Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs

Background Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child & youth care forum 2017-06, Vol.46 (3), p.285-305
Hauptverfasser: Akiva, Thomas, Li, Junlei, Martin, Kelly M., Horner, Christy Galletta, McNamara, Anne R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 305
container_issue 3
container_start_page 285
container_title Child & youth care forum
container_volume 46
creator Akiva, Thomas
Li, Junlei
Martin, Kelly M.
Horner, Christy Galletta
McNamara, Anne R.
description Background Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staff, is particularly needed. Objective This pilot study introduces Simple Interactions (SI), an innovative, strengths-based, and interaction-based professional development approach. Rather than attempting to teach generic competencies or targeting weakness areas for improvement, SI is designed to help program staff build from their strengths. Methods In two cohorts over the course of 10 months, ten afterschool programs (N = 70 staff) participated in a pilot of SI. Program staff watched short video clips of themselves working with children and used the intuitive, 1-page SI Tool to guide discussion of adult–child interactions; specifically, connection (affective intune-ness), reciprocity (balanced roles of engagement), participation (involving all children), and progression (incremental challenge). Results Results suggest that participants valued the professional development process, the strengths-based approach, and the use of self-video despite initial apprehension, and reported perceived improvements in their professional learning communities. Pre-post videos of Cohort 2 staff (n = 20), coded blind to time point (pre or post), indicate significant and substantive improvements in staff–child connection, reciprocity, and participation. Conclusion These results support the use of this simple, practical, and potentially effective model of supporting quality improvement for and by local staff.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1890530949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1138340</ericid><sourcerecordid>4321897967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-2590c98f411a2b6d39029f79987682c69822bf16982a7160c89661d2e38f0aa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxhdRsFYfwIMQ8BydJN1s4k3rv0qhhdZzSLdJXdnd1CQVfAZf2iwr0ounGeb7vpnhl2XnBK4IQHEdCOScYyAcS1bkWB5kA5IXDDNG5GHqIWeYCAnH2UkI7wAgC5oPsu9F1WxrgyZtNF6XsXJtuEHzqnaxajdIo0X0pt3Et4DvdDBrpNv1vvl3OvfOmhDSQNfo3nya2m0b08be-pm6JCHrPJrtInYWL8o352q0rBrThTdeN-E0O7K6Dubstw6z18eH5fgZT2dPk_HtFJeMiYhpLqGUwo4I0XTF10wClbaQUhRc0JJLQenKkq7qgnAoheScrKlhwoLWlA2zy37v1ruPnQlRvbudT58H1RHKGciRTC7Su0rvQvDGqq2vGu2_FAHVMVc9c5WYq4656jIXfcb4qvzzP7wQwgQbQdJpr4ektRvj9y7_u_QH30KOhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1890530949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Akiva, Thomas ; Li, Junlei ; Martin, Kelly M. ; Horner, Christy Galletta ; McNamara, Anne R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Akiva, Thomas ; Li, Junlei ; Martin, Kelly M. ; Horner, Christy Galletta ; McNamara, Anne R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staff, is particularly needed. Objective This pilot study introduces Simple Interactions (SI), an innovative, strengths-based, and interaction-based professional development approach. Rather than attempting to teach generic competencies or targeting weakness areas for improvement, SI is designed to help program staff build from their strengths. Methods In two cohorts over the course of 10 months, ten afterschool programs (N = 70 staff) participated in a pilot of SI. Program staff watched short video clips of themselves working with children and used the intuitive, 1-page SI Tool to guide discussion of adult–child interactions; specifically, connection (affective intune-ness), reciprocity (balanced roles of engagement), participation (involving all children), and progression (incremental challenge). Results Results suggest that participants valued the professional development process, the strengths-based approach, and the use of self-video despite initial apprehension, and reported perceived improvements in their professional learning communities. Pre-post videos of Cohort 2 staff (n = 20), coded blind to time point (pre or post), indicate significant and substantive improvements in staff–child connection, reciprocity, and participation. Conclusion These results support the use of this simple, practical, and potentially effective model of supporting quality improvement for and by local staff.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>After School Programs ; Anxiety ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Child care ; Child care services ; Children ; Classroom Observation Techniques ; Cohort Analysis ; Collaboration ; Competence ; Early Childhood Education ; Educational Practices ; Effect Size ; Elementary Education ; Elementary Schools ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Interaction ; Intervention ; Learning ; Meta Analysis ; Original Paper ; Out of school time ; Participation ; Pilot Projects ; Professional Development ; Professional training ; Psychology ; Quality management ; Quality of care ; Reciprocity ; Strength ; Teacher Student Relationship ; Teaching Methods ; Time ; Training ; Video Technology ; Young Children ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Child &amp; youth care forum, 2017-06, Vol.46 (3), p.285-305</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>Child &amp; Youth Care Forum is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-2590c98f411a2b6d39029f79987682c69822bf16982a7160c89661d2e38f0aa23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-2590c98f411a2b6d39029f79987682c69822bf16982a7160c89661d2e38f0aa23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1872-0316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,12829,27327,27907,27908,30982,33757,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1138340$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akiva, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horner, Christy Galletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Anne R.</creatorcontrib><title>Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs</title><title>Child &amp; youth care forum</title><addtitle>Child Youth Care Forum</addtitle><description>Background Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staff, is particularly needed. Objective This pilot study introduces Simple Interactions (SI), an innovative, strengths-based, and interaction-based professional development approach. Rather than attempting to teach generic competencies or targeting weakness areas for improvement, SI is designed to help program staff build from their strengths. Methods In two cohorts over the course of 10 months, ten afterschool programs (N = 70 staff) participated in a pilot of SI. Program staff watched short video clips of themselves working with children and used the intuitive, 1-page SI Tool to guide discussion of adult–child interactions; specifically, connection (affective intune-ness), reciprocity (balanced roles of engagement), participation (involving all children), and progression (incremental challenge). Results Results suggest that participants valued the professional development process, the strengths-based approach, and the use of self-video despite initial apprehension, and reported perceived improvements in their professional learning communities. Pre-post videos of Cohort 2 staff (n = 20), coded blind to time point (pre or post), indicate significant and substantive improvements in staff–child connection, reciprocity, and participation. Conclusion These results support the use of this simple, practical, and potentially effective model of supporting quality improvement for and by local staff.</description><subject>After School Programs</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child care services</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</subject><subject>Cohort Analysis</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Early Childhood Education</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Out of school time</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Teacher Student Relationship</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1053-1890</issn><issn>1573-3319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9KAzEQxhdRsFYfwIMQ8BydJN1s4k3rv0qhhdZzSLdJXdnd1CQVfAZf2iwr0ounGeb7vpnhl2XnBK4IQHEdCOScYyAcS1bkWB5kA5IXDDNG5GHqIWeYCAnH2UkI7wAgC5oPsu9F1WxrgyZtNF6XsXJtuEHzqnaxajdIo0X0pt3Et4DvdDBrpNv1vvl3OvfOmhDSQNfo3nya2m0b08be-pm6JCHrPJrtInYWL8o352q0rBrThTdeN-E0O7K6Dubstw6z18eH5fgZT2dPk_HtFJeMiYhpLqGUwo4I0XTF10wClbaQUhRc0JJLQenKkq7qgnAoheScrKlhwoLWlA2zy37v1ruPnQlRvbudT58H1RHKGciRTC7Su0rvQvDGqq2vGu2_FAHVMVc9c5WYq4656jIXfcb4qvzzP7wQwgQbQdJpr4ektRvj9y7_u_QH30KOhg</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Akiva, Thomas</creator><creator>Li, Junlei</creator><creator>Martin, Kelly M.</creator><creator>Horner, Christy Galletta</creator><creator>McNamara, Anne R.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1872-0316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs</title><author>Akiva, Thomas ; Li, Junlei ; Martin, Kelly M. ; Horner, Christy Galletta ; McNamara, Anne R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-2590c98f411a2b6d39029f79987682c69822bf16982a7160c89661d2e38f0aa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>After School Programs</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child care services</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Classroom Observation Techniques</topic><topic>Cohort Analysis</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Early Childhood Education</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Out of school time</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Teacher Student Relationship</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akiva, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kelly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horner, Christy Galletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Anne R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child &amp; youth care forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akiva, Thomas</au><au>Li, Junlei</au><au>Martin, Kelly M.</au><au>Horner, Christy Galletta</au><au>McNamara, Anne R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1138340</ericid><atitle>Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs</atitle><jtitle>Child &amp; youth care forum</jtitle><stitle>Child Youth Care Forum</stitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>285-305</pages><issn>1053-1890</issn><eissn>1573-3319</eissn><abstract>Background Adult–child relational interactions constitute an essential component of out-of-school-time programs, and training staff to effectively interact with children is key to improving program quality. Efficient staff training, that meets the limited time availability of out-of-school time staff, is particularly needed. Objective This pilot study introduces Simple Interactions (SI), an innovative, strengths-based, and interaction-based professional development approach. Rather than attempting to teach generic competencies or targeting weakness areas for improvement, SI is designed to help program staff build from their strengths. Methods In two cohorts over the course of 10 months, ten afterschool programs (N = 70 staff) participated in a pilot of SI. Program staff watched short video clips of themselves working with children and used the intuitive, 1-page SI Tool to guide discussion of adult–child interactions; specifically, connection (affective intune-ness), reciprocity (balanced roles of engagement), participation (involving all children), and progression (incremental challenge). Results Results suggest that participants valued the professional development process, the strengths-based approach, and the use of self-video despite initial apprehension, and reported perceived improvements in their professional learning communities. Pre-post videos of Cohort 2 staff (n = 20), coded blind to time point (pre or post), indicate significant and substantive improvements in staff–child connection, reciprocity, and participation. Conclusion These results support the use of this simple, practical, and potentially effective model of supporting quality improvement for and by local staff.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1872-0316</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1890
ispartof Child & youth care forum, 2017-06, Vol.46 (3), p.285-305
issn 1053-1890
1573-3319
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1890530949
source Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects After School Programs
Anxiety
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Child and School Psychology
Child care
Child care services
Children
Classroom Observation Techniques
Cohort Analysis
Collaboration
Competence
Early Childhood Education
Educational Practices
Effect Size
Elementary Education
Elementary Schools
Instructional Effectiveness
Interaction
Intervention
Learning
Meta Analysis
Original Paper
Out of school time
Participation
Pilot Projects
Professional Development
Professional training
Psychology
Quality management
Quality of care
Reciprocity
Strength
Teacher Student Relationship
Teaching Methods
Time
Training
Video Technology
Young Children
Youth
title Simple Interactions: Piloting a Strengths-Based and Interaction-Based Professional Development Intervention for Out-of-School Time Programs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A59%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simple%20Interactions:%20Piloting%20a%20Strengths-Based%20and%20Interaction-Based%20Professional%20Development%20Intervention%20for%20Out-of-School%20Time%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Child%20&%20youth%20care%20forum&rft.au=Akiva,%20Thomas&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=285-305&rft.issn=1053-1890&rft.eissn=1573-3319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10566-016-9375-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4321897967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1890530949&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1138340&rfr_iscdi=true