Construct validity of Brazilian cooking skills and healthy eating questionnaire by the known-groups method
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe the results of the construct validity by the known-groups method of a Brazilian cooking skills and healthy-eating questionnaire. Design/methodology/approach Responses obtained from university students (n=767) for Brazilian-Portuguese cooking skills an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British food journal (1966) 2017-05, Vol.119 (5), p.1003-1016 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1016 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1003 |
container_title | British food journal (1966) |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Jomori, Manuela Mika Proença, Rossana Pacheco da Costa Echevarria-Guanilo, Maria Elena Bernardo, Greyce Luci Uggioni, Paula Lazzarin Fernandes, Ana Carolina |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to describe the results of the construct validity by the known-groups method of a Brazilian cooking skills and healthy-eating questionnaire.
Design/methodology/approach
Responses obtained from university students (n=767) for Brazilian-Portuguese cooking skills and health eating questionnaire, surveyed online, were submitted to construct validity comparing two known groups. The t-test was used to compare differences between gender (male and female) and the level of cooking knowledge (high or low) in each measure of the questionnaire. Internal consistency was evaluated by obtaining the Cronbach’s coefficient.
Findings
Women showed significantly higher means than men in all scale measures, except in the self-efficacy for using basic cooking techniques (SECT), where no differences were found. Students classified as having high cooking knowledge and had higher score means in all scales compared to the students with low levels. Internal consistency was adequate for all scales (a>0.70), except for cooking attitude (CA) (a=0.33) and cooking behavior (CB) scales (a=0.59).
Research limitations/implications
SECT likely depends on cooking knowledge, independent of gender, suggesting further examination. Items and structure of CA and CB constructs also need to be examined more deeply.
Practical implications
A validated cooking skills and health-eating questionnaire demonstrated its ability to detect differences between groups, useful to provide data for further interventions.
Originality/value
No available cooking skills questionnaires were found that have been validated by the known-groups method regarding differences between gender and individuals’ level of cooking knowledge, as conducted in this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-0448 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1891379309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321964013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-857a3d137fa225edff9a43fb17d6774c077025ebd0eb2e7060c1ea47f7e492a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUT1PwzAQtRBIlMLOaInZ9BwndTLSik9VYgGJLXJiu3Gb2sV2QOHXk1AWJKb7ePfend4hdEnhmlLIZ4u7J0KBJEDnBNI0P0ITyrOcpAN4jCYAwAlweDtFZyFsxjLhfII2S2dD9F0d8YdojTSxx07jhRdfpjXC4tq5rbFrHLambQMWVuJGiTY2PVYijsh7p0I0zlphvMJVj2Oj8Na6T0vW3nX7gHcqNk6eoxMt2qAufuMUvd7dviwfyOr5_nF5syI1ozSSPOOCScq4FkmSKal1IVKmK8rlnPO0Bs5h6FcSVJUoDnOoqRIp11ylRSIyNkVXB929dz-3lRvXeTusLGleDMIFg2KYgsNU7V0IXuly781O-L6kUI6OloOjYz46Wo6ODpTZgaJ2yotW_sf48wP2DewLeNY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1891379309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construct validity of Brazilian cooking skills and healthy eating questionnaire by the known-groups method</title><source>Emerald eJournals</source><creator>Jomori, Manuela Mika ; Proença, Rossana Pacheco da Costa ; Echevarria-Guanilo, Maria Elena ; Bernardo, Greyce Luci ; Uggioni, Paula Lazzarin ; Fernandes, Ana Carolina</creator><creatorcontrib>Jomori, Manuela Mika ; Proença, Rossana Pacheco da Costa ; Echevarria-Guanilo, Maria Elena ; Bernardo, Greyce Luci ; Uggioni, Paula Lazzarin ; Fernandes, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to describe the results of the construct validity by the known-groups method of a Brazilian cooking skills and healthy-eating questionnaire.
Design/methodology/approach
Responses obtained from university students (n=767) for Brazilian-Portuguese cooking skills and health eating questionnaire, surveyed online, were submitted to construct validity comparing two known groups. The t-test was used to compare differences between gender (male and female) and the level of cooking knowledge (high or low) in each measure of the questionnaire. Internal consistency was evaluated by obtaining the Cronbach’s coefficient.
