How the Growing Gap in Life Expectancy May Affect Retirement Benefits and Reforms
Older Americans have experienced dramatic gains in life expectancy in recent decades, but an emerging literature reveals that these gains are accumulating mostly to those at the top of the income distribution. We explore how growing inequality in life expectancy affects lifetime benefits from Social...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NBER Working Paper Series 2017-04, p.23329 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 23329 |
container_title | NBER Working Paper Series |
container_volume | |
creator | Goldman, Dana Weil, David N Charles, Kerwin Orszag, Peter R Coile, Courtney Sheiner, Louise Auerbach, Alan J Lee, Ronald Lucas, Charles Gale, William Tysinger, Bryan Wolfers, Justin Wong, Rebeca |
description | Older Americans have experienced dramatic gains in life expectancy in recent decades, but an emerging literature reveals that these gains are accumulating mostly to those at the top of the income distribution. We explore how growing inequality in life expectancy affects lifetime benefits from Social Security, Medicare, and other programs and how this phenomenon interacts with possible program reforms. We first project that life expectancy at age 50 for males in the two highest income quintiles will rise by 7 to 8 years between the 1930 and 1960 birth cohorts, but that the two lowest income quintiles will experience little to no increase over that time period. This divergence in life expectancy will cause the gap between average lifetime program benefits received by men in the highest and lowest quintiles to widen by $130,000 (in $2009) over this period. Finally we simulate the effect of Social Security reforms such as raising the normal retirement age and changing the benefit formula to see whether they mitigate or enhance the reduced progressivity resulting from the widening gap in life expectancy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3386/w23329 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1888669343</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w23329</nber_id><sourcerecordid>1888669343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1049-5ffbb00b4981ab77bf8af7c5b4f71b53965d80612cd984c1d808fbf47d5542c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1LAzEQBuAcFKxVf4CngOfVfG6SYy21FVZE0fOSZBNNsdk12VL77w2seBre4WFmGACuMLqlVNZ3B0IpUSdghqSSFVFUnIHznLcIESkRnoGXTX-A46eD69QfQvyAaz3AEGETvIOrn8HZUUd7hE_6CBfelwhf3RiS27k4wnsXnQ9jhjp2pe_7tMsX4NTrr-wu_-ocvD-s3pabqnlePy4XTeUwYqri3huDkGFKYm2EMF5qLyw3zAtsOFU17ySqMbGdksziEqQ3nomOc0Yso3NwM80dUv-9d3lst_0-xbKyxVLKulaU0aLgpJztY8jtkMJOp2Nbbqi5IAjJQq4nEo1L_2D6HP0FqmlfuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888669343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How the Growing Gap in Life Expectancy May Affect Retirement Benefits and Reforms</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Goldman, Dana ; Weil, David N ; Charles, Kerwin ; Orszag, Peter R ; Coile, Courtney ; Sheiner, Louise ; Auerbach, Alan J ; Lee, Ronald ; Lucas, Charles ; Gale, William ; Tysinger, Bryan ; Wolfers, Justin ; Wong, Rebeca</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Dana ; Weil, David N ; Charles, Kerwin ; Orszag, Peter R ; Coile, Courtney ; Sheiner, Louise ; Auerbach, Alan J ; Lee, Ronald ; Lucas, Charles ; Gale, William ; Tysinger, Bryan ; Wolfers, Justin ; Wong, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><description>Older Americans have experienced dramatic gains in life expectancy in recent decades, but an emerging literature reveals that these gains are accumulating mostly to those at the top of the income distribution. We explore how growing inequality in life expectancy affects lifetime benefits from Social Security, Medicare, and other programs and how this phenomenon interacts with possible program reforms. We first project that life expectancy at age 50 for males in the two highest income quintiles will rise by 7 to 8 years between the 1930 and 1960 birth cohorts, but that the two lowest income quintiles will experience little to no increase over that time period. This divergence in life expectancy will cause the gap between average lifetime program benefits received by men in the highest and lowest quintiles to widen by $130,000 (in $2009) over this period. Finally we simulate the effect of Social Security reforms such as raising the normal retirement age and changing the benefit formula to see whether they mitigate or enhance the reduced progressivity resulting from the widening gap in life expectancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w23329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Economic theory ; Economics of Aging ; Economics of Health ; Income distribution ; Life expectancy ; Public Economics ; Retirement ; Retirement benefits</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2017-04, p.23329</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Apr 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weil, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Kerwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orszag, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coile, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheiner, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auerbach, Alan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gale, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tysinger, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfers, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><title>How the Growing Gap in Life Expectancy May Affect Retirement Benefits and Reforms</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>Older Americans have experienced dramatic gains in life expectancy in recent decades, but an emerging literature reveals that these gains are accumulating mostly to those at the top of the income distribution. We explore how growing inequality in life expectancy affects lifetime benefits from Social Security, Medicare, and other programs and how this phenomenon interacts with possible program reforms. We first project that life expectancy at age 50 for males in the two highest income quintiles will rise by 7 to 8 years between the 1930 and 1960 birth cohorts, but that the two lowest income quintiles will experience little to no increase over that time period. This divergence in life expectancy will cause the gap between average lifetime program benefits received by men in the highest and lowest quintiles to widen by $130,000 (in $2009) over this period. Finally we simulate the effect of Social Security reforms such as raising the normal retirement age and changing the benefit formula to see whether they mitigate or enhance the reduced progressivity resulting from the widening gap in life expectancy.</description><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics of Aging</subject><subject>Economics of Health</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Public Economics</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Retirement benefits</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo90E1LAzEQBuAcFKxVf4CngOfVfG6SYy21FVZE0fOSZBNNsdk12VL77w2seBre4WFmGACuMLqlVNZ3B0IpUSdghqSSFVFUnIHznLcIESkRnoGXTX-A46eD69QfQvyAaz3AEGETvIOrn8HZUUd7hE_6CBfelwhf3RiS27k4wnsXnQ9jhjp2pe_7tMsX4NTrr-wu_-ocvD-s3pabqnlePy4XTeUwYqri3huDkGFKYm2EMF5qLyw3zAtsOFU17ySqMbGdksziEqQ3nomOc0Yso3NwM80dUv-9d3lst_0-xbKyxVLKulaU0aLgpJztY8jtkMJOp2Nbbqi5IAjJQq4nEo1L_2D6HP0FqmlfuQ</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Goldman, Dana</creator><creator>Weil, David N</creator><creator>Charles, Kerwin</creator><creator>Orszag, Peter R</creator><creator>Coile, Courtney</creator><creator>Sheiner, Louise</creator><creator>Auerbach, Alan J</creator><creator>Lee, Ronald</creator><creator>Lucas, Charles</creator><creator>Gale, William</creator><creator>Tysinger, Bryan</creator><creator>Wolfers, Justin</creator><creator>Wong, Rebeca</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>How the Growing Gap in Life Expectancy May Affect Retirement Benefits and Reforms</title><author>Goldman, Dana ; Weil, David N ; Charles, Kerwin ; Orszag, Peter R ; Coile, Courtney ; Sheiner, Louise ; Auerbach, Alan J ; Lee, Ronald ; Lucas, Charles ; Gale, William ; Tysinger, Bryan ; Wolfers, Justin ; Wong, Rebeca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1049-5ffbb00b4981ab77bf8af7c5b4f71b53965d80612cd984c1d808fbf47d5542c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics of Aging</topic><topic>Economics of Health</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Public Economics</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Retirement benefits</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weil, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Kerwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orszag, Peter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coile, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheiner, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auerbach, Alan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gale, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tysinger, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfers, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldman, Dana</au><au>Weil, David N</au><au>Charles, Kerwin</au><au>Orszag, Peter R</au><au>Coile, Courtney</au><au>Sheiner, Louise</au><au>Auerbach, Alan J</au><au>Lee, Ronald</au><au>Lucas, Charles</au><au>Gale, William</au><au>Tysinger, Bryan</au><au>Wolfers, Justin</au><au>Wong, Rebeca</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>How the Growing Gap in Life Expectancy May Affect Retirement Benefits and Reforms</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><spage>23329</spage><pages>23329-</pages><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>Older Americans have experienced dramatic gains in life expectancy in recent decades, but an emerging literature reveals that these gains are accumulating mostly to those at the top of the income distribution. We explore how growing inequality in life expectancy affects lifetime benefits from Social Security, Medicare, and other programs and how this phenomenon interacts with possible program reforms. We first project that life expectancy at age 50 for males in the two highest income quintiles will rise by 7 to 8 years between the 1930 and 1960 birth cohorts, but that the two lowest income quintiles will experience little to no increase over that time period. This divergence in life expectancy will cause the gap between average lifetime program benefits received by men in the highest and lowest quintiles to widen by $130,000 (in $2009) over this period. Finally we simulate the effect of Social Security reforms such as raising the normal retirement age and changing the benefit formula to see whether they mitigate or enhance the reduced progressivity resulting from the widening gap in life expectancy.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, Mass</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w23329</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-2937 |
ispartof | NBER Working Paper Series, 2017-04, p.23329 |
issn | 0898-2937 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1888669343 |
source | National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Economic theory Economics of Aging Economics of Health Income distribution Life expectancy Public Economics Retirement Retirement benefits |
title | How the Growing Gap in Life Expectancy May Affect Retirement Benefits and Reforms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=How%20the%20Growing%20Gap%20in%20Life%20Expectancy%20May%20Affect%20Retirement%20Benefits%20and%20Reforms&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Goldman,%20Dana&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.spage=23329&rft.pages=23329-&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w23329&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E1888669343%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888669343&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w23329&rfr_iscdi=true |