Comparing Multimedia and Traditional Approaches in Undergraduate Psychology Classes
In this study, we compared the effectiveness of multimedia and traditional classes. Six instructors within the Department of Psychology taught 1 of 3 courses: human development, psychological statistics, or abnormal psychology. An instructor taught each course in either a multimedia or traditional c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Teaching of psychology 1999-01, Vol.26 (1), p.58-61 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 61 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 58 |
| container_title | Teaching of psychology |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Erwin, T. Dary Rieppi, Ricardo |
| description | In this study, we compared the effectiveness of multimedia and traditional classes. Six instructors within the Department of Psychology taught 1 of 3 courses: human development, psychological statistics, or abnormal psychology. An instructor taught each course in either a multimedia or traditional classroom. Results showed that (a) the students in the multimedia and traditional classes did not differ on scholastic abilities prior to course enrollment, (b) students in the larger multimedia class averaged higher examination scores than those in the traditional classes, and (c) there were no consistent patterns between the student's learning preference and final examination scores in either the multimedia or traditional classes. We discuss the implications and limitations of the results. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1207/s15328023top2601_18 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1884392282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ588756</ericid><sage_id>10.1207_s15328023top2601_18</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1884392282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-496d9bf668bcbb8daf14921570233bda31c4425249ff13ddd5a22d1a019237c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIXwMES54CfiXOsovJSEUi058ixndRVGgc7OfTvcRWEOCBOK83szM4OANcY3WGCsvuAOSUCETq4nqQIl1icgNkRTI7oKZghlIskJYKeg4sQdgghxjibgY_C7XvpbdfA17Ed7N5oK6HsNFx7qe1gXSdbuOh776TamgBtBzedNr6J9CgHA9_DQW1d65oDLFoZggmX4KyWbTBX33MONg_LdfGUrN4en4vFKlGUZkPC8lTnVZ2molJVJbSsMcsJ5llMTCstKVaMEU5YXteYaq25JERjiXBOaKY4nYPbyTeG-xxNGMqdG33MG-L_gtGcEEHiFp22lHcheFOXvbd76Q8lRuWxvfKP9qLqZlIZb9WPYvnChch4Gmk00UE25tfZfxy_AEaLe-M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884392282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Multimedia and Traditional Approaches in Undergraduate Psychology Classes</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Erwin, T. Dary ; Rieppi, Ricardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Erwin, T. Dary ; Rieppi, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we compared the effectiveness of multimedia and traditional classes. Six instructors within the Department of Psychology taught 1 of 3 courses: human development, psychological statistics, or abnormal psychology. An instructor taught each course in either a multimedia or traditional classroom. Results showed that (a) the students in the multimedia and traditional classes did not differ on scholastic abilities prior to course enrollment, (b) students in the larger multimedia class averaged higher examination scores than those in the traditional classes, and (c) there were no consistent patterns between the student's learning preference and final examination scores in either the multimedia or traditional classes. We discuss the implications and limitations of the results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-6283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top2601_18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction ; Computer Uses in Education ; Conventional Instruction ; Educational Research ; Higher Education ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Learning Strategies ; Multimedia ; Multimedia Instruction ; Psychology ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Teaching of psychology, 1999-01, Vol.26 (1), p.58-61</ispartof><rights>1999 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-496d9bf668bcbb8daf14921570233bda31c4425249ff13ddd5a22d1a019237c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-496d9bf668bcbb8daf14921570233bda31c4425249ff13ddd5a22d1a019237c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15328023top2601_18$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15328023top2601_18$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,21800,27904,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ588756$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erwin, T. Dary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieppi, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Multimedia and Traditional Approaches in Undergraduate Psychology Classes</title><title>Teaching of psychology</title><description>In this study, we compared the effectiveness of multimedia and traditional classes. Six instructors within the Department of Psychology taught 1 of 3 courses: human development, psychological statistics, or abnormal psychology. An instructor taught each course in either a multimedia or traditional classroom. Results showed that (a) the students in the multimedia and traditional classes did not differ on scholastic abilities prior to course enrollment, (b) students in the larger multimedia class averaged higher examination scores than those in the traditional classes, and (c) there were no consistent patterns between the student's learning preference and final examination scores in either the multimedia or traditional classes. We discuss the implications and limitations of the results.</description><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>Multimedia Instruction</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>0098-6283</issn><issn>1532-8023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIXwMES54CfiXOsovJSEUi058ixndRVGgc7OfTvcRWEOCBOK83szM4OANcY3WGCsvuAOSUCETq4nqQIl1icgNkRTI7oKZghlIskJYKeg4sQdgghxjibgY_C7XvpbdfA17Ed7N5oK6HsNFx7qe1gXSdbuOh776TamgBtBzedNr6J9CgHA9_DQW1d65oDLFoZggmX4KyWbTBX33MONg_LdfGUrN4en4vFKlGUZkPC8lTnVZ2molJVJbSsMcsJ5llMTCstKVaMEU5YXteYaq25JERjiXBOaKY4nYPbyTeG-xxNGMqdG33MG-L_gtGcEEHiFp22lHcheFOXvbd76Q8lRuWxvfKP9qLqZlIZb9WPYvnChch4Gmk00UE25tfZfxy_AEaLe-M</recordid><startdate>199901</startdate><enddate>199901</enddate><creator>Erwin, T. Dary</creator><creator>Rieppi, Ricardo</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199901</creationdate><title>Comparing Multimedia and Traditional Approaches in Undergraduate Psychology Classes</title><author>Erwin, T. Dary ; Rieppi, Ricardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-496d9bf668bcbb8daf14921570233bda31c4425249ff13ddd5a22d1a019237c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>Multimedia Instruction</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erwin, T. Dary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieppi, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Teaching of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erwin, T. Dary</au><au>Rieppi, Ricardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ588756</ericid><atitle>Comparing Multimedia and Traditional Approaches in Undergraduate Psychology Classes</atitle><jtitle>Teaching of psychology</jtitle><date>1999-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>58-61</pages><issn>0098-6283</issn><eissn>1532-8023</eissn><abstract>In this study, we compared the effectiveness of multimedia and traditional classes. Six instructors within the Department of Psychology taught 1 of 3 courses: human development, psychological statistics, or abnormal psychology. An instructor taught each course in either a multimedia or traditional classroom. Results showed that (a) the students in the multimedia and traditional classes did not differ on scholastic abilities prior to course enrollment, (b) students in the larger multimedia class averaged higher examination scores than those in the traditional classes, and (c) there were no consistent patterns between the student's learning preference and final examination scores in either the multimedia or traditional classes. We discuss the implications and limitations of the results.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1207/s15328023top2601_18</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0098-6283 |
| ispartof | Teaching of psychology, 1999-01, Vol.26 (1), p.58-61 |
| issn | 0098-6283 1532-8023 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1884392282 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Education Source |
| subjects | Computer Assisted Instruction Computer Uses in Education Conventional Instruction Educational Research Higher Education Instructional Effectiveness Learning Strategies Multimedia Multimedia Instruction Psychology Teaching Methods Undergraduate Study |
| title | Comparing Multimedia and Traditional Approaches in Undergraduate Psychology Classes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A22%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Multimedia%20and%20Traditional%20Approaches%20in%20Undergraduate%20Psychology%20Classes&rft.jtitle=Teaching%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Erwin,%20T.%20Dary&rft.date=1999-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=58-61&rft.issn=0098-6283&rft.eissn=1532-8023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15328023top2601_18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1884392282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884392282&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ588756&rft_sage_id=10.1207_s15328023top2601_18&rfr_iscdi=true |