Findings
Women showed significantly higher means than men in all scale measures, except in the self-efficacy for using basic cooking techniques (SECT), where no differences were found. Students classified as having high cooking knowledge and had higher score means in all scales compared to the students with low levels. Internal consistency was adequate for all scales (a>0.70), except for cooking attitude (CA) (a=0.33) and cooking behavior (CB) scales (a=0.59).
Research limitations/implications
SECT likely depends on cooking knowledge, independent of gender, suggesting further examination. Items and structure of CA and CB constructs also need to be examined more deeply.
Practical implications
A validated cooking skills and health-eating questionnaire demonstrated its ability to detect differences between groups, useful to provide data for further interventions.
Originality/value
No available cooking skills questionnaires were found that have been validated by the known-groups method regarding differences between gender and individuals’ level of cooking knowledge, as conducted in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-070X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4108</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-0448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Consistency ; Cooking ; Eating ; Eating behavior ; Females ; Food ; Fruits ; Gender ; Independent sample ; Knowledge ; Nutrition ; Questionnaires ; Self-efficacy ; Skills ; Students ; University students ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Vegetables ; Women ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>British food journal (1966), 2017-05, Vol.119 (5), p.1003-1016</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-857a3d137fa225edff9a43fb17d6774c077025ebd0eb2e7060c1ea47f7e492a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-857a3d137fa225edff9a43fb17d6774c077025ebd0eb2e7060c1ea47f7e492a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8179-4855 ; 0000-0003-2696-0539</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-0448/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jomori, Manuela Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proença, Rossana Pacheco da Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echevarria-Guanilo, Maria Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, Greyce Luci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uggioni, Paula Lazzarin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><title>Construct validity of Brazilian cooking skills and healthy eating questionnaire by the known-groups method</title><title>British food journal (1966)</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to describe the results of the construct validity by the known-groups method of a Brazilian cooking skills and healthy-eating questionnaire.
Design/methodology/approach
Responses obtained from university students (n=767) for Brazilian-Portuguese cooking skills and health eating questionnaire, surveyed online, were submitted to construct validity comparing two known groups. The t-test was used to compare differences between gender (male and female) and the level of cooking knowledge (high or low) in each measure of the questionnaire. Internal consistency was evaluated by obtaining the Cronbach’s coefficient.
Findings
Women showed significantly higher means than men in all scale measures, except in the self-efficacy for using basic cooking techniques (SECT), where no differences were found. Students classified as having high cooking knowledge and had higher score means in all scales compared to the students with low levels. Internal consistency was adequate for all scales (a>0.70), except for cooking attitude (CA) (a=0.33) and cooking behavior (CB) scales (a=0.59).
Research limitations/implications
SECT likely depends on cooking knowledge, independent of gender, suggesting further examination. Items and structure of CA and CB constructs also need to be examined more deeply.
Practical implications
A validated cooking skills and health-eating questionnaire demonstrated its ability to detect differences between groups, useful to provide data for further interventions.
Originality/value
No available cooking skills questionnaires were found that have been validated by the known-groups method regarding differences between gender and individuals’ level of cooking knowledge, as conducted in this study.</description><subject>Consistency</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>Eating behavior</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Independent sample</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Self-efficacy</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0007-070X</issn><issn>1758-4108</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptUT1PwzAQtRBIlMLOaInZ9BwndTLSik9VYgGJLXJiu3Gb2sV2QOHXk1AWJKb7ePfend4hdEnhmlLIZ4u7J0KBJEDnBNI0P0ITyrOcpAN4jCYAwAlweDtFZyFsxjLhfII2S2dD9F0d8YdojTSxx07jhRdfpjXC4tq5rbFrHLambQMWVuJGiTY2PVYijsh7p0I0zlphvMJVj2Oj8Na6T0vW3nX7gHcqNk6eoxMt2qAufuMUvd7dviwfyOr5_nF5syI1ozSSPOOCScq4FkmSKal1IVKmK8rlnPO0Bs5h6FcSVJUoDnOoqRIp11ylRSIyNkVXB929dz-3lRvXeTusLGleDMIFg2KYgsNU7V0IXuly781O-L6kUI6OloOjYz46Wo6ODpTZgaJ2yotW_sf48wP2DewLeNY</recordid><startdate>20170502</startdate><enddate>20170502</enddate><creator>Jomori, Manuela Mika</creator><creator>Proença, Rossana Pacheco da Costa</creator><creator>Echevarria-Guanilo, Maria Elena</creator><creator>Bernardo, Greyce Luci</creator><creator>Uggioni, Paula Lazzarin</creator><creator>Fernandes, Ana Carolina</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8179-4855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-0539</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170502</creationdate><title>Construct validity of Brazilian cooking skills and healthy eating questionnaire by the known-groups method</title><author>Jomori, Manuela Mika ; Proença, Rossana Pacheco da Costa ; Echevarria-Guanilo, Maria Elena ; Bernardo, Greyce Luci ; Uggioni, Paula Lazzarin ; Fernandes, Ana Carolina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-857a3d137fa225edff9a43fb17d6774c077025ebd0eb2e7060c1ea47f7e492a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Consistency</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>Eating behavior</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Independent sample</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Self-efficacy</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jomori, Manuela Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proença, Rossana Pacheco da Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echevarria-Guanilo, Maria Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, Greyce Luci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uggioni, Paula Lazzarin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>British food journal (1966)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jomori, Manuela Mika</au><au>Proença, Rossana Pacheco da Costa</au><au>Echevarria-Guanilo, Maria Elena</au><au>Bernardo, Greyce Luci</au><au>Uggioni, Paula Lazzarin</au><au>Fernandes, Ana Carolina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construct validity of Brazilian cooking skills and healthy eating questionnaire by the known-groups method</atitle><jtitle>British food journal (1966)</jtitle><date>2017-05-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1003</spage><epage>1016</epage><pages>1003-1016</pages><issn>0007-070X</issn><eissn>1758-4108</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to describe the results of the construct validity by the known-groups method of a Brazilian cooking skills and healthy-eating questionnaire.
Design/methodology/approach
Responses obtained from university students (n=767) for Brazilian-Portuguese cooking skills and health eating questionnaire, surveyed online, were submitted to construct validity comparing two known groups. The t-test was used to compare differences between gender (male and female) and the level of cooking knowledge (high or low) in each measure of the questionnaire. Internal consistency was evaluated by obtaining the Cronbach’s coefficient.
Findings
Women showed significantly higher means than men in all scale measures, except in the self-efficacy for using basic cooking techniques (SECT), where no differences were found. Students classified as having high cooking knowledge and had higher score means in all scales compared to the students with low levels. Internal consistency was adequate for all scales (a>0.70), except for cooking attitude (CA) (a=0.33) and cooking behavior (CB) scales (a=0.59).
Research limitations/implications
SECT likely depends on cooking knowledge, independent of gender, suggesting further examination. Items and structure of CA and CB constructs also need to be examined more deeply.
Practical implications
A validated cooking skills and health-eating questionnaire demonstrated its ability to detect differences between groups, useful to provide data for further interventions.
Originality/value
No available cooking skills questionnaires were found that have been validated by the known-groups method regarding differences between gender and individuals’ level of cooking knowledge, as conducted in this study.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-0448</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8179-4855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-0539</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-070X |
ispartof | British food journal (1966), 2017-05, Vol.119 (5), p.1003-1016 |
issn | 0007-070X 1758-4108 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1891379309 |
source | Emerald eJournals |
subjects | Consistency Cooking Eating Eating behavior Females Food Fruits Gender Independent sample Knowledge Nutrition Questionnaires Self-efficacy Skills Students University students Validation studies Validity Vegetables Women Young adults |
title | Construct validity of Brazilian cooking skills and healthy eating questionnaire by the known-groups method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construct%20validity%20of%20Brazilian%20cooking%20skills%20and%20healthy%20eating%20questionnaire%20by%20the%20known-groups%20method&rft.jtitle=British%20food%20journal%20(1966)&rft.au=Jomori,%20Manuela%20Mika&rft.date=2017-05-02&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1003&rft.epage=1016&rft.pages=1003-1016&rft.issn=0007-070X&rft.eissn=1758-4108&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-0448&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E4321964013%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1891379309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |