Through-Running and Regional Transit in New York: An Analysis of Legal Structures and Approaches

Over the past decade, a cottage industry of online and New Yorkbased transportation analysts and journalists has formed to answer that question, advocating for and debating options for improving regional rail service to the New York metropolitan region.3 Each of these analyses and articles share a c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Urban lawyer 2017-01, Vol.49 (1), p.109-147
1. Verfasser: Ullman, David G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147
container_issue 1
container_start_page 109
container_title The Urban lawyer
container_volume 49
creator Ullman, David G.
description Over the past decade, a cottage industry of online and New Yorkbased transportation analysts and journalists has formed to answer that question, advocating for and debating options for improving regional rail service to the New York metropolitan region.3 Each of these analyses and articles share a common theme: a critique of New York's regional transit system as inadequate, outdated, and non-conforming to best practices adopted by modern transit agencies across the world. [...]some through-running proposals would require a new tunnel between Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal, an expensive endeavor.4 But each proposal is consistent in agreeing that through-running trains in the New York metropolitan region could reduce congestion and create additional capacity in stations, eliminate the need for trains to turn around in valuable urban space, and provide for the ability of consumers to get to multiple locations within and outside of Manhattan's midtown business district.5 Analysts are somewhat divided as to the viability of various throughrunning plans given technical challenges throughout New York's various transit systems.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1890571572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A503308855</galeid><jstor_id>44648025</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A503308855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1552-a6487c8308c7f70b8863622bb7165c20b45e725e9913b8b3d3eb9a884086cef93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkG1LwzAQx4soOKcfQQj4upImTZP6rgyfYCjM-sJXNcmuXWaXzKRF9u0NThBh3MEdx-_-93CUTLIyJ2nBSnqcTDCOOS4xO03OQlhjTHFG8knyXq-8G7tVuhitNbZD0i7RAjrjrOxR7aUNZkDGoif4Qm_Of9ygykaX_S6YgFyL5tBF8mXwox5GD-FHodpuvZN6BeE8OWllH-DiN06T17vbevaQzp_vH2fVPO0yxkgqi1xwLSgWmrccKyEKWhCiFM8KpglWOQNOGJRlRpVQdElBlVKIHItCQ1vSaXK1142DP0cIQ7N2o497hiYT8W6eMU7-qLgzNMa2bvBSb0zQTcUwjeMFY5FKD1AdWPCydxZaE8v_-OsDfLQlbIw-2HC5b1iHwflm681G-l2T5_ELmDD6DYr8hHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1890571572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Through-Running and Regional Transit in New York: An Analysis of Legal Structures and Approaches</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Ullman, David G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ullman, David G.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past decade, a cottage industry of online and New Yorkbased transportation analysts and journalists has formed to answer that question, advocating for and debating options for improving regional rail service to the New York metropolitan region.3 Each of these analyses and articles share a common theme: a critique of New York's regional transit system as inadequate, outdated, and non-conforming to best practices adopted by modern transit agencies across the world. [...]some through-running proposals would require a new tunnel between Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal, an expensive endeavor.4 But each proposal is consistent in agreeing that through-running trains in the New York metropolitan region could reduce congestion and create additional capacity in stations, eliminate the need for trains to turn around in valuable urban space, and provide for the ability of consumers to get to multiple locations within and outside of Manhattan's midtown business district.5 Analysts are somewhat divided as to the viability of various throughrunning plans given technical challenges throughout New York's various transit systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-0905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-6593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The Section of State and Local Government Law</publisher><subject>Central business districts ; Cities ; Comparative analysis ; Cooperation ; Governors ; Interstate commerce ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Light rail transportation ; Management ; Professional football ; Rail mass transit ; Railroad transportation ; Service enhancement ; Trains ; Transportation planning</subject><ispartof>The Urban lawyer, 2017-01, Vol.49 (1), p.109-147</ispartof><rights>2017 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Winter 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44648025$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44648025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ullman, David G.</creatorcontrib><title>Through-Running and Regional Transit in New York: An Analysis of Legal Structures and Approaches</title><title>The Urban lawyer</title><description>Over the past decade, a cottage industry of online and New Yorkbased transportation analysts and journalists has formed to answer that question, advocating for and debating options for improving regional rail service to the New York metropolitan region.3 Each of these analyses and articles share a common theme: a critique of New York's regional transit system as inadequate, outdated, and non-conforming to best practices adopted by modern transit agencies across the world. [...]some through-running proposals would require a new tunnel between Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal, an expensive endeavor.4 But each proposal is consistent in agreeing that through-running trains in the New York metropolitan region could reduce congestion and create additional capacity in stations, eliminate the need for trains to turn around in valuable urban space, and provide for the ability of consumers to get to multiple locations within and outside of Manhattan's midtown business district.5 Analysts are somewhat divided as to the viability of various throughrunning plans given technical challenges throughout New York's various transit systems.</description><subject>Central business districts</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Interstate commerce</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Light rail transportation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Professional football</subject><subject>Rail mass transit</subject><subject>Railroad transportation</subject><subject>Service enhancement</subject><subject>Trains</subject><subject>Transportation planning</subject><issn>0042-0905</issn><issn>1942-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkG1LwzAQx4soOKcfQQj4upImTZP6rgyfYCjM-sJXNcmuXWaXzKRF9u0NThBh3MEdx-_-93CUTLIyJ2nBSnqcTDCOOS4xO03OQlhjTHFG8knyXq-8G7tVuhitNbZD0i7RAjrjrOxR7aUNZkDGoif4Qm_Of9ygykaX_S6YgFyL5tBF8mXwox5GD-FHodpuvZN6BeE8OWllH-DiN06T17vbevaQzp_vH2fVPO0yxkgqi1xwLSgWmrccKyEKWhCiFM8KpglWOQNOGJRlRpVQdElBlVKIHItCQ1vSaXK1142DP0cIQ7N2o497hiYT8W6eMU7-qLgzNMa2bvBSb0zQTcUwjeMFY5FKD1AdWPCydxZaE8v_-OsDfLQlbIw-2HC5b1iHwflm681G-l2T5_ELmDD6DYr8hHg</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Ullman, David G.</creator><general>The Section of State and Local Government Law</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Through-Running and Regional Transit in New York: An Analysis of Legal Structures and Approaches</title><author>Ullman, David G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1552-a6487c8308c7f70b8863622bb7165c20b45e725e9913b8b3d3eb9a884086cef93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Central business districts</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Interstate commerce</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Light rail transportation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Professional football</topic><topic>Rail mass transit</topic><topic>Railroad transportation</topic><topic>Service enhancement</topic><topic>Trains</topic><topic>Transportation planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ullman, David G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Urban lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ullman, David G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Through-Running and Regional Transit in New York: An Analysis of Legal Structures and Approaches</atitle><jtitle>The Urban lawyer</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>109-147</pages><issn>0042-0905</issn><eissn>1942-6593</eissn><abstract>Over the past decade, a cottage industry of online and New Yorkbased transportation analysts and journalists has formed to answer that question, advocating for and debating options for improving regional rail service to the New York metropolitan region.3 Each of these analyses and articles share a common theme: a critique of New York's regional transit system as inadequate, outdated, and non-conforming to best practices adopted by modern transit agencies across the world. [...]some through-running proposals would require a new tunnel between Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal, an expensive endeavor.4 But each proposal is consistent in agreeing that through-running trains in the New York metropolitan region could reduce congestion and create additional capacity in stations, eliminate the need for trains to turn around in valuable urban space, and provide for the ability of consumers to get to multiple locations within and outside of Manhattan's midtown business district.5 Analysts are somewhat divided as to the viability of various throughrunning plans given technical challenges throughout New York's various transit systems.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The Section of State and Local Government Law</pub><tpages>39</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-0905
ispartof The Urban lawyer, 2017-01, Vol.49 (1), p.109-147
issn 0042-0905
1942-6593
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1890571572
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Central business districts
Cities
Comparative analysis
Cooperation
Governors
Interstate commerce
Laws, regulations and rules
Light rail transportation
Management
Professional football
Rail mass transit
Railroad transportation
Service enhancement
Trains
Transportation planning
title Through-Running and Regional Transit in New York: An Analysis of Legal Structures and Approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A33%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Through-Running%20and%20Regional%20Transit%20in%20New%20York:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Legal%20Structures%20and%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=The%20Urban%20lawyer&rft.au=Ullman,%20David%20G.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=109-147&rft.issn=0042-0905&rft.eissn=1942-6593&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA503308855%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1890571572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A503308855&rft_jstor_id=44648025&rfr_iscdi=true