Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure
An evaluation measure (EM) guides a learner's choice of grammar when more than one is compatible with available input. EM must be universal, so children receiving comparable input acquire comparable grammars. It must favor the choices children actually make. The theoretical shift from rule-base...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Language acquisition 2017-04, Vol.24 (2), p.85-99 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 99 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 85 |
| container_title | Language acquisition |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Fodor, Janet Dean |
| description | An evaluation measure (EM) guides a learner's choice of grammar when more than one is compatible with available input. EM must be universal, so children receiving comparable input acquire comparable grammars. It must favor the choices children actually make. The theoretical shift from rule-based grammars to principles-and-parameter-based grammars demanded a new conception of EM. I propose that it reflects biases of the sentence processing mechanism. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10489223.2016.1270948 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1888951977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1137775</ericid><jstor_id>26158416</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26158416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-eb215623fa120f0ac9abc1a9820775bcc2306e2104eb142564e6b012cf939d5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfYVDwda25SdOkb44x_zHwRZ9DmqUzo2tm0ir79mZ0zjef7oXzO_ceDkITwBlgge8A56IkhGYEQ5EB4bjMxRkaAaMk5QL4edwjkx6gS3QVwgZjnGPCRiibbSu77m23nyY75YNt19NEtauk-zCJ-VJNrzrr2mRrVOi9uUYXtWqCuTnOMXp_WLzNn9Ll6-PzfLZMNRWkS01FgBWE1goIrrHSpao0qFIQzDmrtCYUF4bEUKaCnLAiN0WFgei6pOWKKTpGt8PdnXefvQmd3Ljet_GlBCFEyaDkPFJsoLR3IXhTy523W-X3ErA8VCN_q5GHauSxmuibDD7jrT55Fi8AlMd8f_omdM6fAFIAEzkUUb8fdNvWzm_Vt_PNSnZq3zhfe9VqGyT9P8IP3i57aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888951977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Fodor, Janet Dean</creator><creatorcontrib>Fodor, Janet Dean</creatorcontrib><description>An evaluation measure (EM) guides a learner's choice of grammar when more than one is compatible with available input. EM must be universal, so children receiving comparable input acquire comparable grammars. It must favor the choices children actually make. The theoretical shift from rule-based grammars to principles-and-parameter-based grammars demanded a new conception of EM. I propose that it reflects biases of the sentence processing mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-9223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10489223.2016.1270948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mahwah: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Ambiguity (Semantics) ; Child Language ; Children ; Computational Linguistics ; Evaluation Methods ; Grammar ; Language Acquisition ; Language Processing ; Language Research ; Linguistic Input ; Linguistic Theory ; Parsing ; Psycholinguistics ; Sentences ; Syntactic processing</subject><ispartof>Language acquisition, 2017-04, Vol.24 (2), p.85-99</ispartof><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2017</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.</rights><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-eb215623fa120f0ac9abc1a9820775bcc2306e2104eb142564e6b012cf939d5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-eb215623fa120f0ac9abc1a9820775bcc2306e2104eb142564e6b012cf939d5a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26158416$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26158416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1137775$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fodor, Janet Dean</creatorcontrib><title>Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure</title><title>Language acquisition</title><description>An evaluation measure (EM) guides a learner's choice of grammar when more than one is compatible with available input. EM must be universal, so children receiving comparable input acquire comparable grammars. It must favor the choices children actually make. The theoretical shift from rule-based grammars to principles-and-parameter-based grammars demanded a new conception of EM. I propose that it reflects biases of the sentence processing mechanism.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Ambiguity (Semantics)</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Computational Linguistics</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Language Research</subject><subject>Linguistic Input</subject><subject>Linguistic Theory</subject><subject>Parsing</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Syntactic processing</subject><issn>1048-9223</issn><issn>1532-7817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfYVDwda25SdOkb44x_zHwRZ9DmqUzo2tm0ir79mZ0zjef7oXzO_ceDkITwBlgge8A56IkhGYEQ5EB4bjMxRkaAaMk5QL4edwjkx6gS3QVwgZjnGPCRiibbSu77m23nyY75YNt19NEtauk-zCJ-VJNrzrr2mRrVOi9uUYXtWqCuTnOMXp_WLzNn9Ll6-PzfLZMNRWkS01FgBWE1goIrrHSpao0qFIQzDmrtCYUF4bEUKaCnLAiN0WFgei6pOWKKTpGt8PdnXefvQmd3Ljet_GlBCFEyaDkPFJsoLR3IXhTy523W-X3ErA8VCN_q5GHauSxmuibDD7jrT55Fi8AlMd8f_omdM6fAFIAEzkUUb8fdNvWzm_Vt_PNSnZq3zhfe9VqGyT9P8IP3i57aw</recordid><startdate>20170403</startdate><enddate>20170403</enddate><creator>Fodor, Janet Dean</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</general><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170403</creationdate><title>Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure</title><author>Fodor, Janet Dean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-eb215623fa120f0ac9abc1a9820775bcc2306e2104eb142564e6b012cf939d5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Ambiguity (Semantics)</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Computational Linguistics</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Language Research</topic><topic>Linguistic Input</topic><topic>Linguistic Theory</topic><topic>Parsing</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Syntactic processing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fodor, Janet Dean</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language acquisition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fodor, Janet Dean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1137775</ericid><atitle>Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure</atitle><jtitle>Language acquisition</jtitle><date>2017-04-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>85-99</pages><issn>1048-9223</issn><eissn>1532-7817</eissn><abstract>An evaluation measure (EM) guides a learner's choice of grammar when more than one is compatible with available input. EM must be universal, so children receiving comparable input acquire comparable grammars. It must favor the choices children actually make. The theoretical shift from rule-based grammars to principles-and-parameter-based grammars demanded a new conception of EM. I propose that it reflects biases of the sentence processing mechanism.</abstract><cop>Mahwah</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><doi>10.1080/10489223.2016.1270948</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1048-9223 |
| ispartof | Language acquisition, 2017-04, Vol.24 (2), p.85-99 |
| issn | 1048-9223 1532-7817 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1888951977 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Ambiguity Ambiguity (Semantics) Child Language Children Computational Linguistics Evaluation Methods Grammar Language Acquisition Language Processing Language Research Linguistic Input Linguistic Theory Parsing Psycholinguistics Sentences Syntactic processing |
| title | Ambiguity, parsing, and the evaluation measure |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T22%3A48%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambiguity,%20parsing,%20and%20the%20evaluation%20measure&rft.jtitle=Language%20acquisition&rft.au=Fodor,%20Janet%20Dean&rft.date=2017-04-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=85-99&rft.issn=1048-9223&rft.eissn=1532-7817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10489223.2016.1270948&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26158416%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888951977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1137775&rft_jstor_id=26158416&rfr_iscdi=true |