Energy-led refurbishment of non-domestic buildings: ranking measures by attributes
Purpose In the context of the energy-led refurbishment of traditionally constructed non-domestic buildings, the purpose of this study was to identify the attributes that professionals consider to be important in the selection of energy performance improvement measures (EPIMs) and to establish their...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Facilities (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) West Yorkshire, England), 2017-04, Vol.35 (5/6), p.286-302 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 302 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5/6 |
container_start_page | 286 |
container_title | Facilities (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Strachan, Megan E. Banfill, Phil FG |
description | Purpose
In the context of the energy-led refurbishment of traditionally constructed non-domestic buildings, the purpose of this study was to identify the attributes that professionals consider to be important in the selection of energy performance improvement measures (EPIMs) and to establish their relative importance.
Design/methodology/approach
A questionnaire-based Delphi exercise was carried out to draw up a set of attributes agreed among a small panel of experts. Subsequently, a paired comparison questionnaire was completed by the experts to establish the relative importance ascribed to the attributes.
Findings
In total, 22 assessment attributes, relevant to different stages in the building’s life cycle, were agreed as important by the expert panel. Measures fell into one of three broad groups, expressed on a weighting scale of 0-100, such that the sum of the weights of all 22 measures was 100. Measures of relatively high importance (7-9 per cent) included capital cost, potential energy and carbon savings, financial payback and impact on the building’s vapor permeability. Measures of medium importance (4-5 per cent) were impact on internal air movement, loss of significant original building fabric, impact on internal layout, appearance and occupant comfort, environmental impact and availability of grants or subsidies. Eight further measures were ranked of low importance (2-3 per cent).
Originality/value
This paper is the first attempt to draw up a ranking order of the attributes of EPIMs applicable to non-domestic buildings. It confirms that more attributes must be considered by professionals with decision-making responsibility than merely cost, energy performance and payback on investment and suggests that policy instruments targeting or incentivizing a single or a restricted range of attributes risk failure to deliver the desired improvements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/F-04-2016-0036 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1884004950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321435647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-34909347bb6be8c4b93b7c9db56afdff4416a7e7452b7d5a2c1fa9e3f9a5785c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMltidjnHdhyzoaoFpEpICGbLju2SkjjFTob-e1KVBTHdDc97Hw9CtxQWlEJ1vybASQG0JACsPEMzKkVFJGX0HM2gKBkppCwu0VXOOwBaMAYz9LaKPm0PpPUOJx_GZJv82fk44D7g2Efi-s7noamxHZvWNXGbH3Ay8WvqcOdNHpPP2B6wGYbU2HHw-RpdBNNmf_Nb5-hjvXpfPpPN69PL8nFDagZiIIwrUIxLa0vrq5pbxayslbOiNMGFwDktjfSSi8JKJ0xR02CUZ0EZIStRszm6O83dp_57nI7Uu35McVqpaVVxAK4ETNTiRNWpz3l6Ue9T05l00BT00Ztea-D66E0fvU0Bcgr4zifTuv_8H8_sBx6-bj0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884004950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy-led refurbishment of non-domestic buildings: ranking measures by attributes</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Strachan, Megan E. ; Banfill, Phil FG</creator><creatorcontrib>Strachan, Megan E. ; Banfill, Phil FG</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
In the context of the energy-led refurbishment of traditionally constructed non-domestic buildings, the purpose of this study was to identify the attributes that professionals consider to be important in the selection of energy performance improvement measures (EPIMs) and to establish their relative importance.
Design/methodology/approach
A questionnaire-based Delphi exercise was carried out to draw up a set of attributes agreed among a small panel of experts. Subsequently, a paired comparison questionnaire was completed by the experts to establish the relative importance ascribed to the attributes.
Findings
In total, 22 assessment attributes, relevant to different stages in the building’s life cycle, were agreed as important by the expert panel. Measures fell into one of three broad groups, expressed on a weighting scale of 0-100, such that the sum of the weights of all 22 measures was 100. Measures of relatively high importance (7-9 per cent) included capital cost, potential energy and carbon savings, financial payback and impact on the building’s vapor permeability. Measures of medium importance (4-5 per cent) were impact on internal air movement, loss of significant original building fabric, impact on internal layout, appearance and occupant comfort, environmental impact and availability of grants or subsidies. Eight further measures were ranked of low importance (2-3 per cent).
Originality/value
This paper is the first attempt to draw up a ranking order of the attributes of EPIMs applicable to non-domestic buildings. It confirms that more attributes must be considered by professionals with decision-making responsibility than merely cost, energy performance and payback on investment and suggests that policy instruments targeting or incentivizing a single or a restricted range of attributes risk failure to deliver the desired improvements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/F-04-2016-0036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Building construction ; Buildings ; Built environment ; Capital costs ; Carbon ; Construction ; Decision making ; Electricity ; Energy ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Energy measurement ; Environmental impact ; Focus groups ; Internal layout ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycle engineering ; Payback periods ; Permeability ; Potential energy ; Professionals ; Ranking ; Raw materials ; Refurbishment ; Residential buildings ; Residential energy ; Useful life ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Facilities (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2017-04, Vol.35 (5/6), p.286-302</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-34909347bb6be8c4b93b7c9db56afdff4416a7e7452b7d5a2c1fa9e3f9a5785c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-34909347bb6be8c4b93b7c9db56afdff4416a7e7452b7d5a2c1fa9e3f9a5785c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/F-04-2016-0036/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strachan, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banfill, Phil FG</creatorcontrib><title>Energy-led refurbishment of non-domestic buildings: ranking measures by attributes</title><title>Facilities (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</title><description>Purpose
In the context of the energy-led refurbishment of traditionally constructed non-domestic buildings, the purpose of this study was to identify the attributes that professionals consider to be important in the selection of energy performance improvement measures (EPIMs) and to establish their relative importance.
Design/methodology/approach
A questionnaire-based Delphi exercise was carried out to draw up a set of attributes agreed among a small panel of experts. Subsequently, a paired comparison questionnaire was completed by the experts to establish the relative importance ascribed to the attributes.
Findings
In total, 22 assessment attributes, relevant to different stages in the building’s life cycle, were agreed as important by the expert panel. Measures fell into one of three broad groups, expressed on a weighting scale of 0-100, such that the sum of the weights of all 22 measures was 100. Measures of relatively high importance (7-9 per cent) included capital cost, potential energy and carbon savings, financial payback and impact on the building’s vapor permeability. Measures of medium importance (4-5 per cent) were impact on internal air movement, loss of significant original building fabric, impact on internal layout, appearance and occupant comfort, environmental impact and availability of grants or subsidies. Eight further measures were ranked of low importance (2-3 per cent).
Originality/value
This paper is the first attempt to draw up a ranking order of the attributes of EPIMs applicable to non-domestic buildings. It confirms that more attributes must be considered by professionals with decision-making responsibility than merely cost, energy performance and payback on investment and suggests that policy instruments targeting or incentivizing a single or a restricted range of attributes risk failure to deliver the desired improvements.</description><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy measurement</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Internal layout</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Payback periods</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Potential energy</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Refurbishment</subject><subject>Residential buildings</subject><subject>Residential energy</subject><subject>Useful life</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>0263-2772</issn><issn>1758-7131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMltidjnHdhyzoaoFpEpICGbLju2SkjjFTob-e1KVBTHdDc97Hw9CtxQWlEJ1vybASQG0JACsPEMzKkVFJGX0HM2gKBkppCwu0VXOOwBaMAYz9LaKPm0PpPUOJx_GZJv82fk44D7g2Efi-s7noamxHZvWNXGbH3Ay8WvqcOdNHpPP2B6wGYbU2HHw-RpdBNNmf_Nb5-hjvXpfPpPN69PL8nFDagZiIIwrUIxLa0vrq5pbxayslbOiNMGFwDktjfSSi8JKJ0xR02CUZ0EZIStRszm6O83dp_57nI7Uu35McVqpaVVxAK4ETNTiRNWpz3l6Ue9T05l00BT00Ztea-D66E0fvU0Bcgr4zifTuv_8H8_sBx6-bj0</recordid><startdate>20170404</startdate><enddate>20170404</enddate><creator>Strachan, Megan E.</creator><creator>Banfill, Phil FG</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170404</creationdate><title>Energy-led refurbishment of non-domestic buildings: ranking measures by attributes</title><author>Strachan, Megan E. ; Banfill, Phil FG</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-34909347bb6be8c4b93b7c9db56afdff4416a7e7452b7d5a2c1fa9e3f9a5785c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy measurement</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Internal layout</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Payback periods</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Potential energy</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Refurbishment</topic><topic>Residential buildings</topic><topic>Residential energy</topic><topic>Useful life</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strachan, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banfill, Phil FG</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Facilities (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strachan, Megan E.</au><au>Banfill, Phil FG</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy-led refurbishment of non-domestic buildings: ranking measures by attributes</atitle><jtitle>Facilities (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle><date>2017-04-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5/6</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>286-302</pages><issn>0263-2772</issn><eissn>1758-7131</eissn><abstract>Purpose
In the context of the energy-led refurbishment of traditionally constructed non-domestic buildings, the purpose of this study was to identify the attributes that professionals consider to be important in the selection of energy performance improvement measures (EPIMs) and to establish their relative importance.
Design/methodology/approach
A questionnaire-based Delphi exercise was carried out to draw up a set of attributes agreed among a small panel of experts. Subsequently, a paired comparison questionnaire was completed by the experts to establish the relative importance ascribed to the attributes.
Findings
In total, 22 assessment attributes, relevant to different stages in the building’s life cycle, were agreed as important by the expert panel. Measures fell into one of three broad groups, expressed on a weighting scale of 0-100, such that the sum of the weights of all 22 measures was 100. Measures of relatively high importance (7-9 per cent) included capital cost, potential energy and carbon savings, financial payback and impact on the building’s vapor permeability. Measures of medium importance (4-5 per cent) were impact on internal air movement, loss of significant original building fabric, impact on internal layout, appearance and occupant comfort, environmental impact and availability of grants or subsidies. Eight further measures were ranked of low importance (2-3 per cent).
Originality/value
This paper is the first attempt to draw up a ranking order of the attributes of EPIMs applicable to non-domestic buildings. It confirms that more attributes must be considered by professionals with decision-making responsibility than merely cost, energy performance and payback on investment and suggests that policy instruments targeting or incentivizing a single or a restricted range of attributes risk failure to deliver the desired improvements.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/F-04-2016-0036</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0263-2772 |
ispartof | Facilities (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2017-04, Vol.35 (5/6), p.286-302 |
issn | 0263-2772 1758-7131 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1884004950 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Building construction Buildings Built environment Capital costs Carbon Construction Decision making Electricity Energy Energy conservation Energy consumption Energy measurement Environmental impact Focus groups Internal layout Life cycle assessment Life cycle engineering Payback periods Permeability Potential energy Professionals Ranking Raw materials Refurbishment Residential buildings Residential energy Useful life Ventilation |
title | Energy-led refurbishment of non-domestic buildings: ranking measures by attributes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A36%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy-led%20refurbishment%20of%20non-domestic%20buildings:%20ranking%20measures%20by%20attributes&rft.jtitle=Facilities%20(Bradford,%20West%20Yorkshire,%20England)&rft.au=Strachan,%20Megan%20E.&rft.date=2017-04-04&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5/6&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=286-302&rft.issn=0263-2772&rft.eissn=1758-7131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/F-04-2016-0036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E4321435647%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884004950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |