8e87043f588e243ba6ffe93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Obligations</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AULD, GRAEME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RENCKENS, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AULD, GRAEME</au><au>RENCKENS, STEFAN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rule-Making Feedbacks through Intermediation and Evaluation in Transnational Private Governance</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>670</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>93-111</pages><issn>0002-7162</issn><eissn>1552-3349</eissn><abstract>Feedback from rule-making is an important facet of regulatory processes. By examining the operations of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), a transnational private certification program, we explore two types of feedback that operate within and outside R-I-T relationships and potentially influence agenda-setting and rule-reformulation. Within R-I-T relationships, intermediation feedback results from the knowledge that intermediaries acquire as they translate rules into practical forms applicable to specific regulatory targets. Intermediaries may communicate this knowledge to the regulator to strategically inform rule-reformulation. But the regulator may also have access to this information if transparency obligations come with the responsibility of performing intermediation functions. Outside R-I-T relationships, evaluation feedback involves external evaluative audiences—actors outside the regulatory process that hold an interest in evaluating and influencing that process. Transparency about R-I-T relationships should strengthen this feedback, though lack of information will not prevent external evaluators from rendering judgments and seeking to influence rule-reformulation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publishing</pub><doi>10.1177/0002716217690185</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7162 |
ispartof | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2017-03, Vol.670 (1), p.93-111 |
issn | 0002-7162 1552-3349 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1891973137 |
source | Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Audiences Certification Disclosure Feedback Fishing Governance Management Obligations Transnationalism Transparency |
title | Rule-Making Feedbacks through Intermediation and Evaluation in Transnational Private Governance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A18%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rule-Making%20Feedbacks%20through%20Intermediation%20and%20Evaluation%20in%20Transnational%20Private%20Governance&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Political%20and%20Social%20Science&rft.au=AULD,%20GRAEME&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=670&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=93-111&rft.issn=0002-7162&rft.eissn=1552-3349&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0002716217690185&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26362036%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1891973137&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26362036&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0002716217690185&rfr_iscdi=true |