Multiobjective optimization for interwoven systems
In practical situations, complex systems are often composed of subsystems or subproblems with single or multiple objectives. These subsystems focus on different aspects of the overall system, but they often have strong interactions with each other and they are usually not sequentially ordered or obv...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis 2017-01, Vol.24 (1-2), p.71-81 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 81 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 71 |
| container_title | Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Klamroth, Kathrin Mostaghim, Sanaz Naujoks, Boris Poles, Silvia Purshouse, Robin Rudolph, Günter Ruzika, Stefan Sayın, Serpil Wiecek, Margaret M. Yao, Xin |
| description | In practical situations, complex systems are often composed of subsystems or subproblems with single or multiple objectives. These subsystems focus on different aspects of the overall system, but they often have strong interactions with each other and they are usually not sequentially ordered or obviously decomposable. Thus, the individual solutions of subproblems do not generally induce a solution for the overall system. Here, we strive to identify “re‐composition architectures” of such “interwoven” systems. Our intention is to connect the subsystems adequately, analyze the resulting performance, model/solve the overall system, and improve the overall solution instead of just solving each subsystem separately. We review recent developments in this field and discuss modeling and solution paradigms in a general and unified framework using the example of an interwoven system consisting of two interacting subsystems. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mcda.1598 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1884068799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321437797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-b26ce039f272c8174cc61bf2b6e6a9f98f010f68e86d00c6d6e3ba606d7b27003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtqwzAUREVpoWnaRf_A0LWTK8m-lpYhfUJCN-1a2LIEMn7VkhPcr69NupphGGbgEPJIYUMB2LbRZb6hqRRXZEVByphyhOvFp1ksGU1uyZ33FQCIlCcrwo5jHVxXVEYHdzJR1wfXuN98ztrIdkPk2mCGc3cybeQnH0zj78mNzWtvHv51Tb5fX7727_Hh8-1jvzvEmico4oKhNsClZRnTgmaJ1kgLywo0mEsrhQUKFoURWAJoLNHwIkfAMitYBsDX5Omy2w_dz2h8UFU3Du18qagQCaDIpJxb20vr7GozqX5wTT5MioJaeKiFh1p4qOP-ebcY_gdUEVUV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884068799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiobjective optimization for interwoven systems</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Klamroth, Kathrin ; Mostaghim, Sanaz ; Naujoks, Boris ; Poles, Silvia ; Purshouse, Robin ; Rudolph, Günter ; Ruzika, Stefan ; Sayın, Serpil ; Wiecek, Margaret M. ; Yao, Xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Klamroth, Kathrin ; Mostaghim, Sanaz ; Naujoks, Boris ; Poles, Silvia ; Purshouse, Robin ; Rudolph, Günter ; Ruzika, Stefan ; Sayın, Serpil ; Wiecek, Margaret M. ; Yao, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>In practical situations, complex systems are often composed of subsystems or subproblems with single or multiple objectives. These subsystems focus on different aspects of the overall system, but they often have strong interactions with each other and they are usually not sequentially ordered or obviously decomposable. Thus, the individual solutions of subproblems do not generally induce a solution for the overall system. Here, we strive to identify “re‐composition architectures” of such “interwoven” systems. Our intention is to connect the subsystems adequately, analyze the resulting performance, model/solve the overall system, and improve the overall solution instead of just solving each subsystem separately. We review recent developments in this field and discuss modeling and solution paradigms in a general and unified framework using the example of an interwoven system consisting of two interacting subsystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mcda.1598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>interwoven systems ; multiobjective optimization ; Optimization ; systems of systems</subject><ispartof>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2017-01, Vol.24 (1-2), p.71-81</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-b26ce039f272c8174cc61bf2b6e6a9f98f010f68e86d00c6d6e3ba606d7b27003</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmcda.1598$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmcda.1598$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klamroth, Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostaghim, Sanaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naujoks, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poles, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purshouse, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzika, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayın, Serpil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiecek, Margaret M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Xin</creatorcontrib><title>Multiobjective optimization for interwoven systems</title><title>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</title><description>In practical situations, complex systems are often composed of subsystems or subproblems with single or multiple objectives. These subsystems focus on different aspects of the overall system, but they often have strong interactions with each other and they are usually not sequentially ordered or obviously decomposable. Thus, the individual solutions of subproblems do not generally induce a solution for the overall system. Here, we strive to identify “re‐composition architectures” of such “interwoven” systems. Our intention is to connect the subsystems adequately, analyze the resulting performance, model/solve the overall system, and improve the overall solution instead of just solving each subsystem separately. We review recent developments in this field and discuss modeling and solution paradigms in a general and unified framework using the example of an interwoven system consisting of two interacting subsystems.</description><subject>interwoven systems</subject><subject>multiobjective optimization</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>systems of systems</subject><issn>1057-9214</issn><issn>1099-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotkMtqwzAUREVpoWnaRf_A0LWTK8m-lpYhfUJCN-1a2LIEMn7VkhPcr69NupphGGbgEPJIYUMB2LbRZb6hqRRXZEVByphyhOvFp1ksGU1uyZ33FQCIlCcrwo5jHVxXVEYHdzJR1wfXuN98ztrIdkPk2mCGc3cybeQnH0zj78mNzWtvHv51Tb5fX7727_Hh8-1jvzvEmico4oKhNsClZRnTgmaJ1kgLywo0mEsrhQUKFoURWAJoLNHwIkfAMitYBsDX5Omy2w_dz2h8UFU3Du18qagQCaDIpJxb20vr7GozqX5wTT5MioJaeKiFh1p4qOP-ebcY_gdUEVUV</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Klamroth, Kathrin</creator><creator>Mostaghim, Sanaz</creator><creator>Naujoks, Boris</creator><creator>Poles, Silvia</creator><creator>Purshouse, Robin</creator><creator>Rudolph, Günter</creator><creator>Ruzika, Stefan</creator><creator>Sayın, Serpil</creator><creator>Wiecek, Margaret M.</creator><creator>Yao, Xin</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Multiobjective optimization for interwoven systems</title><author>Klamroth, Kathrin ; Mostaghim, Sanaz ; Naujoks, Boris ; Poles, Silvia ; Purshouse, Robin ; Rudolph, Günter ; Ruzika, Stefan ; Sayın, Serpil ; Wiecek, Margaret M. ; Yao, Xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-b26ce039f272c8174cc61bf2b6e6a9f98f010f68e86d00c6d6e3ba606d7b27003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>interwoven systems</topic><topic>multiobjective optimization</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>systems of systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klamroth, Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostaghim, Sanaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naujoks, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poles, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purshouse, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzika, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayın, Serpil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiecek, Margaret M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Xin</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klamroth, Kathrin</au><au>Mostaghim, Sanaz</au><au>Naujoks, Boris</au><au>Poles, Silvia</au><au>Purshouse, Robin</au><au>Rudolph, Günter</au><au>Ruzika, Stefan</au><au>Sayın, Serpil</au><au>Wiecek, Margaret M.</au><au>Yao, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiobjective optimization for interwoven systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>71-81</pages><issn>1057-9214</issn><eissn>1099-1360</eissn><abstract>In practical situations, complex systems are often composed of subsystems or subproblems with single or multiple objectives. These subsystems focus on different aspects of the overall system, but they often have strong interactions with each other and they are usually not sequentially ordered or obviously decomposable. Thus, the individual solutions of subproblems do not generally induce a solution for the overall system. Here, we strive to identify “re‐composition architectures” of such “interwoven” systems. Our intention is to connect the subsystems adequately, analyze the resulting performance, model/solve the overall system, and improve the overall solution instead of just solving each subsystem separately. We review recent developments in this field and discuss modeling and solution paradigms in a general and unified framework using the example of an interwoven system consisting of two interacting subsystems.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/mcda.1598</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1057-9214 |
| ispartof | Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 2017-01, Vol.24 (1-2), p.71-81 |
| issn | 1057-9214 1099-1360 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1884068799 |
| source | Wiley Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | interwoven systems multiobjective optimization Optimization systems of systems |
| title | Multiobjective optimization for interwoven systems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T01%3A50%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiobjective%20optimization%20for%20interwoven%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20multi-criteria%20decision%20analysis&rft.au=Klamroth,%20Kathrin&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=71-81&rft.issn=1057-9214&rft.eissn=1099-1360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mcda.1598&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E4321437797%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884068799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |