Gender Roles and Achievement-Related Choices: A Comparison of Early Adolescent Girls in Gifted and General Education Programs
The purpose of this study was to compare early-adolescent girls in gifted and general education programs on constructs related to gender-role stereotyping. Participants included 132 girls in a gifted program and 77 girls in general education. All participants were in grades 6–8. Because the gifted g...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal for the education of the gifted 2000-12, Vol.24 (2), p.149-169 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 169 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 149 |
| container_title | Journal for the education of the gifted |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Mendez, Linda M. Raffaele |
| description | The purpose of this study was to compare early-adolescent girls in gifted and general education programs on constructs related to gender-role stereotyping. Participants included 132 girls in a gifted program and 77 girls in general education. All participants were in grades 6–8. Because the gifted group was significantly higher in socioeconomic status than the general education group, this variable was covaried in the analyses. Results showed that girls in the gifted education program held stronger self-perceptions of instrumentality (or stereotypically masculine personality attributes), evidenced higher achievement motivation, were less traditional in their career aspirations, and were more liberal toward the rights and roles of women than their peers in general education. The two groups did not differ significantly on self-perceptions of expressiveness (or stereotypically feminine personality traits), degree of competitiveness, or fear of success. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding differences in gender-role stereotyping and achievement-related choices between girls in gifted and general education programs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/016235320002400203 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1885382641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A167347141</galeid><ericid>EJ623130</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_016235320002400203</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A167347141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-d98c18b829fe665129c1065175b8f31801fbbe66261027c6095bd166ccec52ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNklGL1DAQgIMouJ7-AfEh4JMPvcuk27T1rZS99WRx5fR8DWk62cvRNmvSFe_B_25q5WQ5D44QEma-bwaGIeQ1sFOAPD9jIHiapZwxxpfxsvQJWfAYTMqMwVOymIBkIp6TFyHcMAacCb4gv9Y4tOjppeswUDW0tNLXFn9gj8OYXGKnRmxpfe2sxvCeVrR2_V55G9xAnaEr5btbWrWTraNB19Z3gdohfsxkThVjC_Sqo6v2oNVoo_nZu51XfXhJnhnVBXz19z0hV-err_WHZLNdX9TVJtEZpGPSloWGoil4aVCIDHipgcU3z5rCpFAwME0TM1wA47kWrMyaFoTQGnXGG5WekLdz3b133w8YRnnjDn6ILSUURZYWXCwhUqcztVMdSjsYN3ql42mxt9oNaGyMVyDydJnDH-HdkRCZEX-OO3UIQV58-fR4dvvt0Wyx3hyzyf9Y7boOdyjjGOvtMc9nXnsXgkcj9972yt9KYHLaJXl_l6L0ZpbQW30nrD5GEFIW02dzOqjY8t9oHy74G7YdzI0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1885382641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender Roles and Achievement-Related Choices: A Comparison of Early Adolescent Girls in Gifted and General Education Programs</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Mendez, Linda M. Raffaele</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendez, Linda M. Raffaele</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare early-adolescent girls in gifted and general education programs on constructs related to gender-role stereotyping. Participants included 132 girls in a gifted program and 77 girls in general education. All participants were in grades 6–8. Because the gifted group was significantly higher in socioeconomic status than the general education group, this variable was covaried in the analyses. Results showed that girls in the gifted education program held stronger self-perceptions of instrumentality (or stereotypically masculine personality attributes), evidenced higher achievement motivation, were less traditional in their career aspirations, and were more liberal toward the rights and roles of women than their peers in general education. The two groups did not differ significantly on self-perceptions of expressiveness (or stereotypically feminine personality traits), degree of competitiveness, or fear of success. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding differences in gender-role stereotyping and achievement-related choices between girls in gifted and general education programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-3532</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/016235320002400203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Aspiration ; Achievement motivation ; Achievement Need ; Adolescents ; Attitude (Psychology) ; Attitudes ; Career Choice ; Case studies ; Child Development ; Evaluation ; Females ; Feminism ; General education ; Gifted ; Gifted and talented education ; Middle School Students ; Self Concept ; Sex Role ; Sex roles ; Sex Stereotypes ; Student Attitudes ; Teenage girls</subject><ispartof>Journal for the education of the gifted, 2000-12, Vol.24 (2), p.149-169</ispartof><rights>2000 The Association of the Gifted</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-d98c18b829fe665129c1065175b8f31801fbbe66261027c6095bd166ccec52ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-d98c18b829fe665129c1065175b8f31801fbbe66261027c6095bd166ccec52ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/016235320002400203$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016235320002400203$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ623130$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendez, Linda M. Raffaele</creatorcontrib><title>Gender Roles and Achievement-Related Choices: A Comparison of Early Adolescent Girls in Gifted and General Education Programs</title><title>Journal for the education of the gifted</title><addtitle>Journal for the Education of the Gifted</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to compare early-adolescent girls in gifted and general education programs on constructs related to gender-role stereotyping. Participants included 132 girls in a gifted program and 77 girls in general education. All participants were in grades 6–8. Because the gifted group was significantly higher in socioeconomic status than the general education group, this variable was covaried in the analyses. Results showed that girls in the gifted education program held stronger self-perceptions of instrumentality (or stereotypically masculine personality attributes), evidenced higher achievement motivation, were less traditional in their career aspirations, and were more liberal toward the rights and roles of women than their peers in general education. The two groups did not differ significantly on self-perceptions of expressiveness (or stereotypically feminine personality traits), degree of competitiveness, or fear of success. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding differences in gender-role stereotyping and achievement-related choices between girls in gifted and general education programs.</description><subject>Academic Aspiration</subject><subject>Achievement motivation</subject><subject>Achievement Need</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Attitude (Psychology)</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>General education</subject><subject>Gifted</subject><subject>Gifted and talented education</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Sex Role</subject><subject>Sex roles</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teenage girls</subject><issn>0162-3532</issn><issn>2162-9501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNklGL1DAQgIMouJ7-AfEh4JMPvcuk27T1rZS99WRx5fR8DWk62cvRNmvSFe_B_25q5WQ5D44QEma-bwaGIeQ1sFOAPD9jIHiapZwxxpfxsvQJWfAYTMqMwVOymIBkIp6TFyHcMAacCb4gv9Y4tOjppeswUDW0tNLXFn9gj8OYXGKnRmxpfe2sxvCeVrR2_V55G9xAnaEr5btbWrWTraNB19Z3gdohfsxkThVjC_Sqo6v2oNVoo_nZu51XfXhJnhnVBXz19z0hV-err_WHZLNdX9TVJtEZpGPSloWGoil4aVCIDHipgcU3z5rCpFAwME0TM1wA47kWrMyaFoTQGnXGG5WekLdz3b133w8YRnnjDn6ILSUURZYWXCwhUqcztVMdSjsYN3ql42mxt9oNaGyMVyDydJnDH-HdkRCZEX-OO3UIQV58-fR4dvvt0Wyx3hyzyf9Y7boOdyjjGOvtMc9nXnsXgkcj9972yt9KYHLaJXl_l6L0ZpbQW30nrD5GEFIW02dzOqjY8t9oHy74G7YdzI0</recordid><startdate>20001222</startdate><enddate>20001222</enddate><creator>Mendez, Linda M. Raffaele</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001222</creationdate><title>Gender Roles and Achievement-Related Choices: A Comparison of Early Adolescent Girls in Gifted and General Education Programs</title><author>Mendez, Linda M. Raffaele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-d98c18b829fe665129c1065175b8f31801fbbe66261027c6095bd166ccec52ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Academic Aspiration</topic><topic>Achievement motivation</topic><topic>Achievement Need</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Attitude (Psychology)</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>General education</topic><topic>Gifted</topic><topic>Gifted and talented education</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Sex Role</topic><topic>Sex roles</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teenage girls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendez, Linda M. Raffaele</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal for the education of the gifted</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendez, Linda M. Raffaele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ623130</ericid><atitle>Gender Roles and Achievement-Related Choices: A Comparison of Early Adolescent Girls in Gifted and General Education Programs</atitle><jtitle>Journal for the education of the gifted</jtitle><addtitle>Journal for the Education of the Gifted</addtitle><date>2000-12-22</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>149-169</pages><issn>0162-3532</issn><eissn>2162-9501</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare early-adolescent girls in gifted and general education programs on constructs related to gender-role stereotyping. Participants included 132 girls in a gifted program and 77 girls in general education. All participants were in grades 6–8. Because the gifted group was significantly higher in socioeconomic status than the general education group, this variable was covaried in the analyses. Results showed that girls in the gifted education program held stronger self-perceptions of instrumentality (or stereotypically masculine personality attributes), evidenced higher achievement motivation, were less traditional in their career aspirations, and were more liberal toward the rights and roles of women than their peers in general education. The two groups did not differ significantly on self-perceptions of expressiveness (or stereotypically feminine personality traits), degree of competitiveness, or fear of success. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding differences in gender-role stereotyping and achievement-related choices between girls in gifted and general education programs.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/016235320002400203</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0162-3532 |
| ispartof | Journal for the education of the gifted, 2000-12, Vol.24 (2), p.149-169 |
| issn | 0162-3532 2162-9501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1885382641 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Academic Aspiration Achievement motivation Achievement Need Adolescents Attitude (Psychology) Attitudes Career Choice Case studies Child Development Evaluation Females Feminism General education Gifted Gifted and talented education Middle School Students Self Concept Sex Role Sex roles Sex Stereotypes Student Attitudes Teenage girls |
| title | Gender Roles and Achievement-Related Choices: A Comparison of Early Adolescent Girls in Gifted and General Education Programs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A29%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20Roles%20and%20Achievement-Related%20Choices:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Early%20Adolescent%20Girls%20in%20Gifted%20and%20General%20Education%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20the%20education%20of%20the%20gifted&rft.au=Mendez,%20Linda%20M.%20Raffaele&rft.date=2000-12-22&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=149-169&rft.issn=0162-3532&rft.eissn=2162-9501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/016235320002400203&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA167347141%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1885382641&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A167347141&rft_ericid=EJ623130&rft_sage_id=10.1177_016235320002400203&rfr_iscdi=true |