Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs
Background Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staf...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child & youth care forum 2017-06, Vol.46 (3), p.285-305 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 305 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | Child & youth care forum |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Akiva, Thomas Li, Junlei Martin, Kelly M. Horner, Christy Galletta McNamara, Anne R. |
description | Background
Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staff, is particularly needed.
Objective
This pilot study introduces Simple Interactions (SI), an innovative, strengths-based, and interaction-based professional development approach. Rather than attempting to teach generic competencies or targeting weakness areas for improvement, SI is designed to help program staff build from their strengths.
Methods
In two cohorts over the course of 10 months, ten afterschool programs (N = 70 staff) participated in a pilot of SI. Program staff watched short video clips of themselves working with children and used the intuitive, 1-page SI Tool to guide discussion of adult–child interactions; specifically, connection (affective intune-ness), reciprocity (balanced roles of engagement), participation (involving all children), and progression (incremental challenge).
Results
Results suggest that participants valued the professional development process, the strengths-based approach, and the use of self-video despite initial apprehension, and reported perceived improvements in their professional learning communities. Pre-post videos of Cohort 2 staff (n = 20), coded blind to time point (pre or post), indicate significant and substantive improvements in staff–child connection, reciprocity, and participation.
Conclusion
These results support the use of this simple, practical, and potentially effective model of supporting quality improvement for and by local staff. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1890530949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1138340</ericid><sourcerecordid>4321897967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-2590c98f411a2b6d39029f79987682c69822bf16982a7160c89661d2e38f0aa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxhdRsFYfwIMQ8BydJN1s4k3rv0qhhdZzSLdJXdnd1CQVfAZf2iwr0ounGeb7vpnhl2XnBK4IQHEdCOScYyAcS1bkWB5kA5IXDDNG5GHqIWeYCAnH2UkI7wAgC5oPsu9F1WxrgyZtNF6XsXJtuEHzqnaxajdIo0X0pt3Et4DvdDBrpNv1vvl3OvfOmhDSQNfo3nya2m0b08be-pm6JCHrPJrtInYWL8o352q0rBrThTdeN-E0O7K6Dubstw6z18eH5fgZT2dPk_HtFJeMiYhpLqGUwo4I0XTF10wClbaQUhRc0JJLQenKkq7qgnAoheScrKlhwoLWlA2zy37v1ruPnQlRvbudT58H1RHKGciRTC7Su0rvQvDGqq2vGu2_FAHVMVc9c5WYq4656jIXfcb4qvzzP7wQwgQbQdJpr4ektRvj9y7_u_QH30KOhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1890530949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Akiva, Thomas ; Li, Junlei ; Martin, Kelly M. ; Horner, Christy Galletta ; McNamara, Anne R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Akiva, Thomas ; Li, Junlei ; Martin, Kelly M. ; Horner, Christy Galletta ; McNamara, Anne R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staff, is particularly needed.
Objective
This pilot study introduces Simple Interactions (SI), an innovative, strengths-based, and interaction-based professional development approach. Rather than attempting to teach generic competencies or targeting weakness areas for improvement, SI is designed to help program staff build from their strengths.
Methods
In two cohorts over the course of 10 months, ten afterschool programs (N = 70 staff) participated in a pilot of SI. Program staff watched short video clips of themselves working with children and used the intuitive, 1-page SI Tool to guide discussion of adult–child interactions; specifically, connection (affective intune-ness), reciprocity (balanced roles of engagement), participation (involving all children), and progression (incremental challenge).
Results
Results suggest that participants valued the professional development process, the strengths-based approach, and the use of self-video despite initial apprehension, and reported perceived improvements in their professional learning communities. Pre-post videos of Cohort 2 staff (n = 20), coded blind to time point (pre or post), indicate significant and substantive improvements in staff–child connection, reciprocity, and participation.
Conclusion
These results support the use of this simple, practical, and potentially effective model of supporting quality improvement for and by local staff.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>After School Programs ; Anxiety ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Child care ; Child care services ; Children ; Classroom Observation Techniques ; Cohort Analysis ; Collaboration ; Competence ; Early Childhood Education ; Educational Practices ; Effect Size ; Elementary Education ; Elementary Schools ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Interaction ; Intervention ; Learning ; Meta Analysis ; Original Paper ; Out of school time ; Participation ; Pilot Projects ; Professional Development ; Professional training ; Psychology ; Quality management ; Quality of care ; Reciprocity ; Strength ; Teacher Student Relationship ; Teaching Methods ; Time ; Training ; Video Technology ; Young Children ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Child & youth care forum, 2017-06, Vol.46 (3), p.285-305</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>Child & Youth Care Forum is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-2590c98f411a2b6d39029f79987682c69822bf16982a7160c89661d2e38f0aa23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-2590c98f411a2b6d39029f79987682c69822bf16982a7160c89661d2e38f0aa23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1872-0316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,12829,27327,27907,27908,30982,33757,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1138340$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akiva, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horner, Christy Galletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Anne R.</creatorcontrib><title>Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs</title><title>Child & youth care forum</title><addtitle>Child Youth Care Forum</addtitle><description>Background
Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staff, is particularly needed.
Objective
This pilot study introduces Simple Interactions (SI), an innovative, strengths-based, and interaction-based professional development approach. Rather than attempting to teach generic competencies or targeting weakness areas for improvement, SI is designed to help program staff build from their strengths.
Methods
In two cohorts over the course of 10 months, ten afterschool programs (N = 70 staff) participated in a pilot of SI. Program staff watched short video clips of themselves working with children and used the intuitive, 1-page SI Tool to guide discussion of adult–child interactions; specifically, connection (affective intune-ness), reciprocity (balanced roles of engagement), participation (involving all children), and progression (incremental challenge).
Results
Results suggest that participants valued the professional development process, the strengths-based approach, and the use of self-video despite initial apprehension, and reported perceived improvements in their professional learning communities. Pre-post videos of Cohort 2 staff (n = 20), coded blind to time point (pre or post), indicate significant and substantive improvements in staff–child connection, reciprocity, and participation.
Conclusion
These results support the use of this simple, practical, and potentially effective model of supporting quality improvement for and by local staff.</description><subject>After School Programs</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child care services</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</subject><subject>Cohort Analysis</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Early Childhood Education</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Out of school time</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Teacher Student Relationship</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1053-1890</issn><issn>1573-3319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxhdRsFYfwIMQ8BydJN1s4k3rv0qhhdZzSLdJXdnd1CQVfAZf2iwr0ounGeb7vpnhl2XnBK4IQHEdCOScYyAcS1bkWB5kA5IXDDNG5GHqIWeYCAnH2UkI7wAgC5oPsu9F1WxrgyZtNF6XsXJtuEHzqnaxajdIo0X0pt3Et4DvdDBrpNv1vvl3OvfOmhDSQNfo3nya2m0b08be-pm6JCHrPJrtInYWL8o352q0rBrThTdeN-E0O7K6Dubstw6z18eH5fgZT2dPk_HtFJeMiYhpLqGUwo4I0XTF10wClbaQUhRc0JJLQenKkq7qgnAoheScrKlhwoLWlA2zy37v1ruPnQlRvbudT58H1RHKGciRTC7Su0rvQvDGqq2vGu2_FAHVMVc9c5WYq4656jIXfcb4qvzzP7wQwgQbQdJpr4ektRvj9y7_u_QH30KOhg</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Akiva, Thomas</creator><creator>Li, Junlei</creator><creator>Martin, Kelly M.</creator><creator>Horner, Christy Galletta</creator><creator>McNamara, Anne R.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1872-0316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs</title><author>Akiva, Thomas ; Li, Junlei ; Martin, Kelly M. ; Horner, Christy Galletta ; McNamara, Anne R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-2590c98f411a2b6d39029f79987682c69822bf16982a7160c89661d2e38f0aa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>After School Programs</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child care services</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Classroom Observation Techniques</topic><topic>Cohort Analysis</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Early Childhood Education</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Out of school time</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Teacher Student Relationship</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akiva, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horner, Christy Galletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Anne R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child & youth care forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akiva, Thomas</au><au>Li, Junlei</au><au>Martin, Kelly M.</au><au>Horner, Christy Galletta</au><au>McNamara, Anne R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1138340</ericid><atitle>Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs</atitle><jtitle>Child & youth care forum</jtitle><stitle>Child Youth Care Forum</stitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>285-305</pages><issn>1053-1890</issn><eissn>1573-3319</eissn><abstract>Background
Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staff, is particularly needed.
Objective
This pilot study introduces Simple Interactions (SI), an innovative, strengths-based, and interaction-based professional development approach. Rather than attempting to teach generic competencies or targeting weakness areas for improvement, SI is designed to help program staff build from their strengths.
Methods
In two cohorts over the course of 10 months, ten afterschool programs (N = 70 staff) participated in a pilot of SI. Program staff watched short video clips of themselves working with children and used the intuitive, 1-page SI Tool to guide discussion of adult–child interactions; specifically, connection (affective intune-ness), reciprocity (balanced roles of engagement), participation (involving all children), and progression (incremental challenge).
Results
Results suggest that participants valued the professional development process, the strengths-based approach, and the use of self-video despite initial apprehension, and reported perceived improvements in their professional learning communities. Pre-post videos of Cohort 2 staff (n = 20), coded blind to time point (pre or post), indicate significant and substantive improvements in staff–child connection, reciprocity, and participation.
Conclusion
These results support the use of this simple, practical, and potentially effective model of supporting quality improvement for and by local staff.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1872-0316</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1890 |
ispartof | Child & youth care forum, 2017-06, Vol.46 (3), p.285-305 |
issn | 1053-1890 1573-3319 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1890530949 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | After School Programs Anxiety Behavioral Science and Psychology Child and School Psychology Child care Child care services Children Classroom Observation Techniques Cohort Analysis Collaboration Competence Early Childhood Education Educational Practices Effect Size Elementary Education Elementary Schools Instructional Effectiveness Interaction Intervention Learning Meta Analysis Original Paper Out of school time Participation Pilot Projects Professional Development Professional training Psychology Quality management Quality of care Reciprocity Strength Teacher Student Relationship Teaching Methods Time Training Video Technology Young Children Youth |
title | Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A59%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simple%20Interactions:%20Piloting%20a%20Strengths-Based%20and%20Interaction-Based%20Professional%20Development%20Intervention%20for%20Out-of-School%20Time%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Child%20&%20youth%20care%20forum&rft.au=Akiva,%20Thomas&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=285-305&rft.issn=1053-1890&rft.eissn=1573-3319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4321897967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1890530949&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1138340&rfr_iscdi=true |